← Table of contents
Integration of the Armed Forces, 1940-1965

CHAPTER 19

Reading edition

A New Era Begins

The new era's turbulence was caused in part by the decade-long debate that immediately ensued over the scope of President Truman's guarantee of equal treatment and opportunity for servicemen. On one side were ranged most service officials, who argued that integration, now a source of pride to the services and satisfaction to the civil rights movement, had ceased to be a public issue. Abolishing segregated units, they claimed, fulfilled the essential elements of the executive order, leaving the armed forces only rare vestiges of discrimination to correct. Others, at first principally the civil rights bloc in Congress and civil rights organizations, but later black servicemen themselves, contended that the Truman order committed the Department of Defense to far more than integration of military units. They believed that off-base discrimination, so much more apparent with the improvement of on-base conditions, seriously affected morale and efficiency. They wanted the department to challenge local laws and customs when they discriminated against black servicemen.

This interpretation made little headway in the Department of Defense during the first decade of integration. Both the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations made commitments to the principle of equal treatment within the services, and both admitted the connection between military efficiency and discrimination, but both presumed, at least until 1963, severe limitations on their power to change local laws and customs. For their part, the services constantly referred to the same limitations, arguing that their writ in regard to racial reform ran only to the gates of the military reservation.

Yet while there was no substantive change in the services' view of their racial responsibilities, the Department of Defense was able to make significant racial reforms between 1954 and 1962. More than expressing the will of the Chief Executive, these changes reflected the fact that military society was influenced by some of the same forces that were operating on the larger American society. Possessed of a discipline that enabled it to reform rapidly, military society still shared the prejudices as well as the reform impulses of the body politic. Racial changes in the services during the first decade of integration were primarily parochial responses to special internal needs; nevertheless, they took place at a time when civil rights demands were stirring the whole country. Their effectiveness must be measured against the expectations such demands were kindling in the black community.

The Civil Rights Revolution

The difference was understandable. The rapid urbanization of many black Americans, coupled with their experience in World War II, especially in the armed forces and in defense industries, had enhanced their economic and political power and raised their educational opportunities. And what was true for the war generation was even truer for its children. Possessed of a new self-respect, young Negroes began to demonstrate confidence in the future and a determination to reject the humiliation of second-class citizenship. Out of this attitude grew a widespread demand among the young for full equality, and when this demand met with opposition, massive participation in civil rights demonstrations became both practical and inevitable. Again historian Woodward's observations are pertinent:

Clarence Mitchell
Clarence Mitchell

Clarence Mitchell

To a remarkable extent, this youthful vanguard was strongly religious and nonviolent. The influence of the church on the militant phase of the civil rights movement is one of the movement's salient characteristics.

This black awakening paralleled a growing realization among an increasing number of white Americans that the demands of the civil rights leaders were just and that the government should act. World War II had made many thoughtful Americans aware of the contradiction inherent in fighting fascism with segregated troops. In the postwar years, the cold war rivalry for the friendship and allegiance of the world's colored peoples, who were creating a multitude of new states, added a pragmatic reason for ensuring equal treatment and opportunity for black Americans. A further inducement, and a particularly forceful one, was the size of the northern black vote, which had become the key to victory in several electorally important states and had made the civil rights cause a practical political necessity for both major parties.

Independent federal agencies also began to attack racial discrimination. The Interstate Commerce Commission, with strong assistance from the courts, made a series of rulings that by 1961 had outlawed segregation in much interstate travel. The Federal Housing Authority, following the Supreme Court's abrogation of the state's power to enforce restrictive covenants in the sale of housing, began in the early 1950's to push toward a federal open-occupancy policy in public housing and all housing with federally guaranteed loans. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, an investigatory agency appointed by the President under the Civil Rights Act of 1957, examined complaints of voting discrimination and denials of equal protection under the law. Both Eisenhower and Kennedy dispatched federal officials to investigate and prosecute violations of voting rights in several states.

Despite the President's reluctance to lead in civil rights matters, major blame for the lack of substantial progress must be assigned to the third branch of government. The 1957 and 1960 civil rights laws, pallid harbingers of later powerful legislation in this field, demonstrated Congress's lukewarm commitment to civil rights reform that severely limited federal action. The reluctance of Congress to enact the reforms augured in the Brown decision convinced many Negroes that they would have to take further measures to gain their full constitutional rights. They had seen presidents and federal judges embrace principles long argued by civil rights organizations, but to little avail. Seven years after the Brown decision, Negroes were still disfranchised in large areas of the south, still endured segregated public transportation and places of public accommodation, and still encountered discrimination in employment and housing throughout the nation. Nor had favorable court decisions and federal attempts at enforcement reversed the ominous trend in black unemployment rates, which had been rising for a decade. Above all, court decisions could not spare Negroes the sense of humiliation that segregation produced. Segregation implied racial inferiority, a "constant corroding experience," as Clarence Mitchell once called it. It was segregation's seeming imperviousness to governmental action in the 1950's that caused the new generation of civil rights leaders to develop new civil rights techniques.

Their new methods forced the older leaders, temporarily at least, into eclipse. No longer could they convince their juniors of the efficacy of legal action, and the 1950's ended with the younger generation taking to the streets in the first spontaneous battles of their civil rights revolution. Under the direction of the Southern Christian Leadership Council and its charismatic founder, Martin Luther King, Jr., the strategy of massive civil disobedience, broached in 1948 by A. Philip Randolph, became a reality. Other organizations quickly joined the battle, including the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), also organized by Dr. King but soon destined to break away into more radical paths, and the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), an older organization, now expanded and under its new director, James Farmer, rededicated to activism.

The stage was set for a climatic scene, and onto that stage walked the familiar figure of A. Philip Randolph, calling for a massive march on Washington to demand a redress of black grievances. This time, unlike the response to his 1940 appeal, the answer was a promise of support from both races. The churches joined in, many labor leaders, including Walter Reuther, enlisted in the demonstration, and even the President, at first opposed, gave his blessing to the national event. A quarter of a million people, about 20 percent of them white, marched to the Lincoln Memorial on 28 August 1963 to hear King appeal to the nation's conscience by reciting his dream of a just society. In the words of the Kerner Commission:

Limitations on Executive Order 9981

The decade of national civil rights activity that culminated symbolically at the Lincoln Memorial in 1963 was closely mirrored in the Department of Defense, where the services' definition of equal treatment and opportunity underwent a marked evolution. Here, a decade that had begun with the department's placing severe limitations on its defense of black servicemen's civil rights ended with the department's joining the vanguard of the civil rights movement.

This requirement could be rather brutal in practice and placed the services, the nation's leading equal opportunity employer, in questionable company. In 1953 a black pilot stationed at Craig Air Force Base, Alabama, refused to move to the rear of a public bus until the military police ordered him to comply with the state law. The Air Force officially reprimanded and eventually discharged the pilot. The position of the Air Force was made clear in the reprimand:

Tact and diplomacy were also the keynote when the services helped enforce the local segregation practices of the nation's allies. This became increasingly true even in Europe in the 1950's, although never with as much publicity as the events connected with the carrier Midway's visit to Capetown, South Africa, in 1955. Its captain, on the advice of the U.S. consul, agreed to conform with a local law that segregated sailors when they were ashore. This agreement became public knowledge while the ship was en route, but despite a rash of protests and congressional demands that the visit be canceled, the Midway arrived at Capetown. Later a White House spokesman tried to put a good face on the incident:

The President's heart bleeds when any Americans are victims of injustice, and he is doing everything he possibly can to rectify this situation in our country.

But as the record suggests, this promise to rectify the situation was never meant to extend beyond the gates of the military reservation. Thus, the countless incidents of blatant discrimination encountered by black GI's would continue largely unchallenged into the 1960's, masking the progress made by the Eisenhower administration in ordering the sometimes reluctant services to adopt reforms. This presidential resolution was particularly obvious in the integration of civilian facilities at Navy shipyards and installations and in schools for dependent children on military posts.

Integration of Navy Shipyards

Congressman Powell
Congressman Powell

Congressman Powell

Secretary Anderson
Secretary Anderson

Secretary Anderson talks to a member of the fleet.

Anderson then proceeded to reverse his position. He began by ordering a survey of a group of southern installations to estimate the effect of integration on their civilian programs. He learned segregation could be virtually eliminated at these shipyards and stations within six months, although Under Secretary Charles S. Thomas, who prepared the report, agreed with the local commanders that an integration directive would be certain to cause trouble. But the formula chosen by the commanders for eliminating segregation, in which Thomas concurred, might well have given Anderson pause. They wanted to remove racial signs from drinking fountains and toilets, certain that the races would continue using separate facilities, and leave the problem of segregated cafeterias till later. It was the unanimous opinion of those involved, Thomas reported, that the situation should not be forced by "agitators," a category in which they all placed Powell.

Dependent Children and Integrated Schools

The Department of Defense's effort to integrate schools attended by servicemen's children proved infinitely more complex than integrating naval shipyards. In a period when national attention was focused on the constitutional implications of segregated education, the Eisenhower administration was thrust into a dispute over the intent of federal aid to education and eventually into a reappraisal of the federal role in public education. Confusing to the Department of Defense, the President's personal attitude remained somewhat ambiguous throughout the controversy. He had publicly committed himself to ending segregation in federally financed institutions, yet he had declared scruples against federal interference with state laws and customs that would prevent him from acting to keep such a pledge when all its ramifications were revealed.

In fact not one but four separate categories of educational institutions came under scrutiny. Only the first category, schools run by the U.S. Office of Education for the Department of Defense overseas and on military reservations in the United States, operated exclusively with federal funds. The next two categories, schools operated by local school districts on military reservations and schools on federal land usually adjacent to a military reservation, were supported by local and state funds with federal subsidies. The fourth and by far the largest group contained the many community schools attended by significant numbers of military dependents. These schools received considerable federal support through the impact aid program.

The matter was rescued from bureaucratic limbo when in answer to a question during his 19 March 1953 press conference President Eisenhower promised to investigate the school situation, adding:

The integration of schools operated by local school authorities on military posts was not so simple, and before the controversy died down the Department of Defense found itself assuming responsibility for a number of formerly state-operated institutions. As of April 1953, twenty-one of these sixty-three schools in the United States were operating on a segregated basis. (Table 12)

Table 12—Defense Installations With Segregated Public Schools

State Installation

Alabama (C)[1] Maxwell Air Force Base

Craig Air Force Base

Arkansas (S)[2] Pine Bluff Arsenal (Army)

Florida (C) MacDill Air Force Base

Eglin Air Force Base

Tyndall Air Force Base

Naval Air Station, Pensacola

Patrick Air Force Base

Maryland (S) Andrews Air Force Base

Naval Air Station, Patuxent

Naval Powder Factory, Indianhead

Oklahoma (C) Fort Sill (Army)

Texas (C) Fort Bliss (Army)

Fort Hood (Army)

Fort Sam Houston (Army)

Randolph Air Force Base

Reese Air Force Base

Shepherd Air Force Base

Lackland Air Force Base

Virginia (C) Fort Belvoir (Army)

Langley Air Force Base

Tablenote 1: (C) indicates segregation required by state constitution. Tablenote 2: (S) indicates segregation required by state statute.

The three services quickly responded to the order. By 18 February all had issued specific directives for enforcing it. The Secretary of the Navy, for example, declared that the "policy of non-segregation" would apply

Reading Class in the Military Dependents School
Reading Class in the Military Dependents School

Reading Class in the Military Dependents School, Yokohama, Japan, 1955.

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · On 30 October 1954 the Secretary of Defense announced that the last racially segregated unit in the armed forces of the United States had beNote 2 · The post-World War II civil rights movement was unique in the nation's history. Contrasting this era of black awakening with the post-Civil Note 3 · Twenty years ago the Negro was satisfied if he could have even a half-decent school to go to (and took it for granted that it would be a segNote 4 · More than a black revolt against whites, it was in part a generational rebellion, an uprising of youth against the older generation, againstNote 5 · The U.S. Supreme Court was the real pacesetter. Significantly broadening its interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court reversed Note 6 · These judicial initiatives whittled away at segregation's hold on the Constitution, but it was the Supreme Court's rulings in the field of pNote 7 · But it was only the beginning, for the Court's order that the transition to racially nondiscriminatory school systems be accomplished "with Note 8 · The executive branch also took up the cause of civil rights, albeit in a more limited way than the courts. The Eisenhower administration, foNote 9 · But civil rights progress was still painfully slow in the 1950's. The fight for civil rights in that decade graphically demonstrated a politNote 10 · Rosa Parks's refusal to move to the rear of the Montgomery bus in 1955 and the ensuing successful black boycott that ended the city's segregNote 11 · It [the march] was more than a summation of the past years of struggle and aspiration. It symbolized certain new directions: a deeper concerNote 12 · In the early 1950's the services were constantly referring to the limitations of Executive Order 9981. The Air Force could not intervene in Note 13 · These excuses for not dealing with off-base discrimination continued throughout the decade. As late as 1959, discussing a case of racial disNote 14 · Understandably, in view of the difficulties they perceived, the services tried to avoid the whole problem. In 1954, for example, a group of Note 15 · But the services never did get "them" off their neck, and to a large extent defense officials could only blame themselves for their troublesNote 16 · Your actions in this instance are prejudicial to good order and military discipline and do not conform to the standards of conduct expected Note 17 · As the young pilot's commanding officer put it, the lieutenant had refused to accept the fact that military personnel must use tact and diplNote 18 · We believe that a far greater blow was struck for the cause of equal justice when 23,000 South Africans came aboard the Midway on a non-segrNote 19 · The black serviceman lacked the civilian's option to escape community discrimination. For example, one black soldier requested transfer becaNote 20 · At times the services' respect for local laws and ordinances forced them to retain some aspects of the segregation policies so recently abolNote 21 · This response illustrates the services' approach to equal opportunity and treatment during the Eisenhower administration. The President showNote 22 · You can hold up his hand by carrying on, despite the unpleasant things that are happening to you at this moment, realizing that, on this endNote 23 · The Navy employed many thousands of civilians, including a large number of Negroes, at some forty-three installations from Virginia to TexasNote 24 · In January 1952 the Chief of the Office of Industrial Relations, Rear Adm. W. McL. Hague, all but absolved Navy installations from the proviNote 25 · Official protestations to the contrary, the Navy was again segregating people by race. Evans, in the Department of Defense, charged that thiNote 26 · Nelson was right of course. The notice quickly won the attention of civil rights leaders. Walter White condemned the policy, but his protestNote 27 · This Department cannot take the initiative in correcting this social ill but must content itself with being alert to take advantage of the gNote 28 · President Eisenhower's newly appointed Secretary of the Navy, Robert B. Anderson, endorsed Notice 75 along the same lines, informing MitchelNote 29 · But what seemed practical and reasonable in the Navy was not necessarily so in the White House, where the President had publicly pledged hisNote 30 · With his policy openly contradicting the President's, Anderson was in an awkward position. He had been unaware of the implications of the prNote 31 · But neither the civil rights leaders nor the White House could be put off with gradualism. Anderson's stand was roundly criticized. In an adNote 32 · On 20 August Anderson directed commanders of segregated facilities to proceed steadily toward complete elimination of racial barriers. FurthNote 33 · He need not have worried. Evans reported on 29 October that integration of the Charleston shipyard was almost complete and had occurred so fNote 34 · The federal support program for schools in "federally impacted" areas added yet another dimension to the administration's reappraisal. The iNote 35 · In recognition of these inequities in the tax system, Congress gave such school systems special "in-lieu of tax" support. Public Law 815 proNote 36 · Attacks on segregation in schools attended by military dependents did not begin until the early fifties when the Army, in answer to complainNote 37 · Senator Humphrey, for one, was not to be put off by such an interpretation. He reminded Assistant Secretary Rosenberg that President Truman Note 38 · After conferring with both Humphrey and Mitchell, Rosenberg took the matter of segregated schools on military posts to the U.S. CommissionerNote 39 · Commissioner McGrath proposed that his office discuss the integration question further with Defense Department representatives but the changNote 40 · I will say this—I repeat it, I have said it again and again: whenever Federal funds are expended for anything, I do not see how any AmericanNote 41 · The sweeping changes implied in this declaration soon became apparent. Statistics compiled as a result of the White House investigation reveNote 42 · The Department of Defense experienced few problems at first as it integrated its own schools. Its overseas schools, especially in Germany anNote 43 · The Secretary of the Army promised to investigate the possibility of integrating schools on Army bases and to consider further action with tNote 44 · Others in the administration took these complications more seriously. Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, was conNote 45 · In marked contrast to Hobby's recommendation, and incidentally buttressing popular belief in the existence of an interdepartmental dispute oNote 46 · Although both Wilson and Hobby later denied that the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare was opposed to integrating the schools, ruNote 47 · The interdepartmental dispute was quickly buried by Wilson's dramatic order of 12 January 1954. Effective as of that date, the secretary annNote 48 · The order prompted considerable public response. The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith telegraphed "hearty approval of your directive .Note 49 · to the operation of existing schools and school facilities hereafter constructed on Navy and Marine Corps installations within the United StNote 50 · Any local school official hoping for a reprieve from the deadlines expressed in these orders was likely to be disappointed. In response to qNote 51 · As a result of this unified determination on the part of departmental officials, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense could annoNote 52 · Strictly speaking there were more than twenty-one segregated schools operating on federal installations. A small group of institutions builtNote 53 · It was some time before the question of temporary extensions was resolved. Two of the leased property schools, Biggs and Fort Bliss, were inNote 54 · The Department of Defense could look with pride at its progress. In less than three years after President Eisenhower had promised to look inNote 55 · This dreary prospect had not always seemed so inevitable. Although Wilson's order ignored local public schools, civil rights advocates did nNote 56 · Richardson might be "constrained" to accept the status quo, but some black parents were not. In the fall of 1958 matters came to a head at tNote 57 · The department would not get off the hook so easily; the President wanted something done about the Little Rock school, although he wanted hiNote 58 · Before he went to Little Rock, Jackson met with officials from the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and decided, with the concurNote 59 · Jackson failed to convince the board, and in late October 1958 it rejected the government's offer to run an integrated school on land purchaNote 60 · It was just as well, for soon after this decision was reached the NAACP brought up the subject of dependent schools near the Air Force basesNote 61 · This attitude was to prevail for some time in the Department of Defense. In April 1961, for example, the Assistant Secretary for Manpower inNote 62 · Yet even as the principle of noninterference with racial patterns of the local community emerged intact from the lengthy controversy, exceptNote 63 · The controversy over schools for dependents demonstrated the limits of federal intervention in the local community on behalf of the civil riNote 64 · As such encomiums became more frequent, successful integration became a source of pride to the services. Military commanders with experienceNote 65 · Combat effectiveness is increased as individual capabilities rather than racial designations determine assignments and promotions. EconomicsNote 66 · In other reports he expatiated on this theme, explaining how integration cut down racial incidents in the services and improved "national soNote 67 · Certainly racial incidents in the armed forces practically disappeared in the immediate post-integration period, and the number of complaintNote 68 · But what about the black serviceman himself? A Negro enlisting in the armed forces in 1960, unlike his counterpart in 1950, entered an integ
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings