← Table of contents
Integration of the Armed Forces, 1940-1965

CHAPTER 15

Reading edition

The Role of the Secretary of Defense 1949-1951

The issue of civil rights, however, was still of vital interest to one of the President's major constituencies. Black voters, recognized as a decisive factor in the November 1948 election, pressed their demands on the victorious President; in particular some of their spokesmen called on the administration to implement fully the program put forth by the Fahy Committee. These demands were being echoed in Congress by a civil rights bloc—for bloc it had now become in the wake of the election that sent Harry Truman back to the White House. No longer the concern of a congressman or two, the cause of the black serviceman was now supported by a group of politicians who, joining with civil rights leaders, pressed the Department of Defense for rapid changes in its racial practices.

At most, Congress played only a minor role in the dramatic changes beginning in the armed forces. Champions of civil rights had little effect on service practices, although these congressmen channeled the complaints of black voters and kept the military traditionalists on the defensive. As for the congressional traditionalists, their support may have helped sustain those on the staff who resisted racial change within the Army, thus slowing down that service's integration. But the demands of congressional progressives and obstructionists tended to cancel each other out, and in the wake of the Fahy Committee's disbandment the services themselves reemerged as the preeminent factor in the armed forces racial program.

The services regained control by default. Logically, direction of racial reforms in the services should have fallen to the Secretary of Defense. In the first place, the secretary, other administration officials, and the public alike had begun to use the secretary's office as a clearinghouse for reconciling conflicting demands of the services, as an appellate court reviewing decisions of the service secretaries, and as the natural channel of communication between the services and the White House, Congress, and the public. Many racial problems had become interservice in nature, and only the Office of the Secretary of Defense possessed the administrative machinery to deal with such matters. The Personnel Policy Board or, later, the new Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Personnel might well have become the watchdog recommended by the Fahy Committee to oversee the services' progress toward integration, but neither did.

Certainly the Secretary of Defense had other matters pressing for his attention. Secretary Johnson had become the central character in the budgetary conflicts of Truman's second term, and both he and General George C. Marshall, who succeeded him as secretary on 20 September 1950, were suddenly thrust into leadership of the Korean War. In administrative matters, at least, Marshall had to concentrate on boosting the morale of a department torn by internecine budgetary arguments. Integration did not appear to have the same importance to national security as these weighty matters. More to the point, Johnson and Marshall were not social reformers. Whatever their personal attitudes, they were content to let the services set the pace of racial reform. With one notable exception neither man initiated any of the historic racial changes that took place in the armed forces during the early 1950's.

Navy Corpsman in Korea
Navy Corpsman in Korea

Navy Corpsman in Korea attends wounded from the 1st Marine Division, 1950.

Overseas Restrictions

25th Division Troops Unload Trucks and Equipment
25th Division Troops Unload Trucks and Equipment

25th Division Troops Unload Trucks and Equipment at Sasebo Railway Station, Japan, for transport to Korea, 1950.

Congressional Concerns

Assistant Secretary Rosenberg
Assistant Secretary Rosenberg

Assistant Secretary Rosenberg talks with men of the 140th Medium Tank Battalion during a Far East tour.

Still, to bring about effective integration of the services would take more than a positive attitude, and Rosenberg faced a delicate situation. She had to reassure integrationists that the new racial policy would be enforced by urging the sometimes reluctant services to take further steps toward eliminating discrimination. At the same time she had to promote integration and avoid provoking the segregationists in Congress to retaliate by blocking other defense legislation. The bill for universal military training was especially important to the department and to push for its passage was her primary assignment. It is not surprising, therefore, that she accomplished little in the way of specific racial reform during the first year of the Korean War.

Table 3—Percentage of Black Enlisted Men and Women

Service 1 July 1949 1 July 1954 1 July 1956

Army 12.4 13.7 12.8

Navy 4.7 3.6 6.3

Air Force 5.1 8.6 10.4

Marine Corps 2.1 6.5 6.5

Source: Memo for Rcd, ASD/M, 12 Sep 56, sub: Integration Percentages, ASD(M) 291.2.

Executive Order 9981 passed its third anniversary in July 1951 with little having happened in the Office of the Secretary of Defense to lift the hearts of the champions of integration. The race issues with which the Secretary of Defense concerned himself in these years—the definition of race, the status of black servicemen overseas, even the parity of enlistment standards—while no doubt important in the long run to the status of the Negro in the armed forces, had little to do with the immediate problem of segregation. Secretary Johnson had done nothing to enforce the executive order in the Army and his successor achieved little more. Willing to let the services set the pace of reform, neither secretary substantially changed the armed forces' racial practices. The integration process that began in those years was initiated, appropriately enough perhaps, by the services themselves.

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · Having ordered the integration of the services and supported the Fahy Committee in the development of acceptable racial programs, President Note 2 · The traditionalists in the armed forces also had congressional allies. In all probability these legislators would accept an integrated Navy Note 3 · For the most part those racial issues that did involve the Secretary of Defense centered on the status of the Negro in the armed forces in gNote 4 · The regulation was obviously subject to controversy, and in the wake of the President's equality order it is not surprising that some group—Note 5 · Secretary Johnson sent the congressman's complaint to the Personnel Policy Board, which, ignoring the larger considerations posed by HolifieNote 6 · The secretary's racial adviser, James C. Evans, saw no need for racial designations on departmental forms, but knowing their removal was unlNote 7 · The Navy, too, objected to the board's categories. After consulting a Smithsonian ethnologist, the Under Secretary of the Navy suggested thaNote 8 · Its ruling under attack from the services, the board made a hasty appeal to authority. Its chief of staff, Vice Adm. John L. McCrea,[15-8] rNote 9 · The board's rulings, unscientific and open to all sorts of legal complications, could only be stopgap measures, and when on 4 January 1950 tNote 10 · The board's decision to accept an applicant's declaration was simply a return to the reasonable and practical method the Selective Service hNote 11 · At the time the Army did not see this responsibility as a burden and in its quest for uniformity was willing to assume an even greater shareNote 12 · The considerable staff activity devoted to definitions of race between 1949 and 1951 added very little to racial harmony or the cause of intNote 13 · There was some justification for the Defense Department's position. Many of those who found racial designations distasteful also demanded haNote 14 · Another problem involving the Secretary of Defense concerned restrictions placed on the use of black servicemen in certain foreign areas. ThNote 15 · The interservice and departmental aspects of the problem involved Secretary of Defense Johnson. Following promulgation of his directive on rNote 16 · For his part the Secretary of State had no objection to stationing Negroes in any of the listed countries. In fact, Under Secretary James E.Note 17 · This policy definition did not end the matter. In the first place the State Department decided not to restrict its list of excepted areas toNote 18 · Yet for several reasons, the services were uneasy about the situation. The Director of Marine Corps Personnel, for example, feared that sincNote 19 · Maj. Gen. James H. Burns, Secretary Johnson's assistant for foreign military affairs, put the matter to the State Department, and James EvanNote 20 · Yet the problem refused to go away, largely because the services continued to limit foreign assignment of black personnel, particularly in aNote 21 · Undoubtedly certain countries objected to the assignment of American servicemen on grounds of race or religion, but there were also indicatiNote 22 · Congress was slow to see that changes were gradually transforming the armed services. In its special preelection session, the Eightieth CongNote 23 · When debate began on the amendment, Senator Leverett Saltonstall of Massachusetts was one of the first to rise in opposition. While confessiNote 24 · Discussion of the Russell amendment continued with opponents and defenders raising the issues of military efficiency, legality, and principlNote 25 · The Russell amendment was the high point of the congressional fight against armed forces integration. During the next year the integrationisNote 26 · Johnson employed much the same technique when Congressman Jacob K. Javits of New York, who with several other legislators had become interesNote 27 · Departmental interest in racial affairs quickened noticeably when General Marshall, Johnson's successor, appointed the brilliant labor relatNote 28 · Secretary Rosenberg took it upon herself to meet with legislators interested in civil rights to outline the department's current progress anNote 29 · Rosenberg and her departmental colleagues were less forthcoming in some other areas of civil rights. Reflecting a desire to placate segregatNote 30 · The civil rights leaders had at least some congressional support for their demand. Congressman Abraham J. Multer of New York called on the ANote 31 · The matter came up again in the next Congress when Senator Herbert H. Lehman of New York offered a similar amendment to the universal militaNote 32 · But evidently not just yet, for when the NAACP's Mitchell, referring to Marshall's letter to Congressman Havenner, asked Rosenberg to press Note 33 · Despite her concern over possible congressional opposition, Rosenberg achieved one important reform during her first year in office. For yeaNote 34 · The Navy and the Air Force had always insisted their high minimum entrance requirements were designed to maintain the good quality of their Note 35 · The program had yet another consequence: it destroyed the Army's best argument for the reimposition of the racial quota. Upset over the stea
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings