Contra quae omittuntur in Gudiano, habentur in H sqq., haec

libri I

(deficit E)p. 13, 11 ab (HS).

p. 15, 27 ea (HSG^c).

p. 20, 23 in (HS).

p. 22, 22 est (HS).

p. 28, 20 id (HS).

libri II

(def. E)p. 38, 13 perrumpit (HSG^c).

p. 51, 14 inanibus (HSG^c).

libri III

(def. E)p. 71, 23 in (HS).

p. 72, 3 si &trastylos facienda fuerit (HSG^c) ex hom.

p. 72, 11-12 ipsarum—modulorum (HS) ex hom.

p. 74, 16-18 earumque—septem (HSLG^c, om. etiam Pfvlch) ex hom.

p. 77, 1 ita (HS).

p. 84, 26 in (HS).

libri IV

(def. E)p. 84, 18-20 columnas—possent (HSG^c).

p. 87, 16 praeter (HSG^c).

p. 93, 20 habeat (HSG^c).

p. 100, 5 columnas (HSG^c).

libri V

(def. E)p. 120, 6-8 allelos linea—regione (HS) ex hom.

p. 122, 6 incensum (HSG^c).

p. 125, 20 tegulae (HSG^c).

p. 130, 9 pilae (HSG^c).

libri VI

p. 135, 19 capillo (EHS).

p. 138, 20 (= E) et (HS).

(def. E)p. 142, 17 latum (HS¹).

p. 143, 30 cum (HS).

p. 148, 2 in (HS).

p. 154, 1 opera constitui (HSG^c) ex hom.

libri VII

(def. E)p. 165, 11 ex spica (HSG^c).

p. 165, 17 in (HS).

libri VIII

p. 185, 10 in (HSE).

(def. E) p. 186, 2 ea (HS).

p. 189, 7 (= E) et (HSG^c).

p. 190, 20 agger (EHSG^c).

(def. E)p. 201, 13/14 πημηνη—εμην (H) [lac. ES]. hic ep. v. 5 sic scribit G ΡΑΜΗϹΗΚΑΙΔΥΡΗΙΤΗΓΗΝ.

p. 207, 25 ne minus longae (H) [lac. S].

libri IX

p. 223, 8 ardere (EHS).

p. 229, 1 supra—aquarii (EHSG^c) ex hom.

p. 230, 25 (= E) ad (HS).

(def. E)p. 236, 1 rationes (HSG^c).

p. 239, 22 significat (HSG^c).

p. 240, 12 foramen per quod ex cas (HSG^c).

libri X

(def. E)p. 247, 8 capite (HSG^c).

p. 247, 18 est (HS).

p. 256, 4 se (HS).

p. 256, 19 ad (HS) ex hom.

p. 270, 12 praeterquam— (p. 271, 2) crassitudo (HS—notatur quidem a pr. m. ð in G, sed deest supplementum ipsum) ex hom.

p. 271, 12-13 scapos—XII K (HSG^c).

p. 272, 7 ea (HSG^c) ex hom.

p. 273, 9 iugis (HSG^c).

p. 274, 18 autem (HS).

p. 281, 10 (= E) & (HSG^c).

quorum pleraque omisit ipse G, non is ex quo ductus fuit (cum E), sicut novas lacunas et proprias plurimas praebet S, locis circiter 80, quas tamen, praeter 20 mox supplevit S^c: in quo S hoc maxime mirum est quod de magnis illis lacunis librorum VIII (p. 200, 26-208, 25) et X (p. 258, 2-267, 21) in margine nihil (ne signo quidem đ ut p. 77, 12) apposito[8] notatum est, cum ad manus essent et scribentium et corrigentium integra exemplaria. eae tales sunt ut dimidiorum fere quaternionum eius exemplaris ex quo descriptus fuerit S (non Harleiani qui plenus est sed eius simillimi aut gemelli) defectus significare videantur. quod cum ab ipso H manifesto pendeat S, equidem non concedo, quo vero casu factum sit, non explico.