Volume 5 — DISEASES OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. (continued 7)

The proper TREATMENT of the incurable, demented insane should provide not only that they be not at large, where they annoy the strong and the well, but also that they shall not disturb the insane who are acutely ill and in need of treatment suited to sick people, and whose chances of recovery at best are none too favorable. Experiments, now quite numerous, have shown that the lives and occupations of many of them may be made not entirely unlike those to which they were reared, and that nearly all may be suitably provided for without the expensive hospitals and appliances necessary for the proper treatment of acute mental disease.

A comparison of countries in which there is and is not a comprehensive system of State supervision of the insane by a competent board seems to me to reveal so unquestionably the fact that such a system alone provides the proper protection for the insane, and the needed variety and uniformly high standard of excellence in the provisions for their treatment, that I hope to see the medical profession using its vast influence upon public opinion to secure it.

If we meet in the wards of our insane asylums hopeless mental and physical wrecks, if we find there the extremity of human wretchedness, the supreme control of all that is evil or vile in our nature, the worst antitypes of all the virtues, so, on the other hand, nowhere else do we see such struggles for the mastery of the better impulses, such efforts against such odds to hold back the mind in an unequal fight. Nowhere else, too, are developed finer sympathy, more beautiful unselfishness, more generous charity, or more heroic resignation where no hope in life remains but for death.

The State has taken charge of these most unfortunate people, shutting up behind the same locked doors and barred windows people of all social grades, often mingling together in one presence the so-called criminal insane, insane criminals, idiots, imbeciles, epileptics, paralytics, the chronic insane, and the demented, with patients suffering from acute mental disease. Some of them are unconscious of their condition, many are better off than ever before, but others are painfully alive to their situation and surroundings, fully aware of the gravity of their illness, keenly sensitive to the distressing sights and associations, disturbed by the noises, and discouraged by the many chances of becoming like the worst incurables around them. The State cannot evade the responsibility of seeing that their confinement is made the least rigorous, wretched, and injurious possible.

HYSTERIA.

BY CHARLES K. MILLS, M.D.

DEFINITION.—Hysteria is a functional disease of the cerebro-spinal axis, characterized either by special mental symptoms or by motor, sensory, vaso-motor, or visceral disorders related in varying degree to abnormal psychical conditions.

This, like all other definitions of hysteria, is imperfect. No absolutely satisfactory definition can well be given. It is not abnormal ideation, although this is so often prominent; it is not emotional exaltation, although this may be a striking element; it is not perversion of reflexes and of sensation, although these may be present. Some would make it a disease of the womb, others an affection of the ovaries; some regard it as of spinal, others as of cerebral origin; some hold it to be a disease of the nerves, others claim that it is a true psychosis; but none of these views can be sustained.

Sir James Paget¹ says of hysterical patients that they are as those who are color-blind. They say, “I cannot;” it looks like “I will not,” but it is “I cannot will.” Although, however, much of the nature of hysteria is made clear in this explanation, hysteria is not simply paralysis of the will. A true aboulomania or paralysis of the will occurs in non-hysterical patients, male and female, and of late years has been studied by alienists.

¹ “Clinical Lecture on the Nervous Mimicry of Organic Diseases,” Lancet for October, November, and December, 1873.

In many definitions the presence of a spasmodic seizure or paroxysm is made the central and essential feature; but, although convulsions so frequently occur, typical hysterical cases pass through the whole course of the disorder without suffering from spasm of any kind.

In a general neurosis a definition, well considered, should serve the purpose of controlling and guiding, to a large extent at least, the discussion of the subject.

The definition given asserts that hysteria is a functional disease. In the present state of knowledge this is the only ground that can be taken. It is claimed that in a strict sense no disease can be regarded as functional; but it is practically necessary to use such terms as functional in reference to affections in which disordered action without recognizable permanent alteration of structure is present. Temporary anatomical changes must sometimes be present in hysteria; organic disease may be a complication in special cases; post-mortem appearances may occasionally be found as accidents or coincidences; it is possible that structural alterations may result from hysteria; but no pathologist has as yet shown the existence of a special morbid anatomy underlying as a permanent basis the hysterical condition.

The mental, motor, sensory, and other phenomena of hysteria cannot be explained except by regarding the cerebro-spinal nervous system as the starting-point or active agency in their production.

The term vaso-motor is used in a broad sense to include not only peripheral vascular disturbances, but also cardiac, respiratory, secretory, and excretory affections of varying type. Some of these disorders are also visceral, but under visceral affections are also included such hysterical phenomena as abdominal phantom tumors, hysterical tympanites, and the like.

That all hysterical phenomena are related in varying degree to abnormal psychical conditions may perhaps, at first sight, be regarded as open to dispute and grave doubt. It is questionable whether in every case of hysteria the relation of the symptoms to psychical states could be easily demonstrated. I certainly do not look upon every hysterical patient as a case of insanity in the technical sense, but hold that a psychical element is or has been present, even when the manifestations of the disorder are pre-eminently physical. James Hendrie Lloyd,² in a valuable paper, has ably sustained this position, one which has been held by others, although seldom, if ever, so clearly defined as by this writer.

² “Hysteria: A Study in Psychology,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. x., No. 4, October, 1883.

The alleged uterine origin of hysteria has been entirely disregarded in the definition. This has been done intentionally. It is high time for the medical profession to throw off the thraldom of this ancient view. The truth is, as asserted by Chambers,³ that hysteria “has no more to do with the organs of reproduction than with any other of the female body; and it is no truer to say that women are hysterical because they have wombs, than that men are gouty because they have beards.”

³ Brit. Med. Journ., December 21, 1861, 651.

SYNONYMS.—Hysterics, Vapors. Many Latin and other synonyms have been used for hysteria: most of these have reference to the supposed uterine origin of the disease, as, for instance, Uteri adscensus, Asthma uteri, Vapores uterini, Passio hysterica, Strangulatio uterina seu Vulvæ. Some French synonyms are Maladie imaginaire, Entranglement, and Maux ou attaques de nerfs. Other French synonyms besides these have been used; most of them are translations from the Latin, having reference also to the uterine hypothesis. In our language it is rare to have any other single word used as a synonym for hysteria. Sir James Paget⁴ introduced the term neuromimesis, or nervous mimicry, and suggested that it be substituted for hysteria, and neuromimetic for hysterical. Neuromimesis is, however, not a true synonym. Many cases of hysteria are cases of neuromimesis, but they are not all of this character. Among the desperate attempts which have been made to originate a new name for hysteria one perhaps worthy of passing notice is that of Metcalfe Johnson,⁵ who proposes to substitute the term ganglionism, as giving a clue to the pathology of hysteria. His main idea is that hysteria exhibits a train of symptoms which are almost always referable to the sympathetic or ganglionic nervous system. This is another of those half truths which have misled so many. The term hysteria, from the Greek ὑστερα, the uterus, although attacked and belabored, has come to stay; it is folly to attempt to banish it.

⁴ Op. cit.

⁵ Med. Times and Gaz., 1872, ii. 612.

METHOD OF DISCUSSING THE SUBJECT.—It is hard to decide upon the best method of discussing the subject of hysteria. One difficulty is that connected with the question whether certain affections should be considered as independent disorders or under some subdivisions of the general topic of hysteria. Certain great phases of hysteria are represented by hystero-epilepsy, catalepsy, ecstasy, etc.; but it will best serve practical ends to treat of these in separate articles. They have distinctive clinical features, and are capable of special definition and discussion.

HISTORY AND LITERATURE.—To give a complete history of hysteria it would be necessary to traverse the story of medicine from the time of Hippocrates to the present. A complete bibliography would require an immense volume. Volume vi. of the Index Catalogue of the Library of the Surgeon-General's Office, United States Army, which has appeared during the present year (1885), contains a bibliography of nearly seventeen double-column pages, most of it in the finest type. The references are to 318 books and 914 journals. The number of books and articles cited as having appeared in different languages is as follows: Latin, 99; Greek, 2; German, 180; British, 177; American, 159; French, 449; Italian, 75; Spanish, 45; Swedish, 12; miscellaneous, 34. Even this wonderful list probably only represents a tithe of the works written on this subject. Those desirous of studying it from a bibliographical point of view can do so by consulting this great work.

Many as are the names and voluminous as is the literature, certain names and certain works are pre-eminent—Sydenham, Laycock, and Skey in England; Tissot, Briquet, Charcot, and Landouzy in France; Stahl, Frank, Eulenburg, and Jolly in Germany; and in America, Weir Mitchell. The greatest work on hysteria is the treatise of Briquet.⁶

⁶ Traité clinique et thérapeutique de l'Hystérie, par le Dr. P. Briquet, 1859.

Mitchell⁷ has organized into a scientific system a valuable method of treating hysteria, and has given to the world a series of studies of some types of the affection best or only seen in the United States.

⁷ Fat and Blood: An Essay on the Treatment of Certain Forms of Neurasthenia and Hysteria, and Clinical Lecture on Diseases of the Nervous System, especially in Women.

Among other American monographs on hysteria and allied subjects worthy of note are the contributions of Shaffer on The Hysterical Element in Orthopædic Surgery;⁸ Seguin's essay on Hysterical Symptoms in Organic Nervous Affections;⁹ Beard's volume on Nervous Exhaustion;¹⁰ the chapters on Hysterical Insanity, etc. in Hammond's text-books;¹¹ and the papers of G. L. Walton¹² on Hystero-epilepsy. Spitzka, Mann, Hughes, and Kiernan have made important contributions to the psychical aspects of the subject in various American medical journals.

⁸ The Hysterical Element in Orthopædic Surgery, by Newlin M. Shaffer, M.D., New York, 1880.

⁹ Archives of Neurology and Electrology, for May, 1875, and Opera Minora, p. 180.

¹⁰ A Practical Treatise on Nervous Exhaustion (Neurasthenia), by George M. Beard, A.M., M.D., New York, 1880.

¹¹ A Treatise on Diseases of the Nervous System, and A Treatise on Insanity in its Medical Relations.

¹² Brain, vol. v. p. 458, Jan., 1883; Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. xi. p. 425, July, 1884.

During the last five years I have published a number of articles and lectures on the subject of hysteria and hystero-epilepsy, some of which have been freely used in the preparation of this and the succeeding sections.¹³ My first paper on hystero-epilepsy, in the American Journal of the Medical Sciences, was written to strongly direct the attention of the American profession to the subject as studied in France. It was in large part a translation from the works of Charcot, Richer, and Bourneville, with, however, notes of some observed cases.

¹³ “Hystero-epilepsy,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences, October, 1881. “Epileptoid Varieties of Hystero-epilepsy,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, October, 1882. “Illustrations of Local Hysteria,” Polyclinic, vol. i., Nos. 3 and 4, September 15, October 15, 1883. “Clinical Lecture on the Treatment of Hysterical Paralysis by Rest, Massage, and Electricity,” Med. and Surg. Reporter, vol. 1. p. 168, February 9, 1884. “Clinical Lecture on the Differential Diagnosis of Organic from Hysterical Hemianæsthesia, etc.,” ibid. vol. 1. p. 233, 265, February 23, March 1, 1884. “Clinical Lecture on Spinal Traumatisms and Pseudo-Traumatisms,” Polyclinic, vol. i. No. 9, March 15, 1884. “A Case of Nymphomania, with Hystero-epilepsy, etc.,” Medical Times, vol. xv. p. 534, April 18, 1885. “Hystero-epilepsy in the Male, etc.,” Medical Times, vol. xv. p. 648, May 30, 1885. “Some Forms of Myelitis, their Diagnosis from each Other and from Hysterical Paraplegia,” Medical News, vol. xlvii., Nos. 7 and 8, August 15 and 22, 1885. “Clinical Lecture on Acute Mania and Hysterical Mania,” Medical Times, vol. xvi. p. 153, November 28, 1885.

PATHOLOGY.—Strictly speaking, hysteria cannot be regarded as having a morbid anatomy. In an often-quoted case of Charcot's,¹⁴ an old hystero-epileptic woman, affected for ten years with hysterical contracture of all the limbs, sclerosis of the lateral columns was found after death. On several occasions this woman experienced temporary remissions of the contracture, but after a last seizure it became permanent. This is one of the few reported cases showing organic lesion; and this was doubtless secondary or a complication. In a typical case of hystero-epilepsy at the Philadelphia Hospital, a report of which was made by Dr. J. Guiteras,¹⁵ the patient, a young woman, died subsequently while in my wards. Autopsy and microscopical examination revealed an irregularly diffused sclerosis, chiefly occupying the parieto-occipital region of both cerebral hemispheres. Undoubtedly, as suggested by Charcot, in some of the grave forms of hysteria either the brain or spinal cord is the seat of temporary modification, which in time may give place to permanent material changes. Old cases of chronic hysteria in all probability may develop a secondary degeneration of the cerebro-spinal nerve-tracts, or even degeneration of the nerve-centres themselves may possibly sometimes occur. Two cases now and for a long time under observation further indicate the truth of this position. One, which has been reported both by H. C. Wood¹⁶ and myself,¹⁷ is a case of hysterical rhythmical chorea in a young woman. Although the hysterical nature of her original trouble cannot be doubted, she now has contractures of all the extremities, which seem to have an organic basis. The other patient is a woman who has reached middle life; she has several times temporarily recovered from what was diagnosticated as hysterical paraplegia, in one instance the recovery lasting for months. Now, after more than four years, she has not recovered from her last relapse. Contractures, chiefly in the form of flexure, have developed, and she has every appearance of organic trouble, probably sclerosis or secondary degeneration of the lateral columns.

¹⁴ Leçons sur les Maladies du Système nerveux.

¹⁵ Philadelphia Medical Times, 1878-79, ix. 224-227.

¹⁶ Ibid., vol. xi. p. 321, Feb. 26, 1881.

¹⁷ Ibid., vol. xii. p. 97, Nov. 19, 1881.

Briquet¹⁸ reviews the various hypotheses which have been held as to the pathological anatomy of hysteria, giving a valuable summary of the autopsies upon supposed hysterical cases up to the time of the publication of his treatise in 1859. About the sixteenth century, Rislau, Diemerbroeck, and Th. Bonet sought to establish a relation between lesions of the genital organs met with in the bodies of hysterical women and the affection from which they suffered. About 1620, Ch. Lepois believed that he had established the existence of certain alterations of the brain in cases of hysteria. Hochstetter and Willis toward the beginning of the present century arrived at similar conclusions. That researches into the state of the genital organs have chiefly occupied those investigating hysteria is shown by the writings of Pujol, Broussais, Lovyer-Villermay, and, above all, by those of Piorry, Landouzy, Schutzenberger, and Duchesne-Duparc. Georget, Brachet, Girard, Gendrin, Bouillaud, Forget, and Lelut, about the fourth or fifth decades of the present century, made numerous autopsies on those dying when hysterical phenomena were in full activity, and concluded that the genital organs of these individuals revealed nothing in particular. This, in brief, is also the conclusion of Briquet. Jeanne d'Albret, the mother of Henry IV., who was all her life subject to hysterical headache, had her brain examined after death, but absolutely nothing was found. Vesalius made an autopsy with equally negative results on a woman who died from strangulation in an hysterical attack. Royer-Collard also found nothing in an old hysteric. Briquet believed—and I fully accord with this view—that in some of the cases of Ch. Lepois, Hochstetter, and Willis diseases such as chronic meningitis were present with the hysteria. He concludes that anatomy does not show anything positive as to the seat or nature of hysteria, except the suspicion of a certain degree of congestion in various parts of the brain.

¹⁸ Op. cit.

While, however, hysteria may not have a morbid anatomy, it, like every other disease, has, in a correct sense, a pathology.

The ancients saw only the uterus when regarding hysteria. Hippocrates described the hysterical paroxysm and its accompanying disorders under the name of strangulation of the uterus. The ancients generally supposed that the disease originated in the ascent of the uterus to the diaphragm and throat. They believed that this accommodating organ could wander at will throughout the body, doing all manner of mischief. Hippocrates asserted that it was the origin of six hundred evils and innumerable calamities.

According to Sydenham,¹⁹ the disorders which are termed “hysterical in women and hypochondriac in men arise from irregular motions of the animal spirits, whence they are hurried with violence and too copiously to a particular part, occasioning convulsions and pain when they exert their force upon parts of delicate sensation, and destroying the functions of the respective organs which they enter into, and of those also whence they came; both being highly injured by this unequal distribution, which quite perverts the economy of nature.” Speaking of the strangulation of the womb, or fits of the mother, he says: “In this case the spirits, being copiously collected in the lower belly and rushing with violence to the fauces, occasion convulsions in all the parts through which they pass, puffing up the belly like a ball.”

¹⁹ The Entire Works of Dr. Thomas Sydenham, newly made English from the Originals, etc., by John Swan, M.D., London, 1763, pp. 416, 417.

After a time, the idea that the uterus was the exclusive seat of hysteria was in large measure supplanted by the view that the sexual organs in general were concerned in the production of hysterical phenomena. Romberg defined hysteria as a “reflex neurosis caused by genital irritation.” Woodbury²⁰ concludes as late as 1876 that only where the pathological source of hysterical symptoms resides in the uterus or ovaries, cases may, with some show of propriety, be termed hysterical; and where the uterus and organs associated with it in function are not in a morbid condition no symptoms can be correctly called hysterical.

²⁰ Medical and Surgical Reporter, December 2, 1876.

Bridges,²¹ another American writer, in a paper on the pathology of hysteria, says that hysteria does not occur most frequently in women with diseased wombs, but in those whose sexual systems, by pampering and other processes, are abnormally developed and sensitive. He makes the same point with reference to the male sex. Sometimes, however, besides the emotional state in the male, there is actual disease of the sexual organs, caused by abuse or over-indulgence. Uterine disease and hysteria are sometimes like results of one cause, and not respectively cause and effect: women are hysterical oftener than men because the uterine function in woman's physiology plays a more important part in the production of emotional diseases than any organ of the male sex.

²¹ Chicago Medical Examiner, 1872, xiii. 193-199.

The truth would seem simply to be, that, as the uterus and ovaries are the most important female organs, they are therefore a frequent source of reflex irritation in hysterical patients.

Seguin²² adopts with some reservation Brown-Séquard's hypothesis that cerebral lesions produce the symptoms which point out their existence, not by destroying organs of the brain, but by setting up irritations which arrest (inhibit) the functions of other parts of the encephalon. He says that he finds no difficulty in believing that the same symptom may exist as well without as with a brain lesion. “In typical hysteria the functions of parts of the encephalon included in the right hemisphere, or in physiological relation with it, are inhibited by a peripheral irritation starting from a diseased or disordered sexual apparatus or other part; and in case of organic cerebral disease the same inhibitory action is produced. In both kinds of cases we may have loss of rational control over the emotions, loss of voluntary power over one-half of the body, and loss of sensibility in the same part.”

²² “On Hysterical Symptoms in Organic Nervous Affections,” Archives of Electrology and Neurology, for May, 1875.

Simply as a matter of passing interest, the attempt of Dupuy²³ to frame a pathology of hysteria is worthy of attention. According to him, every local hysterical phenomenon is dependent upon an abnormal state of either lateral half of the upper part of the pons varolii. The centres of the pons, he holds, are perhaps merely passive in the process, only becoming organically implicated when various forms of permanent contractures and paralyses ensue.

²³ Medical Record, New York, 1876, ii. 251.

The pathology of hysteria must be considered with reference to the explanation of the exact condition of the cerebro-spinal axis during the existence of certain special grave phenomena of hysteria, such as hemianæsthesia, hemiplegia, paraplegia, and contractures.

What is the probable state of the nerve-centres and tracts during these hysterical manifestations? If, for example, in a case of hysterical hemianæsthesia it is admitted that the brain of the other side of the body is somehow implicated, although temporarily, what is the probable condition of this half of the brain? Is the cerebral change vascular or is it dynamic? If vascular, is the state one of vaso-motor spasm or one of paresis, or are there alternating conditions of spasm and paresis? Are true congestions or anaæmias present? If the condition is dynamic, what is its nature? Is it molecular? and if molecular in what does it consist? Is it possible to say absolutely what the pathological condition is in a disorder in which autopsies are obtained only by accident, and even when obtained the probabilities are that with fleeting life depart the changes that are sought to be determined?

Two hypotheses, the vaso-motor and the dynamic, chiefly hold sway. The vaso-motor, attractive because of its apparent simplicity, has been well set forth by Walton,²⁴ who contends that while it may not be competent to easily explain all hysterical symptoms, it will best explain some of the major manifestations of hysteria—for example, hemianæsthesia. Hemianæsthesia, he argues, may appear and disappear suddenly; it may be transferred from one side of the body to another in a few seconds; so blood-vessels can dilate as in a blush, or contract as in the pallor of fear, in an instant. In fainting the higher cerebral functions are suspended, presumably because of vaso-motor changes; therefore the sudden loss of function of one-half of the brain-centres, seen sometimes in hysterical hemiplegia and hemianæsthesia, may easily be imagined to be the result of an instantaneous and more or less complete contraction of cortical blood-vessels on that side. Neurotic patients have a peculiarly irritable vaso-motor nervous system. He records a case seen in consultation with H. W. Bradford. The patient had a right-sided hemianæsthesia, including the special senses, the sight in the left eye being almost wanting. The fundus of the right eye was normal; the left showed an extreme contractility of the retinal blood-vessels under ophthalmoscopic examination; these contracted to one-third their calibre, and the patient was unable to have the examination continued. The explanation offered is, that spasm of the blood-vessels on the surface of the left cerebral hemisphere had caused, by modification of the cortical cells, a right-sided hemianæsthesia, including the sight, and by reaching the meninges a left-sided spastic migraine, and by extending to the fundus of the left eye an intermittent retinal ischæmia.

²⁴ Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. xi., July, 1884, p. 424 et seq.

The vaso-motor hypothesis is held by Rosenthal,²⁵ who, however, wrongly gives the spinal cord the preponderating part in the production of the symptoms. According to this author, the anæsthesia and analgesia present in hysteria conform to the law as established by Voigt with regard to the distribution of the cutaneous nerves. The sensory nerves form at the periphery a sort of mosaic corresponding to an analogous arrangement in the spinal cord. “It is evident,” he says, “that the peripheral disorders in hysteria merely represent an exact reproduction of the central changes, and that the latter are situated, in great part, in the spinal cord.” He attributes a large part of the symptoms of hysteria to a congenital or acquired want of resistance of the vaso-motor nervous system. “Motor hysterical disorders are also due in the beginning to a simple functional hyperæmia, but in certain forms the chronic hyperæmia may lead to an inflammatory process which may terminate (as in Charcot's case) in secondary changes in the columns of the cord and nerve-roots.” When the brain is involved in hysteria, he holds that the most serious symptoms must be attributed to reflex spasms of the cerebral arteries and to the consequent cerebral anæmia.

²⁵ “A Clinical Treatise on Diseases of the Nervous System,” by M. Rosenthal, Vienna, translated by L. Putzel, M.D., vol. ii. Wood's Library, New York, 1879.

The dynamic pathology of hysteria is probably believed in by most physicians, and yet it is difficult to explain. Thus, Briquet²⁶ says that hysteria manifests itself by derangement of the nervous action, and what is called nervous influence is something like electricity. It is simply the result of undulations analogous to those which produce heat and light; in other words, it is a mode of movement. Wilks²⁷ compares some of the conditions found in hysteria to a watch not going; it may be thought to be seriously damaged in its internal machinery, yet on looking into it there is found a perfect instrument that only needs winding up. As regards the brain being for a time functionless, the possibility of this is admitted by all, as in sleep or after concussion. He mentions the case of a young girl who had been assaulted, and had complete paralysis of motion and sensation. The shock had suspended for a time the operations of her brain, and organic life only remained. We have only to suppose that half of the brain is in this way affected to account for all the phenomena of hemianæsthesia.

²⁶ Op. cit.

²⁷ Lectures on Diseases of the Nervous System, delivered at Guy's Hospital, by Samuel Wilks, M.D., F. R. S., Philada., 1883.

According to the dynamic view, the central nervous system is at fault in some way which cannot be demonstrated to the eye or by any of our present instruments of research. The changes are supposed to be molecular or protoplasmic, rather than vaso-motor or vascular.

As innervation and circulation go hand in hand or closely follow each other, my own view is that both vaso-motor and molecular changes, temporary in character, probably occur in the central nervous system in grave hysterical cases.

Whatever the temporary conditions are, it is evident, on the one hand, that they are not states of simple anæmia or congestion, and, on the other hand, that they are not inflammations or atrophies. Patients with hysterical manifestations of the gravest kind as a rule are free for a time from their harassing and distressing symptoms. This could not be if these symptoms were due to lesions of an organic nature. Sudden recoveries also could not be accounted for if the changes were organic.

Lloyd²⁸ contends that most hysterical symptoms, if not all, are due to abnormal states of consciousness. The development of this idea constitutes his argument for the recognition of the disease as a true psychosis. In the reflex action, not only of the lower spinal cord and ganglia of special sensation, but of the highest centres of the brain, he sees the explanation of many of the characteristics of hysteria. In other words, he finds that the sphere of the disease is more especially in the automatic action of the brain and cord.

²⁸ Op. cit.

Dercum and Parker²⁹ have published the results of a series of experiments on the artificial induction of convulsive seizures which bear upon this discussion of the pathology of hysteria. The experiments were performed by subjecting one or a group of muscles to a constant and precise effort, the attention being at the same time concentrated on some train of thought. The position most frequently adopted was the following: The subject being seated, the tips of the fingers of one or both hands were placed upon the surface of the table, so as to give merely a faint sense of contact—i.e. the fingers were not allowed to rest upon the table, but were held by a constant muscular effort barely in contact with it.

²⁹ Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. xi., October, 1884, pp. 579-588.

Tremors commenced in the hands; these became magnified into rapid, irregular movements which passed from one limb or part to another until the subject was thrown into strong general convulsions. Opisthotonos, emprosthotonos, and the most bizarre contortions were produced in various degrees. No disturbances of sensation were at any time present. Disturbances of respiration and phonation were often present in a severe seizure, and the circulatory apparatus was profoundly affected. A flow of tears, and occasionally profuse perspiration, were sometimes induced. After severe seizures large quantities of pale urine were passed. The reflexes were distinctly exaggerated. No unconsciousness was ever observed, but a progressive abeyance or paresis of the will. Nitrite of amyl seemed to arrest the convulsive seizures at once.

In attempting to explain these phenomena Dercum and Parker refer to the induction of Spencer as to the universality of the rhythm of motion. Through the whole nervous system of every healthy animal a constant rhythmical interchange of motion takes place. What might be called nervous equilibration results. In man the will modifies and controls the action of the nervous system; it assists in maintaining nervous equilibrium when it is threatened. The will being withdrawn from the nervo-muscular apparatus, and this being subjected to strain, a disturbance takes place. This same explanation may be applied to some of the convulsive and other phenomena of hysteria.

Comparing and analyzing the various views, it may be concluded with reference to the pathology of hysteria as follows:

(1) The anatomical changes in hysteria are temporary.

(2) These changes may be at any level of the cerebro-spinal axis, but most commonly and most extensively cerebral.

(3) They are both dynamic and vascular: the dynamic are of some undemonstrable molecular character; the vascular are either spastic or paretic, most frequently the former.

(4) The psychical element enters in that, either, on the one hand, violent mental stimuli which originate in the cerebral hemispheres are transmitted to vaso-motor conductors,³⁰ or, on the other hand, psychical passivity or torpor permits the undue activity of the lower nervous levels.

³⁰ Rosenthal.

ETIOLOGY.—Heredity has much to do with the development of hysteria. It is not that it is so frequently transmitted directly after its own kind, but this disorder in one generation generally indicates the existence of some ancestral nervous, mental, or diathetic affection.

Briquet³¹ has shown that of hysterical women who have daughters, more than half transmit the disease to one or several of these, and, again, that rather more than half of the daughters of the latter also become hysterical. Amann, according to Jolly,³² has stated that in 208 cases of hysteria he proved with certainty an hereditary tendency 165 times—that is, in 76 per cent. This is too big to be true.

³¹ Op. cit.

³² Ziemssen's Cyclopædia of the Practice of Medicine, vol. xiv., American translation.

Briquet has also made some careful investigations into the subject of the health of infants born of hysterical mothers. The investigations were based upon a study of 240 hysterical women, with whom he compared 240 other patients affected with such diseases as fever, phthisis, cancer, diseases of the heart, liver, and kidneys, but without any hysterical symptoms. In brief, the result of his investigations was that children born of hysterical mothers die more frequently and at a younger age than those who are born of mothers not hysterical.

The relation of hysteria to certain morbid constitutional states has long been recognized, particularly its connection with the tubercular diathesis. This has been shown by numerous observers, especially among the French. The most valuable recent contribution is that of Grasset,³³ who believes that a direct connection can be traced between the tubercular diathesis and hysteria. When the relations of hysteria to the scrofulous and tubercular diathesis are spoken of by him, it is not meant that hysterical subjects have tubercles in the lungs, but that these diatheses are found in various generations, and that among some subjects of the hereditary series the constitutional states manifest themselves as hysteria. It is not the evidences of hysteria with pulmonary and other tuberculous conditions that he is considering, but that hysteria may be, and often is, a manifestation of the tubercular diathesis. Two cases may present themselves: in one the neurosis is the only manifestation of the diathesis; in the other, it is continued in the same subject along with the other diathetic manifestations. In demonstration of his thesis he concludes with a series of most interesting cases, which he arranges into two groups. In the first, hysteria is the only manifestation of the tubercular diathesis; in the second, are simultaneous pulmonary and hysterical manifestations. In the first group he has arrayed eight personal observations and seventeen derived from various authors; in the second he has two personal and seventeen compiled observations.

³³ “The Relation of Hysteria with the Scrofulous and the Tubercular Diathesis,” by J. Grasset, Brain, Jan., April, and July, 1884.

Personal experience and observation go far to confirm the views of Grasset, although I recognize fully the strength of the objection of Brachat and Dubois and others that, phthisis being such a common complaint, it might be demonstrated by statistics that it was related to almost any disease. Not only hysteria, but other neuroses or psychoses, have a close connection with the tubercular diathesis.

Among the insane and idiotic and among epileptics phthisis is of frequent occurrence. At the Pennsylvania Training School for Feeble-minded Children the frequency of phthisis among the inmates of the institution is one of the most striking clinical facts. The insane of our asylums die of pulmonary troubles oftener almost than of any other disease. The fact that hysteria is met with in the robust and vigorous does not invalidate the position taken, for the robust and vigorous who are not hysterical are not infrequently found in the descendants of the tuberculous.

Laycock³⁴ believed that the gouty diathesis was particularly liable to give rise to the hysterical paroxysm or to irregular forms of hysteria. Gairdner, quoted by Handfield Jones,³⁵ supports this view.

³⁴ A Treatise on the Nervous Diseases of Women, by Thomas Laycock, M.D., London, 1840.

³⁵ Studies on Functional Nervous Disorders.

Gout in England plays a greater part in the production of nervous and other disorders than in this country, but even here its instrumentality is too often overlooked. In Philadelphia are many families, some of them of English origin, in which gout has occurred, sometimes of the regular type, but oftener of anomalous forms. Among the most striking examples of hysteria that have fallen under my observation, some have been in these families. In a few of them remedies directed to the lithæmic or gouty conditions in connection with other measures have been efficient. More frequently they have failed, for while a relation may exist between the neurotic disorder and the diathesis, it is not the diathesis, but the neurotic disorder, which we are called upon to treat.

That a certain mental constitution predisposes to hysteria cannot be doubted. Ribot³⁶ describes, chiefly from Huchard,³⁷ the hysterical constitution. It is a state in which volition is nearly always lacking. The prominent trait is mobility. The hysterical pass with increditable rapidity from joy to sadness, from laughter to tears; they are changeable, freakish, or capricious; they have fits of sobbing or outbursts of laughter. Ch. Richét compares them to children, who oftentimes can be made to laugh heartily while their cheeks are still wet with tears. Sydenham says of them that inconstancy is their most common trait: their sensibilities are aroused by the most trivial cause, while profounder emotions scarcely touch them. They are in a condition of moral ataxy, lacking equilibrium between the higher and lower faculties.

³⁶ Diseases of the Will.

³⁷ Axenfeld et Huchard, Traité des Neuroses, 2d ed., 1883, pp. 958-971.

As to sex, it is almost unnecessary to say that hysteria occurs with greater frequency among females than males; and yet it is all important to emphasize the fact that it is not exclusively a disease of the former sex. Some statistics on this subject have been collected. In Briquet's often-quoted 1000 cases of hysteria, 50 only occurred in men. I believe, however, that the proportion of hysterical men to hysterical women is greater than this. Instead of a ratio of 1 to 20, as these statistics would indicate, 1 to 15 would probably be nearer the truth. Statistics upon this subject are deceptive.

The occurrence of hysteria in the male was little discussed before the publication of Briquet's great work, but since that time it has received great attention from the medical profession. Charcot³⁸ in some recent lectures at Salpêtrière has called attention to this subject. From 1875 to 1885 he says that five doctoral theses have been written on hysteria in men. Batault has collected 218 and Klein 80 cases. The Index Catalogue contains 102 references to hysteria in the male.

³⁸ Le Progrès médical, 1885.

Hysteria in men may take on almost any form that it shows in women. It may occur in the strong, although more likely to be seen among the weak and effeminate. Even strong, vigorous workmen are susceptible, at times, to hysteria. According to Charcot, the duration of the affection differs somewhat in the two sexes. In male patients it lasts a long time and the symptoms are troublesome; in females the contrary is usually although not always the case. The occurrence of hysteria in the male sex has probably been overlooked through the tendency to class symptoms which would be regarded as hysterical in women as hypochondriacal in men.

One of the most typical half-purposive hysterical attacks that has ever come under my observation was in a literary man of some prominence. Hysterical syncope, contracture, hysterical breathing, hysterical hydrophobia, coccygodynia, hemiparesis, hemianæsthesia, and blindness are some other forms of hysteria in the male of which there are clinical records the result of personal observation. A remarkable case of hysterical motor ataxy was seen in a boy who was for some time a patient at the Philadelphia Polyclinic. Wilks³⁹ records several interesting cases of hysteria in boys. One simulated laryngismus stridulus, with paroxysmal suffocative attacks and barking. Another was a case of hysterical maniacal excitement; another was an example of malleation, or constant movement as in hammering; still others were instances of extreme hyperæsthesia, of anorexia, and of nervous dyspnœa. The same author also dwells on the hysterical perversion of the moral sense found in boys as in girls. He gives some instances clipped from English newspapers—attempts to poison, murder or attempts to murder, confessions false and true. Many instances could be added from our own sensational American sheets.

³⁹ Op. cit.

No age is free from a liability to hysteria. Its occurrence, however, at certain periods of life with great frequency is well known. The following table has been arranged from tables given by Briquet and Jolly, and shows that it is of most frequent occurrence between the ages of fifteen and thirty:

Age. Landouzy. Georget. Beau. Briquet. Scanzoni. Total.

0-10 4 1 — 66 — 71

10-15 48 5 6 98 4 161

15-20 105 7 7 140 13 272

20-25 80 4 3 71 64 289

25-30 40 3 — 24

30-35 38 — — 9 78 149

35-40 15 — — 9

40-45 7 1 — 1 44 65

45-50 8 — 1 3

50-55 4 — — 3 11 25

55-60 4 — 1 2

60-80 2 — — — 3 5

355 21 18 426 217 1037

Hysteria in the United States assumes almost every form, probably because we have here represented almost every race and nationality, either pure or mixed. While it cannot be clearly shown that certain races are much more prone to hysteria than others, the type of this disease is doubtless much influenced by racial and climatic conditions. Certain phases of the disease prevail in certain sections more than in others. Mitchell's⁴⁰ experience is that the persistent hystero-epilepsies, and the multiple and severe contractures which Charcot and others describe, are rare in this country among all classes, and especially uncommon in the lowest classes, among which Charcot seems to have found his worst and most interesting cases. He says that while his own clinic furnishes numerous cases of neural maladies, and while he has examples of every type of the milder form of hysteria, it is extremely uncommon to encounter the more severe and lasting forms of this disease. When Mitchell's Lectures were first published I was inclined to regard hystero-epilepsy of the grave type as of rare occurrence, and so stated in answer to a communication from him. Recently, as the result of a longer experience, I have become persuaded that some irregular forms are met with somewhat frequently in various sections of our country. It remains true, however, that in the Middle and Northern sections of the United States the graver hysterias of the convulsive type are not nearly as frequently observed as in the southern countries of Europe.

⁴⁰ Op. cit.

Dr. Guiteras, formerly physician to the Philadelphia Hospital, and Lecturer on Physical Diagnosis in the University of Pennsylvania, now in the United States marine hospital service, has for several years been on duty, most of the time, in Florida, the West Indies, and the Gulf of Mexico. In answer to an inquiry made by me, he writes: “Hysteria prevails with extraordinary frequency amongst the Cubans. It presents itself in the shape of excito-motory and mental phenomena, almost to the exclusion of all other manifestations. The motory anomalies comprise the whole range from mild hysterics to the gravest hystero-epilepsy. The latter is incomparably more frequent in Key West than in Philadelphia. The confirmed hystero-epileptics are few, but it is the rule for well-marked cases of hysteria to present occasionally, often only once in the course of the disease, hystero-epileptic seizures which may be of frightful intensity. By mental disorders I do not mean only the acute attacks of excitement and delirium which attend upon or take the place of convulsive attacks, but I mean also to include the chronic form of hysterical insanity, which is generally some variety of melancholia. These are the peculiarities of hysteria as seen by myself in the Latin race in the tropics. My experience teaches me that the Saxon race in the tropics shows the same peculiarities to a less extent.”

In the region referred to by Guiteras it will be remembered there is a mixed population composed largely of Spanish, French, and Portuguese. Climatic and other local influences may have something to do with the particular form which this disorder assumes in these tropical or semitropical districts, but race would seem to be the most important factor. In the section on Hystero-epilepsy I will speak of the irregular type of this disorder, which has fallen most frequently under my own observation.

Hysteria in the negro is of somewhat frequent occurrence, and is more likely to be of the demonstrative or convulsive than of a paralytic or negative form. Hysterical convulsions, particularly of the purposive kind, and hysterical mania, are often met with in the colored population of our large city hospitals and asylums.

The influence which climate exerts, like that of race, is rather on the type of hysteria than upon the disease itself. Hysteria is found in every climate, but in warm countries the disorder seems more likely to be mobile and dramatic than when found in the more temperate or colder zones.

Season and meteorological conditions have some influence on the production of hysterical attacks. It is well known that hysteria, chorea, and other allied nervous disorders are more likely to appear in the spring than at other seasons. This fact has been shown by various observers.

Hysteria may occur in any rank of life. It is not, as has been held by some, a disease of the luxurious classes. The American physician who has seen much of this disorder—and that means every physician of large practice—has met with hysterical cases in every walk of life. While this is true, however, hysteria of certain types is met with more frequently in certain social positions. Some of the remarks about race and climate apply also here. It is the type of the disorder, and its relative frequency among various classes, which are affected by social position. Young women of the richer classes, who have been coddled and pampered, whose wants and whose whims have been served without stint or opposition, often pass into hysterical conditions which do not have any special determining causative factor, or at least only such as are comparatively trivial. Occasionally, in them hystero-epilepsy, catalepsy, and the train of grave hysterical phenomena are observed. We are more likely, however, to have the minor and indefinite hysterical symptoms; or, if grave manifestations be present, they are most usually ataxia, paralysis, contractures, or aphonia, and not convulsive phenomena. Hysteria in our American cities is especially prevalent among certain classes of working-people, as among the operatives in manufacturing establishments. Dividing American society into the three classes of rich, middle, and poor, hysteria is most prevalent in the first and the last. It is, however, by no means absent in the middle class.

The absence of occupation on the one hand, and, on the other, the necessity of following work for which the individual is unfitted, particularly irritating lines of work, predispose to the occurrence of hysteria. It may be caused, therefore, either by no work, overwork, or irritating work. As to the special occupations, hysteria would seem to result most commonly in those positions where physical fatigue combines with undue mental irritation to harass and reduce the nervous system. In men it occurs often as the result of overwork conjoined with financial embarrassment. It is met with not infrequently among teachers, particularly those who are engaged in the straining and overstraining labor of preparing children for examinations. A good method of education is the best preventive; a bad method is one of the most fruitful causes of the affection. The injurious effect of American school or college life in the production of hysteria is undoubted, and should be thoroughly appreciated. Our educational processes act both as predisposing and exciting causes of this disorder. Both in our private and public educational institutions the conditions are frequently such as to lead to the production of hysteria or to confirm and intensify the hysterical temperament. In our large cities all physicians in considerable practice are called upon to treat hysterical girls and boys, the former more frequently, but the latter oftener than is commonly supposed. Hysteria in boys, indeed, does not always meet with recognition, from the fact that it is in boys. Cases of hysteria in girls under twelve years of age have come under my observation somewhat frequently. About or just succeeding examination-time these cases are largely multiplied. The hysteria under such circumstances may assume almost any phase; usually, however, we have not to deal in such patients with convulsive types of the disease.

Clarke⁴¹ has considered some of these questions in connection particularly with the physiological processes of menstruation, and its bearing upon the inability of girls to maintain equally with boys the stress of such competition.

⁴¹ Sex in Education, etc., by Edward H. Clarke, M.D., Boston, 1873.

The cramming processes which are resorted to in order to force children at fixed times from the lower to the higher grades of public schools, and more especially from grammar to normal or high schools, is a fruitful source of evil in this direction. It is not always so much hard study as it is the badly-arranged and too numerous subjects of study that make the strain. I have spoken of this in another connection as follows:⁴² “Our children are too largely in the hands of those educationalists to whom Clouston refers,⁴³ who go on the theory that there is an unlimited capacity in every individual brain for education to any extent and in any direction. Children varying in age and original capacity, in previous preparation, and in home-surroundings are forced into the same moulds and grooves. The slow must keep pace with the fleet, the frail with the sturdy, the children of toil and deprivation with the sons and daughters of wealth and luxury. A child is always liable to suffer from mental overwork when the effort is made to force its education beyond its receptive powers. Education is not individualized enough. The mind of the child is often confused by a multitude of ill-assorted studies. Recreation is neglected and unhealthy emulation is too much cultivated. In many communities admissions to various grades of public schools are regulated entirely by the averages obtained at examinations, instead of on the general record of the pupils in connection with proper but not too severe examinations. In consequence often, after the campaign of overwork and confusion called an examination, we see children developing serious disturbances of health or even organic disease—paroxysmal fever, loss of appetite, headache or neckache, disturbed sleep, temporary albuminuria, chorea, hysteria, and hystero-epilepsy.”

⁴² “Toner Lecture on Mental Overwork and Premature Disease among Public and Professional Men.” delivered March 19, 1884, Washington, Smithsonian Inst., January, 1885.

⁴³ Clinical Lectures on Mental Diseases.

The term students' hysteria has been applied to the neuromimetic disorders from which medical students frequently suffer during their attendance upon lectures. Some years since, when engaged in examining students upon the lectures upon the practice of medicine delivered by Professor DaCosta, I saw many illustrations of this affection, some of which were very amusing. In a paper on hysteria which received the prize at the Physical Society of Guy's Hospital, P. Horrocks⁴⁴ writes that during the fortnight following the death of the late Napoleon, Sir James Paget was consulted for stone in the bladder by no less than four gentlemen who had nothing the matter with them. “How many students,” says Horrocks, “are there, of one year's standing or more, who have not imagined and really became convinced that they were suffering from some disease, generally a fatal disease?” In such cases we have a combination of true psychical influence with overwork and the unhygienic surroundings for which our medical colleges are notorious.

⁴⁴ Med. and Surg. Reporter, vol. xxxvii., Nov. 24, 1877.

It has been my personal experience that comparatively few cases of hysteria occur among female medical students. Not long since a thesis was presented at graduation by a woman medical student⁴⁵ on the curative effects of professional training in neurasthenic and hysterical women. In this she shows that there are certain relations of mind over body which enable it to modify bodily conditions and ward off disease when other remedies appear almost powerless. She illustrates the therapeutic power of mental impressions and occupations by two cases in which a judicious and careful course of study acted to cure severe nervous and uterine troubles. One of these women, who had suffered with neurasthenia and general debility, severe nervous headaches, and other symptoms, was able during her last year at college to attend fifteen lectures a week, besides clinics, prepare for examination on five subjects, and was seldom troubled with even headache. She afterward was employed in hospital work, and could walk five miles a day without discomfort. That women medical students know when and how to take care of themselves during the menstrual period, and that they can, if they see fit, cease work or lighten their labors at that time, would partly account for their escaping from nervous break-down.

⁴⁵ “The Therapeutic Value of Mental Occupation,” by Hannah M. Thompson, M.D., Medical and Surgical Reporter, November, 1883.

That any form of irritation in a patient predisposed to hysteria may act as an exciting cause in this affection has led Laségue to apply the term peripheral hysteria to certain cases. One of his cases was a girl fourteen years old, who, having suffered for a few hours with her eyes because of some sand thrown into one of them by a playmate, awoke the next morning with a spasm of the eyelid on that side, which rendered it impossible for her to open that eye; and it remained closed during four months. He considered that the irritation produced by the sand was not the immediate cause of the spasm, but that its long duration was an hysterical phenomenon. The patient afterward became the subject of hysterical manifestations. In another complete hysterical aphonia came on after a slight bronchitis. Another, after an attack of indigestion, refused to touch either food or drink for twenty-four hours, and later was troubled with regurgitation from constriction of the pharynx or œsophagus which lasted for some weeks.

Anæmia and chlorosis are frequent exciting causes of hysteria in children, particularly in girls.

Disorders of menstruation play a prominent part as exciting causes of special hysterical manifestations. The period of the establishment of the menstrual function is one that is particularly fertile in the production of hysteria, much more so than acquired disorders of menstruation occurring later. Menorrhagia, dysmenorrhœa, and certain local utero-vaginal disorders may act upon those predisposed to hysteria as exciting causes. These conditions themselves are, on the other hand, sometimes caused by nervous, hysterical states in the individual.

With reference to the very common assertions that continence on the one hand, and sexual over-indulgence on the other, are the most prolific causes of hysteria, the true stand to take is that neither of these positions is philosophically correct; for, as Briquet has shown, nuns on the one hand and prostitutes on the other are frequent victims of this protean disorder.

As affirmed by Jolly, sexual over-irritation, particularly that induced by onanism, more frequently causes hysteria than sexual abstinence or deprivation.

The occurrence of hysteria and hysterical choreas among pregnant women has long been recognized. Scanzoni, quoted by Jolly,⁴⁶ states that of 217 patients whom he had treated, 165, or 76 per cent. had been puerperal, and that of the latter not less than 65 per cent. had borne children more than three times. Cases of grave hysteria or hystero-epilepsy have been aggravated by pregnancy and have led to premature labor.

⁴⁶ Op. cit.

Chrobak attacks the etiological problem of hysteria by referring its causation to movable kidneys! He observed 19 such patients in Vienna, 16 being in Oppolzer's clinic.⁴⁷ Three times no subjective symptoms accompanied the anomaly; eight times the trouble could be referred either to the dislocation of the kidneys or to disease of the same; and eight times the evidence of hysteria was unmistakable. Among the latter eight cases neither vaginal, uterine, nor ovarian conditions were recognized. He concludes that there is a direct nervous connection between the kidneys and the genital organs, and between both and hysteria.

⁴⁷ Medizinische-Chirurgische Rundschan, quoted by Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 1870, lxxxiii. 430-432.

In brief, the truth is that frequent or severe local irritation in any part of the body in an individual of the hysterical diathesis may act as the exciting cause of an hysterical paroxysm or of special hysterical manifestations. Irritation or disease of the uterus or ovaries may result in hysteria, as may the bite of a dog, a tumor of the brain, a polypus in the nose, a phymosis, an irritated clitoris, a gastric ulcer, a stenosis of the larynx, a foreign body in the eye, a toe-nail ulcer, or a movable kidney.

Whatever tends to exhaust the nervous system will also cause hysteria, but only in those who have some inherited predisposition to the disorder. C. Handfield Jones⁴⁸ mentions heatstroke and severe physical labor as such causes. One of the sequelæ of heatstroke enumerated by Sir R. Martin, and quoted by Jones, is a distressing hysterical state of the nervous system, with an absence of self-control in laughing and crying, the paroxysm being followed by great prostration of nervous power.

⁴⁸ Op. cit.

The effect of imitation in the production of hysteria has been known in all ages. Most of the epidemics and endemics of nervous disorders which have from time to time prevailed in various parts of the world have either been hysterical in character or have had in them a large element of hysteria. While it is impossible in a practical work to devote much space to this branch of the subject, a discussion of hysteria in its etiological relations would be imperfect without some reference to these outbreaks. In ancient times, in the Middle Ages, and within comparatively recent periods extraordinary epidemics have occurred. No country within the range of medical observation has been entirely free from them. Communities civilized and semi-civilized, Christian and Mohammedan, Protestant and Catholic, have had a fair share of the visitations. Some of them constitute epochs in history, and, as Hecker,⁴⁹ their greatest historian, has remarked, their study affords a deep insight into the work of the human mind in certain states of society. “They are,” he says, “a portion of history, and will never return in the way in which they are recorded; but they expose a vulnerable part of man—the instinct of imitation—and are therefore very nearly connected with human life in the aggregate.”

⁴⁹ The Epidemics of the Middle Ages, from the German of J. F. C. Hecker, M.D., Professor at the Frederick William University at Berlin, etc., translated by B. G. Babington, M.D., F. R. S., etc.; 3d ed., London, 1859.

Some authors under hysteria, others under catalepsy, others under ecstasy, still others under chorea, have discussed these epidemics—a fact which serves to emphasize the truth that while these affections have points of difference, they have also an easily-traced bond of union. They are but variations of the same discordant tune. Briquet in an admirable manner sketches their history from the age of Pausanias and Plutarch to the time of Mesmer. Of American writers, James J. Levick⁵⁰ of Philadelphia has furnished one of the most valuable contributions to this subject.

⁵⁰ “An Historical Sketch of the Dance of St. Vitus, with Notices of some Kindred Disorders,” Med. and Surg. Reporter, vol. vii., Dec. 21 and 28, 1861, p. 276, and Jan. 4 and 11, 1862, p. 322.

In the year 1237 a hundred children or more were suddenly seized with the dancing mania at Erfurt; another outbreak occurred at Utrecht in 1278.

As early as the year 1374 large assemblages of men and women were seen at Aix-la-Chapelle affected with a “dancing mania.” They formed circles and danced for hours in wild delirium. Attacks of insensibility, of convulsions, and of ecstasy occurred. The disease spread from Germany to the Netherlands. In a few months it broke out in Cologne, and about the same time at Metz. “Peasants,” we are told, “left their ploughs, mechanics their workshops, housewives their domestic duties, to join the wild revelry, and this rich commercial city became the scene of the most ruinous disorder.”

The festival of St. John the Baptist was one celebrated in strange wild ways in these early days. Fanatical rites, often cruel and senseless, were performed on these occasions. Hecker supposes that the wild revels of St. John's Day in 1374 may have had something to do with the outbreak of the frightful dancing mania soon after this celebration. It at least brought to a crisis a malady which had been long impending.

The Flagellants afford another illustration of an early religio-nervous craze. Self-flagellation was indulged in for generations before the fourteenth century, but it then became epidemic. A brotherhood of Flagellants was formed; they marched in processions carrying scourges, with which they violently lashed and scourged themselves. As late as 1843, Flagellant processions, but without the whips and scourging, were continued in Lisbon on Good Friday.

Strasburg was visited by the dancing plague in 1418. Those afflicted were conducted to the chapel of St. Vitus, where priests attempted to relieve them by religious ceremonies. The name St. Vitus's dance, still so common as a synonym for chorea, has come down to us because of the alleged wonderful doings of this saint in behalf of those affected during some of the dancing epidemics. Both Hecker and Madden⁵¹ give interesting details of the personal history of St. Vitus, who was a Sicilian, born in the time of Diocletian, and even in childhood is said to have worked great miracles, and was delivered from many sufferings and torments. He died about the year 303. His body was moved to Apulia, afterward to St. Denys in France, and still later to the abbey of Corvey in Saxony. A legend was invented that St. Vitus, just before he bent his neck to the sword, prayed to God that he might protect from the dancing mania all those who should solemnize the day of his commemoration and fast upon its eve.

⁵¹ Phantasmata; or, Illusions and Fanaticisms, etc., by R. R. Madden, F. R. S., London, 1857.

Another strange disorder called tarantismus derived its name from the fact that it was supposed to be caused by the bite of the tarantula, a ground-spider common in Apulia, Italy. According to Hecker, the word tarantula is the same as terrantola, a name given by the Italians to a poisonous lizard of extraordinary endowments. The fear of the insect was so general that its bite was much oftener imagined than actually received. The disorder was probably in existence long before the fifteenth century, although the first account of it, that of Nicholas Perotti, refers to its occurrence in this century. Many symptoms followed the bite or supposed bite: the individuals became melancholy, stupefied, lost their senses, and, above all, were irresistibly impelled to dance until exhausted and almost lifeless. It was believed that the results of the bite could be cured, or at least much benefited, by dancing to a certain kind of music. Tarantism was at its height in the seventeenth century. To this day, in some parts of Italy, dances called tarantellas are performed with intricate figures to marked time.

Abyssinia was visited by a dancing mania called the tigretier, which, according to Hecker, resembled the original mania of the St. John dancers. It exhibited a similar ecstasy. Those affected with it were cured by dancing to the music of trumpeters, drummers, fifers, etc.

Levick says that the dancing mania of the fifteenth century is still kept in popular remembrance in some places by an annual festival, especially at Echtermarch, a small town in Luxembourg, where a jumping procession occurs annually on Whit Tuesday. In the year 1812, 12,678 dancers were in the procession.

The Anabaptists, a religious sect of the sixteenth century, exhibited many of the wild and grotesque phenomena of hysteria or hystero-epilepsy.

The French Calvinists or Camisards, who appeared near the close of the seventeenth century, were also the subjects of ecstasy and of peculiar fits of trembling. These trembleurs experienced convulsive shocks in the head, the shoulders, the legs, and the arms, and were sometimes thrown violently down.

About 1731 and later great crowds frequented the tomb of Deacon François de Paris, an advocate of the doctrines of Jansenius. It was reported that miracles were performed at his tomb: the sick were brought there, and often were seized with convulsions and pains, through which they were healed. The subjects of these attacks are sometimes spoken of as the Jansenist Convulsionnaires. The tomb was in the cemetery of St. Médard, and hence those who visited the place were also termed the Convulsionnaires of St. Médard. This disorder increased, multiplied, and disseminated, lasting with more or less intensity for fifty-nine years. Great immorality prevailed in the secret meetings of the believers.

Hecker gives some remarkable instances of the effect of sympathy or imitation exhibited on a smaller scale than in the epidemics of the Middle Ages. One is of a series of cases of fits in a Lancashire factory, the first one brought on by a girl putting a mouse into the bosom of another. In Charité Hospital in Berlin in 1801 a patient fell into strong convulsions, and immediately afterward six other patients were affected in the same way; by degrees eight more were attacked. At Redruth, England, a man cried out in a chapel, “What shall I do to be saved?” Others followed his example, and shortly after suffered most excruciating bodily pain. The occurrence soon became public; hundreds came, and many of them were affected in the same way. The affection spread from town to town. Four thousand people were said in a short time to be affected with this malady, which included convulsions.

Hecker in the edition of his work referred to has also a treatise on child pilgrimages.⁵² These pilgrimages, like the dancing mania, occurred in the Middle Ages. The greatest was the boy crusade in the year 1212. The passion to repossess the Holy Land then had its grip on Catholic Europe. The first impulse to the child pilgrimages was given by a shepherd-boy, who had revelations and ecstatic seizures, and held himself to be an ambassador of the Lord. Soon thirty thousand souls came to partake of his revelations; new child-prophets and miracle-workers arose; the children of rich and poor flocked together from all quarters; parents were unable to restrain them, and some even began to urge them. A host of boys, armed and unarmed, assembled at Vendôme, and started for Jerusalem with a boy-prophet at their head. They got to Marseilles, and embarked on seven large ships. Two ships were wrecked, and not a soul was saved. The other five ships reached Bougia and Alexandria, and the young crusaders were all sold as slaves to the Saracens. In Germany child-prophets arose, especially in the Rhine countries and far eastward. An army of them gathered together, crossed the Alps, and reached Genoa. They were soon scattered; many perished; many were retained as servants in foreign lands; some reached Rome. A second child's pilgrimage occurred twenty-five years later. It was confined to the city of Erfurt. One thousand children wandered, dancing and leaping, to Armstadt, and were brought back in carts. Another child's pilgrimage from Halle, in Suabia, to Mount St. Michel in Normandy, occurred in 1458.

⁵² Translated by Robert H. Cooke, M. R. C. S.

In the convent of Yvertet in the territory of Liège, in 1550, the inmates were seized with a leaping and jumping malady. The disorder began with a single individual, and was soon propagated.

Sometimes the convulsive disorders of early days, especially those occurring in convents, were associated with the strange delusion that the subjects of them were changed into lower animals. Various names have been given to disorders of this kind, such as lycanthropia or wolf madness, zoomania or animal madness, etc. Burton in the Anatomy of Melancholy gives an interesting summary of these disorders, which are also discussed by Levick.

In 1760 a religious sect known as the Jumpers prevailed in Great Britain. They were affected with religious frenzy, and jumped continuously for hours. Other jumping epidemics have appeared at different times, both in Great Britain and in this country.

The New England witchcraft episode is of historical interest in connection with this subject of epidemic hysteria. This excitement occurred during the latter part of the seventeenth century. Adults and children were its subjects. The Rev. Cotton Mather records many cases, some of which illustrate almost every phase of hysteria. Individuals who were seized with attacks, which would now be regarded as hysterical or hystero-epileptic, were supposed to have become possessed through the machinations of others. Those who were supposed to be possessed were tried, condemned, and executed in great numbers. Many accused themselves of converse with the devil. The epidemic spread with such rapidity, and so many were executed, that finally the good sense of the people came to the rescue.

The nervous epidemics, nearly all religious, which have occurred in this country have usually been during the pioneer periods, and have therefore appeared at different eras as one part of the country after another has been developed. Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and neighboring States were visited time and again. Even to-day we occasionally hear of outbreaks of this kind in remote or primitive localities, whether it be in the far South-west or in the woods of Maine.

David W. Yandell⁵³ has published a valuable paper on “Epidemic Convulsions,” the larger part of the materials of which were collected by his father for a medical history of Kentucky. From this it would appear the convulsions were first noticed in the revivals from 1735 to 1742. Many instances are related of fainting, falling, trance, numbness, outcries, and spasms. The epidemic of Kentucky spread widely, reappeared for years, and involved a district from Ohio to the mountains of Tennessee, and even to the old settlements in the Carolinas. Wonderful displays took place at the camp-meetings. At one of these, where twenty thousand people were present, sobs, shrieks, and shouts were heard; sudden spasms seized upon scores and dashed them to the ground. Preachers went around in ecstasy, singing, shouting, and shaking hands. Sometimes a little boy or girl would be seen passionately exhorting the multitude, reminding one of the part taken by the children in the epidemics of the Middle Ages. A sense of pins and needles was complained of by many; others felt a numbness and lost all control of their muscles. Some subjects were cataleptic; others were overcome with general convulsions.

⁵³ Brain, vol. iv., Oct., 1881, p. 339 et seq.

The term jerks was properly applied to one of the forms of convulsion. Sometimes the jerking affected a single limb or part. The Rev. Richard McNemar has given a graphic description of this jerking exercise in a History of the Kentucky Revival. The head would fly backward and forward or from side to side; the subject was dashed to the ground, or would bounce from place to place like a football, or hop around with head, limbs, and trunk twitching and jolting in every direction. Curiously, few were hurt. Interesting descriptions of the jerks can be found in various American autobiographical and historical religious works. In such books as the Autobiography of Peter Cartwright, a Western Methodist, for instance, striking accounts of some of the phases of these epidemics are to be found. Lorenzo Dow in his Journal, published in Philadelphia in 1815, has also recorded them.

Hysterical laughter was a grotesque manifestation often witnessed. The holy laugh began to be a part of religious worship. Dancing, barking, and otherwise acting like dogs, were still other manifestations. It is remarkable that, according to Yandell, no instance is recorded in which permanent insanity resulted from these terrible excitements.

The absurd and extraordinary exhibitions witnessed among the Shakers belong to the same category, and have been well described by Hammond and others.

In a History of the Revival in Ireland in 1859, by the Rev. William Gibson, instances of excitement that fairly rivalled those which occurred in our Western States are given. Cases of ecstasy are described.

The religious sect known as the Salvation Army, which has in very recent years excited so much attention, curiosity, and comment both in America and England, has much in common with the Jumpers, the Jerkers, and the Convulsionnaires. The frenzied excitement at their meetings, with their tambourine-playing, dancing, shouting, and improvising are simply the same phases of religio-hysterical disorder, modified by differences in the age and environment.

In 1878, in the district of Tolmezo, Italy, an epidemic of hysteria which recalls the epidemics of the Middle Ages occurred. It has been described by M. Léon Colin.⁵⁴ It was reported to the prefect of Undine that for three months some forty females living in the commune of Verzeguis had been attacked by religious mania. “From the report it appears that the first was in the person of a woman named Marguerite Vidusson, who had been the subject of simple hysteria for about eight years. In January, 1878, she began to suffer from convulsive attacks, accompanied by cries and lamentations. She was regarded as the subject of demoniacal possession, and on the first Sunday in May was publicly exorcised. Her affection, however, increased in severity; the attacks were more frequent and more intense, and were especially provoked by the sound of the church-bells and by the sight of priests. Seven months later three other hysterical girls became subject to convulsive and clamorous attacks. Here, again, an attempt was made to get rid of the supposed demon. A solemn mass was said in the presence of the sufferers, but was followed only by a fresh outbreak. At the time of the visit of the delegates eighteen were suffering, aged from sixteen to twenty-six years, except three, whose ages were respectively forty-five, fifty-five, and sixty-three years. Similar symptoms had also appeared in a young soldier on leave in the village.” During the attacks the patients talked of the demon which possessed them, stated the date on which they were seized by it, and the names of the persons who were possessed before them. Some boasted of being prophetesses and clairvoyants and of having the gift of tongues. In all, the sound of church-bells caused attacks, and religious ceremonies appeared not only to aggravate the disease in the sufferers, but also to cause its extension to those not previously attacked. M. Colin points out that the soil is particularly favorable for the development of an epidemic of this nature. The people of Verzeguis are backward in education and most superstitious. Functional nervous diseases are common among them. The inhabitants of the village are largely cut off from intercourse with the adjacent country in consequence of comparative inaccessibility and the frequent interruption of communications by storms and floods. Craniometric observations on twelve of the inhabitants seemed to show that the brachycephalic form of skull predominated, and that the development of the cranium was slightly below the average. The epidemic proved extremely obstinate.

⁵⁴ Annales d'Hygiène, quoted in Lancet, Oct. 16, 1880.

In Norway and New Caledonia similar hysterical outbreaks have been observed in recent times.

An endemic of hysteria from imitation occurred in Philadelphia in 1880. Some of the cases fell under my own observation. A brief account of them is given by Mitchell in his Lectures. The outbreak occurred in a Church Home for Children, to which Dr. S. S. Stryker was physician. The Home contained ninety-five girls and six boys; all of them were well nourished and in good condition. The epidemic began by a girl having slight convulsive twitchings of the extremities, with a little numbness. Attacks returned daily; respiration became loud and crowing. She soon had all the phenomena of convulsive hysteria. Many of her comrades began to imitate her bark. Soon another girl of ten was attacked with harsh, gasping breathing, with crowing, speechlessness, clutching at her throat, and the whole series of phenomena exhibited by the first girl attacked. Nine or ten others were affected in like manner, and many of the remaining children had similar symptoms in a slight degree. At first convulsions occurred irregularly; after a while they appeared every evening; later, both morning and evening. The presence of visitors would excite them. Many interesting hysterical phases occurred among the children. One night some of them took to walking about on their hands and knees; others described visions. The girls often spoke of being surrounded by wild beasts, and one child would adopt the fiction which another related in her hearing. The cases were scattered about in different hospitals, and made good recoveries in from one to two months.

The Jumpers or Jumping Frenchmen of Maine and Northern New Hampshire were described by Beard in 1880.⁵⁵ They presented nervous phenomena in some phases allied to hysteria. In June, 1880, Beard visited Moosehead Lake and experimented with some of them. Whatever order was given them was at once obeyed. One of the Jumpers, who was sitting in a chair with a knife in his hand, was told to throw it, and he threw it quickly so that it struck in a beam opposite; at the same time he repeated the order to throw it with a cry of alarm. They were tried with Latin and Greek quotations, and repeated or echoed the sound as it came to them. They could not help repeating any word or sound that came from the person that ordered them. Any sudden or unexpected noise, as the report of a gun, the slamming of a door, etc., would cause them to exhibit some phenomena. It was dangerous to startle them where they could injure themselves, or if they had an axe, knife, or other weapon in their hands. Since the time of Beard's observation accounts of their doings have now and then found their way into newspapers. One recent account tells of one of these peculiar people jumping from a raft into the Penobscot River on an order to jump.

⁵⁵ Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, vol. vii., 1880, p. 487.

Hammond⁵⁶ has described under the name Miryachit an affection which seems to be essentially the same disorder as that of which the Jumpers are the victims. He quotes from a report of a journey from the Pacific Ocean through Asia to Europe by Lieutenant B. H. Buckingham and Ensigns Geo. C. Foulk and Walter McLean of the United States Navy, an account of this disease. The party made their first observations on this affection while on the Ussuri River in Siberia. The captain of the general staff approached the steward of the boat suddenly, and without any apparent reason or remark clapped his hand before his face; instantly the steward clapped his hand in the same manner, put on an angry look, and passed on. When the captain slapped the paddle-box suddenly, the steward instantly gave it a similar thump. Some of the passengers imitated pigs grunting or called out absurd names, etc.; the poor steward would be compelled to echo them all. The United States naval officers were informed that the affection was not uncommon in Siberia, and that it was commonest about Yakutsk, where the winter cold is extreme. Both sexes were subject to it, but men much less than women. It was known to Russians by the name of Miryachit.

⁵⁶ New York Med. Journ., Feb. 16, 1884.

In both these classes of cases a suggestion of some kind was required, and then the act took place independently of the will. “There is another analogous condition known by the Germans as Schlaftrunkenheit, and to English and American neurologists as somnolentia or sleep-drunkenness. In this state an individual on being suddenly awakened commits some incongruous act of violence, ofttimes a murder. Sometimes this appears to be a dream, but in others no such cause could be discovered.” Curious instances are mentioned by Hammond of this disorder.

The phenomena of automatism at command in hypnotized subjects have much similarity to the phenomena of these affections, and the same explanation to a certain extent will answer for both.

Paget⁵⁷ has ably discussed the subject of neuromimesis in general, and Mitchell⁵⁸ devotes two lectures to its consideration. As already stated when discussing the synonyms of hysteria, the mistake must not be made of supposing all cases of hysteria to be instances of neuromimesis; but, as Mitchell remarks, the hysterical state, however produced, is a fruitful source of mimicry of disease in its every form, from the mildest of pains up to the most complete and carefully-devised frauds. “Its sensitiveness and mobility, its timidity and emotionalness, its greed of attention, of sympathy, and of power in all shapes, supply both motive and help, so that while we must be careful not to see mimicry in every hysteric symptom, we must in people of this temperament be more than usually watchful for this form of trouble, and at least reasonably suspicious of every peculiar or unusual phenomenon.”

⁵⁷ Op. cit.

⁵⁸ Op. cit.

SYMPTOMATOLOGY.—At the outset of the discussion of the symptomatology of hysteria, hysterical cases should be divided into four classes—viz. (1) Cases in which the symptoms are involuntary; (2) cases in which the symptoms are artificially induced and become involuntary; (3) cases in which the symptoms are acted or simulated, but in which the patient, because of impaired mental power, is irresistibly impelled to their performance; (4) cases in which the symptoms are purely acts of deception which are under the control of the patient.

Keeping in mind these different classes, we will always be able to link to the phenomena of hysteria the psychical element which is present in all genuine cases of this disorder. To comprehend the existence of the psychical element in the first class, in which the manifestations are absolutely involuntary, may offer difficulties. In these cases, at a period more or less recent or remote, psychical stimuli may have acted to produce the hysterical phenomena, and, once produced, these have been repeated and intensified by habit, and continue independently both of volition and consciousness. The experiments of Dercum and Parker show how hysterical symptoms may be artificially induced and may get beyond the patient's control. The difference between induced and simulated manifestations must always be clearly borne in mind. To induce a set of phenomena a certain mechanism must be set in action, and this, through rational, explicable processes, leads to certain results. The psychical element enters here both positively and negatively—positively, in the determination to produce a certain train of events; negatively, in the condition of mental concentration or abstraction which is a part of the procedure. In the third class of cases acting or simulation is dependent upon the irresistible inclinations of the patient. This may seem to some an uncertain and even dangerous ground to take. I am convinced, however, after observing many hysterical cases, that acts clearly purposive, so far as the particular performance is concerned, are sometimes the result of a general unstable mental condition. Some at least of these patients are as irresistibly impelled to swallow blood and vomit, to scream and gesticulate, etc., as is the monomaniac to commit arson, to ravish, or to kill. In the fourth class, the cases of pure, unmitigated, uncontrollable deception, the psychical element is very evident, although some may question whether such cases should be ranged under the banner of hysteria, where it is both convenient and customary to place them.

The symptoms of hysteria may develop in any order or after any fashion. The graver hysterical phenomena, such as convulsions, paralysis, and anæsthesia, often seem to come on suddenly, but usually this suddenness of onset is apparent rather than real. Minor hysterical symptoms, such as general nervous irritability, pains, aches, and discomforts, and mental peculiarities, have usually been present for a long time. These minor evidences of the hysterical constitution are sometimes the only phenomena ever presented.

Todd⁵⁹ has described an expression of countenance which he designates as the facies hysterica. The characteristics of this expression are a remarkable depth and prominent fulness, with more or less thickness, of the upper lip, and a peculiar drooping of the upper eyelids. It would be absurd to assert that all hysterical patients presented this cast of countenance, but an appearance which approaches closely to this description is presented in a fair percentage of cases. It has seemed to me that male hysterics were more likely to have this peculiar facies than hysterical females.

⁵⁹ Reynolds's System of Medicine, vol. ii. p. 656.

The psychical peculiarities or mental disorders of hysteria form a large and important part of its phenomena. We have to deal not only with peculiar and diverse psychical manifestations, but to one form of mental disorder it is clinically convenient and correct to apply the designation hysterical insanity.

In the mildest cases of ordinary hysteria conditions of mental irritability and mobility are sometimes the only striking features. “Patients,” says Jolly,⁶⁰ “are timid, easily overcome by any unexpected occurrence, sentimental, and sensitive. Every trifle annoys and upsets them; and there is this peculiarity—that a more recent stimulus may often effect a diversion in an exactly opposite direction.”

⁶⁰ Op. cit.

As bearing upon the question of the mental state in hysteria, the confessions obtained by Mitchell from several patients are of great interest. One patient, who had learned to notice and dwell upon any little symptom, vomited daily and aroused much sympathy. She took little or no food. Spasms came on, and she confessed that every new symptom caused new anxiety, and that somehow she rather liked it all. She gradually lost all her symptoms except vomiting, and overcame this by desperate efforts. Another patient confessed to having played a game upon her doctor for a long time by pretending she took no food. She would get out of bed at night, but remain there all day; she filled up a vessel with water to make others believe she passed large quantities of urine, etc. Another patient, a girl of nineteen, who came on a litter from a Western State, after a time regained her feet. In her confession she stated that what she lacked was courage. She believed that she would have overcome her difficulties if any one had told her that nothing was the matter. “In looking back over the year with the light of the present,” she says, “I can only say that I believe that there was really nothing the matter with me; only it seemed to me as if there was, and because of these sensations I carried on a sort of starvation process physical and mental.”

The older and some of the more recent classifications of insanity recognize hysterical insanity as a distinct form of mental disease. Morel and Skae, however, in their etiological classifications, and Hammond, Spitzka, Mann, and Clouston in their recently-published works, give it a “local habitation and a name.” Krafft-Ebing not only recognizes hysterical insanity as a distinct form of mental disease, but, after the German fashion, subdivides it quite minutely, as follows: First, transitory forms: a. with fright; b. hystero-epileptic deliria; c. ecstatic visionary forms; d. moria-like conditions. Second, chronic forms: a. hystero-melancholia; b. hystero-mania; c. degenerative states with hysterical basis.

Spitzka⁶¹ speaks of chronic hysterical insanity as an intensification of the hysterical character, to which “a silly mendacity is frequently added, and develops pari passu with advancing deterioration.” At the State Hospital for the Insane at Norristown and at the department for the insane of the Philadelphia Hospital cases of chronic hysterical insanity have come under my observation. Hammond under hysterical mania includes several different and somewhat distinct mental disorders.

⁶¹ Insanity, its Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment, by E. C. Spitzka, M.D., New York, 1883.

With regard to the occurrence of hysterical manifestations amongst patients suffering from some well-recognized non-hysterical forms of insanity, a tour through any large asylum will afford abundant evidence. Cases of tremor closely simulating cerebro-spinal sclerosis have been observed frequently among the insane. Paralysis, contracture, hysterical joints, hysterical neuralgias, convulsions, and cataleptoid phenomena are among other hysterical manifestations which have fallen under personal observation among the insane of various classes.

A remarkable case of hysterical motor paralysis was observed at the State Hospital for the Insane at Norristown. This patient was an intelligent single woman about thirty-five years of age, of good family, well educated; she had been a teacher and writer, and became insane through family and business troubles. When only eight years of age she was paralyzed for two years and a half, and had had at times during her life, before becoming insane, attacks of partial or complete unconsciousness. Prior to coming under observation she had been an inmate of an English private asylum. She was sick on shipboard coming to this country, and on her arrival was in a state of delirium and insomnia, with attacks of loss of sight. Four months later she developed mania with suicidal inclinations. Just before the development of this maniacal condition her lower limbs became comparatively helpless, and soon after she entirely lost their use. I found her in this condition, and examination showed no change in knee-jerk, electrical reactions, nutrition, nor genito-urinary conditions, which led me to diagnosticate the absence of any organic spinal trouble. The case was pronounced one of hysterical paralysis, and it was prophesied that she would eventually completely recover, probably suddenly. For one year her paralysis remained, her mental condition varying very greatly during this time—sometimes in a lethargic state; sometimes with variable delusions and delirium; occasionally violent and destructive, again peaceable and pleasant; sometimes requiring strong anodynes and hypnotics. Fourteen months after her paralytic condition began, one day she suddenly threw away her crutches and ran up and down the corridor of the hospital. From that time she walked without difficulty, although her mental condition did not entirely clear.

I wish to impress the fact that because hysterical manifestations occur in a case of insanity it should not necessarily be diagnosticated as one of hysterical insanity. Monomania, melancholia, mania, paretic dementia, epileptic insanity, and other forms of mental disorder may at times have an hysterical tinge or hysterical episodes.

The whole question of hysterical insanity is one of great difficulty. The psychical element is probably at the root of all cases of hysteria, but this does not justify us, as I have already stated, in declaring that all cases of hysteria are insane. In practical professional life we must make practical distinctions. In the matter before us distinctions are necessary to be made for legal as well as medical purposes. It might be right and proper to place a case of hysterical insanity in a hospital or asylum under restraint, but no one would dare to claim that every case of hysteria should be so treated.

Hysterical insanity may be conveniently subdivided into an acute and chronic form.

Acute hysterical insanity or hysterical mania is a disorder usually, in part at least, purposive, and characterized by great emotional excitement, which shows itself in violent speech and movement, and often also in deception, simulation, and dramatic behavior. The phenomena indicated by this definition may constitute the entire case, or, in addition, the patient may have, at intervals or in alternation, various other phases of grave hysteria, such as hystero-epileptic seizures or attacks of catalepsy, trance, or ecstasy.

In chronic hysterical insanity we have a persisting abnormal mental condition, which may show itself in many ways, but chiefly as follows: (1) A form in which occur frequent repetitions, over a series of years, of the phenomena of acute hysterical insanity, such as hysterical mania, hystero-epilepsy, catalepsy, etc.; (2) a form in which sensational deceptions—sometimes undoubtedly self-deceptions—are practised.

In a case of chronic hysterical insanity you may have both of these forms commingling in varying degree, as in the following case: G—— is a seamstress, twenty-one years of age. Although young in years, she is an old hospital rounder: she has at various times been in almost all the hospitals of the city. She has been treated for such alleged serious affections as fractured ribs, hemorrhages from the lungs, stomach, and vagina, gastric ulcer, epilepsy, apoplexy, paralysis, anæsthesia of various localities, amenorrhœa, dysmenorrhœa, and fever with marvellous variations of temperature. She has become the bane and terror of every one connected with her treatment and care-taking. She has developed violent attacks of mania, with contortions and convulsions, on the streets and in churches. Sums of money have been collected for her at times by those who have become interested in her as bystanders at the time of an attack or have heard of her case from others. She has made several pseudo-attempts at suicide. Recently an empty chloroform-liniment bottle tumbled from her bed at a propitious moment, she at the same time complaining of pain and symptoms of poisoning. She has refused to partake of food, and has been discovered obtaining it surreptitiously. Her large and prolonged experience with doctors and hospitals has so posted her with reference to the symptomatology of certain nervous affections that she is able at will to get up a fair counterfeit of a large variety of grave nervous disorders.

One of her recent attacks of hysteria was preceded by a series of hysterical phenomena, such as vomiting, hemorrhage, aphonia, ovaralgia, headache, and simulation of fever. She began by crying and moaning, which was kept up for many hours. She fell out of bed, apparently insensible. Replaced in bed, she passed into a state closely simulating true acute maniacal delirium. She shrieked, cried, shouted, and moaned, threw her arms and legs about violently, and contorted her entire body, snapping and striking at the nurses and physicians in attendance. At times she would call those about her by strange names, as if unconscious of the true nature of her surroundings. Attacks of this kind were kept up for a considerable period, and after an interval of rest were repeated again and again.

Many of the extraordinary facts which fill the columns of the sensational newspapers are the results of the vagaries of patients suffering from the second of the forms of chronic hysterical insanity. “When,” says Wilks,⁶² “you see a paragraph headed ‘Extraordinary Occurrence,’ and you read how every night loud rapping is heard in some part of the house, how the rooms are being constantly set on fire, or how all the sheets in the house are torn by rats, you may be quite sure that there is a young girl on the premises.” It is unnecessary to add that said girl is of the hysterical genus.

⁶² Op. cit.

A story comes from an inland town, for instance, of a respectable family consisting, besides the parents, of three daughters and six sons, one of whom died of pneumonia. Since his death the family had been startled by exciting and remarkable events in the house—a clatter of stones on the kitchen floor, the doors and windows being closed; shoes suddenly ascending to the ceiling and then falling to the floor, etc. Search revealed nothing to explain the affair. As throwing light upon this matter, a visitor, who confessed his inability to explain the occurrences, nevertheless referred to one of the daughters as looking like a medium.