← Table of contents
The Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics

Part 2 — CHAPTER III. HISTORY OF THE STOICS UNTIL THE END OF THE SECOND CENTURY B.C.

Oswald J. (Oswald Joseph) Reichel translation

A striking feature in the history of the post-Aristotelian philosophy, and one which at the same time brings forcibly home the thorough change in its surroundings, is the fact that so many of its representatives come from eastern countries in which Greek and Oriental modes of thought met and mingled. Although for centuries Athens still continued to have the reputation of being the chief seat of Greek philosophy, and did not cease to be one of the most important seminaries of philosophy, even when it had to share that reputation with other cities, such as Alexandria, Rome, Rhodes, and Tarsus, yet at Athens itself there were teachers not a few whose foreign extraction indicates the age of Hellenism. This remark applies primarily to the later Neoplatonic School: next to it it is of none more true than of the Stoic. With this fact may be also associated the world-citizenship of this School, though it would be unfair to attribute a general characteristic of the then state of the world to purely external circumstances. Nearly all the most important Stoics before the Christian era belong by birth to Asia Minor, to Syria, and to the islands of the Eastern Archipelago. Then follow a series of Roman Stoics, by the side of whom the Phrygian Epictetus occupies a prominent place; but Greece proper is represented only by men of third or fourth rate capacity.

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · The details are differently given by Diog. 2–5; 31; Plut. Inimic. Util. 2, p. 87; and Sen. Tranq. An. 14, 3. Most accounts say that he came Note 2 · The dates in Zeno’s life are very uncertain. He is said to have been thirty when he first came to Athens (Diog. 2). Persæus, however (Ibid. Note 3 · Diog. vii. 2; vi. 105. ↑Note 4 · Diog. 3: ἐντεῦθεν ἤκουσε τοῦ Κράτητος, ἄλλως μὲν εὔτονος πρὸς φιλοσοφίαν, αἰδήμων δὲ ὡς πρὸς τὴν κυνικὴν ἀναισχυντίαν. ↑Note 5 · Conf., besides what immediately follows, Diog. 25 and 15: ἦν δὲ ζητητικὸς καὶ περὶ πάντων ἀκριβολογούμενος. ↑Note 6 · Diog. vii. 2; 4; 16; 20; 24; ii. 114; 120. Numen. in Eus. Pr. Ev. xiv. 5, 9; 6, 6. Polemo is called his teacher by Cic. Fin. iv. 16, 45; AcaNote 7 · Diog. 5, according to whom he gave instruction walking to and fro, like Aristotle, but never to more than two or three at a time (Diog. 14).Note 8 · Which, however, must be judged by the standard of that time and of Greek customs. Conf. Diog. 13; and the quotations in Athen. xiii. 607, e;Note 9 · See Musonius in Stob. Serm. 17, 43. His outward circumstances also appear to have been very simple. According to one account (Diog. 13), he Note 10 · Conf. Diog. 13; 16; 24; 26; Athen. in the passage quoted p. 36, 2; Suid.; Clem. Strom. 413, A. It is mentioned as a peculiarity of Zeno, thaNote 11 · Antigonus (conf. Athen. xiii. 603, e; Arrian, Diss. Epict. ii. 13, 14; Simpl. in Epict. Enchir. 283, c; Æl. V. H. ix. 26) was fond of his soNote 12 · He himself (Diog. vii. 18) compares the λόγοι ἀπηρτισμένοι of the ἀσόλοικοι to the elegant Alexandrian coins, which, instead of being betterNote 13 · Diog. 28, 1. The statement that he was ἄνοσος must be taken with some limitation, according to Diog. vii. 162; Stob. Floril. 17, 43. ↑Note 14 · Diog. 28; 31. Lucian, Macrob. 19. Lactant. Inst. iii. 18. Stob. Floril. 7, 45. Suid. ↑Note 15 · The list of them in Diog. 4, to which additions are made Diog. 34; 39; 134. The Διατριβαὶ (Diog. 34; Sext. Pyrrh. iii. 205; 245; Math. xi. 9Note 16 · This appears at least probable from Diog. 4: ἕως μὲν οὖν τινὸς ἤκουσε τοῦ Κράτητος· ὅτε καὶ τὴν πολιτείαν αὐτοῦ γράψαντος, τινὲς ἔλεγον παίζNote 17 · Mohnike, Cleanthes d. Sto.: Greifsw. 1814. Cleanthis Hymn. in Jovem, ed. Sturz, ed. nov. cur. Merzdorf.: Lips. 1835. ↑Note 18 · Strabo, xiii. 1, 57, p. 610. Diog. vii. 168. Ælian, Hist. Anim. vi. 50. How Clemens, Protrept. 47, A, comes to call him Πισαδεὺς, it is hardNote 19 · According to Antisthenes (the Rhodian), in Diog. l.c., Cleanthes was a pugilist, who came to Athens with four drachmæ, and entered the schooNote 20 · Aristo, son of Miltiades, a Chian, discussed most fully by Krische, Forsch. 405, known as the Siren, because of his persuasive powers, and aNote 21 · Herillus’s native place was Carthage (Diog. vii. 37; 165). If Χαλχηδόνιος is read by Cobet in the last passage, we have again the same confuNote 22 · Citium was his birthplace. His father’s name was Demetrius (Diog. 6; 36), and his own nickname Dorotheus (Suid. Περσ.). According to Diog. 3Note 23 · According to the sketch of his life in Buhle (Arat. Opp. i. 3), Aratus was a pupil of Persæus at Athens, in company with whom he repaired toNote 24 · Hence his name ὁ Μεταθέμενος. On his writings, consult Diog. vii. 166; 37; 23; v. 92; Athen. vii. 281, d; x. 437, e; Cic. Acad. ii. 22, 71; Note 25 · Diog. 177; Plut. Cleomen. 2; 11; Athen. viii. 354, e. Sphærus’ presence in Egypt seems to belong to the time before he became connected withNote 26 · Athenodorus, a native of Soli (Diog. vii. 38; 100); Callippus of Corinth (Diog. 38); Philonides of Thebes, who went with Persæus to AntigonuNote 27 · Baguet, De Chrysippo. Annal. Lovan. vol. iv. Lovan. 1822. ↑Note 28 · Εἰ μὴ γὰρ ἦν Χρύσιππος οὐκ ἂν ἦν στοά (Diog. 183). Cic. Acad. ii. 24, 75: Chrysippum, qui fulcire putatur porticum Stoicorum, Athen. viii. 3Note 29 · It is recorded (Diog. 179) that he was brought up in early life as a racer, which is an exceedingly suspicious statement, (confer D, 168); aNote 30 · According to Apollodorus in Diog. 184, he died c. 205 B.C., in his 73rd year, which would make 281 to 276 the year of his birth. According tNote 31 · This is the view of Diog. 179; Plut. De Exil. 14, p. 605; Strabo, xiii. 1. 57, p. 610; xiv. 4, 8, p. 671, and most writers. Alexander PolyhiNote 32 · On this point all authorities are agreed. When and how he came to Athens is not recorded. He subsequently obtained the rights of citizenshipNote 33 · Diog. 179. This statement cannot be tested by chronology. Authorities, however, do not look promising. ↑Note 34 · Diog. Pro. 15. Strabo, xiii. 1, 57, 610. ↑Note 35 · Diog. vii. 183. It is possible, as Ritter, iii. 524, supposes, that he was for some time doubtful about Stoicism, whilst he was under the inNote 36 · Diog. 184; iv. 62. Cic. Acad. ii. 27, 87. Plut. Sto. Rep. p. 10, 3, 1036. These passages refer particularly to Chrysippus’ six books κατὰ τῆNote 37 · When a learner, he is said to have used these words to Cleanthes: ‘Give me the principles; the proofs I can find myself.’ Subsequently it waNote 38 · Diog. 180. Athen. xiii. 565, a. Damasc. V. Isid. 36. Cic. Tusc. i. 45, 108. ↑Note 39 · Diog. 179; 183. ↑Note 40 · Diog. 185, mentions it as deserving of especial notice, that he refused the invitation of Ptolemy to court, and dedicated none of his numeroNote 41 · Cic. Acad. ii. 47, 143. Diog. 179. Plut. Sto. Rep. 4, 1, p. 1034. According to the latter passage, Antipater had written a special treatise Note 42 · Quid enim est a Chrysippo prætermissum in Stoicis? Cic. Fin. i. 2, 6. ↑Note 43 · According to Diog. 180, there were not fewer than 750. Conf. Valer. Max. viii. 7, ext. 10; Lucian, Hermotim. 48. ↑Note 44 · This appeared to the Epicureans disparaging to the honour of their master. Hence the charge that Chrysippus had written against Epicurus in Note 45 · Baguet, pp. 114–357, discusses the subject very fully, but omits several fragments. As to his logical treatises, of which alone there were 3Note 46 · See Cic. De Orat. i. 11, 50; Dionys. Hal. See above 46, 3; Diog. vii. 180; x. 27. Galen, Differ. Puls. ii. 10; vol. viii. 631 K; Hippocr. etNote 47 · The circumstances of his death are related differently in Diog. 184; but both stories are untrustworthy. The story of the ass is also told iNote 48 · In Stob. Floril. 40, 8, mention is made of the honourable position enjoyed by the Athenian Chremonides, who had been banished from his countNote 49 · Floril. 5, 67; 40, 8; 91, 33; 93, 31; 98, 72; 108, 82 and 83. ↑Note 50 · According to Suid., he was born c. 275 B.C., and died in his 80th year. ↑Note 51 · See p. 41, 2. ↑Note 52 · Conf. Diog. 54: ὁ δὲ Χρύσιππος διαφερόμενος πρὸς αὐτόν … κριτήριά φησιν εἶναι αἴσθησιν καὶ πρόληψιν. That he was junior to Aratus appears byNote 53 · We shall have occasion to prove this in speaking of his views of a criterion, and of his denial of a conflagration and destruction of the woNote 54 · This follows from the great importance of Chrysippus, and the esteem in which he was held from the very first, and is confirmed by the numbeNote 55 · Aristocreon, the nephew of Chrysippus, is the only pupil who can be definitely mentioned by name. See Diog. vii. 185; Plut. Sto. Rep. 2, 5, Note 56 · What is known of this philosopher is limited to the statements in Diog. 35; Suid. Ζήν. Διοσκ.; Eus. Pr. Ev. xv. 13, 7; Arius Didymus, Ibid. Note 57 · According to Diog. vi. 81; Lucian, Macrob. 20, he was a native of Seleucia on the Tigris; but he is sometimes called a native of Babylon (DiNote 58 · It was often supposed, on the strength of Cic. N. D. i. 15, 41, Divin. i. 3, 6, that Diogenes was the immediate successor of Chrysippus. TheNote 59 · Cic. Off. iii. 12, 51, only calls him his pupil; but it is clear that he taught in Athens from Plut. Ti. Gracch. c. 8, as Zumpt, Ueber die pNote 60 · Cic. l.c.; Strabo xiv. 4, 14, p. 674, Epictet. l.c.; Diog. vii. 55. It does not follow that they were cotemporaries, but only that their wriNote 61 · Apollodorus of Athens, the compiler of the Βιβλιοθήκη, a well-known grammarian, is also mentioned as a pupil of Diogenes (Scymnus, Chius PerNote 62 · B. Pupils of Zeno. (1) Cleanthes. The successor to the chair of Zeno was Cleanthes,20 a native of Assos in the Troad,21 a man of strong and Note 63 · (2) Aristo and Herillus. Besides Cleanthes, the best known among the pupils of Zeno are Aristo of Chios,23 and Herillus of Carthage,24 who dNote 64 · (3) Other pupils. Other pupils of Zeno were Persæus, a countryman and companion of Zeno;25 Aratus, the well-known poet of Soli;26 Dionysius Note 65 · C. Chrysippus and the later Stoics. (1) Chrysippus. It was therefore fortunate for Stoicism that Cleanthes was followed in the presidency ofNote 66 · (2) Later Stoics. A cotemporary of Chrysippus, but probably somewhat his senior, was Teles, from whose writings a few extracts51 have been pNote 67 · A. Authorities for the Stoic philosophy. (1) Review of authorities. To give a faithful exposition of the Stoic philosophy is a work of more
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings