← Table of contents
The American Indian as Participant in the Civil War

XIII. ASPECTS, CHIEFLY MILITARY, 1864-1865

Reading edition

Illustration from The American Indian as Participant in the Civil War

FACSIMILE OF MONTHLY INSPECTION REPORT OF THE FIRST CREEK REGIMENT OF MOUNTED VOLUNTEERS.

It seems a little strange that the Indians should so emphasize their national individualism at this particular time, inasmuch as six of them, the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, and Caddo, professing to be still in strict alliance with the Southern States, had formed an Indian confederacy, had collectively re-asserted their allegiance, pledged their continued support, and made reciprocal demands. All these things they had done in a joint, or general, council, which had been held at Armstrong Academy the previous November. Resolutions of the council, embodying the collective pledges and demands, were even at this very moment under consideration by President Davis and were having not a little to do with his attitude toward the whole Maxey programme.

as a separate department Indian Territory could not count upon the protection of the forces belonging to the Trans-Mississippi Department that was assured to her while she remained one of its integral parts. A distinct military district she should certainly be.

It was hoped that prospective Indian brigades would be a powerful incentive to Indian enlistment and so they proved. Moreover, much was expected in that direction from the reassembling of the general council at Armstrong Academy, and much had to be; for the times were critical. Maxey's position was not likely to be a sinecure. As a friend wrote him,

Northern Texas and the Indian Department have been neglected so long that they have become the most difficult and the most responsible commands in the Trans-Mississippi Department. I tremble for you. A great name is in store for you or you fall into the rank of failures; the latter may be your

Whereas, the final issue of the present struggle between the North and South involves the destiny of the Indian Territory alike with that of the Confederate States: Therefore,

Resolved, That we, the Cherokee Troops, C.S. Army, do

As a corollary to reorganization, the three brigade plan was now put tentatively into operation. It was, in truth, "a fine recruiting order," and Commissioner Scott, when making his annual rounds in August, was able to report to Secretary Seddon,

propaganda work he had no peer. At Fort Towson, his headquarters, he had set up a printing press, from which issued many and many a document, the purpose of each and every one the same. The following quotation from one of Maxey's letters illustrates the purpose and, at the same time, exhibits the methods and the temper of the man behind it. The matter he was discussing when writing was the Camden campaign, in connection with which, he said,

... In the address of General Smith the soldiers of Arkansas, Missouri, Texas, and Louisiana are specially named. The soldiers from this Territory bore an humbler part in the campaign, and although they did not do a great deal, yet a fair share of the killed, wounded, captured, and captured property and cannon can be credited to them. I had a number of General Smith's address struck off for circulation here, and knowing the omission would be noticed and felt, I inserted after Louisiana, "and of the Indian Territory," which I hope will not meet General Smith's disapproval.

I would suggest that want of transportation in this Territory will cripple movements very much....

During my absence General Cooper urged General McCulloch to help him in this particular; General M. replies he can do "absolutely nothing." I am not disposed to complain about anything, but I do think this thing ought to be understood and regulated. Supplies of breadstuffs and forage, as well as clothing, sugar, etc., all having to be drawn from beyond the limits of this Territory, a more than ordinary supply of transportation is necessary. To that for the troops must be added that made necessary by the destitute thrown on the hands of the Government and who must be taken care of. I do not expect General Smith to investigate and study the peculiar

characteristics of command here so closely as I have. He hasn't the time, nor is it necessary. In my opinion no effort should be spared to hold this country. Its loss would work a more permanent injury than the loss of any State in the Confederacy. States can be recovered—the Indian Territory, once gone, never. Whites, when exiled by a cruel foe, find friends amongst their race; Indians have nowhere to go. Let the enemy once occupy the country to Red River and the Indians give way to despair. I doubt whether many of the highest officials in our Government have ever closely studied this subject. It is the great barrier to the empire State of the South from her foe now and in peace. Let Federalism reach the Red River, the effects will not stop there. The doctrine of uti possidetis may yet play an important part.

supply trains were his objective, but not always. The refugees were coming back from Kansas and their new home beginnings were mercilessly preyed upon by their Confederate fellow tribesmen, who felt for the owners a vindictive hatred that knew no relenting.

Had the force at Fort Gibson been at all adequate to the needs of the country it was supposed to defend, such raids as Watie's would have been an utter impossibility. Thanks to Federal indifference and mismanagement, however, the safety of Indian Territory was

Great as Maxey's services to Indian Territory had been and yet were, he was not without his traducers and Cooper was chief among them, his overweening

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · Footnote 902: (return) Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 917.Note 2 · Footnote 903: (return) Boudinot to Davis, January 4, 1864 [ibid., vol. liii, supplement, 920-921]. Boudinot also suggested other things, somNote 3 · Footnote 904: (return) —Ibid., vol. xxxiv, part ii, 858.Note 4 · In the matter of army reorganization, Smith was prepared to concede to Maxey a large discretion.902 The brigading that would most comfortablNote 5 · Footnote 905: (return) Maxey to Smith, January 15, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 875.Note 6 · Footnote 906: (return) —Ibid., vol. xxii, part ii, 1101-1102.Note 7 · Footnote 907: (return) —Ibid., vol. xxxiv, part ii, 845, 848.Note 8 · Footnote 908: (return) So Smith explained [ibid., 845, when Steele objected to staying in the Indian Territory in a subordinate capacity [ibNote 9 · Footnote 909: (return) Boudinot to Davis, February 11, 1864, ibid., 968.Note 10 · Footnote 910: (return) Seddon to Davis, February 22, 1864, ibid., 968-969.Note 11 · Footnote 911: (return) Richardson, Messages and Papers of the Confederacy, vol. i, 477-479; Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part iii, 824-825.Note 12 · preference for the two brigade plan.905 The promotion of Cooper, implicit in the three brigade plan, was not at all pleasing to General SmitNote 13 · The formation of brigades was only one of the Indian demands that had emanated from the general council. Another was, the establishment of INote 14 · Footnote 912: (return) Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 848; Special Orders of the Adjutant and Inspector General's Office, 1864, ConfNote 15 · Footnote 913: (return) Cooper to Davis, February 29, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 1007.Note 16 · Footnote 914: (return) —Ibid., 1008.Note 17 · When Davis wrote, the ambition of Cooper had, in a measure, been satisfied; for he had been put in command of all "the Indian troops in the Note 18 · Footnote 915: (return) S.A. Roberts to Maxey, February 1, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 936-937.Note 19 · Footnote 916: (return) Seddon to Scott, January 6, 1864, ibid., 828-829.Note 20 · Footnote 917: (return) Moty Kanard, late principal chief of the Creek Nation, spoke of it as a noble address and begged for a copy [ibid., 9Note 21 · Footnote 918: (return) Vore to Maxey, January 29, 1864, ibid., 928; Maxey to Anderson, February 9, 1864, ibid., 958; same to same, February Note 22 · Footnote 919: (return) Inasmuch as the alliance with the Indians of the Plains was never fully consummated and inasmuch as these Indians harNote 23 · fate, and might be the fate of any man, even after an entire and perfect devotion of all one's time and talent, for want of the proper meansNote 24 · With a view to strengthening the Indian alliance and accomplishing all that was necessary to make it effective, Commissioner Scott was orderNote 25 · Footnote 920: (return) Cooper to Maxey, February, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 959. The report reached Phillips that the ChoNote 26 · Footnote 921: (return) Although Davis's address of February 22 could well, in point of chronology, have been an answer to the applications aNote 27 · Footnote 922: (return) Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 10.Note 28 · Footnote 923: (return) Ewing wanted the command of Indian Territory, ibid., 89.Note 29 · and Cooper was forced, so he said, to "put the members of the grand council to work on" him.920 It was Cooper's wish, evidently, that the coNote 30 · In January and so anterior to most of the foregoing incidents, the shaking of the political dice in Washington, D.C., had brought again intoNote 31 · Footnote 924: (return) Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 167, 187.Note 32 · Footnote 925: (return) —Ibid., 188.Note 33 · Footnote 926: (return) Lane, Wilder, and Dole, requested that Blunt be summoned to Washington [ibid., 52].Note 34 · Footnote 927: (return) See Phillips's address to his soldiers, January 30, 1864, ibid., 190.Note 35 · Footnote 928: (return) Phillips to Curtis, February 16, 1864, ibid., part i, 106-108.Note 36 · Footnote 929: (return) Richardson, Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. vi, 213-215.Note 37 · Arkansas; for Steele had control over all Federal forces within the political and geographical boundaries of the state that gave the name toNote 38 · But politics had nothing whatever to do with an event more notable still. With the first of February began one of the most remarkable expediNote 39 · Footnote 930: (return) To Governor Colbert of the Chickasaw Nation [Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part i, 109-110], to the Council of the ChNote 40 · Footnote 931: (return) Phillips to Curtis, February 24, 1864, ibid., part i, 108-109.Note 41 · Footnote 932: (return) For the itinerary of the course, see ibid., 111-112.Note 42 · of secessionist persuasion he sent messages of encouragement and good-will.930 More sanguine than circumstances really justified, he returneNote 43 · Footnote 933: (return) F. Steele to S. Breck, March 27, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 751.Note 44 · Footnote 934: (return) T.M. Scott to Maxey, April 12, 1864, ibid., part iii, 762.Note 45 · Footnote 935: (return) This matter is very much generalized here for the reason that it properly belongs in the volume on reconstruction thaNote 46 · Footnote 936: (return) February 23, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 408.Note 47 · Footnote 937: (return) John M. Thayer to Charles A. Dana, March 15, 1864, ibid., 617.Note 48 · The explanation of Phillips's whole proceeding during the month of February is to be found in his genuine friendship for the Indian, which eNote 49 · Blunt's journey to Washington had results, complimentary and gratifying to his vanity because publicly vindicatory. On the twenty-seventh ofNote 50 · Footnote 938: (return) Thayer to Grant, March 11, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 566.Note 51 · Footnote 939: (return) —Ibid., part iii, 192, 196.Note 52 · Footnote 940: (return) —Ibid., part ii, 651. Blunt would have preferred Scullyville [ibid., part iii, 13].Note 53 · Footnote 941: (return) Blunt to Curtis, March 30, 1864, ibid., part ii, 791.Note 54 · Footnote 942: (return) Blunt to Phillips, April 3, 1864, ibid., part iii, 32; Phillips to Curtis, April 5, 1864, ibid., 52-53.Note 55 · Footnote 943: (return) Curtis had ordered the completion of the fortifications which might be taken to imply that he too was not favoring a Note 56 · western counties of Arkansas938 so as to round out the Department of Kansas. To them it was absurd that Fort Smith should be within their juNote 57 · Footnote 944: (return) Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part ii, 1034, 1036.Note 58 · Footnote 945: (return) Maxey to Smith, April 3, 1864, ibid., part iii, 728-729.Note 59 · Footnote 946: (return) For Steele's opposition to Adair's predatory movements, see Confederate Records, chap. 2, nos. 267, 268.Note 60 · Among the southern Indians, Maxey's reconstruction policy was all this time having its effect. It was revitalizing the Indian alliance with Note 61 · Footnote 947: (return) Williamson to Maxey, April 28, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part i, 845.Note 62 · Footnote 948: (return) It had not been Smith's intention that he should go out of his own district, where his services were indispensable, uNote 63 · Footnote 949: (return) __Ibid., part i, 1011-1013; part iv, 686-687.Note 64 · eighteenth of April, offered a thorough test of what Indians could do when well disciplined, well officered, and well considered. The IndianNote 65 · Price's call for help had come before Maxey had taken more than the most preliminary of steps towards the reorganization of his forces and nNote 66 · Footnote 950: (return) Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part iv, 694.Note 67 · Footnote 951: (return) __Ibid., 695.Note 68 · Footnote 952: (return) Stand Watie to Cooper, June 27, 1864, ibid., part i, 1013.Note 69 · It was under the inspiration of such recent victories that the southern Indians took up for consideration the matter of reënlistment, the exNote 70 · The First Brigade was not behindhand except in point of time by a few days. All Cherokee military units were summoned to Watie's camp on LimNote 71 · Footnote 953: (return) Official Records, vol. xli, part ii, 1013.Note 72 · Footnote 954: (return) —Ibid., 1046-1047. The general council of the confederated tribes had recommended an increase in the armed force of INote 73 · Footnote 955: (return) —Ibid., vol. xli, part ii, 1078. For additional facts concerning the progress of reorganization, see Portlock to MarsNote 74 · Footnote 956: (return) The most significant of Maxey's rulings was that on official precedence. His position was that no race or color line Note 75 · unanimously re-enlist as soldiers for the war, be it long or short.953Note 76 · No action was taken on the policy of conscription; but, in July, the Cherokee National Council met and, to it, Chief Watie proposed the enacNote 77 · It is proposed to organize them into three brigades, to be called the Cherokee, Choctaw, and Creek Brigades; the Cherokee Brigade, composed Note 78 · Behind all this virility was General Maxey. Without him, it is safe to say, the war for the Indians would have ended in the preceding winterNote 79 · Footnote 957: (return) Maxey to Boggs, May 11, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part iii, 820.Note 80 · Footnote 958: (return) For progress reached in reorganization by October, see orders issued by direction of Maxey, ibid., vol. liii, supplemNote 81 · I believe from what I have heard that Mr. Davis has a fair knowledge of this subject, and I think from conversations with General Smith he hNote 82 · Military reorganization958 for the Indian troops had, in reality, come too late. Confederate warfare all along the frontier, in the summer aNote 83 · Footnote 959: (return) Cooper to T.M. Scott, October 1, 1864, Official Records, vol. xli, part i, 783; Watie to T.B. Heiston, October 3, 186Note 84 · Footnote 960: (return) —Ibid., 793, 794. Cooper described it "as brilliant as any one of the war" [ibid., 783] and Maxey confessed that he hNote 85 · Footnote 961: (return) Maxey to Boggs, October 9, 1864, ibid., part iii, 990.Note 86 · Footnote 962: (return) Cooper to Bell, October 6, 1864, ibid., 982-984.Note 87 · Footnote 963: (return) Curtis Johnson to W.H. Morris, September 20, 1864 [ibid., part i, 774].Note 88 · Watie's last great raid was another Cabin Creek affair that reversed the failure of two years before. It occurred in September and was underNote 89 · Footnote 964: (return) Official Records, vol. xli, part iii, 301. Wattles was not at Fort Gibson a month before he was told to be prepared tNote 90 · of less consequence now than it had been before. The incorporation with the Department of Arkansas and the consequent separation from that oNote 91 · Footnote 965: (return) Official Records, vol. xli, part iv, 1035-1037; vol. liii, supplement, 1027.Note 92 · Footnote 966: (return) In July, 1864, orders issued from Richmond for the retirement of Maxey and the elevation of Cooper [ibid., part ii, 1Note 93 · Footnote 967: (return) Official Records, vol. xlviii, part i, 1382.Note 94 · Footnote 968: (return) —Ibid., 1403.Note 95 · Footnote 969: (return) —Ibid., 1408.Note 96 · Footnote 970: (return) —Ibid.Note 97 · Footnote 971: (return) The evidence for this is chiefly in Cooper's own letter book. One published letter is especially valuable in this conNote 98 · ambition being still unsatisfied. In November, at a meeting of the general council for the confederated tribes, Maxey spoke965 in his own deNote 99 · But Smith was mistaken in his prognostications. The change was not just but it did work beneficially. Cooper knew how to manage the Indians,Note 100 · Footnote 972: (return) For Phillips's own account of his reinstallment, see his letter to Herron, January 16, 1865, ibid., part i, 542-543.Note 101 · Footnote 973: (return) Smith to Pike, April 8, 1864, ibid., part ii, 1266-1269. It was necessary to have someone else beside Throckmorton, wNote 102 · Footnote 974: (return) Smith issued him a commission however. See ibid., 1266.Note 103 · Footnote 975: (return) —Ibid., 604-606.Note 104 · Phillips was again in charge of their northern compatriots972 and, at Fort Gibson, he, too, was handling Indians carefully. It was in a finaNote 105 · LITTLE ROCK,976 December 30, 1862.Note 106 · Footnote 956: (return) (cont.) the relative rank of officers [Maxey to Cooper, June 29, 1864, Official Records, vol. xxxiv, part iv, 698-699
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings