← Table of contents
The American Indian as Participant in the Civil War

VI. GENERAL PIKE IN CONTROVERSY WITH GENERAL HINDMAN

Reading edition

To one of Pike's proud spirit, such orders could be nothing short of galling. He had collected his force and everything he possessed appertaining to it at the cost of much patience, much labor, much expense. Untiring vigilance had alone made possible the formation of his brigade and an unselfish willingness to advance his own funds had alone furnished it with quartermaster and commissary stores. McCulloch and Van

With the thought of that ingratitude still rankling in his breast, Pike noted additional features of Hindman's first instructions to him, which were, that he should advance his Indian force to the northern border of Indian Territory and hold it there to resist invasion from Kansas. He was expected to do this unsupported

by white troops, the need of which, for moral as well as for physical strength, he had always insisted upon.

affairs in the West and should be dealt with analytically, yet also as a whole; since no paraphrase, no mere synopsis of contents could ever do the subject justice. From the facts presented, it is only too evident that very little had been attempted or done by the Richmond authorities for the Indian regiments. Neither officers nor men had been regularly or fully paid. And not all the good intentions, few as they were, of the central government had been allowed realization. They had been checkmated by the men in control west of the Mississippi. In fact, the army men in Arkansas had virtually exploited Pike's command, had appropriated for their own use his money, his supplies, and had never permitted anything to pass on to Indian Territory, notwithstanding that it had been bought with Indian funds, "that was fit to be sent anywhere else." The Indian's portion was the "refuse," as Pike so truly, bitterly, and emphatically put it, or, in other words of his, the "crumbs" that fell from the white man's table.

Respecting the forward movement of the Indian troops, Pike made not the slightest observation in his

During the night Pike must have pondered deeply

Of the Indian contingent, Russell had this to say:

the Salt Plains and Santa Fé road; but the withdrawal of Colonel Dawson's regiment prevents that, and the regiment is now ordered to take position here, and the battalion to march to and take position at Camp McIntosh, 17 miles this side of Fort Cobb, where, with Hart's Spies, 40 in number, it will send out parties to the Wichita Mountains and up the False Wichita, and prevent, if possible, depredations on the frontier of Texas.

Included in Russell's report there might well have been much interesting data respecting the condition of the troops that Pike was parting with; for it can scarcely be said that he manifested any generosity in sending them forth. He obeyed the letter of his order and ignored its spirit. He permitted no guns to be taken out of the Territory that had been paid for with money that he had furnished. Dawson's regiment had not its full quota of men, but that was scarcely Pike's fault. Neither was it his fault that its equipment was so sadly below par that it could make but very slow progress on the nine hundred mile march between Fort McCulloch and Little Rock. Moreover, the health of the

So slowly and laboriously did Dawson's regiment progress that Hindman, not hearing either of it or of Woodruff's battery, which was slightly in advance, began to have misgivings as to the fate of his orders of May 31. He, therefore, repeated them in substance, on June 17, with the additional specific direction that Pike should "move at once to Fort Gibson." That order Pike received June 24, the day following his issuance of instructions to his next in command, Colonel D.H. Cooper, that he should hasten to the country north of the Canadian and there take command of all forces except Chief Jumper's.

twenty-fifth and not until the twenty-seventh could they be proceeded against as deserters. Not until that date, too, would the reorganization, preliminary to marching, be possible. He was short of transportation and half of what he had was unserviceable.

Of his available Indian force, he had made what disposition to him seemed best. He had ordered the newly-organized First Choctaw Regiment, under Colonel Sampson Folsom, to Fort Gibson and had assigned Cooper to the command north of the Canadian, which meant, of course, the Cherokee country. Cooper's own regiment was the First Choctaw and Chickasaw, of which, two companies, proceeding from Scullyville, had already posted themselves in the upper part of the Indian Territory, where also were the two Cherokee regiments, Watie's and Drew's. The remaining eight companies of the First Choctaw and Chickasaw were encamped near Fort McCulloch and would have, before moving elsewhere, to await the reorganization of their regiment, now near at hand. However, Cooper was not without hope that he could effect reorganization promptly and take at least four companies to join those that had just come from Scullyville. There were six companies in the Chickasaw Battalion, two at Fort Cobb and four on the march to Fort McCulloch; but they would all have to be left within their own country for they were averse to moving out of it and were in no condition to move. The three companies of the Choctaw Battalion would also have to be left behind in the south for they had no transportation with which to effect a removal. The Creek commands, D.N. McIntosh's Creek Regiment, Chilly McIntosh's Creek Battalion, and John Jumper's Seminole Battalion, were operating in the west, along

the Santa Fé Trail and towards Forts Larned and Wise.

His indignation must have been immense; but whether righteously so or not, it was for others higher up to decide. That Pike had some sort of a case against the men in Arkansas there can be no question. The tale he told Secretary Randolph was a revelation such as would have put ordinary men, if involved at all, to deepest shame. Hindman, perforce, was the victim of accumulated resentment; for he, personally, had done only a small part of that of which Pike complained. In the main, Pike's report simply furnished particulars in matters, such as the despoiling him of his hard-won supplies, of which mention has already been made; and his chief accusation was little more than hinted at, the gist of it being suggested in some of his concluding sentences:

I know nothing about Major Pearce as a quartermaster nor of any right Major-General Hindman has to make him one. He is an assistant commissary of subsistence, with the rank of major, and Major Quesenbury, my brigade or department quartermaster, is major by an older commission....

No officer of the Missouri State Guard, whatever his rank, unless he has a command adequate to his rank, can ever exercise or assume any military authority in the Indian country, and much less assume command of any Confederate troops or

compare rank with any officer in the Confederate service. The commissioned colonels of Indian regiments rank precisely as if they commanded regiments of white men, and will be respected and obeyed accordingly.

His provocations were very great. As was perfectly

Hindman's position throughout this affair was not

changing nothing as regarded the facts but showing a willingness to let bygones be bygones. Considering how great had been his chagrin, his indignation, and his poignant sense of ingratitude and wrong, he rose to heights really noble. He seemed desirous, even anxious, that the great cause in which they were both so vitally interested should be uppermost in both their minds always and that their differences, which, after all, were, comparatively speaking, so very petty, should be forgotten forever. It was in the spirit of genuine helpfulness that he wrote and also in the spirit of great magnanimity. Pike was a man who studied the art of war zealously, who knew the rules of European warfare, and a man, who, even in war times, could read Napier's Peninsular War and succumb to its charm. He was a classicist and a student very much more than a man of action. Could those around him, far meaner souls many of them than he, have only known and remembered that and, remembering it, have made due allowances for his vagaries, all might have been well. His generous letter of the third of July failed utterly of its mission; but not so much, perhaps, because of Hindman's inability to appreciate it or unwillingness to meet its writer half-way, as because of the very seriousness of Hindman's own military situation, which made all compromises impossible. The things he felt it incumbent upon him to do must be done his way or not at all. The letter of July 3 could scarcely have been received before the objectionable orders of July 8 had been planned.

The last ten days of July were days of constant scouting on the part of both the Federal and Confederate Indians but nothing of much account resulted. Colonel W.A. Phillips of the Third Indian Home Guard,

Remain true, I earnestly advise you, to the Confederate States and yourselves. Do not listen to any men who tell you that the Southern States will abandon you. They will not do it. If the enemy has been able to come into the Cherokee country it has not been the fault of the President; and it is but the fortune of war, and what has happened in Maryland, Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, and even Arkansas. We have not been able to keep the enemy from our frontier anywhere; but in the interior of our country we can defeat them always.

Be not discouraged, and remember, above all things, that you can have nothing to expect from the enemy. They will have no mercy on you, for they are more merciless than wolves and more rapacious. Defend your country with what help you

can get until the President can send you troops. If the enemy ever comes to the Canadian he cannot go far beyond that river. The war must soon end since the recent victories near Richmond, and no treaty of peace will be made that will give up any part of your country to the Northern States. If I am not again placed in command of your country some other officer will be in whom you can confide. And whatever may be told you about me, you will soon learn that if I have not defended the whole country it was because I had not the troops with which to do it; that I have cared for your interest alone; that I have never made you a promise that I did not expect, and had not a right to expect, to be able to keep, and that I have never broken one intentionally nor except by the fault of others.

of Chief Ross's complaint to Hindman. If so, it was all important that he should vindicate himself. So maligned had he been that his sensitiveness on the score of the discharge of his duties was very natural, very pardonable. After all he had done for the Confederacy and for the Indians, it seemed hardly right that he should be blamed for all that others had failed to do. His motives were pure and could not be honestly impugned by anybody. The address was an error of judgment but it was made with the best of intentions.

Richmond, Va., August 9, 1862.

Brig. Gen. Albert Pike,

Camp McCulloch, Choctaw Nation:

the Army the publication of this circular was a grave military offense, and if the purpose was to abate an evil, by making an appeal that would be heeded by me, the mode taken was one of the slowest and worst that could have been adopted.

Very respectfully, yours, Jefferson Davis.

... I approved his action, and ordered General Pike sent to Little Rock in custody. I also forwarded Colonel Cooper's letter to Richmond, with an indorsement, asking to withdraw my approval of General Pike's resignation, that I might bring him before a court-martial on charges of falsehood, cowardice, and treason. He was also liable to the penalties prescribed by section 29 of the act of Congress regulating intercourse with the Indians and to preserve peace on the frontiers, approved April 8, 1862....

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · Footnote 392: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 934.Note 2 · Footnote 393: (return) Van Dorn would seem to have been a gross offender in this respect. Similar charges were made against him by other menNote 3 · Footnote 394: (return) It was matter of common report that Van Dorn despised Pike's Indians [ibid., vol. xiii, 814-816]. The entire ArkansasNote 4 · Footnote 395: (return) How great was that stigma can be best understood from the following: "The horde of Indians scampered off to the mountNote 5 · Dorn393 each in turn had diverted his supplies from their destined course, yet he had borne with it all, uncomplainingly. He had even brokenNote 6 · Footnote 396: (return) Pike had fought a duel with Roane, Roane having challenged him because he had dared to criticize his conduct in the MNote 7 · Footnote 397: (return) Maury to Roane, May 11, 1862, Official Records, vol. xiii, 827.Note 8 · Footnote 398: (return) Maury to Pike, May 19, 1862, ibid.Note 9 · Footnote 399: (return) Pike to Roane, June 1, 1862, ibid., 935-936.Note 10 · Footnote 400: (return) General Orders, June 8, 1862, ibid., 943.Note 11 · Footnote 401: (return) Pike to Hindman, June 8, 1862, ibid., 936-943.Note 12 · It is quite believable that Van Dorn was the person most responsible for Hindman's interference with Pike, although, of course, the very serNote 13 · Pike received Hindman's communication of May 31 late in the afternoon of June 8 and he replied to it that same evening immediately after he Note 14 · The reply401 as it stands in the records today is a strong indictment of the Confederate management of IndianNote 15 · Footnote 402: (return) C.L. Dawson of the Nineteenth Regiment of Arkansas Volunteers had joined Pike at Fort McCulloch in April [Fort Smith Note 16 · Pike's compliance with Hindman's orders was only partial and he offered not the vestige of an apology that it was so. What he did send was DNote 17 · Footnote 403: (return) His enemies were particularly scornful of his work in this regard. They poked fun at him on every possible occasion. Note 18 · reply. His silence was ominous. Perhaps it was intended as a warning to Hindman not to encroach too far upon his department; but that is merNote 19 · Footnote 404: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 943-945.Note 20 · Footnote 405: (return) For tabulated showing of Pike's brigade, see ibid., 831.Note 21 · Footnote 406: (return) Compare Russell's statement with Hindman's [ibid., 30]. See also Maury to Price, March 22, 1862 [ibid., vol. viii, 79Note 22 · Footnote 407: (return) The parentheses appear here as in the original.Note 23 · over things omitted from his reply to Hindman and over all that was wanting to make his compliance with Hindman's instructions full and satiNote 24 · The two Cherokee regiments are near the Kansas line, operating on that frontier. Col. Stand Watie has recently had a skirmish there, in whicNote 25 · Footnote 408: (return) Pike had just received assurances of the friendly disposition of the Kiowas [Bickel to Pike, June 1, 1862, Official RNote 26 · Footnote 409: (return) The enemy in mind was the Indian Expedition. Pike had heard that Sturgis had been removed "on account of his tardinesNote 27 · The First Choctaw and Chickasaw Regiment, of Col. Douglas H. Cooper, goes out of service on the 25th and 26th of July. It is now encamped 11Note 28 · The Indian troops have been instructed, if the enemy409 invades the country, to harass him, and impede his progress by every possible means,Note 29 · Footnote 410: (return) Dawson to Hindman, June 20, 1862, Official Records, vol. xiii, 945-946.Note 30 · Footnote 411: (return) Dawson had allowed his wagons to go "of his own motion" [Pike to Hindman, June 24, 1862, ibid., 947].Note 31 · Footnote 412: (return) —Ibid., 947-950.Note 32 · men was impaired, their duties, especially the "fort duties, throwing up intrenchments, etc.,"410 had been very fatiguing. Pike had no wagonNote 33 · The receipt of Hindman's order of June 17 was the signal for Pike to pen another lengthy letter412 of description and protest. Interspersed Note 34 · Footnote 413: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 967.Note 35 · Footnote 414: (return) —Ibid., 946.Note 36 · Footnote 415: (return) —Ibid., 968, 968-969, 969.Note 37 · Footnote 416: (return) —Ibid., 841-844.Note 38 · Footnote 417: (return) George W. Randolph.Note 39 · June 17 might be said to mark the beginning of the real controversy between Pike and Hindman; for, on that day, not only did Hindman reiteraNote 40 · Footnote 418: (return) "George E. White, formerly a partner, I believe, of Senator Oldham of Texas..."—Official Records, vol. xiii, 842.Note 41 · ... I struggled for a good while before I got rid of the curse of dependence for subsistence, transportation, and forage on officers at FortNote 42 · Footnote 419: (return) George W. Clark, Official Records, vol. xiii.Note 43 · Footnote 420: (return) For an equally vigorous statement on this score, see Pike to Randolph, June 30, 1862 [ibid., 849].Note 44 · Footnote 421: (return) —Ibid., 846-847, 848-849, 850-851, 852.Note 45 · Footnote 422: (return) Chilly McIntosh to Pike, June 9, 1862, ibid., 853; Pike to Chilly McIntosh, July 6, 1862, ibid., 853-854.Note 46 · Footnote 423: (return) July 5, 1862 [ibid., 963-965; July 8, 1862 [ibid., 965-967].Note 47 · Footnote 424: (return) —ibid., 844-845.Note 48 · I could get up a mule factory now with the skeletons I have, and there are a few miles from here 600 or 800 sent up by Major Clark419 in eveNote 49 · While I am here there will be no fine contracts for mules, hay, keeping of mules, beef on the hoof at long figures, or anything of the kind.Note 50 · Subsequent communications421 from Pike to Randolph reported the continued despoiling of his command and the persistent infringement of PearcNote 51 · Footnote 425: (return) Pike to Pearce, July 1, 1862, Official Records, vol. xiii, 967.Note 52 · Footnote 426: (return) One of the best statements of the case by Pike is to be found in a letter from him to Stand Watie, June 27, 1862 [ibiNote 53 · Footnote 427: (return) For some of Cooper's statements, illustrative of his position, see his letter to Pike, February 10, 1862 [ibid., 896]Note 54 · Footnote 428: (return) It was at the express wish of Stand Watie and Drew that Hindman placed Clarkson in the Cherokee country [Carroll to PNote 55 · With the same confidence in the justness of his own cause, he called425 Pearce's attention to an act of Congress which seemed "to have escapNote 56 · In some of his contentions, General Pike was most certainly on strong ground and never on stronger than when he argued that the Indians wereNote 57 · Footnote 429: (return) Ross to Hindman, June 25, 1862, Official Records, vol. xiii, 950-951. A little while before, Ross had complained, in Note 58 · Footnote 430: (return) Pike had his traducers. The Texans and Arkansans circulated infamous stories about him. See his reference to the sameNote 59 · Kansas? And why, when the unionist Indian Expedition was threatening Fort Gibson, Tahlequah, and Cherokee integrity generally, did he not haNote 60 · In addressing General Hindman as Pike's superior officer, John Ross did something more than make representations as to the claims, which hisNote 61 · Footnote 431: (return) July 3.Note 62 · Footnote 432: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 854.Note 63 · Footnote 433: (return) First, probably only in the sense that it was the first to be received.Note 64 · Footnote 434: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 857.Note 65 · Footnote 435: (return) —Ibid., 856-857.Note 66 · Footnote 436: (return) Pike to Hindman, July 15, 1862 [ibid., 858; Pike to Secretary of War, July 20, 1862 [ibid., 856].Note 67 · natural, the Confederate defeat at Locust Grove counted heavily against him.431 On the seventh of July, Hindman began a new attack upon him Note 68 · The second435 set of orders, dated July 8, was of a tenor much the same, just as insulting, just as peremptory. The only difference of note Note 69 · Footnote 437: (return) In September, Hindman declared he had never had any knowledge of the order creating Pike's department [Official RecorNote 70 · Footnote 438: (return) He instituted martial law, June 30, 1862 and, although he believed he had precedent in Pike's own procedure, Pike criNote 71 · Footnote 439: (return) Pike to Hindman, July 15, 1862.Note 72 · Footnote 440: (return) Hindman's Report [Official Records, vol. xiii, 40]Note 73 · Footnote 441: (return) Pike to the Secretary of War, July 20, 1862 [ibid., 859].Note 74 · Footnote 442: (return) —Ibid., 954-962.Note 75 · destitute of justification.437 One has only to read his general reports to appreciate how heavy was the responsibility that rested upon him.Note 76 · Pike's definite break with Hindman was, perhaps, more truly a consummation of Hindman's wishes than of Pike's own. On the third of July, as Note 77 · Footnote 443: (return) Phillips to Furnas, July 27, 1862, Official Records, vol. xiii, 181-182.Note 78 · Footnote 444: (return) Same to same, August 6, 1862, ibid., 183-184.Note 79 · Footnote 445: (return) Cooper reported that Pike regarded the Indian Expedition as only a "jayhawking party," and "no credit due" "for arresNote 80 · whose command had been left by Furnas to scout around Tahlequah and Fort Gibson, came into collision with Stand Watie's force on the twenty-Note 81 · Pike had his own opinion of Cooper and Watie's daring methods of fighting and most decidedly disapproved of their attempting to meet the eneNote 82 · Footnote 446: (return) Pike to the Secretary of War, July 20, 1862, Official Records, vol. xiii, 859-860.Note 83 · Footnote 447: (return) —Ibid., 869-871.Note 84 · small bodies of mounted Indians and white troops to the Arkansas."446Note 85 · No doubt it was in repudiation of all responsibility for what Cooper and Watie might eventually do that he chose soon to bring himself, throNote 86 · Footnote 448: (return) Pike gives this as the effect of his proclamation: "... it effected what I desired. The Choctaw force was immediatelyNote 87 · The only fair way to judge Pike's farewell address to his Indian charges is to consider it in the light of its effect upon them, intended anNote 88 · Footnote 449: (return) Official Records, vol. liii, supplement, 822.Note 89 · Footnote 450: (return) —Ibid., vol. xiii, 860-869.Note 90 · Footnote 451: (return) —Ibid., vol. liii, supplement, 820-821.Note 91 · Footnote 452: (return) It is possible that the printed circular here referred to was some other one that was directly addressed to the presiNote 92 · And so the authorities at Richmond seem to have regarded it; that is, if the reference in President Davis's letter449 to Pike of August 9 isNote 93 · General: Your communication of July 3 is at hand. I regret the necessity of informing you that it is an impropriety for an officer of the ArNote 94 · Footnote 453: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 903; Pike to Holmes, December 30, 1862, Pike Papers, Library of the Supreme Council, 33ºNote 95 · Footnote 454: (return) Official Records, vol. xiii, 970.Note 96 · Footnote 455: (return) This is inferred from the very peculiar General Orders that issued from Fort McCulloch that selfsame day. They were sNote 97 · Footnote 456: (return) —Ibid., 973, 974.Note 98 · Footnote 457: (return) —Ib id., 973.Note 99 · Footnote 458: (return) Pike to Hindman, July 31, 1862, ibid., 973.Note 100 · The sympathy of Secretary Randolph was conceivably with Pike; for, on the fourteenth of July, he wrote assuring him that certain general ordNote 101 · Footnote 459: (return) And yet, August 1, 1862, Pike wrote to Davis one of the sanest papers he ever prepared. It was full of sage advice asNote 102 · Footnote 460: (return) Pike to S. Cooper, August 3, 1862, ibid., 975. See also Pike to Newton, August 3, 1862, ibid., 976.Note 103 · Footnote 461: (return) D.H. Cooper to Hindman, August 7, 1862, ibid., 977.Note 104 · Footnote 462: (return) Pike to Anderson, October 26, 1862, ibid., 903.Note 105 · Footnote 463: (return) Hindman's Report, ibid., 41.Note 106 · soon as he had, the whole situation changed. He had deliberately put himself in the wrong and into the hands of his enemies. The address wasNote 107 · Not until August 6 did General Pike's circular address reach Colonel D.H. Cooper, who was then at Cantonment Davis. Cooper wisely suppressedNote 108 · But his resignation had been accepted....463
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings