Chapter III
Reading edition
THE DAWN OF HASKALAH
1794-1840
(pp. 110-161)
Notes in this chapter
Note 1 · Footnote 1: (return) See Orshansky, in Yevreyskaya Biblyotyeka, ii. 240; Drabkin, in Monatsschrift, xix-xx.Note 2 · Footnote 2: (return) FKN, pp. 27, 303.Note 3 · Footnote 3: (return) JE, iv. 301; Plungian, op. cit, p. 59.Note 4 · Footnote 4: (return) FKN, p. 193.Note 5 · Footnote 5: (return) JE, iv. 407.Note 6 · Footnote 6: (return) FKN, p. 193; Jellinek, Kuntres ha-Rambam, pp. 39f.Note 7 · Footnote 7: (return) Occident, v. 360.Note 8 · Footnote 8: (return) Jost, Culturgeschichte, Berlin, 1847, p. 302.Note 9 · Footnote 9: (return) Steinschneider, 'Ir Vilna, 1900, p. 146.Note 10 · Footnote 10: (return) Voskhod, 1881, ii. 29-30; 1900, p. 55.Note 11 · Footnote 11: (return) FKN, pp. 277-279.Note 12 · Footnote 12: (return) See Rabinovitz, Ma'amar 'al ha-Defosat ha-Talmud, Munich, 1876, p. 112. Cf. Zweifel, op. cit., iv. 7.Note 13 · Footnote 13: (return) FKN, pp. 277-279.Note 14 · Footnote 14: (return) Toledot Adam, pp. 14 b, 16 b, 24 b, 75 b, 84 a.Note 15 · Footnote 15: (return) See Plungian, op cit., pp. 46-47, 91; Voskhod, 1900, ix. 77; Ha-Zeman (monthly), 1903, iii. 22-30; see also Die ZukunfNote 16 · Footnote 16: (return) Voskhod, Dec., 1890, pp. 142 f.; Ha-Boker Or, Jan., 1881.Note 17 · Footnote 17: (return) Voskhod, 1888, iii. 37 f; Rodkinson, Toledot 'Ammude HaBaD.Note 18 · Footnote 18: (return) Cohan, Rabbi Yisraël Ba'al Shem Tob, 1900, p. 67.Note 19 · Footnote 19: (return) 'Ammude Bet Yehudah, xxvii., and see Ha-Zeman (monthly), ii. 8-15.Note 20 · Footnote 20: (return) Buchholtz, op. cit., Beilage 14, pp. 137-138.Note 21 · Footnote 21: (return) See Weissberg, op. cit., p. 53; Talmud Leshon Russiah, Vilna, 1825; Moda' li-Bene Binah, ibid., 1826; cf. Baër Heteb, Note 22 · Footnote 22: (return) Helel ben Shahar, Warsaw, 1804, Introduction, and p. 81. See Peri ha-Arez Yashan, Letter 2, quoted by Dubnow, Pardes, Note 23 · Footnote 23: (return) Keneset Yisraël, i. 138; Morgulis, Voprosi Yevreyskoy Zhizni, pp. 7-10.Note 24 · Footnote 24: (return) Enziklopedichesky Slovar, St. Petersburg, 1895, xvii. 642.Note 25 · Footnote 25: (return) Ha-Shahar, x. 44-52; FKN, p. 33; Ha-Boker Or, i. 145-146.Note 26 · Footnote 26: (return) FSL, p. 164.Note 27 · Footnote 27: (return) See Günzburg, Ha-Debir, Warsaw, 1883, ii. 55; Israelitische Annalen, 1840, p. 263.Note 28 · Footnote 28: (return) Ha-Zeman (monthly), iii. 10.Note 29 · Footnote 29: (return) Minor, op. cit, p. 46; Lerner, Yevreyi v Novorossiskom Kraye, Odessa, 1901, p. 234; Monatsschrift, xviii. 234 f., 477 Note 30 · Footnote 30: (return) Voskhod, 1881, i-iii; Ha-Zeman (monthly), iii. 11-14.Note 31 · Footnote 31: (return) Op. cit, pp. 208-209.Note 32 · Footnote 32: (return) Cf. Graetz, xi. 50; Kayserling, op. cit, p. 288; Fünn, Sofre Yisraël, Vilna, 1891, pp. 138-143; WMG, p. 135.Note 33 · Footnote 33: (return) Graetz, xi. 590, 604, 606; Annalen, xx. 467; Kayserling, op. cit., p. 307; Landshut, Toledot Anshe Shem, p. 85.Note 34 · Footnote 34: (return) [Hebrew: Yd Tshlhu 'l Rm''d Bsfri]. Weiss, Zikronotaï, p. 58, n.; Ha-Zeman (monthly), i. and iii. 18-19.Note 35 · Footnote 35: (return) Zweifel, op. cit., pp. 35-40, and Ha-Hasidut we-ha-Musar in Ha-Meliz, 1897; Toledot Mishpehot Shneersohn, in Ha-Asif, Note 36 · Footnote 37: (return) GMC, no. 42. On similar enthusiasm among the Galician Maskilim, see Erter, Kol Kore, in Ha-Zofeh le-Bet Yisrael, WarsaNote 37 · Footnote 38: (return) Elk, Die jüdischen Kolonien in Russland, Frankfort-on-the-Main, 1886, pp. 28-53, 60-80, 119-140, 153-160, 205-208; JasNote 38 · Footnote 39: (return) See Zunz, Gesammelte Schriften, Berlin, 1875, pp, 279-290; Jost, Freimüthige Beleuchtung, Berlin, 1830; and CulturgescNote 39 · Footnote 40: (return) Rabinovitz, op. cit., pp. 11-18.Note 40 · Footnote 41: (return) On Volozhin, see Ha-Kerem, 1887, pp. 67-77; Bikkurim, 1865, pp. 6-45; Ozar ha-Sifrut, iii.; Ha-Asif, iii.; Ha-Meliz, 1Note 41 · Footnote 42: (return) Read the vivid description in WMG, p. 147.Note 42 · Footnote 43: (return) Occident, ii. 563-564.Note 43 · Footnote 44: (return) Uvarov's opinion of the Talmud was "razvrashchal i raz-vrashchayet" ("it has been degrading and is degrading"). NicholNote 44 · Footnote 45: (return) Occident, ii. 562-563.Note 45 · Footnote 46: (return) See Loewe, Diaries of Sir Moses and Lady Montefiore, London, 1890, i. 100, 231, 311-312, passim; Günzburg, Debir, ii. Note 46 · Footnote 47: (return) Günzburg, op. cit., pp. 115-117, 122-125; Leket Amarim (suppl. to Ha-Meliz), St. Petersburg, 1887, pp. 81-86; AZJ, ix.Note 47 · Footnote 48: (return) GMC, no. 255.