← Table of contents
Principia mathematica, vol. 2 (of 3)

Volume 1 / Part 5 — *200. RELATIONS CONTAINED IN DIVERSITY.

Reading edition

*200. RELATIONS CONTAINED IN DIVERSITY.

Summary of *200.

Some of the propositions of this number are repetitions or immediate consequences of previous propositions, especially those of the propositions of *50 which deal with diversity. But we are chiefly concerned here with propositions which will be useful in the theory of series; this leads us to introduce propositions on and on matters connected with relation-arithmetic and other topics. It will be seen that "" (i.e. " is asymmetrical") is an important hypothesis, as is also , of the use of which we have already had examples in *96 and *121.

The following are among the most useful propositions in this number:

*200·12.

This is the proposition which makes it impossible to define an ordinal number 1 which shall take its place among relation-numbers applicable to series.

*200·35.

This is a consequence of *200·12.

*200·36.

*200·361.

I.e. if , no term precedes itself or any of its predecessors, and no term succeeds itself or any of its successors.

*200·38.

*200·39.

We then have a collection of propositions concerned with relation-arithmetic.

*200·211.

I.e. the property of being contained in diversity is invariant for likeness-transformations;

*200·4.

*200·41.

and other such propositions.

We then have a set of propositions concerned with and . The most important are

*200·5.

*200·52.

*200·53.

I.e. if is asymmetrical, the terms which precede part of do not succeed the whole of , and vice versa.

*200·11.

*200·12.

Dem.

*200·2.

Dem.

*200·21.

Dem.

*200·211.

The properties of relations are very frequently common to all relations which are like a given relation, and this applies specially to the kinds of properties with which we are most concerned. The above proposition is an illustration of this fact: it shows that the property of being contained in diversity is invariant for likeness-transformations.

*200·22.

Dem.

We have, without the need of typical definiteness, both of which are immediate consequences of *200·211. The converse implications, however, fail if is taken in a type in which .

*200·3.

*200·31.

*200·32.

*200·33.

*200·34.

*200·35.

Dem.

*200·36.

*200·361.

Dem.

*200·37.

Dem.

*200·38.

*200·381.

Dem.

*200·39.

Dem.

*200·391.

Dem.

The above proposition is useful in the theory of segments.

The following propositions are concerned with the ideas of relation-arithmetic. Analogous propositions will be proved for transitiveness and connection in *201 and *202, whence analogous propositions concerning series will be deduced in *204.

*200·4.

Dem.

This proposition is part of the proof that the sum of two mutually exclusive series is a series.

*200·41.

*200·42.

Dem.

The following propositions (*200·421·422·423) are lemmas for *204·53.

*200·421.

Dem.

*200·422.

Dem.

*200·423.

Dem.

*200·43.

Dem.

The following propositions, with the exception of *200·52, are concerned with and , i.e. the class of terms preceding (or succeeding) the whole of .

*200·5.

Dem.

*200·51.

Dem.

*200·52.

Dem.

This proposition is often used in the theory of well-ordered series.

*200·53.

Dem.

The above proposition is frequently used. If is an existent class contained in , and are the two parts of the Dedekind "cut" determined by (excluding the maximum of , if any). The above proposition shows that these two parts are mutually exclusive.

*200·54.

Dem.

This proposition is a lemma whose purpose is to avoid the necessity of introducing the hypothesis or in proofs in which it is not really necessary. The first use of this proposition occurs in *206·551.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings