← Table of contents
The tribes and castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh, Volume 1 (of 4)

Chapter V

Reading edition

Exogamy.

All that we know at present about the evolution of the Brâhmanical tribal system tends to confirm this theory. At any rate, whatever may be the origin of these Brâhmanical gotras, it must be remembered that the system extends to all respectable Hindus. As soon as a caste rises in the social scale a compliant priest is always ready to discover an appropriate gotra for the aspirant, just as an English brewer, raised to the peerage, has little difficulty in procuring a coat-of-arms and a pedigree which links him with the Norman conquest. It is obvious in such cases that the idea of common descent from the eponymous founder of the gotra becomes little more than a pious fiction. But among many of the Râjputs who have been promoted at a later date, and in particular with more recent converts to orthodox Hinduism from the forest tribes, with a comical disregard for the theory of gotra exogamy, we find the sept enjoying only a single gotra, and this is very often that of Bhâradvaja, which is a sort of refuge for the destitute who can find no other place of rest. As has already been shown, some of the sectional titles are eponymous, like those of the gotras named after the famous Rishis; others like the Durgbans Râjputs take their name from an historical personage; others, again, are totemistic, and others purely territorial.

Exogamy among the lower castes. 4. Passing on to the inferior castes, such as those of the agriculturists, artisans, and menials generally, we find very considerable differences in their internal structure: some are divided into regular endogamous sub-castes, which again are provided with exogamous sections, or, where these are absent, practise a special exogamous rule which bars intermarriage by reckoning as prohibited degrees seven (sometimes more or sometimes less) generations in the descending line. But it is obvious that, as in the case of Brâhmans, this rule which prohibits intermarriage within the section, is one-sided in its application, as Mr. Risley remarks:—“In no case may a man marry into his own section, but the name of the section goes by the male side, and consequently, so far as the rule of exogamy is concerned, there is nothing to prevent him from marrying his sister’s daughter, his maternal aunt, or even his maternal grandmother.” Hence came the ordinary formula which prevails generally among the inferior castes that a man cannot marry in the line of his paternal uncle, maternal uncle, paternal aunt, maternal aunt. But even this formula is not invariably observed. What the low caste villager will say if he is asked regarding his prohibited degrees, is that he will not take a bride from a family into which one of his male relations has married, until all recollection of the relationship has disappeared. And as rural memory runs hardly more than three generations, any two families may intermarry, provided they were not connected by marriage within the last sixty or seventy years. It is only when a man becomes rich and ambitious, begins to keep an astrologer and Pandit, and to live as an orthodox Hindu, that he thinks much about his gotra. To procure one and have the proper prohibited degrees regularly worked out is only a matter of money.

The present survey has given indication of the existence of totemistic sections among at least twenty-four tribes, most of whom are of Dravidian origin.

[

Contents

]

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · 1. No enquiry into the social relations of the Hindus can leave out of account the thorny subject of the origin of exogamy. By exogamy is geNote 2 · Various forms of exogamy. 2. Before discussing the possible origin of exogamy it may be well to explain some of its various forms, of which Note 3 · The gotra. 3. These prohibitions form a list of prohibited degrees in addition to the ordinary formula, which prevents a Brâhman or a memberNote 4 · 5. Having thus endeavoured briefly to explain the rules of exogamy which regulate the different classes of Hindus,35 we are now in a positioNote 5 · McLennan’s theory of exogamy. 6. The earliest theory was that of Mr. McLennan,36 who began by calling attention to the fact that there are nNote 6 · Spencer’s theory of exogamy. 7. Conscious of these and other difficulties which surrounded Mr. McLennan’s explanation, Mr. Herbert Spencer sNote 7 · Lubbock’s theory of exogamy. 8. Sir John Lubbock’s41 theory again depends on his theory of what he calls communal marriage, by which all theNote 8 · Starcke’s theory. 9. Mr. Starcke42 in his account of exogamy attempts to draw a distinction between the license which would permit intercourNote 9 · Tylor’s theory of exogamy. 10. All these theories, it will be observed, base exogamy more or less on the abhorrence of incest. Dr. Tylor,43 Note 10 · Morgan’s theory of exogamy. 11. Next comes that advocated by Mr. Morgan45 and others, that it arises from the recognition of the observed evNote 11 · 12. This theory, which bases exogamy on the unconscious result of natural selection, gradually weeding out those groups which persisted in tNote 12 · Exogamy and Totemism. 13. There is, however, another side to the discussion on the origin of exogamy which must not be neglected. In anotherNote 13 · Now we know that one of the ordinary incidents of totemism is that persons of the same totem may not marry or have sexual intercourse with e
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings