← Table of contents
History of Gujarát, Volume I, Part I.

Chapter VIII · THE VALABHIS (a.d. 509–766.)

Reading edition

The ruins of Valabhi show few signs of representing a large or important city. The want of sweet water apparently unfits the site for the capital of so large a kingdom as Valabhi. Its choice as capital was probably due to its being a harbour on the Bhávnagar creek. Since Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Vaḷeh Town, 1893. the days of Valabhi’s prime the silt which thickly covers the ruins has also filled and choked the channel which once united it with the Bhávnagar creek when the small Ghelo was probably a fair sized river.

Valabhi Administration, a.d. 500–700.The Valabhi grants supply information regarding the leading office bearers and the revenue police and village administrators whose names generally occur in the following order:

(1) Áyuktaka, meaning appointed, apparently any superior official. (2) Viniyuktaka

Illustration from History of Gujarát Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency, Volume I, Part I.

(3) Drángika, apparently an officer in charge of a town, as dranga means a town.

(4) Mahattara or Senior has the derivative meaning of high in rank. Mhátára the Maráthi for an old man is the same word. In the Valabhi plates mahattara seems to be generally used to mean the accredited headman of a village, recognised as headman both by the people of the village and by the Government.

(7) Adhikaraṇika means the chief judicial magistrate or judge of a place.

(8) Daṇḍapáśika literally ‘holding the fetters or noose of punishment,’ is used both of the head police officer and of the hangman or executioner.

(9) Chauroddharaṇika the thief-catcher. Of the two Indian ways of catching thieves, one of setting a thief to catch a thief the other the Pagi or tracking system, the second answers well in sandy Gujarát and Káthiáváḍa where the Tracker or Pagi is one of the Bárábalute or regular village servants.

(10) Rájastháníya, the foreign secretary, the officer who had to do with other states and kingdoms rájasthánas. Some authorities take rájastháníya to mean viceroy.

(11) Amátya minister and sometimes councillor is generally coupled with kumára or prince.

(12) Anutpannádánasamudgráhaka the arrear-gatherer.

(13) Śaulkika the superintendent of tolls or customs.

(14) Bhogika or Bhogoddharaṇika the collector of the Bhoga that is the state share of the land produce taken in kind, as a rule one-sixth. The term bhoga is still in use in Káthiáváḍa for the share, usually one-sixth, which landholders receive from their cultivating tenants.

(17) Vishayapati division-lord probably corresponded to the present subáh.

(18) Ráshṭrapati the head of a district.

(19) Grámakúṭa the village headman.

Land Assessment.The district of Kaira and the province of Káthiáváḍa to which the Valabhi grants chiefly refer appear to have had separate systems Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Land Assessment. of land assessment Kaira by yield Káthiáváḍa by area. Under the Káthiáváḍa system the measurement was by pádávarta literally the space between one foot and the other that is the modern kadam or pace. The pace used in measuring land seems to have differed from the ordinary pace as most of the Káthiáváḍa grants mention the bhúpádávarta or land pace. The Kaira system of assessment was by yield the unit being the piṭaka or basketful, the grants describing fields as capable of growing so many baskets of rice or barley (or as requiring so many baskets of seed). As the grants always specify the Kaira basket a similar system with a different sized basket seems to have been in use in other parts of the country. Another detail which the plates preserve is that each field had its name called after a guardian or from some tree or plant. Among field names are Kotilaka, Atimaṇa-kedára, Khaṇda-kedára, Gargara-kshetra, Bhíma-kshetra, Khagali-kedára, Śami-kedára.

Religion.The state religion of the Valabhi kings was Śaivism. Every Valabhi copperplate hitherto found bears on its seal the figure of a bull with under it the name of Bhaṭárka the founder of the dynasty who was a Śaiva. Except Dhruvasena I. (a.d. 526) who is called Paramabhágavata or the great Vaishṇava and his brother and successor Dharapaṭṭa who is styled Paramádityabhakta or the great devotee of the sun, and Guhasena, who in his grant of Saṃ. 248 calls himself Paramopásaka or the great devotee of Buddha, all the Valabhi kings are called Parama-máheśvara the great Śaiva.

This Báva is the popular Prakrit form of the older Prakrit or deśí Bappa meaning Father or worshipful. Bappa is the original of the Hindustáni and Gujaráti Bává father or elder; it is also a special term for a head Gosávi or Atít or indeed for any recluse. The epithet Bappa-pádánudhyáta, Bowing at the feet of Bappa, occurs in the attributes of several Nepál kings, and in the case of king Vasantasena appears the full phrase:

Parama-daivata-bappa-bhaṭṭáraka-mahárája-Śrí-pádánudhyáta.

Falling at the illustrious feet of the great Mahárája Lord Bappa.

First Valabhi Grant, a.d. 526.The first trace of the new power, the earliest Valabhi grant, is that of Dhruvasena in the Valabhi or Gupta year 207 (a.d. 526). In this grant Dhruvasena is described as the third son of the Senápati or general Bhaṭárka. Of Senápati Bhaṭárka neither copperplate nor inscription has been found. Certain coins which General Cunningham Arch. Surv. Rept. IX. Pl. V. has ascribed to Bhaṭárka have on the obverse a bust, as on the western coins of Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. First Valabhi Grant, a.d. 526. Kumáragupta, and on the reverse the Śaiva trident, and round the trident the somewhat doubtful legend in Gupta characters:

Rájño Mahákshatri Paramádityabhakta Śrí Śarvva-bhaṭṭárakasa.

Of the king the great Kshatri, great devotee of the sun, the illustrious Śarvva-bhaṭṭáraka.

This Śarvva seems to have been a Ráshṭrakúṭa or Gurjjara king. His coins were continued so long in use and were so often copied that in the end upright strokes took the place of letters. That these coins did not belong to the founder of the Valabhi dynasty appears not only from the difference of name between Bhaṭṭáraka and Bhaṭárka but because the coiner was a king and the founder of the Valabhis a general.

All known copperplates down to those of Dharasena (a.d. 579 the great grandson of Bhaṭárka) give a complete genealogy from Bhaṭárka to Dharasena. Later copperplates omit all mention of any descendants but those in the main line.

In these grants Dhruvasena’s father Bhaṭárka and his elder brothers are described as ‘great Máheśvaras’ that is followers of Śiva, while Dhruvasena himself is called Paramabhágavata the great Vaishṇava. It is worthy of note, as stated in the a.d. 535 grant, that his niece Duḍḍá (or Lulá?) was a Buddhist and had dedicated a Buddhist monastery at Valabhi. The latest known date of Dhruvasena is a.d. 535 (G. 216). Whether Dharapaṭṭa or Dharapaṭṭa’s son Guhasena succeeded is doubtful. That Dharapaṭṭa is styled Mahárája and that a twenty-four years’ gap occurs between the latest grant of Dhruvasena and a.d. 559 the earliest grant of Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Dhruvasena I. a.d. 526–535. Guhasena favour the succession of Dharapaṭṭa. On the other hand in the a.d. 559 grant all Guhasena’s sins are said to be cleansed by falling at the feet of, that is, by succeeding, Dhruvasena. It is possible that Dharapaṭṭa may have ruled for some years and Dhruvasena again risen to power.

The beginning of Guhasena’s reign is uncertain. Probably it was not earlier than a.d. 539 (G. 220). His latest known date is a.d. 567 (G. 248) but he may have reigned two years longer.

Śíláditya I. a.d. 594–609.Dharasena II. was succeeded by his son Śíláditya I. who is also called Dharmáditya or the sun of religion.

The Śatruñjaya Máhátmya has a prophetic account of one Śíláditya who will be a propagator of religion in Vikrama Saṃvat Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Śíláditya I. a.d. 590–609. 477 (a.d. 420). This Máhátmya is comparatively modern and is not worthy of much trust. Vikrama Saṃvat 477 would be a.d. 420 when no Valabhi kingdom was established and no Śíláditya can have flourished. If the date 477 has been rightly preserved, and it be taken in the Śaka era it would correspond with Gupta 237 or a.d. 556, that is thirty to forty years before Śíláditya’s reign. Although no reliance can be placed on the date still his second name Dharmáditya gives support to his identification with the Śíláditya of the Máhátmya.

His grants like many of his predecessors style Śíláditya a great devotee of Śiva. Still that two of his three known grants were made to Buddhist monks shows that he tolerated and respected Buddhism. The writer of one of the grants is mentioned as the minister of peace and war Chandrabhaṭṭi; the Dútaka or causer of the gift in two of the Buddhist grants is Bhaṭṭa Ádityayaśas apparently some military officer. The third grant, to a temple of Śiva, has for its Dútaka the illustrious Kharagraha apparently the brother and successor of the king.

Kharagraha, a.d. 610–615.Śíláditya was succeeded by his brother Kharagraha, of whom no record has been traced. Kharagraha seems to have been invested with sovereignty by his brother Śíláditya who probably retired from the world. Kharagraha is mentioned as a great devotee of Śiva.

Dharasena III. a.d. 615–620.Kharagraha was succeeded by his son Dharasena III. of whom no record remains.

Dharasena IV. a.d. 640–649.Dhruvasena II. was succeeded by his son Dharasena IV. perhaps the most powerful and independent of the Valabhis. A copperplate dated a.d. 649 (G. 330) styles him Parama-bhaṭṭáraka, Mahárájádhirája, Parameśvara, Chakravartin Great Lord, King of Kings, Great Ruler, Universal Sovereign. Dharasena IV.’s successors continue the title of Mahárájádhirája or great ruler, but none is called Chakravartin or universal sovereign a title which implies numerous conquests and widespread power.

Dhruvasena III. a.d. 650–656.Dharasena IV. was not succeeded by his son but by Dhruvasena the son of Derabhaṭa the son of Dharasena IV.’s paternal grand-uncle. Derabhaṭa appears not to have been ruler of Valabhi itself but of some district in the south of the Valabhi territory. His epithets describe him as like the royal sage Agastya spreading to the south, and as the lord of the earth which has for its two breasts the Sahya and Vindhya hills. This description may apply to part of the province south of Kaira where the Sahyádri and Vindhya mountains may be said to unite. In the absence of a male heir in the direct line, Derabhaṭa’s son Dhruvasena appears to have succeeded to the throne of Valabhi. The only known copperplate of Dhruvasena III.’s, dated a.d. 651 (G. 332), records the grant of the village of Peḍhapadra in Vanthali, the modern Vanthali in the Navánagar State of North Káthiáváḍa. A copperplate of his elder brother and successor Kharagraha dated a.d. 656 (G. 337) shows that Dhruvasena’s reign cannot have lasted over six years.

Śíláditya IV. a.d. 691.Śíláditya III. was succeeded by his son Śíláditya IV. of whom one grant dated a.d. 691 (G. 372) remains. The officer who prepared the grant is mentioned as the general Divirapati Śrí Haragaṇa the son of Bappa Bhogika. The Dútaka or gift-causer is the prince Kharagraha, which may perhaps be the personal name of the next king Śíláditya V.

Śíláditya V. a.d. 722.Of Śíláditya V. the son and successor of Śíláditya IV. two grants dated a.d. 722 (G. 403) both from Gondal remain. Both record grants to the same person. The writer of both was general Gillaka son of Buddhabhaṭṭa, and the gift-causer of both prince Śíláditya.

Śíláditya VI. a.d. 760.Of Śíláditya VI. the son and successor of the last, one grant dated a.d. 760 (G. 441) remains. The grantee is an Atharvavedi Bráhman. The writer is Sasyagupta son of Emapatha and the gift-causer is Gánjaśáti Śrí Jajjar (or Jajjir).

Śíláditya VII. a.d. 766.Of Śíláditya VII. the son and successor of the last, who is also called Dhrúbhaṭa (Sk. Dhruvabhaṭa), one grant dated a.d. 766 (G. 447) remains.

Valabhi Family Tree.The following is the genealogy of the Valabhi Dynasty:

VALABHI FAMILY TREE, a.d. 509–766.

Bhaṭárka a.d. 509. (Gupta 190?).

Dharasena I. Droṇasiṃha. Dhruvasena I. a.d. 526. (Gupta 207). Dharapaṭṭa.

Guhasena a.d. 559, 565, 567, (Gupta 240, 246, 248).

Dharasena II. a.d. 571, 588, 589 (Gupta 252, 269, 270).

Śíláditya I. or Dharmáditya I. a.d. 605, 609 (Gupta 286, 290). Kharagraha I.

Dharasena III. Dhruvasena II. or Báláditya, a.d. 629 (Gupta 310).

Derabhaṭa.

Śíláditya II. Kharagraha II. or Dharmáditya II. a.d. 656 (Gupta 337). Dhruvasena III. a.d. 651 (Gupta 332). Dharasena IV. a.d. 645, 649, (Gupta 326, 330).

Śíláditya III. a.d. 671 (Gupta 352).

Śíláditya IV. a.d. 691, 698 (Gupta 372 & 379).

Śíláditya V. a.d. 722 (Gupta 403).

Śíláditya VI. a.d. 760 (Gupta 441).

Śíláditya VII. or Dhrúbhaṭa, a.d. 766 (Gupta 447).

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · The era has been exhaustively discussed by Mr. Fleet in Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Introduction. ↑Note 2 · Nepaul Inscriptions. The phrase acháṭa-bhaṭa is not uncommon. Mr. Fleet (Corp. Ins. Ind. III. page 98 note 2) explains acháṭa-bhaṭa-praveśyaNote 3 · Bühler in Ind. Ant. V. 205. ↑Note 4 · Ind. Ant. VII. 68. ↑Note 5 · Ind. Ant. VII. 68. ↑Note 6 · Kárván seems to have suffered great desecration at the hands of the Musalmáns. All round the village chiefly under pipal trees, images and pNote 7 · Whether the Valabhis were or were not Gurjjaras the following facts favour the view that they entered Gujarát from Málwa. It has been shown Note 8 · Montfauçon’s Edition in Priaulx’s Indian Travels, 222–223. It seems doubtful if Cosmas meant that Gollas’ overlordship spread as far south aNote 9 · The Mehrs seem to have remained in power also in north-east Káthiáváḍa till the thirteenth century. Mokheráji Gohil the famous chief of PiraNote 10 · All the silver and copper coins found in Valabhi and in the neighbouring town of Sihor are poor imitations of Kumáragupta’s (a.d. 417–453) aNote 11 · The three types of coins still current at Ujjain, Bhilsa, and Gwálior in the territories of His Highness Sindhia are imitations of the previNote 12 · As the date of Droṇasiṃha’s investiture is about a.d. 520 it is necessary to consider what kings at this period claimed the title of supremeNote 13 · Ind. Ant. V. 204. ↑Note 14 · Ind. Ant. IV. 104. ↑Note 15 · In a commentary on the Kalpasútra Daṇḍanáyaka is described as meaning Tantrapâla that is head of a district. ↑Note 16 · Ind. Ant. VII. 66; IV. 174. ↑Note 17 · Ind. Ant. V. 206. ↑Note 18 · Ind. Ant. XIV. 75. ↑Note 19 · Kumárápála-Charita, Abu Inscriptions. ↑Note 20 · Ind. Ant. VIII. 302, VII. 68, XIII. 160. ↑Note 21 · Ind. Ant. VI. 9. ↑Note 22 · Ind. Ant. VII. 90. ↑Note 23 · This change of title was probably connected with the increase of Gurjara power, which resulted in the founding of the Gurjara kingdom of BroNote 24 · Ind. Ant. XI. 306. ↑Note 25 · Ind. Ant. VI. 13. ↑Note 26 · Kávyamidam rachitam mayá Valabhyám, Śrí Dharasena-narendra pálitáyám. ↑Note 27 · Ind. Ant. VII. 76. ↑Note 28 · Journ. Beng. A. S. IV. and an unpublished grant in the museum of the B. B. R. A. Soc. ↑Note 29 · Ind. Ant. XI. 305. ↑Note 30 · Since his authorities mention the destroyers of Valabhi under the vague term mlechchhas or barbarians and since the era in which they date tNote 31 · Tod (An. of Ráj. I. 231) notices what is perhaps a reminiscence of this date (a.d. 766). It is the story that Bappa, who according to Mewáḍ Note 32 · Reinaud’s Fragments, 143 note 1; Mémoire Sur l’Inde, 105; Sachau’s Alberuni, I. 193. The treachery of the magician Ranka is the same cause aNote 33 · Lassen (Ind. Alt. III. 533) puts aside Alberuni’s Arab expedition from Mansúra as without historical support and inadmissible. Lassen held tNote 34 · According to Alberuni (Sachau, I. 21) Al Mansúra, which was close to Bráhmanábád about 47 miles north-east of Haidarábád (Elliot’s Musalmán Note 35 · Elliot, I. 244. ↑Note 36 · That the word read Barada by Elliot is in the lax pointless shikasta writing is shown by the different proposed readings (Elliot, I. 444 notNote 37 · Though, except as applied to the Porbandar range of hills, the name Barada is almost unknown, and though Ghumli not Barada was the early (eiNote 38 · Elliot, I. 445. ↑Note 39 · Compare Tod (Annals, I. 83 and 217). Gajni or Gayni another capital whence the last prince Śíláditya was expelled by Parthian invaders in thNote 40 · Compare Reinaud (Fragments, 212 note 4) who identifies it with the Áin-i-Akbari Kandahár that is Gandhár in Broach. The identification is doNote 41 · The identification of the Balharas of the Arab writers with the Chálukyas (a.d. 500–753) and Ráshṭrakúṭas (a.d. 753–972) of Málkhet in the ENote 42 · After their withdrawal from Valabhi to Mewáḍ the Válas took the name of Gehlot (see below page 98), then of Aharya from a temporary capital Note 43 · The somewhat doubtful Jáikadeva plates (above page 87 and Káthiáváḍa Gazetteer, 275) seem to show the continuance of Maitraka power in NorthNote 44 · The only contemporary rulers in whose grants a reference to Valabhi has been traced are the Gurjjaras of Broach (a.d. 580–808) one of whom, Note 45 · Tod An. of Raj. I. 217: Western India, 269. ↑Note 46 · Tod An. of Raj. I. 112 and Western India, 148: Rás Málá, I. 21. It is not clear whether these passages prove that the Sesodias or only the VNote 47 · Tod’s Western India, 51. ↑Note 48 · Tod’s An. of Raj. I. 230. ↑Note 49 · The cherished title of the later Valabhis, Śíláditya Sun of Virtue, confirms the special sun worship at Valabhi, which the mention of DharapNote 50 · This explanation is hardly satisfactory. The name Gehlot seems to be Guhila-putra from Gobhila-putra an ancient Bráhman gotra, one of the noNote 51 · Tod’s Annals, I. 229–231. ↑Note 52 · Annals, I. 229. ↑Note 53 · Gladwin’s Áin-i-Akbari, II. 81; Tod’s Annals, I. 235 and note *. Tod’s dates are confused. The Aitpur inscription (Ditto, page 230) gives ŚaNote 54 · Tod Western India 268 says Siddha Rája (a.d. 1094–1143): Múla Rája (a.d. 942–997) seems correct. See Rás Málá, I. 65. ↑Note 55 · Káthiáwár Gazetteer, 672. ↑Note 56 · The chronicles of Bhadrod, fifty-one miles south-west of Bhávnagar, have (Káth. Gaz. 380) a Selait Vála as late as a.d. 1554. ↑Note 57 · Káthiáwár Gazetteer, 672. Another account places the movement south after the arrival of the Gohils a.d. 1250. According to local traditionsNote 58 · Káth. Gaz. 111 and 132. According to the Áin-i-Akbari (Gladwin, II. 60) the inhabitants of the ports of Mahua and Tulája were of the Vála trNote 59 · Káth. Gaz. 680. ↑Note 60 · Káth. Gaz. 414. ↑Note 61 · The Vála connection with the Káthis complicates their history. Col. Watson (Káth. Gaz. 130) seems to favour the view that the Válas were theNote 62 · Káth. Gaz. 110–129. ↑Note 63 · Western India, 207; Annals, I. 112–113. ↑Note 64 · It is worthy of note that Bálas and Káthiás are returned from neighbouring Panjáb districts. Bálas from Dehra Ismail Khán (Panjáb Census RepNote 65 · Tod’s Annals, I. 83 and 215; Elliot, II. 410; Jour. B. Br. A. S. XXIII. ↑Note 66 · Annals, I. 215. ↑Note 67 · Kath. Gaz. 589. ↑Note 68 · Bṛihat-Saṃhitá, XIV. 21. The usual explanation (compare Fleet Ind. Ant. XXII. 180) Gold-Śakas seems meaningless. ↑Note 69 · Sachau, II. 11. Among the legends are the much-applied tales of the foot-stamped cloth and the self-sacrificing minister. ↑Note 70 · Western India, 213. ↑Note 71 · Tod’s Annals, I. 83, 215; Western India, 270–352. ↑Note 72 · Sachau, I. 208, II. 341. For the alleged descent of the Sesodiás and Válas from Ráma of the Sun race the explanation may be offered that theNote 73 · Gladwin’s Áin-i-Akbari, II. 81: Tod’s Annals, I. 235. ↑Note 74 · The invasion of Sindh formerly (Reinaud’s Fragments, 29) supposed to be by Naushirván in person according to fuller accounts seems to have bNote 75 · Compare Tod’s Annals, I. 235–239 and Rawlinson’s Seventh Monarchy, 576. ↑Note 76 · Rawlinson Seventh Monarchy, 452 note 3. ↑Note 77 · Compare Tod’s Annals, I. 63; Thomas’ Prinsep, I. 413; Cunningham’s Arch. Survey, VI. 201. According to their own accounts (Rás Málá, I. 296)Note 78 · Válas Musalmán Játs in Lahor and Gurdaspur: Váls in Gujarát and Gujranwálá: Váls in Mozafarnagar and Dhera Ismael Khan. Also Válahs Hindus iNote 79 · Bṛihaṭ Saṃhitá, V. 80. ↑Note 80 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. 140–141. ↑Note 81 · The references are; Langlois’ Harivaṃśa, I. 388–420, II. 178. That in a.d. 247 Balkh or Báktria was free from Indian overlordship (McCrindleNote 82 · The passage from the Karṇa Parva or Eighth Book of the Mahábhárata is quoted in Muir’s Sanskrit Texts, II. 482, and in greater fullness in SNote 83 · Kern in Muir’s Sanskrit Texts, II. 446. St. Martin (Geog. Greque et Latine de l’Inde, 149) takes Báhika to be a contraction of Báhlika. ReasNote 84 · St. Martin Geog. Greque et Latine de l’Inde, 403, puts the probable date at b.c. 380 or about fifty years before Alexander. St. Martin held Note 85 · The name Valabhi, as we learn from the Jain historians, is a Sanskritised form of Valahi, which can be easily traced back to one of the manyNote 86 · Hodgson’s Essays on Indian Subjects, I. 405 Note. ↑Note 87 · McCrindle’s Periplus, 121. Compare Rawlinson’s Seventh Monarchy, 79. The absence of Indian reference to the Yuechi supports the view that inNote 88 · According to Reinaud (Mémoire Sur l’Inde, 82 note 3) probably the modern Kochanya or Kashania sixty or seventy miles west of Samarkand. ThisNote 89 · Etude sur la Geographie Grecque et Latine de l’Inde, 147. ↑Note 90 · McCrindle’s Alexander in India, 350. ↑Note 91 · The suggestion is made by Mr. A. M. T. Jackson. ↑Note 92 · McCrindle’s Alexander, 136. ↑Note 93 · McCrindle’s Alexander, 252. ↑Note 94 · Compare Strabo, XV. I. 8. The Oxydrakai are the descendants of Dionysus. Again, XV. I. 24: The Malloi and the Oxydrakai who as we have alreaNote 95 · See McCrindle’s Alexander, 157, 369, 378, 398. Compare St. Martin Geog. Grecque et Latine de l’Inde, 102. ↑Note 96 · Strabo, XV. I. 8 and 24, Hamilton’s Translation, III. 76, 95. ↑Note 97 · References to the vines of Nysa and Meros occur in Strabo, Pliny, Quintus Curtius, Philostratus, and Justin: McCrindle’s Alexander in India,Note 98 · The Kathaioi Malloi and Oxydrakai are (Arrian in McCrindle’s Alexander, 115, 137, 140, 149) called independent in the sense of kingless: theNote 99 · Káthiáwár Gazetteer, 138. ↑Note 100 · Káthiáwár Gazetteer, 137. ↑Note 101 · Cutch Gazetteer, 80. ↑Note 102 · Cutch Gazetteer, 81. ↑Note 103 · The ma and ra are of the old style and the side and upper strokes, that is the káno and mátra of ro are horizontal. ↑Note 104 · Valabhi in a.d. 630In spite of the disappearance of every sign of greatness Hiuen Tsiang’s (a.d. 640) details show how rich and populous ValNote 105 · Valabhi Copperplates.The only historical materials regarding the Valabhi dynasty are their copperplates of which a large number have been foNote 106 · Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Valabhi Copperplates. The Valabhi copperplates chiefly record grants to Bráhmanical temples and BuNote 107 · Period Covered.So far as is known the dates extend for 240 years from 207 to 447. That the earliest known date is so late as 207 makes it prNote 108 · (5) Cháṭabhaṭa that is bhaṭas or sepoys for chitas or rogues, police mounted and on foot, represent the modern police jamádárs haváldárs andNote 109 · (6) Dhruva fixed or permanent is the hereditary officer in charge of the records and accounts of a village, the Taláti and Kulkarni Chapter Note 110 · (15) Vartmapála the roadwatch were often mounted and stationed in thánás or small roadside sheds.10Note 111 · (16) Pratisaraka patrols night-guards or watchmen of fields and villages.11Note 112 · Territorial Divisions.The plates show traces of four territorial divisions: (1) Vishaya the largest corresponding to the modern administratiNote 113 · The grants to Buddhist viháras or monasteries of which there are several seem special gifts to institutions founded by female relatives of tNote 114 · These Nepál kings were Śaivas as they are called parama-máheśvara in the text of the inscription and like the Valabhi seals their seals bearNote 115 · Origin of the Valabhis.The tribe or race of Bhaṭárka the founder of the Valabhi dynasty is doubtful. None of the numerous Valabhi copperplatNote 116 · History.The preceding chapter shows that except Chandragupta (a.d. 410) Kumáragupta (a.d. 416) and Skandagupta (a.d. 456) none of the GuptasNote 117 · Senápati Bhaṭárka, a.d. 509–520 ?Of the kingdom which Senápati Bhaṭárka overthrew the following details are given in one of his epithets in Note 118 · The above account of the founder of the Valabhis accepts the received opinion that he was the Senápati or General of the Guptas. The two chiNote 119 · Senápati’s Sons.Senápati Bhaṭárka had four sons, (1) Dharasena (2) Droṇasiṃha (3) Dhruvasena and (4) Dharapaṭṭa. Of Dharasena the first son Note 120 · Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Dhruvasena I. a.d. 526–535. Dhruvasena I. a.d. 526–535.The third son Dhruvasena is the first of seNote 121 · Guhasena, a.d. 539–569.Of Guhasena (a.d. 539?–569) three plates and a fragment of an inscription remain. Two of the grants are from Vaḷeh daNote 122 · Dharasena II. a.d. 569–589.About a.d. 569 (G. 250) Guhasena was succeeded by his son Dharasena II. Five of his grants remain, three dated a.Note 123 · Śíláditya’s reign probably began about a.d. 594 (G. 275). His latest grant is dated a.d. 609 (G. 290).32Note 124 · Dhruvasena II. (Báláditya) a.d. 620–640.Dharasena III. was succeeded by his younger brother Dhruvasena II. also called Báláditya or the risiNote 125 · Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Dharasena IV. a.d. 640–649. Two of Dharasena IV.’s grants remain, one dated a.d. 645 (G. 326) the Note 126 · Kharagraha, a.d. 656–665.The less than usually complimentary and respectful reference to Dhruvasena III. in the attributes of Kharagraha sugNote 127 · Śíláditya III. a.d. 666–675.Kharagraha was succeeded by Śíláditya III. son of Kharagraha’s elder brother Śíláditya II. Śíláditya II. seems nNote 128 · Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. The Fall of Valabhi, a.d. 750–770. The Fall of Valabhi, a.d. 750–770.Of the overthrow of Valabhi mNote 129 · Similarly S. 205 the date given by some of Col. Tod’s authorities (An. of Ráj. I. 82 and 217–220) represents a.d. 524 the practical establisNote 130 · The Importance of Valabhi.The discovery of its lost site; the natural but mistaken identification of its rulers with the famous eighth and nNote 131 · Valabhi and the Gehlots.In connection with the pride of the Sesodias or Gohils of Mewáḍ in their Valabhi origin54 the question who were the Note 132 · Whether or not the ancestors of the Gohils and Válas were settled in Káthiáváḍa before the establishment of Valabhi about a.d. 526 Chapter VNote 133 · In support of a Bráhman origin is Prinsep’s conjecture (J. A. S. Bl. LXXIV. [Feb. 1838] page 93) that Divaij the name of the first recorded Note 134 · The Válas of Káthiáváḍa.The Arab accounts of the surprise-attack and of the failure of the invaders to make a settlement agree with the locaNote 135 · The local tradition regarding the settlement of the Válas in the Balakshetra south of Valabhi is that it took place after the capture of ValNote 136 · The Válas and Káthis.If from the first and not solely since the fall of Valabhi the Válas have been associated with the Káthis it seems bestNote 137 · Descent from Kanaksen, a.d. 150.The Sesodia or Gohil tradition is that the founder of the Válas was Kanaksen, who, in the second century aftNote 138 · Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Mewáḍ and the Persians. Mewáḍ and the Persians.One further point requires notice, the traditional Note 139 · Válas.Can the Vála traditions of previous northern settlements be supported either by early Hindu inscriptions or from living traces in the Note 140 · There is a very close parallel in the modern Panjáb, where (see Census Report of 1881) the national name Baluch has become a tribal name in Note 141 · If the usual derivation of the name Bálhika be accepted,96 it is possible to go a step further and fix a probable limit before which the triNote 142 · One collateral point seems to deserve notice. St. Martin100 says: ‘The Greek historians do not show the least trace of the name Báhlika.’ AcNote 143 · Bom. Gaz. XIV. 372. ↑Note 144 · Ind. Ant. VIII. 244. ↑Note 145 · J. B. B. R. A. S. XVI. 1ff.: Proceedings VIIth Oriental Congress, 210ff. ↑Note 146 · Chapter IX. The Chálukyas, a.d. 634–740. The Chálukyas conquered their Gujarát provinces from the south after subduing the Konkan Mauryas ofNote 147 · Jayasiṃhavarmman, a.d. 666–693.The regular establishment of Chálukya power in South Gujarát seems to have been the work of Dháráśraya JayasiNote 148 · Jayasiṃhavarmman must have established his power in South Gujarát before a.d. 669–70 (T. 421), as in that year his son Śryáśraya made a gran
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings