← Table of contents
History of Gujarát, Volume I, Part I.

Chapter VII · THE GUPTAS (G. 90–149; a.d. 410–470.)

Reading edition

Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. After the Kshatrapas (a.d. 120–410) the powerful dynasty of the Guptas established themselves in Gujarát. So far as the dynasty is connected with Gujarát the Gupta tree is:

Gupta. G.1–12(?)—a.d.319–322(?) Petty N. W. P. Chief.

Ghaṭotkacha. G.12–29(?)—a.d.332–349(?) Petty N. W. P. Chief.

Chandragupta I. G.29–49(?)—a.d.349–369(?) Powerful N. W. P. Chief.

Samudragupta. G.50–75(?)—a.d.370–395. Great N. W. P. Sovereign.

Chandragupta II. G.70–96—a.d.396–415. Great Monarch conquers Málwa. G.80 a.d.400 and Gujarát G.90 a.d.410.

Kumáragupta. G.97–133—a.d.416–453. Rules Gujarát and Káthiáváḍa.

Skandagupta. G.133–149—a.d.454–470. Rules Gujarát Káthiáváḍa and Kachch.

Ghaṭotkacha, a.d. 322–349(?).Gupta the founder seems never to have risen to be more than a petty chief. No known inscription gives him the title Mahárájádhirája Supreme Ruler of Great Kings, which all Gupta rulers after the founder’s grandson Chandragupta assume. Again that no coins of the founder and many coins of his successors have been discovered makes it probable that Gupta was not a ruler of enough importance to have a currency of his own. According to the inscriptions Gupta was succeeded by his son Ghaṭotkacha a petty chief like his father with the title of Mahárája and without coins.

अप्रतिरथराजन्यकीर्ति (र) मम विजयते.

Triumphant is the glory of me the unrivalled sovereign.

नवजमधः राजाधिराज पृथिविं जियत्य.

Navajamadhaḥ rájádhirája pṛithivíṃ jiyatya.

Horse sacrifice, after conquering the earth, the great king (performs).

Rudradeva. Matila. Nágadatta. Chandravarman. Gaṇapatinága. Nágasena. Achyuta. Nandin. Balavarmman.

Samataṭa. Ḍaváka. Kámarúpa. Nepála. Karttṛika.

Málava. Arjunáyana. Yaudheya. Mádraka. Ábhíra. Prárjuna. Sanakáníka. Káka. Kharaparika.

Devaputra. Sháhi. Sháhánusháhi. Śaka. Muruṇḍa. Saiṃhalaka. Island Kings.

Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. Samudragupta, a.d. 370–395. The inscribed pillar is said to have been set up by the great Captain or Dandanáyaka named Tilabhaṭṭanáyaka.

This important inscription shows that Samudragupta’s dominions included Mathurá, Oudh, Gorakhpur, Allahábád, Benares, Behár, Tirhút, Bengal, and part of East Rájputána. The list of Dakhan and South Indian kingdoms does not necessarily imply that they formed part of Samudragupta’s territory. Samudragupta may have made a victorious campaign to the far south and had the countries recorded in the order of his line of march. The order suggests that he went from Behár, by way of Gayá, to Kosala the country about the modern Ráipur in the Central Provinces, and from Kosala, by Ganjam and other places in the Northern Circars, as far as Káñchí or Conjeveram forty-six miles south-west of Madras. Málwa is shown in the second list as a powerful allied kingdom. It does not appear to have formed part of Samudragupta’s territory nor, unless the Śakas are the Kshatrapas, does any mention of Gujarát occur even as an allied state.

श्री गुप्तकुलस्य महाराजाधिराज श्री चंद्रगुप्तविक्रमाङ्कस्य

Śrí Guptakulasya Mahárájadhirája Śrí Chandraguptavikramáṅkasya.

In the very rare Káthiáváḍa coins, though they are similar to the above in style, the legend runs:

परमभागवत महाराजाधिराज श्री चन्द्रगुप्त विक्रमादित्य

Paramabhágavata Mahárájádhirája Śrí Chandragupta Vikramáditya.

Several gold coins of Chandragupta show a young male figure behind the king with his right hand laid on the king’s shoulder. This youthful figure is apparently Chandragupta’s son Kumáragupta who may have acted as Yuvarája during the conquest of Málwa. Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. Chandragupta II, a.d. 396–415. The rareness of Chandragupta’s and the commonness of Kumáragupta’s coins in Káthiáváḍa, together with the date 90 (a.d. 409) on some of Kumáragupta’s coins make it probable that on their conquest his father appointed Kumáragupta viceroy of Gujarát and Káthiáváḍa.

Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. Kumáragupta, a.d. 416–453. Kumáragupta, a.d. 416–453.Chandragupta II. was succeeded by his son Kumáragupta whose mother was the queen Dhruva-Deví. On Kumáragupta’s coins three titles occur: Mahendra, Mahendra-Vikrama, and Mahendráditya. As already noticed the circulation of Kumáragupta’s coins in Káthiáváḍa during his father’s reign makes it probable that on their conquest his father appointed him viceroy of Káthiáváḍa and Gujarát. Kumáragupta appears to have succeeded his father about 96 (a.d. 416). An inscription at Mankuwár near Prayága shows he was ruling as late as 129 (a.d. 449) and a coin of his dated 130 (a.d. 450) adds at least one year to his reign. On the other hand the inscription on the Girnár rock shows that in 137 (a.d. 457) his son Skandagupta was king. It follows that Kumáragupta’s reign ended between 130 and 137 (a.d. 450–457) or about 133 (a.d. 453).

Large numbers of Kumáragupta’s coins of gold silver and copper have been found. The gold which are of various types are inferior in workmanship to his father’s coins. The silver and copper coins are of two varieties, eastern and western. Both varieties have on the obverse the royal bust in the Kshatrapa style of dress. In the western pieces the bust is a copy of the moustached Kshatrapa face with a corrupted version of the corrupt Greek legend used by the Kshatrapas. The only difference between the obverses of the Western Gupta and the Kshatrapa coins is that the date is in the Gupta instead of in the Kshatrapa era. On the reverse is an ill formed peacock facing front as in Chandragupta II.’s coins. The legend runs:

परम भागवत महाराजाधिराज श्री कुमार्गुप्त महेन्द्रादित्य.

Paramabhágavata Maharájádhirája Śrí Kumáragupta Mahendráditya.

In Kumáragupta’s eastern silver and copper coins the bust on the obverse has no moustache nor is there any trace of the corrupt Greek legend. The date is in front of the face in perpendicular numerals one below the other instead of behind the head as in the Kshatrapa and Western Kumáragupta coins. On the reverse is a well-carved peacock facing front with tail feathers at full stretch. Round the peacock runs the clear cut legend:

विजितवनिरवनिपति कुमार्गुप्तो देवं जयति.

Vijitávaniravanipati Kumáragupto devaṃ jayati.

This legend is hard to translate. It seems to mean:

Kumáragupta, lord of the earth, who had conquered the kings of the earth, conquers the Deva.

As almost all the Gupta coins found in Cutch are Skandagupta’s and very few are Kumáragupta’s, Skandagupta seems to have added Cutch to the provinces of Gujarát and Káthiáváḍa inherited from his father. In Káthiáváḍa Skandagupta’s coins are rare, apparently because of the abundant currency left by his father which was so popular in Káthiáváḍa that fresh Kumáragupta coins of a degraded type were issued as late as Valabhi times.

Like his father, Skandagupta issued a gold coinage in his eastern dominions but no trace of a gold currency appears in the west. Like Kumáragupta’s his silver coins were of two varieties, eastern and western. The eastern coins have on the obverse a bust as in Kumáragupta’s coins and the date near the face. On the reverse is a peacock similar to Kumáragupta’s and round the peacock the legend:

विजितावनिरवनिपति जयति देवं स्कन्दगुप्तो यं

Vijitávaniravanipati jayati devaṃ Skandagupto’yaṃ.

Skandagupta’s western coins are of three varieties, one the same as the western coins of Kumáragupta, a second with a bull instead of a peacock on the reverse, and a third with on the reverse an altar with one upright and two side jets of water. Coins of the first two varieties are found both in Gujarát and in Káthiáváḍa. The third water-jet variety is peculiar to Cutch and is an entirely new feature in the western Gupta coinage. On the reverse of all is the legend:

परमभागवत महाराजाधिराज स्कन्दगुप्त क्रमादित्य

Paramabhágavata Mahárájadhirája Skandagupta Kramáditya.

देवं जयति विजितावनिरवनिपति श्री बुधगुप्तो

Devaṁ jayati vijitávaniravanipati Śrí Budhagupto.

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · Váyu Puráṇa, Wilson’s Works, IX. 219n. ↑Note 2 · Vishṇu Puráṇa, III. Chapter 10 Verse 9: Burnell’s Manu, 20. Mr. Fleet (Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 11 note 1) quotes an instance of a Bráhman Note 3 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 53 line 7. ↑Note 4 · Compare Skandagupta’s Junágaḍh Inscription line 15, Ind. Ant. XIV.; Cunningham’s Arch. Sur. X. 113; Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 59. ↑Note 5 · Compare Mr. Fleet’s note in Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 8. ↑Note 6 · The figure of the Ganges standing on an alligator with a stalked lotus in her left hand on the reverse of the gold coins of Samudragupta theNote 7 · Smith’s Gupta Coinage in J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. Pl. I. 10. ↑Note 8 · Compare Wilson’s Ariana Antiqua, Pl. XVIII. Fig. 8, which has the same legend with me for mama. ↑Note 9 · Smith J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. Pl. I. 11, 12. ↑Note 10 · Smith J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. Pl. I. 4. ↑Note 11 · Smith J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. Pl. I. Mr. Smith reads Lichchhavayaḥ (the Lichchhavis) and assigns this type to Chandragupta I. ↑Note 12 · Corpus Ins. Ind. III. 1. ↑Note 13 · Smith J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. Pl. I. 5, 6. ↑Note 14 · Apparently South Kosala, the country about Raipur and Chhattísgarh. ↑Note 15 · Fleet reads Maṇṭarája of Keraḷa. ↑Note 16 · Fleet divides the words differently and translates “Mahendra of Pishṭapura, Svámidatta of Koṭṭura on the hill.” ↑Note 17 · Fleet reads “Nílarája of Avamukta.” ↑Note 18 · Fleet reads Palakka or Pálakka. ↑Note 19 · Arch. Surv. II. 310; J. B. A. S. 1865. 115–121. ↑Note 20 · Mr. Fleet translates “(giving) Garuḍa-tokens, (surrendering) the enjoyment of their own territories.” ↑Note 21 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 6. ↑Note 22 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 3. ↑Note 23 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 5. ↑Note 24 · Mr. Fleet (Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 33) prefers to take Devarája to be the name of Chandragupta’s minister. ↑Note 25 · J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. 120. ↑Note 26 · J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. 121. ↑Note 27 · Mr. Fleet (Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Introd. 130ff) argues that the era was borrowed from Nepal after Chandragupta I. married his Lichchhavi queeNote 28 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 10. ↑Note 29 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 8, 9, 10 and 11. ↑Note 30 · J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. 123. ↑Note 31 · J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. 126. That Kumáragupta’s two successors, Skandagupta and Budhagupta, use the same phrase devaṃ jayati makes the explNote 32 · Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 13. ↑Note 33 · Mr. Fleet (Corp. Ins. Ind. III. 53, 55) reads “nítá triyámá” and translates “a (whole) night was spent.” Dr. Bhagvánlál read “nítás trimásáḥNote 34 · See V. de St. Martin’s Essay, Les Huns Blancs; Specht in Journal Asiatique Oct.–Dec. 1883 and below page 74. ↑Note 35 · In Rudradáman’s inscription the Paláśiní is mentioned, and also the Suvarṇasikatás “and the other rivers,” In Skandagupta’s inscription Mr. Note 36 · Remains of the dam were discovered in 1890 by Khán Bahádúr Ardesir Jamsetji Special Diván of Junágaḍh. The site is somewhat nearer Junágaḍh Note 37 · The reading devo is to be preferred but the anusvára is clear both on these coins and on the coins of his father. For these coins see J. R. Note 38 · J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. Pl. IV. 697. ↑Note 39 · The known dates of Skandagupta are 136 and 137 on his Girnár inscription, 141 in his pillar inscription at Kahaon in Gorakhpur, and 146 in hNote 40 · But see below page 73. ↑Note 41 · Dr. Bhagvánlál examined and copied the original of this inscription. It has since been published as Number 19 in Mr. Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind.Note 42 · J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. 134. ↑Note 43 · It is now known that the main Gupta line continued to rule in Magadha. See page 73 below. ↑Note 44 · Published by Mr. Fleet Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 36. ↑Note 45 · Fleet Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 37. ↑Note 46 · Fleet Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 35. ↑Note 47 · Fleet Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 33. ↑Note 48 · Fleet Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 20. ↑Note 49 · On Naragupta see below page 77, and for his coins J. R. A. S. (N. S.) XXI. note Pl. III. 11. ↑Note 50 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 13 lines 10 and 15. ↑Note 51 · The Pushyamitras seem to have been a long established tribe like the Yaudheyas (above page 37). During the reign of Kanishka (a.d. 78–93) PuNote 52 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 14 line 4. ↑Note 53 · T’oungtien quoted by Specht in Journal Asiatique for Oct.–Dec. 1883. ↑Note 54 · Badeghis is the modern Badhyr the upper plateau between the Merv and the Herat rivers. The probable site of the capital of the White Huns isNote 55 · See the Ghazipur Seal. Smith & Hœrnle, J. A. S. Ben. LVIII. 84ff. and Fleet Ind. Ant. XIX. 224ff. ↑Note 56 · Bihar Ins. Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 12. ↑Note 57 · Junágaḍh Inscrip. Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 14. ↑Note 58 · See note 1 above. ↑Note 59 · See above notes 1 and 2. ↑Note 60 · Ind. Ant. XVIII. 225. ↑Note 61 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Introdn. 12. ↑Note 62 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. Ins. 37 line 4. ↑Note 63 · Beal’s Buddhist Records, I. 169–172 and Rájatarangiṅí, I. 289–326 quoted by Fleet in Ind. Ant. XV. 247–249. ↑Note 64 · Beale’s Hiuen Tsiang, I. 169–171. As Mr. Fleet suggests the younger brother is possibly the Chandra referred to in Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins.Note 65 · Ind. Ant. XIII. 230 and Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Introdn. 12. ↑Note 66 · Specht in Journal Asiatique for Oct.–Dec. 1883. Histoire des Wei. ↑Note 67 · Beal’s Buddhist Records, I. c.–cii. ↑Note 68 · Beal’s Buddhist Records, I. xcix.-c. ↑Note 69 · Beal’s Buddhist Records, I. 171. Hiuen Tsiang’s statement (Ditto) that Mihirakula conquered Gandhára after his capture by Báláditya may refeNote 70 · Beal’s Buddhist Records (I. c.) suggests that Lae-lih is the founder’s name: in his note 50 he seems to regard Lae-lih as the family name. ↑Note 71 · Bühler. Ep. Ind. I. 238. Dr. Bühler hesitates to identify the Toramáṇa of this inscription with Mihirakula’s father. ↑Note 72 · Beal’s Buddhist Records, I. xcix.-c. This is the kingdom which the Ye-tha destroyed and afterwards set up Lae-lih to be king over the countrNote 73 · Specht in Jour. Asiatique 1883 II. 335 and 348. ↑Note 74 · J. R. A. S. XXI. 721. According to other accounts (Ency. Brit. IX. Ed. Art. Turk. page 658) a portion of the Jouen-Jouen remained in EasternNote 75 · The name Jouen-Jouen seems to agree with Toramáṇa’s surname Jaúvla and with the Juvia whom Cosmas Indikopleustes (a.d. 520–535) places to thNote 76 · Rawlinson’s Seventh Monarchy, 311–349. ↑Note 77 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 25 line 1. ↑Note 78 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 19 line 2. ↑Note 79 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins 36. ↑Note 80 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 20. ↑Note 81 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 33. ↑Note 82 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. and Ind. Ant. XVIII. 219. ↑Note 83 · Priaulx’s Indian Travels, 222. Compare Yule’s Cathay, I. clxx.; Mignes’ Patr. Gr. 88 page 450. For the use of Kula for Mihirakula, the seconNote 84 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 18. ↑Note 85 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 33–35. ↑Note 86 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 35 line 5. ↑Note 87 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. 151 note 4. ↑Note 88 · N. Lat. 24° 3′; E. Long. 75° 8′. ↑Note 89 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 33 line 5. ↑Note 90 · This has already been suggested by Genl. Cunningham, Num. Chron. (3rd Ser.), VIII. 41. Dr. Hœrnle (J. B. A. S. LVIII. 100ff) has identified Note 91 · Fleet’s Corp. Ins. Ind. III. Ins. 33 line 6. ↑Note 92 · Beal’s Buddhist Records, I. 169. ↑Note 93 · Hœrnle in J. B. A. S. LVIII. 97. ↑Note 94 · See Smith and Hœrnle J. B. A. S. LVIII. 84; and Fleet Ind. Ant. XIX. 224. ↑Note 95 · Hœrnle makes light of this difficulty: J. B. A. S. LVIII. 97. ↑Note 96 · Rawlinson’s Seventh Monarchy, 420, 422. ↑Note 97 · According to the Puráṇas1 the original seat of the Guptas was between the Ganges and the Jamna. Their first capital is not determined. EngliNote 98 · The Founder Gupta, a.d. 319–322(?).The founder of the dynasty is styled Gupta. In inscriptions this name always appears as Śrí-gupta which iNote 99 · Chandragupta I. a.d. 349–369(?).Chandragupta I. (a.d. 349–369 [?]), the son and successor of Ghaṭotkacha, is styled Mahárájádhirája either bNote 100 · Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. Samudragupta, a.d. 370–395. Samudragupta, a.d. 370–395.Samudragupta was the first of his family to stNote 101 · His Coins.A noteworthy feature of Samudragupta’s coins is that one or other of almost all his epithets appears on each of his coins with a fNote 102 · Coins9 with the epithet Apratiratha Peerless have on the obverse a standing king whose left hand rests on a bow and whose right hand holds aNote 103 · Apratiratharájanyakírti(r)mama vijáyate.10Note 104 · Coins with the attribute Kritánta paraśu the Death-like-battle-axe have on the obverse a royal figure grasping a battle-axe.11 In front of tNote 105 · Coins with the legend Lichchhaveyaḥ, a coin abbreviation for Lichchhavidauhitra Daughter’s son of Lichchhavi (?), have on the obverse a stanNote 106 · His Allahábád Inscription.A fuller source of information regarding Samudragupta remains in his inscription on the Allahábád Pillar.14 NearlyNote 107 · Lines 19 and 20 record the conquest, or submission, of the following South Indian monarchs, Mahendra of Kosala, Vyághrarája of Mahá Kántára,Note 108 · As no reference is made to the territories of these kings they may be supposed to be well known neighbouring rulers. General Cunningham’s coNote 109 · The Indian kingdoms are:23Note 110 · Mention is next made of kings who submitted, gave their daughters in marriage, paid tribute, and requested the issue of the Garuḍa or Eagle Note 111 · Chandragupta II. a.d. 396–415.Samudragupta was succeeded by his son Chandragupta II. whose mother was the queen Dattádeví. He was the greateNote 112 · A third inscription is on the railing of the great Sáñchi stúpa.28 It is dated the 4th day of Bhádrapada Saṃvat 93 (a.d. 412) and records thNote 113 · (Coin) of the king of kings the illustrious Chandragupta Vikramáṅka, of the family of the illustrious Gupta.30Note 114 · The great devotee of Vishṇu the supreme ruler of great kings, the illustrious Chandragupta Vikramáditya.31Note 115 · As the first Gupta was a chief of no great power or influence it is probable that though it is calculated from him the Gupta era was establiNote 116 · Working back from Gupta Saṃvat 80 (a.d. 400) the date of Chandragupta’s conquest of Málwa we may allot 1 to 12 (a.d. 319–332) to the founderNote 117 · None of Kumáragupta’s four inscriptions gives any historical or other details regarding him.35 But the number and the wide distribution of hNote 118 · The great Vaishnava the supreme ruler of great kings, the illustrious Kumáragupta Mahendráditya.36Note 119 · Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. Kumáragupta, a.d. 416–453. Probably the Deva whose name suggested the antithesis between the kings ofNote 120 · Skandagupta, a.d. 454–470.Kumáragupta was succeeded by his son Skandagupta. An inscription of his on a pillar at Bhitarí near Saidpur in GháNote 121 · This king Skandagupta who having conquered the earth conquers the Deva.44Note 122 · The great Vaishnava the supreme ruler of great kings, Skandagupta the Sun of Prowess.45Note 123 · Chapter VII. The Guptas, a.d. 410–470. Skandagupta, a.d. 454–470. The beginning of Skandagupta’s reign has been placed about Gupta 133 or a.Note 124 · Budhagupta, a.d. 485.With Skandagupta the regular Gupta succession ceases.47 The next Gupta is Budhagupta who has a pillar inscription48 in Note 125 · The king the illustrious Budhagupta who has conquered the earth conquers the Deva.49Note 126 · Since the coins are dated Saṃvat 174 and 180 odd (a.d. 494 and 500 odd) and the inscription’s date is 165 (a.d. 485) the inscription may be Note 127 · The Gwálior inscription52 mentions prince Mihirakula as the son of Toramáṇa and a second inscription from a well in Mandasor53 dated Málava Note 128 · Bhánugupta, a.d. 511.After Budhagupta neither inscription nor coin shows any trace of Gupta supremacy in Málwa. An Eraṇ inscription55 found Note 129 · The Pushyamitras, a.d. 455.[Though the history of their last years is known only in fragments, chiefly from inscriptions and coins, little dNote 130 · White Huns, a.d. 450–520.Among the northerners who with or shortly after the Pushyamitras shared in the overthrow of Gupta power two names, Note 131 · Mihirakula, a.d. 512.Mihirakula’s accession to the throne may perhaps be fixed at a.d. 512. An inscription of Yaśodharman, the date of whichNote 132 · Yaśodharman of Málwa, a.d. 533–4.Regarding the history of the third destroyers of Gupta power in Málwa, inscriptions show that in a.d. 437–8Note 133 · The difficult question remains by whom was the power of Mihirakula overthrown. Yaśodharman claims to have subdued Mihirakula, who, he distinNote 134 · Chapter VIII. The Valabhis, a.d. 509–766. Vaḷeh Town, 1893. Vaḷeh Town, 1893.The Valabhi dynasty, which succeeded the Guptas in Gujarát and
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings