WALTER HAMILTON, (continued 4)
Reading edition
A Ballade of Five o’clock Tea. Served in most delicate ware, Dresden or Sévres—where you spy Dainty devices and rare, Hues that enrapture the eye: Hands that are shapely and white, Pour out the fragrant Bohea, Beauty presides at this rite— This is your Five O’clock Tea. Perched in the midst of the fair, Masher resplendent, yet shy, Awkwardly shifts in his chair, He will gain courage by and bye. Beaux so antique, most polite, Prattle in garrulous glee, Here in their element quite— This is your Five O’clock Tea. Characters melt into air; Good reputations must die; Think you “My Lady” will spare For all that you murmur, “Oh Fy?” Colloquies vapid and trite, Slanderous tongues running free, Small emanations of spite— This is your Five O’clock Tea. Envoy. Sugar and cream can excite Envy and malice, we see; Satirists cry with delight— “This is your Five O’clock Tea!” Orchis (F. B. Doveton).
——:o:——
Ballade of Pôt-Pourri. Oriental, and fragile, and old Is the pôt-pourri bowl you see there; Dreamy odours—romances untold It confides to this latter-day air. Ghosts of laughter, of love, and despair, Dim strains of a quaint minuet Bnd a gallant’s low words to his fair— “Our Lady of Roses—Coquette!” * * * * * Premier Pas. Truth. March 8, 1888.
Of the other examples that were printed it must suffice to mention the titles:—
Ballade of Five o’clock Tea—(Five thus). Ballade of the Amateur Reciter. Ballade of Leap year—(Two thus). Fashion’s Fig-leaf. Our Whistling Drawing-room Man. Ballade of an Axe—(The G. O. M.’s Axe). On the modern method of shaking hands. Our grand Fancy Fair. Pat the Patriot. Ballade of a Primal cigar. Ballade of a Programme. A “Blue” Ballade—(“These are the ’Varsity Crews”). Ballade of Pôt-Pourri. Ballade for Diogenes. A Ballade of Girls and Wedding. Girls’ Gossip.
——:o:——
TU QUOQUE.
An Idyll in the Conservatory. (Inserted with the Author’s permission.) Nellie. If I were you, when ladies at the play, Sir, Beckon and nod, a melodrama through, I would not turn abstractedly away, Sir, If I were you! Frank. If I were you, when persons I affected, Wait for three hours to take me down to Kew, I would at least pretend I recollected, If I were you! Nellie. If I were you, when ladies are so lavish, Sir, as to keep me every waltz but two, I would not dance with odious Miss McTavish, If I were you! Frank. If I were you, who vow you cannot suffer Whiff of the best,—the mildest “honey dew,” I would not dance with smoke-consuming Puffer, If I were you! Nellie. If I were you, I would not, Sir, be bitter, Even to write the “Cynical Review;”— Frank. No, I should doubtless find flirtation fitter. If I were you! Nellie. Really! You would? Why, Frank, you’re quite delightful,— Hot as Othello, and as black of hue; Borrow my fan. I would not look so frightful, If I were you! Frank. “It is the cause.” I mean your chaperon is Bringing some well-curled juvenile. Adieu! I shall retire. I’d spare that poor Adonis, If I were you! 63 Nellie. Go, if you will. At once! And by express, Sir; Where shall it be? To China—or Peru? Go. I should leave inquirers my address, Sir, If I were you! Frank. No—I remain. To stay and fight a duel Seems, on the whole, the proper thing to do— Ah, you are strong,—I would not then be cruel, If I were you! Nellie. One does not like one’s feelings to be doubted,— Frank. One does not like one’s friends to misconstrue,— Nellie. If I confess that I a wee-bit pouted? Frank. I should admit that I was piqué, too. Nellie. Ask me to dance. I’d say no more about it, If I were you! (Waltz. Exeunt.) Austin Dobson.
An Idyll of the Lobby. Liberal Seceder. If I were you, when friends electioneering Wish to preserve consistency of view, I would forewarn when Hawarden gales are veering— If I were you. Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. If I were you, when issuing addresses, I would observe the simple rule of two Meanings in a sentence—tip for safe successes— If I were you. L. S. If I were you, when older friends reveal a Freedom in spending time and money too, I would not rush to dance a jig with Healy— If I were you. W. E. G. If I were you, who swear you cannot suffer Plutocrat and peer, landlord and Jew, I would not tilt against the people like a duffer— If I were you. L. S. I would not go at such an awful rate, or Friends may forsake you—thing they’re apt to do— W. E. G. I would remember the fate of such a traitor— If I were you. L. S. Surely you never—call a party meeting; Try to arrange that each may get his due; Keep the dear Irish; I’d avoid a beating, If I were you. W. E. G. No, I depart, I must consult the people, Chamberlain’s coming—Randolph with him too— I wouldn’t pray ’neath Chamberlainic steeple, If I were you. L. S. Go, if you will; my faith is not so flabby; Cowards in midlands happily are few. Stay! I would take that little trick from Labby— If I were you. W. E. G. Done! I remain—Brummagem to pound well. Leave it till autumn—now, of course, you’re true? Wouldn’t smash the party (surely doesn’t sound well) If I were you. L. S. One does not like that Caucus-pressure leaning. W. E. G. Yes, I was sorry—had to use the screw. L. S. If I confess that I mistook your meaning— W. E. G. I will allow ’twas fair to misconstrue. Late L. S. Ask me to vote. You’ve got to put the green in, And cannon off the blue: I’d chalk my cue If I were you. K. The Pall Mall Budget. June 3, 1886.
——:o:——
The Prodigals. (After Mr. Austin Dobson’s famous ballade.) [Dedicated to Mr. Chaplin, M.P., and Mr. Richard Power, M.P., and 223 who followed them.] Ministers!—you, most serious, Critics and statesmen of all degrees, Hearken awhile to the motion of us,— Senators keen for the Epsom breeze! Nothing we ask of posts or fees; Worry us not with objections pray! Lo,—for the Speaker’s wig we seize Give us—ah! give us—the Derby Day. Scots most prudent, penurious! Irishmen busy as humblebees! Hearken awhile to the motion of us,— Senators keen for the Epsom breeze! For Sir Joseph’s sake, and his owner’s, please! (Solomon raced like fun, they say) Lo for we beg on our bended knees,— Give us—ah! give us—the Derby Day. Campbell-Asheton be generous! (But they voted such things were not the cheese) Sullivan, hear us, magnanimous! (But Sullivan thought with their enemies.) And shortly they got both of help and ease For a mad majority crowded to say— “Debate we’ve drunk to the dregs and lees; Give us—ah! give us—the Derby Day.” Envoi. Prince, most just was the motion of these And many were seen by the dusty way, Shouting glad to the Epsom breeze Give us—ah! give us—the Derby Day. W. E. Henley.

64
Ballades, Rondeaus and Villanelles.
The revival of the taste for these curious old French forms of poetry has received a great impetus from the delightful examples produced by Austin Dobson, Edmund Gosse, W. E. Henley, Andrew Lang, R. Le Gallienne, J. Ashby-Sterry, A. C. Swinburne, C. H. Waring and Oscar Wilde.
The composition of all poetry in the English language is governed by clearly defined rules, and although a man ignorant of these rules, if gifted with a fine ear, and original conceptions, may produce a pretty song or ballad, it is very rare indeed that any truly great work is composed, which is not written in accordance with certain regulations as to metre and rhyme.
In ordinary poetry these restrictions allow of great variations in style and treatment, but it is far otherwise when any of the old French poetical fashions are selected; then the rules are exact and peremptory, and for each of the following varieties, the form is clearly defined, and perfectly distinct. They are the Ballade, Chant Royal, Kyrielle, Pantoum, Rondeau Redoublé, Rondel, Rondeau, Sicilian Octave, Triolet, and Villanelle, with a few minor forms.
It is quite beyond the scope of this collection to formulate the rules governing the composition of these poetic trifles, nor indeed is it necessary, for Mr. Gleeson White’s charming little book on the subject is readily accessible, and contains nearly all that can be said about it. It is entitled Ballades and Rondeaus, selected, with a chapter on the various forms, by Gleeson White. London, Walter Scott, 1887.
The editor’s name is sufficient to indicate that the selections are the best that could be chosen, and the introductory essay is, in itself, a distinct gain to our literature, treating as it does, of a somewhat exotic branch of poetry. Mr. Gleeson White is very much in earnest, and although he inserts a few burlesques it is evident that he regards them as desecrations of his favourite metres.
To the Parodist nothing is sacred, but whilst some of the following parodies are quoted from Mr. White’s collection, those who would wish to read the originals must refer to the work itself.
In Punch (October 22, 1887) there was a set of verses (in honour of Mr. White’s book) written in the various metres described, and one of each of these may fitly lead the several varieties here dealt with.
THE MUSE IN MANACLES.
(By an Envious and Irritable Bard, after reading “Ballades and Rondeaus,” just published, and wishing he could do anything like any of them.)
Bored by the Ballade, vexed by Villanelle, Of Rondeau tired, and Triolet as well! The Ballade. (In Bad Weather). Oh! I’m in a terrible plight— For how can I rhyme in the rain? ’Tis pouring from morn until night: So bad is the weather again, My language is almost profane! Though shod with the useful galosh, I’m racked with rheumatical pain— I think that a Ballade is bosh I know I am looking a fright; That knowledge, I know, is in vain; My “brolly” is not water-tight, But hopelessly rended in twain And spoilt by the rude hurricane! Though clad in a stout mackintosh, My temper I scarce can restrain— I think that a Ballade is bosh! Oh, I’m an unfortunate wight! The damp is affecting my brain; My woes I would gladly recite, In phrases emphatic and plain, Your sympathy could I obtain. I don’t think my verses will wash, They’re somewhat effete and inane— I think that a Ballade is bosh! Envoy. I fancy I’m getting insane, I’m over my ankles in slosh; But let me repeat the refrain— I think that a Ballade is bosh!
A Ballade of Old Metres. When, in the merry realm of France, Bluff Francis ruled and loved and laughed, Now held the lists with knightly lance, Anon the knightly beaker quaffed; Where wit could wing his keenest shaft With Villon’s verse or Montaigne’s prose, Then poets exercised their craft In ballades, triolets, rondeaux. O quaint old times! O fitting chants! With fluttering banners fore and aft, With mirth of minstrelsy and dance, Sped Poesy’s enchanted craft; The odorous gale was blowing abaft Her silken sails, as on she goes, Doth still to us faint echoes waft Of ballades, triolets, rondeaux. But tell me with what countenance Ye seek on modern rhymes to graft Those tender shoots of old Romance— Romance that now is only chaffed? O iron days! O idle raft Of rhymesters! they are ‘peu de chose,’ What Scott would call supremely “saft” Your ballades, triolets, rondeaux. Envoy. Bards, in whose vein the maddening draught Of Hippocrene so wildly glows, Forbear, and do not drive us daft With ballades, triolets, rondeaux. The Century.
A Young Poet’s Advice. You should study the bards of to-day Who in England are now all the rage; You should try to be piquant and gay; Your lines are too solemn and sage. 65 You should try to fill only a page, Or two at the most with your lay; And revive the quaint verse of an age That is fading forgotten away. Study Lang, Gosse, and Dobson, I pray— That their rhymes and their fancies engage Your thought to be witty as they. You must stand on the popular stage. In the bars of an old fashioned cage We must prison the birds of our May, To carol the notes of an age That is fading forgotten away. Now this is a ‘Ballade’—I say, So one stanza more to our page, But the “Vers de Société,” If you can are the best for your ‘wage.’ Though the purists may fall in a rage That two rhymes go thrice in one lay, You may passably echo an age That is fading forgotten away. Envoy. Bard—heed not the seer and the sage, ‘Afflatus’ and Nature don’t pay; But stick to the forms of an age That is fading forgotten away. C. P. Cranch.
——:o:——
In an amusing little collection of poems quite recently published, there are several parodies and three ballades, all on legal topics, from which the following extracts are quoted by the kind permission of Messrs. Reeves and Turner. The title of the book is The Lays of a Limb of the Law, by the late John Popplestone, Town Clerk of Stourmouth, edited by Edmund B. V. Christian. London: Reeves and Turner, 1889. It contains Law Reports in the shape of parodies of Cowper’s “Alexander Selkirk;” of Pope’s translation of Homer, “The Splendid Shilling,” and of other poems in a manner somewhat similar to those contained in Professor Frederick Pollock’s well-known, but scarce little work, “Leading Cases Done into English.”
Of the three ballades perhaps the following is the best:—
Ballade of Old Law Books.
“I am improving my legal knowledge, Master Copperfield, said Uriah. ‘I am going through Tidd’s Practice. Oh, what a writer Mr. Tidd is, Master Copperfield.’”
The law books are standing in dingy array, They fill every shelf from ceiling to floor, Old guides to a silent and grass-covered way Which never a traveller now shall explore, Save delvers for antiquarian lore, Who painfully search where their treasures lie hid, In pages that else had been closed evermore, Forgotten for aye, like the wonderful Tidd! Great Blackstone is put up aloft, far away (The Whig, first edition, in calf, volumes four); The Doctor and Student alike are at play; And Perkins is now but a profitless bore. Old Viner’s abridgment is over the door ’Mid dust-begrimed wines that fetch never a bid; Even Fearne on Remainders we vainly deplore Forgotten for aye, like the wonderful Tidd! Oblivion has fallen on the frequent Ca. sa., And Cursitor Street is untrod as of yore; We turn not the leaves of Les Termes de la Ley, Or these ancient Reports, ah, many a score, Of a dulness as deadly as dread hellibore, Of their Latin and law we are joyfully rid. Let them stand, as we peacefully slumber and snore, Forgotten for aye, like the wonderful Tidd. Envoy. How quickly the summers and winters are o’er! They linger not now as in childhood they did. Soon we shall be treading yon shadowy shore, Forgotten for aye like the wonderful Tidd!
The first verse of each of the other two ballades will suffice:—
Ballade of the Honest Lawyer. The “noble savage” of long ago Within a hundred tomes we find; The foreigner acute we know, And “general readers,” looks resigned; The “law of nature,” left behind By a simpler age, has ceased to be Aught but examination grind; “The honest lawyer,” where is he? * * * * *
Ballade of Leading Cases. When August crowns the legal year, When clients leave an hour for play, But—your examination near— You’re doomed in London town to stay; When, tired of our prosaic day, You’d catch a glimpse of old-world faces, Put statutes, text-books, all, away— Read, mark, and learn the Leading Cases. * * * * *
Ballade of the Timid Bard. (To Angelica, who bids him publish.) In Memory’s mystical hazes I see a vast Gander and grey, I see the small boy that he chases At the head of a hissing array: How I wept when they brought me to bay, How I pleaded in vain for a truce! Too frightened too shoo them away, I could never say Boh to a Goose! * * * * * Punch, October 22, 1887.
——:o:——
THE VILLANELLE.
(With Vexation.) I do not like the Villanelle, I think it somewhat of a bore— This tinkle of a Muffin-bell! 66 The reason why I cannot tell; Each day I fancy, more and more, I do not like the Villanelle! It makes me stamp and storm and yell, It makes me wildly rage and roar: This tinkle of a Muffin-bell! I look upon it as a sell, Its use I constantly deplore; I do not like the Villanelle! Poetic thoughts it must dispel, It very often tries me sore: This tinkle of a Muffin-bell! For this I know, and know full well— Let me repeat it o’er and o’er— I do not like the Villanelle, This tinkle of a Muffin-bell!
Such was Mr. Punch’s opinion of this delicious form of verse, which must be complete in nineteen lines, arranged as above. The accepted model is the following old French Villanelle by Jean Passerat:
J’ay perdu ma tourterelle; Est-ce-point ells que i’oy?[2] Je veux aller après elle. Tu regrettes ta femelle; Hélas! aussy fay-je moy: J’ay perdu ma tourterelle. Si ton amour est fidèle, Aussy est ferme ma foy; Je veux aller après elle. Ta plainte se renouvelle? Toujours plaindre je me doy: J’ay perdu ma tourterelle. En ne voyant plus la belle Plus rien de beau je ne voy: Je veux aller après elle. Mort, que tant de fois j’appelle Prens ce qui se donne à toy: J’ai perdu ma tourterelle, Je veux aller après elle.
Of modern English specimens one of the most beautiful is that by Mr. Austin Dobson “When I saw you last, Rose,” which is given in Mr. White’s book, together with a French translation of it by M. J. Boulmier.
A Villanelle. After Mr. Oscar Wilde.) Commissioner of Lunacee! An inquirendo come and hold; For Oscar Wilde hath need of thee! Flings to the world in wild frenzee A poem on “a wattled fold,” Commissioner of Lunacee. In his strange verse none sense can see; He raves of “limbs and beards of gold”; He really hath great need of thee! Anon he says, “A hell I see!” And talks of satyrs dead and cold: Commissioner of Lunacee. And many an untold idiocee, With little meaning, is enrolled: He verily hath need of thee, A Bedlamite as mad as he No open doors should ever hold. Commissioner of Lunacee, You see he has great need of thee! Frank Danby. The Whitehall Review, September 30, 1880.
The Street Singer. (Villanelle from my window.) He stands at the kerb and sings. ’Tis a doleful tune and slow, Ah me, if I had but wings! He bends to the coin one flings, But he never attempts to go,— He stands at the kerb and sings. The conjurer comes with his rings. And the Punch-and-Judy show. Ah me, if I had but wings! They pass like all fugitive things— They fade and they pass, but lo! He stands at the kerb and sings. All the magic that Music brings Is lost when he mangles it so— Ah me, if I had but wings! But the worst is a thought that stings! There is nothing at hand to throw! He stands at the kerb and sings— Ah me, if I had but wings! Austin Dobson.
Culture in the Slums. Now ain’t they utterly too-too (She ses, my missus mine,[3] ses she), Them flymy little bits of Blue. Joe, just you kool ’em—nice and skew Upon our old meogginee, Now ain’t they utterly too-too? They’re better than a pot ’n’ a screw, They’re equal to a Sunday spree, Them flymy little bits of Blue! Suppose I put ’em up the flue, And booze the profits, Joe? Not me. Now ain’t they utterly too-too? I do the ’Igh Art fake, I do. Joe, I’m consummate; and I see Them flymy little bits of Blue. 67 Which, Joe, is why I ses te you— Æsthetic-like, and limp, and free— Now ain’t they utterly too-too, Them flymy little bits o’ Blue? W. E. Henley.
In Wain! (A Villanelle of Vexations. By B * * * y P * * g.) Addressed to all true Jingoes. In wain would I the British Lion wake! In wain I’d rouge the brute to wilent springing; His tail won’t wag, his mane declines to shake. In wain my daily ’larum-bell I take, Till his ears tingle with its brazen ringing In wain would I the British Lion wake! In wain I warn him of that Northern snake, Who midst our Injun grass will soon be stinging; His tail won’t wag, his mane declines to shake. * * * * * He sleeps as placid as a windless lake; Cold water on my fire his calm is flinging. His tail won’t wag, his mane declines to shake; In wain would I the British Lion wake! Punch. August 11, 1877.
——:o:——
THE TRIOLET.
(In a Temper.) A Triolet’s scarcely the thing— Unless you would carol in fetters! If lark-like you freely would sing, A Triolet’s scarcely the thing: I miss the poetical ring, I’m told that it has, by my betters! A Triolet’s scarcely the thing— Unless you would carol in fetters! Punch.
The Triolet, which should consist of eight lines, but only two rhymes, is more often met with in French literature than in our own; the following old specimen was christened by Ménage le roi des Triolets:—
Le premier jour du mois de mai Fut le plus heureux de ma vie: Le beau dessein que je formai, Le premier jour du mois de mai! Je vous vis et je vous aimai. Si ce dessein vous plut, Sylvie, Le premier jour du mois de mai Fut le plus heureux de ma vie. Jacques Ranchin.
A Triolet, (After Mr. Dobson’s “I intended an Ode”) I wished to sing my love; I cannot do so now. (As I remarked above) I wished to sing my love, But Kate crossed with her cow And gave my love a shove. I wished to sing my love; I cannot do so now. John Twig.
How to Fashion a Triolet. As triolets are now the “go,” A charming one I’ll write, Their little niceties to show,— As triolets are now the “go,”— I’m writing one (and à propos, By Webster, I am right); As triolets are now the “go,” A charming one I’ll write. The dictionary teaches me The triolet receipt:— The verses of eight lines must be; The dictionary teaches me The first line, by the recipe, Three times I must repeat. The dictionary teaches me The triolet receipt. The second line must reappear To form the final line; No matter if it soundeth queer. The second line must reappear; When poetry is far from clear It is considered fine! The second line must reappear To form the final line. Now, do you like the triolet? Your true opinion say. It puts me in a horrid pet; Now, do you like the triolet? I wish your real thought to get, So do be candid, pray. Now do you like the triolet? Your true opinion say. W. Best. Detroit Free Press, 1888.
——:o:——
THE RONDEAU.
(In a Rage.) Pray tell me why we can’t agree To bid the merry Muse run free? Pray tell me why we should incline To see her in a Rondeau pine, Or sigh in shackled minstrelsy? Why can’t she sing with lark-like glee, And revel in bright jeux d’esprit? Where form can’t fetter or confine— Pray tell me why? Pray tell me why that frisky gee, Called Pegasus, should harnessed be? Why bit and bridle should combine To all his liveliness consign,— To deck the Rondeau’s narrow line— Pray tell me why? Punch.
68
RONDEAU. Ma foi, c’est fait de moi, car Isabeau M a conjuré de lui faire un rondeau. Cela me met en peine extrême Quoi! treize vers, huit en eau, cinq en eme! Je lui ferais aussitôt un bateau. En voilà cing pourtant en un monceau. Faisons-en huit en invoquant Brodeau, Et puis mettons, par quelque stratagème: Ma foi, c est fait. Si je pouvais encor de mon cerveau Tirer cinq vers l’ouvrage serait beau; Mais cependant je suis dedans l’onzième; Et ci je crois que je fais le douzième; En voila treize ajustés au niveau. Ma foi, c’est fait. —Voiture.
The following humorous paraphrase was written, some years since, by Mr. Austin Dobson:—
You bid me try, BLUE-EYES, to write A Rondeau. What! forthwith?—to-night? Reflect. Some skill I have, ’tis true; But thirteen lines!-and rhymed on two!— “Refrain,” as well. Ah, hapless plight! Still there are five lines—ranged aright. These Gallic bonds, I feared, would fright My easy Muse. They did, till you— You bid me try! “That makes them eight.—The port’s in sight: Tis all because your eyes are bright! Now just a pair to end in “oo,”— When maids command, what can’t we do! Behold! The RONDEAU—tasteful, light— You bid me try!”
A Rondeau. (After Voiture’s “Ma foy c’est fait.”) Why do I wander wildly to and fro? My tyrant bade me twist her a rondeau. Methinks ’twas deleterious to my brain! I loved her (though her name was Mary Jane): She died of D. T. many years ago. A Rondeau? Humph! Ha, hum! Egad, just so! “Five rhymes in ain and eight remain in O.” Eh, no, Voiture! For they be all inane. Why do I wander? White though the head be, red’s the nose below— (Bright beams a light-house spite a roof of snow)— “Why wander goose-like?” doth my love complain? Ah, dear, dead love! Ah, Marie! Ah, ma reine! (Meaning M. J. of course.) Hullo! Gee Wo! Why do I wander?
Culture in the Slums. (Inscribed to an Intense Poet.) “O Crikey, Bill!” she ses to me, she ses. “Look sharp,” ses she, “with them there sossiges. Yea! sharp with them there bags of mysteree! For lo!” she ses, “for lo! old pal,” ses she, “I’m blooming peckish, neither more nor less.” Was it not prime—I leave you all to guess How prime!—to have a jude in love’s distress Come spooning round, and murmuring balmilee, “O crikey, Bill!” For in such rorty wise doth Love express His blooming views, and asks for your address, And makes it right, and does the gay and free. I kissed her—I did so! And her and me Was pals. And if that ain’t good business, O crikey, Bill! W. E. Henley.
A Rondel. (After Mr. Dobson’s “Too hard it is to sing.”) Too hard it is to pipe To an untuneful herd! And berries, while unripe, Repel the prudent bird! The wildly warbling snipe You may, perhaps, have heard— (Too hard it is to pipe To an untuneful herd!) It rarely fed on tripe But mushroom much preferred Lest folk its tail should gripe And salt (which were absurd!) Too hard it is to pipe To an untuneful herd!
Rondel. (Adapted, for the use of the Order of Our Lady of Pain.) Kissing the Heir, I saw him at my feet, Wound round my finger, found him soft and sweet; Made fast his feeble hands, dazzled his eyes,— Like fishes’ optics, no ways clear or wise. With my best dresses made him find me fair— Kissing the Heir! Deep the resources drained by him and me, Deep as Disraeli, or the deeper sea. What wife could draw him thus for her and her’s? What charm have made him more for me disburse?— Ah! if his guardian had not caught me there Kissing the Heir! The Hornet, July 26, 1871.
——:o:——
BEHOLD THE DEEDS!
(Chant Royal.)
An American Parody.
[Being the Plaint of Adolphe Culpepper Ferguson, Salesman of Fancy Notions, held in durance of his Landlady for a failure to connect on Saturday night.]
I. I would that all men my hard case might know; How grievously I suffer for no sin: I, Adolphe Culpepper Ferguson, for lo! I, of my landlady am locked in. For being short on this sad Saturday, 69 Nor having shekels of silver wherewith to pay; She has turned and is departed with my key; Wherefore, not even as other boarders free, I sing (as prisoners to their dungeon stones When for ten days they expiate a spree): Behold the deeds that are done of Mrs. Jones! II. One night and one day have I wept my woe; Nor wot I when the morrow doth begin, If I shall have to write to Briggs & Co., To pray them to advance the requisite tin For ransom of their salesman, that he may Go forth as other boarders go alway—— As those I hear now flocking from their tea, Led by the daughter of my landlady Piano-ward. This day for all my moans, Dry bread and water have been servéd me. Behold the deeds that are done of Mrs. Jones! III. Miss Amabel Jones is musical, and so The heart of the young he-boardér doth win, Playing “The Maiden’s Prayer,” adagio— That fetcheth him, as fetcheth the banco skin The innocent rustic. For my part, I pray: That Badarjewska maid may wait for aye Ere sits she with a lover, as did we Once sit together, Amabel! Can it be That all that arduous wooing not atones For Saturday shortness of trade dollars three? Behold the deeds that are done of Mrs. Jones! IV. Yea! she forgets the arm was wont to go Around her waist. She wears a buckle whose pin Galleth the crook of the young man’s elbow; I forget not, for I that youth have been. Smith was aforetime the Lothario gay. Yet once, I mind me, Smith was forced to stay Close in his room. Not calm, as I, was he; But his noise brought no pleasaunce, verily. Small ease he gat of playing on the bones, Or hammering on his stove-pipe, that I see. Behold the deeds that are done of Mrs. Jones! V. Thou, for whose fear the figurative crow I eat, accursed be thou and all thy kin! Thee will I show up—yea, up will I shew Thy too thick buckwheats, and thy tea too thin. Ay! here I dare thee, ready for the fray! Thou dost not “keep a first-class house,” I say! It does not with the advertisements agree. Thou lodgest a Briton with a puggaree, And thou hast harboured Jacobses and Cohns, Also a Mulligan. Thus denounce I thee! Behold the deeds that are done of Mrs. Jones! Envoy. Boarders! the worst I have not told to ye: She hath stolen my trousers, that I may not flee Privily by the window. Hence these groans, There is no fleeing in a robe de nuit. Behold the deeds that are done of Mrs. Jones! H. C. Bunner.
——:o:——
Poets of the Æsthetic School
About ten years ago London Society was divided into two hostile Camps, one known as the Æsthetes, the other as the Philistines. Neither title was correct, nor very expressive, but each conveyed a certain meaning which even now could not be briefly expressed in more simple language.
The Æsthetes were originally a small body of artists and poets, belonging to what was called the Pre-Raphaelite school, who strove to educate the English people up to a certain standard in art and culture.
All the men who founded this school subsequently became eminent in their professions, but they were, for many years, subjected to the ridicule and criticisms of the Philistines.
Yet it is probable that most of this opposition was directed less against the men of genius who actually created Pre-Raphaelitism, than against those too ardent devotees of the new fashion, who carried all its dictates to the extreme, and frequently turned the true and the beautiful into the absurd and grotesque by their exaggerations in dress, language, and deportment.
On the other hand many of the opponents of Æstheticism were those who having seen Du Maurier’s caricatures in Punch, and witnessed Burnand’s vamped up old comedy The Colonel, or Gilbert & Sullivan’s Patience, thought themselves fully qualified to jeer at the “consummate” the “utter” and the “too-too,” without having either read a poem by Swinburne, or Morris, or having seen a painting by Burne-Jones or Dante Gabriel Rossetti.
This opposition did some good in its day, for although Æstheticism eventually triumphed, only the beautiful that it created has survived, the lank and melancholy maidens, and the “Grosvenor-Gallery” young men, have departed, but the revival—the Renaissance in fact—of British Art in Painting, poetry, dress, decoration, and even in house furniture, is an accomplished fact. Much has been written, and remains to be written, on this fascinating topic, but this collection cannot be made the medium for Lectures on Art.
At the risk of appearing egotistical the following little work can be mentioned as conveying useful information on a subject which is certainly worthy of some little study:—
“The Æsthetic Movement in England,” by Walter Hamilton. Third edition—London. Reeves and Turner, 1882.
Without further preface a selection of parodies will be given on the works of Rossetti, who was not only a founder of the school, but also one of its most eminent exponents.
DANTE GABRIEL ROSSETTI
Born May 12, 1828. | Died April 9, 1882.
There was a particular metre much affected by this great artist and poet, of which perhaps the best example to be found is in his weird “Sister Helen,” which has been frequently parodied. It commences thus:—
“Why did you melt your waxen man, Sister Helen? To-day is the third since you began.” “The time was long, yet the time ran, Little brother.” (O Mother, Mary Mother, Three days to-day, between Hell and Heaven!) 70 “But if you have done your work aright, Sister Helen, You’ll let me play, for you said I might.” “Be very still in your play to-night, Little brother.” (O Mother, Mary Mother, Third night, to-night, between Hell and Heaven!) “Oh, the waxen knave was plump to-day, Sister Helen; How like dead folk he has dropped away!” “Nay now, of the dead what can you say, Little brother?” (O Mother, Mary Mother, What of the dead, between Hell and Heaven?) * * * * * “Ah! what white thing at the door has cross’d, Sister Helen? Ah! what is this that sighs in the frost?” “A soul that’s lost as mine is lost, Little brother!” (O Mother, Mary Mother, Lost, lost, all lost, between Hell and Heaven!)
This, and other poems by Rossetti, such as Eden Bower, and Troy Town, only revived a very old fashion—the ballad with a refrain or burden.
But when once it was revived so many indifferent poets attempted to utter their little insipidities in the ballad style, that the parodists soon caught the infection. One gentleman furbished up a tremendous ballad which resembled nothing so much as the cry of a costermonger, for its burden, oft repeated, was—
“Apple, and orange, and nectarine,”
whilst one of the evening papers published the following satire on Rossetti’s style:—
After Dilettante Concetti. “Why do you wear your hair like a man, Sister Helen? This week is the third since you began.” “I’m writing a ballad; be still if you can, Little brother, (O Mother Carey, mother! What chickens are these between sea and heaven?”) “But why does your figure appear so lean, Sister Helen? And why do you dress in sage sage, green?” “Children should never be heard, if seen, Little brother! (O Mother Carey, mother! What fowls are a-wing in the stormy heaven!” “But why is your face so yellowy white, Sister Helen? And why are your skirts so funnily tight?” “Be quiet you torment, or how can I write, Little brother? (O Mother Carey, mother! How gathers thy train to the sea from the heaven.”) “And who’s Mother Carey, and what is her train, Sister Helen? And why do you call her again and again?” “You troublesome boy, why that’s the refrain, Little brother! O Mother Carey, mother! What work is toward in the startled heaven?”) “And what’s a refrain? What a curious word, Sister Helen; Is the ballad you’re writing about a sea-bird?” “Not at all! why should it be? Don’t be absurd, Little brother. (O Mother Carey, mother! Thy brood flies lower as lowers the heaven.)” (A big brother speaketh:) “The refrain you’ve studied a meaning had, Sister Helen! It gave strange force to a weird ballàd. But refrains have become a ridiculous ‘fad,’ Little brother. And Mother Carey, mother, Has a bearing on nothing in earth or heaven.” * * * * *
For the remainder of this exquisite parody, readers are referred to Mr. H. D. Traill’s Recaptured Rhymes (London, W, Blackwood & Sons, 1882), in which work it was republished.
Eve. (An Imitation.) “Dasz ich genossen des Wissens Frucht, Das kannst du nicht mehr aendern.”—[H. Heine.] The serpent tempted thee to shame, Mother Eve. God’s direst vengeance on thee came, Mother Eve. And never may we hope to win That golden garden close hedged in From toil and tempest, strife and sin, Mother Eve. Before thy wondering, wakened eyes, Mother Eve. Clashed shut the gates of Paradise, Mother Eve. Thy wandering feet, thy hands were torn, By briar, wayside weed and thorn, Thy babes in anguish great were born, Mother Eve. And yet God’s vengeance knew no stay, Mother Eve. Thy first-born did his brother slay, Mother Eve. Died not thy heart for woe and dread, When Abel in thine arms lay dead, And Cain red-handed turned and fled, Mother Eve? Methinks I hear thee murmur “Nay,” Mother Eve. “Evil and bitter was my day,” Mother Eve. “Evil and full of pain, but still I am Thy judge—work all Thy will— I judge Thee knowing good from ill.” Mother Eve. “I stretched mine hand unto Thy tree—” Mother Eve. “Not as the sightless beasts are we—” Mother Eve. “The curse has fallen—let it bide— I and my children open-eyed Know Thee, and judge, whate’er betide,” Mother Eve. Mabel Peacock. Detroit Free Press, December 5, 1885.
71
The Poets at Tea. Rossetti, who took six cups of it. The lilies lie in my lady’s bower, (O weary mother, drive the cows to roost), They faintly droop for a little hour; My lady’s head droops like a flower. She took the porcelain in her hand, (O weary mother, drive the cows to roost), She poured; I drank at her command; Drank deep, and now-you understand! (O weary mother, drive the cows to roost). * * * * * The Cambridge Fortnightly. February, 1888.
A Twilight Fantasy. A woman stood at a garden gate (Sing hey, for the distant spreading sail!) Sing hey, for the dog that hurried by With a kettle tied to his tail. My goodman skurried adown the road. (Sing hey, for the joyous drinking bout!) And after the ochre cur he sped With many a gruesome shout. “Now why this haste, good neighbour?” she cried; “Why after the dog of the umber tint?” But, waking the echoes with yells, he sped Through the twilight’s gleam and glint. A smug-face lad looked over the fence (Sing hey, where the birdlings sing and chirp,) “Why laughest, good mother!” “I laugh,” said she, “To see yon ecru purp.” A smile then smilèd the smug-faced lad. (Sing lack-a-day, for the sunset red,) “Then laugh no more, good gossip, because The kettle is your’n,” he said. The Shooting Times. February 11, 1887.
The Laundress and the Laidy. All on a sofa fair Ada lay, (O, for a brandy and soda, she sighed), It was four in the afternoon, and gay Was the outside world, but Ada must stay In her room, and thus she cried, “Could I but join the happy throng.” (And O, for a brandy and soda she sighed), “That under my windows pass along To Short’s, or to Finch’s, I’d soon be gone, Or to the Inventions glide.” She took down an “afternoon tea-book” to read, (O, for a brandy and soda she sighed), But it interested her little indeed, Such books are tame if you haven’t “teaed.” And no one sat by her side. She went to the window and gazed at the sky, (O, for a brandy and soda she sighed), Then she saw her particular mash pass by, To attract his attention did she try, But in vain, tho’ hard she tried. Her chloral bottle she took in her hand, (O, for a brandy and soda she sighed), “To sleep till the evening will be grand;” And she slept through the strains of a German band, Which was playing in all its pride. “Why didn’t she go for a stroll?” you say, But, reader, I beg you pause; Her friends on a visit were all away, And her laundress forgot to send home that day Her petticoats, stockings, and pockethandkerchiefs. The Sporting Times. June 20, 1885.
The same paper, for May 23, 1885, contained another very funny parody of Rossetti; but unfortunately it was too suggestive to bear republication here.
It was reserved, however, for that prince of Parodists, Charles S. Calverley, to make the ballad with a refrain supremely ridiculous:—
The auld wife sat at her ivied door, (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) A thing she had frequently done before; And her spectacles lay on her apron’d knees. The piper he piped on the hill-top high, (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) Till the cow said “I die,” and the goose ask’d “Why?” And the dog said nothing, but search’d for fleas. The farmer he strode through the square farm-yard; (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) His last brew of ale was a trifle hard— The connexion of which with the plot one sees. The farmer’s daughter hath frank blue eyes; (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) She hears the rooks caw in the windy skies, As she sits at her lattice and shells her peas. The farmer’s daughter hath ripe red lips; (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) If you try to approach her, away she skips Over tables and chairs with apparent ease. The farmer’s daughter hath soft brown hair; (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) And I met with a ballad, I can’t say where, Which wholly consisted of lines like these.
In the second part of this pathetic composition the poet thus describes the melancholy sequel:—
She sat with her hands ’neath her burning cheeks, (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) And gazed at the piper for thirteen weeks; Then she follow’d him out o’er the misty leas. Her sheep follow’d her, as their tails did them, (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese) And this song is consider’d a perfect gem, And as to the meaning, it’s what you please.
When Mr. Calverley composed this burlesque Ballad (which is to be found in full in his Fly Leaves, published by G. Bell & Sons), it is probable that he was thinking of 72 one by Mr. Morris, entitled “Two Red Roses across the Moon” commencing “There was a lady liv’d in a hall,” and ending with the refrain which forms the title.
Having once shown how it could be done, other comic writers followed suit, and the burlesque ballads in this style are almost too numerous to be quoted.
——:o:——
You, I, and the Post. You,—the British Public; I,—W. E. G. The Post—G. P. O. A statesman sits at Hawarden gate, (Paper and pens and a bottle of ink.) A stalwart man with a shapely pate, And brains to spare, as you rightly think. The live-long day he’s been hacking down trees, (Paper and pens and two bottles of ink.) Toughish work, yet he does it with ease, Nor e’en doth, as Milton would phrase it, “swink.” Who is’t approacheth? ha! ha! The post! (Paper and pens and a pint of ink.) Of letters and post-cards bearing a host— Beneath the load he seems ready to sink. The Statesman opens and reads them all, (Paper and pens and a quart of ink.) Quoth he, “I’ll answer them great and small, This very night ere I sleep a wink.” In he strides to his big bureau, (Paper and pens and a gallon of ink.) And answers fourscore letters or so— (Fourscore’s the minimum number, I think); Some answered by note, and some by card, (Paper and pens and a barrel of ink.) But when the question’s uncommonly hard, The point of the query he’ll deftly shrink. Oh, the postman puffs, and the postman swears, (Paper and pens and a sheet of stamps.) At the load of letters and cards he bears To Hawarden gate in his daily tramps. Oh, you who of letters and answers are fond, (Paper and pens and a grey goose quill.) Write to Hawarden, there beyond— And an answer you’ll get from the People’s Will! Hubert John de Burgh.
(This talented young author died in 1877, at the early age of thirty-two. The above parody originally appeared in Yorick, to accompany a cartoon by Harry Furniss.)
As recently as October 20, 1888, Punch had a similar parody entitled
Agriculture’s Latest Rôle.
(A Bucolic Ballad, with a Borrowed Refrain, Dedicated to the British Dairy Farmers’ Association,)
“Where are you going to, my pretty Maid?” (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) “I’m going a-milking, Sir;” she said; (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) “For times are bad, and the farm don’t pay. ’Tis Pasture v. Arable so men say. If still I’d be prosperous this is the way. (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) “I’m tired of corn-growing that brings little cash, (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) The old business of Ceres seems going to smash. (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) Free Trade and the Yankee have finished her clean. From furrow and sheaf there seems little to glean, From ploughed land to pasture I’m changing the scene. (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) “I hope you’ll allow I look fetching like this, (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) A Dairymaid’s dress suits me sweetly, I wis. (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) Just twig my short petticoats, look at my pail! The bards are all ready a Milkmaid to hail! I mean making prettiness pay,—shall I fail? (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) “You’ve been to the Dairy Show, Sir, have you not? (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) Those churners competitive were a sweet lot. (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!) Miss Holmes, and Miss Keel, and Miss Barron, who won, Seemed not a bit fagged when the business was done. I’m sure Butter-making looks capital fun. (Butter and eggs and a pound of cheese!)” * * * * *
A Christmas Wail. (Not by Dante Gabriel Rossetti.) On Christmas day I dined with Brown. (O the dinner was fine to see!) I drove to his house, right merrily down To a western square of London town. (And I moan and I cry woe’s me!) We dined off turkey and Christmas beef; (O the dinner was fine to see!) My anguish is sore and my comfort brief, And nought but blue pills can ease my grief, (As I moan and I cry woe’s me!) We gorged plum-pudding and hot mince pies, (O the dinner was fine to see!) And other nameless atrocities, The weight of which on my—bosom lies. (And I moan and I cry woe’s me!) We drank dry Clicquot and rare old port, (O the dinner was fine to see!) And I pledged my host for a right good sort In bumpers of both, for I never thought (I should moan and I cry woe’s me!) * * * * * But I woke next day with a fearful head, (O that dinner so fine to see!) And on my chest is a weight like lead, And I frequently wish that I were dead, (And I moan and I cry woe’s me!) And as for Brown—why the truth to tell— (O that dinner so fine to see!) I hate him now with the hate of hell, Though before I loved him passing well, (And I moan and I cry woe’s me!) Truth. December 27, 1883.
73 One of the most ridiculous features of the so-called Æsthetic movement was, that a number of brainless noodles set to work to write poetry in serious imitation of Swinburne, Rossetti, and Oscar Wilde. The style was a mixture of mediæval Italian and middle English, and the one principle which guided the dolorous singers was, “We must not have any meaning, or, at any rate, the less the better.” “My lady” was addressed in all kinds of rhymes, “Love” was held responsible for legions of complicated woes, green eyes, golden eyes—even orbs “like a cat’s splendid circled eye” were quite in fashion. The recipe for this description of poetry was—Begin with an address to your lady; never mind if you have not one, for that is a mere detail. Represent her as bewitching you with the unutterably weary gaze of her eyes—or eyne—“eyne” is preferable; stick in an old word like “teen” or “drouth” or “wot” or “sooth” or “wearyhead” or “wanhope;” break out with “Lo!” and “Yea!” and “Nay!” and “Ah!” at brief intervals, and be sure to have a weird refrain. This humbug held its own for a while, but a few unsparing satirists dealt with this dreary small-fry of art, and the following, one of the most delightful modern jests was prompted by the school:—
Madonna Mia. I would I were a cigarette Between my lady’s lithe sad lips Where Death, like Love, divinely set, With exquisite sighs and sips, Feeds and is fed and is not fain, And Memory married with Regret, And Pleasure amorous of red Pain, In moon-wise musing wax and wane; That with the bitter sweetness of her breath I might somewhile remember and forget (For Life is Love, and Love is Death!) It was my hap—ah well-a-way— To burn my little hour away! I would I were a gold jewèl To fleck my lady’s soft lean throat, Where Love, like Death, lies throned to swell A strange and tremulous note Of yearning vague and void and vain, Delight on flame Desire to quell, And Pleasure fearful of red Pain, And dreams fall in to sear and stain; That in the barren blossom of her breath I might be glad we were not one, but twain (For Love is Life, and Life is Death!) And that without me, well-a-way, She could not choose but pass away.
This masterly balderdash has imposed on many people; and the most comic thing in the world is to see an earnest person endeavouring to discover hidden meanings in it.
“John Bull” (a London newspaper) for November 8, 1879, contained a long article from which only the following brief notes can be quoted:—
Immortal Pictures.
Mr. Rossetti has painted a picture, and in an unguarded moment permitted the Athenæum to describe it in the following language.—[Extract given in full.]
Apropos of the above fragment of art-criticism, a correspondent sends us the following analysis (clipped from a rival journal) of another remarkable picture:—
“It is better to speak the truth at once, and to say that we have in Mr. Symphony Priggins a master as great as the greatest; and in this picture the master-piece of a master; and in this episode of a picture the masterstroke of a master’s master-piece. The sublimity of Buonaroti, the poetic fervour of Raffaelle, the tremulous intensity of Sandro Botticelli, the correggiosity of Correggio have never raised these masters to higher heights than our own Priggins has attained in this transcendent rendering of the Dish running away with the Spoon.
“The artist, like some others of his craft, is, as is known, a poet of no mean pretensions; and he has set forth the inner meaning of his picture in the following lines, which form the motto on its frame:—”
A Ballad of High Endeavour. Ah night! blind germ of days to be, Ah me! ah me! (Sweet Venus, mother!) What wail of smitten strings hear we? (Ah me; ah me! Hey diddle dee!) Ravished by clouds our Lady Moon, Ah me! ah me! (Sweet Venus, mother!) Sinks swooning in a lady-swoon (Ah me! ah me! Dum diddle dee!) What profits it to rise i’ the dark? Ah me! ah me! (Sweet Venus, mother!) If love but over-soar its mark (Ah me! ah me! Hey diddle dee!) What boots to fall again forlorn? Ah me! ah me; (Sweet Venus, mother!) Scorned by the grinning hound of scorn, (Ah me! ah me! Dum diddle dee!) Art thou not greater who art less? Ah me! ah me! (Sweet Venus, mother!) Low love fulfilled of low success? (Ah me! ah me! Hey diddle dee!)
No one we imagine, would have been dull enough to have missed the allegory of Mr. Priggins’ great picture even without such exposition; but many, perhaps, will only feel it after this its setting forth in “perfect music matched with noble words.”
Song by Mr. Joseph Hubert Hillyer. Art is to me no intellectual fad; (A goodly balance is fair to see!) You don’t catch me o’er culture going mad. (The rarest of letters are £ s. d.!) As soon as I could paint I set my heart On making money (else what good is Art?); In painting show-bills ’twas I made my start. (O, sweet is the chink of cash to me!) 74 I found the public vulgar scenes liked best, (A goodly balance is fair to see!) And so I painted my great “Crowner’s Quest;” (The rarest of letters are £ s. d.!) And when its sordid realism took, I gave them next my “Fair at Donnybrook.” And “Tourists up the Rhine with Mr. Cook.” (O, sweet is the chink of cash to me!) These made my name, and then the Starch firm, Plums, (A goodly balance is fair to see!) To paint them posters gave me lordly sums; (The rarest of letters are £ s. d.!) And there was not a hoarding but did bear (Above my name, writ large,) a dainty pair Of damsels, who starched collarettes did wear. (O, sweet is the chink of cash to me!) Since then I’ve turned my art to fresh accounts, (A goodly balance is fair to see!) And rival razors puffed for large amounts. (O, rarest of letters are £ s. d.!) I’ve painted, too, with realistic tricks, “The Penny Steamboat’s Progress” (set of six), From Old Swan Pier, till at Vauxhall she sticks! (O, sweet is the chink of cash to me!) Truth. Christmas Number, 1882.
London Town. A Lyric à la Mode. Kent-born Helen, England’s pride, (O London Town!) Had a waist a world too wide For the height of her heart’s desire. Vinegar she in vain had tried. (O London Town! Fashion’s thralls ne’er tire!) Helen knelt at Fashion’s shrine, (O London Town!) Saying, “A little boon is mine, A little boon, but my heart’s desire. Here me speak, and make me a sign! (O London Town! Fashion’s thralls ne’er tire!) “Look! my waist is in excess, (O London Town!) I would die to have it less. Shape it to my heart’s desire. Fit for fashionable dress. (O London Town! Fashion’s thralls ne’er tire!) “It is moulded like a Greek’s, (O London Town!) One of Nature’s spiteful freaks. Pinch it to my heart’s desire: I am full of pains and piques. (O London Town! Fashion’s thralls ne’er tire!) “See Bell Fane’s, how slim it is! (O London Town!) Eighteen inches at most, I wis! Poisons the cup of my heart’s desire. O that I should suffer this! (O London Town! Fashion’s thralls ne’er tire!) “Yea, for straitness here I sue! (O London Town!) Antifat I find won’t do; Give me, give me, my heart’s desire, Three inches less, or at least full two.” (O London Town! Fashion’s thralls ne’er tire!) (Eight verses omitted.) Punch. April 24, 1880.
The following rather more serious imitation of Rossetti is from “The Diversions of the Echo Club” by Bayard Taylor. Mr. Taylor remarks that Rossetti’s poetry is encumbered with the burden of colour, sensuous expression, and mediæval imagery and drapery; but he forgot to mention that Rossetti wrote as an artist, and that some of his finest poems were written to accompany, and to elucidate, certain of his own pictures.
Cimabuella. I. Fair-tinted cheeks, clear eyelids drawn In crescent curves above the light Of eyes, whose dim, uncertain dawn Becomes not day: a forehead white Beneath long yellow heaps of hair: She is so strange she must be fair. II. Had she sharp, slant-wise wings outspread, She were an angel; but she stands With flat dead gold behind her head, And lilies in her long thin hands: Her folded mantle, gathered in, Falls to her feet as it were tin. III. Her nose is keen as pointed flame; Her crimson lips no thing express; And never dread of saintly blame Held down her heavy eyelashes: To guess what she were thinking of, Precludeth any meaner love. IV. An azure carpet, fringed with gold, Sprinkled with scarlet spots, I laid Before her straight, cool feet unrolled: But she nor sound nor movement made (Albeit, I heard a soft, shy smile, Printing her neck a moment’s while); V. And I was shamed through all my mind For that she spake not, neither kissed, But stared right past me. Lo! behind Me stood, in pink and amethyst, Sword-girt and velvet-doubleted, A tall, gaunt youth, with frowzy head, VI. Wide nostrils in the air, dull eyes, Thick lips that simpered, but, ah me! I saw, with most forlorn surprise, He was the Thirteenth Century, I but the Nineteenth: then despair Curdled beneath my curling hair. 75 VII. O, Love and Fate! How could she choose My rounded outlines, broader brain, And my resuscitated Muse? Some tears she shed, but whether pain Or joy in him unlocked their source, I could not fathom which, of course. VIII. But I from missals, quaintly bound, With either and with clavichord Will sing her songs of sovran sound: Belike her pity will afford Such faint return as suits a saint So sweetly done in verse and paint.
——:o:——
THE LEAF.
Those who have read Rossetti’s lines, commencing
“Torn from your parent bough, Poor leaf, all withered now, Where go you?”
will remember that he gives them as translated from Leopardi. It is, however, rather curious that Rossetti does not seem to have noticed that Leopardi headed his little poem “Imitazione” thus distinctly disclaiming the authorship.
The following is Leopardi’s version:—
Imitazione. Lungi dal proprio ramo, Povera foglia frale Dove vai tu? Dal faggio Là dov’ io nacqui, mi divise il vento. Esso, tornando, a volo Dal bosco alla campagna, Dalla valle mi porta alla montagna Seco perpetuamente; Vo pellegrino, e tutto l’altro ignoro. Vo dove ogni altra cosa Dove naturalmente Va la foglia di rosa E la foglia d’alloro.
Leopardi translated these lines from a collection of fables by A. V. Arnault, Paris, 1826, where they are styled:—
De la tige détachée. Pauvre feuille desséchée, Ou vas-tu? Je n’en sais rien. L’orage a brisé le chêne Qui seul etait mon soutien. De son inconstante haleine Le zéphir ou l’acquilon Depuis ce jour me promène De la montagne à la plaine, De la forêt au vallon, Je vais où le vent me mène, Hélas! sans trop m’effrayer; Je vais où va toute chose, Où va la feuille de rose, Où va la feuille de laurier.
These lines had been previously translated into English, before Rossetti, by Macaulay, as follows:—
Thou poor leaf, so sear and frail, Sport of every wanton gale, Whence and whither dost thou fly Through this bleak autumnal sky? On a noble oak I grew, Green and broad and fair to view; But the monarch of the shade By the tempest low was laid. From that time I wandered o’er Wood and valley, hill and moor; Wheresoe’er the wind is blowing, Nothing caring, nothing knowing. Thither go I whither goes Glory’s laurel, Beauty’s rose.
Before leaving Rossetti mention must be made of a singular series of illustrated parodies which appeared in Punch, March 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31, 1866. The illustrations, by Du Maurier, seem to have been intended partly to ridicule Burne Jones’s style, and partly that of Rossetti; as to the poem, it is of the ultra weird and sensational ballad form, with a slight dash of the “Lady of Shalott” thrown in, and the inevitable refrain, popularly supposed to be inseparable from Pre-raffaelite art.
A Legend of Camelot. Tall Braunighrindas left her bed At cock-crow with an aching head, O Miserie! “I yearn to suffer and to do,” She cried, “ere sunset, something new! O Miserie! “To do and suffer, ere I die, I care not what. I know not why. O Miserie! “Some quest I crave to undertake, Or burden bear, or trouble make.” O Miserie! She shook her hair about her form In waves of colour bright and warm. O Miserie! It rolled and writhed and reached the floor; A silver wedding-ring she wore. O Miserie! She left her tower, and wandered down Into the High street of the town. O Miserie! Her pale feet glimmered, in and out, Like tombstones as she went about. O Miserie! From right to left, and left to right; And blue veins streakt her insteps white; O Miserie! And folks did ask her in the street “How fared it with her long pale feet?” O Miserie! And blinkt, as though ’twere hard to bear The red-heat of her blazing hair! O Miserie! Sir Galahad and Sir Launcelot Came hand in hand down Camelot; O Miserie! Sir Gauwaine followed close behind; A weight hung heavy on his mind. O Miserie! 76 “Who knows this damsel, burning bright,” Quoth Launcelot “like a northern light?” O Miserie! Quoth Sir Gauwaine: “I know her not!” “Who quoth you did?” Quoth Launcelot. O Miserie! Then quoth the pure Sir Galahad; “She seems, methinks, but lightly clad!” O Miserie! “Ah me!” sighed Launcelot where he stood, “I cannot fathom it!” … (Who could?) O Miserie! * * * * *
——:o:——
The following beautiful sonnet written by Miss Christina Rossetti, sister of D. G. Rossetti, appears in “Goblin Market and other Poems,” published by Macmillan & Co., 1879:
REMEMBER.
Remember me when I am gone away, Gone far away into the silent land; When you can no more hold me by the hand, Nor I half turn to go yet turning stay. Remember me when no more day by day You tell me of our future that you planned: Only remember me; you understand It will be late to counsel then or pray. Yet if you should forget me for awhile And afterwards remember, do not grieve; For if the darkness and corruption leave A vestige of the thoughts that once I had, Better by far you should forget and smile Than that you should remember and be sad.
This appears to be almost the only poem by Miss Rossetti which has tempted the mocking-bird to sing.
Remember. Remember it, although you’re far away— Too far away more fivers yet to land, When you no more can proffer notes of hand, Nor I half yearn to change my yea to nay. Remember, when no more in airy way, You tell me of repayment sagely planned: Only remember it, you understand! It’s rather late to counsel you to pay; Yet if you should remember for awhile, And then forget it wholly, I should grieve; For, though your light procrastinations leave Small remnants of the hope that once I had, Than that you should forget your debt and smile, I’d rather you’d remember and be sad. Judy. April 18, 1888.
Ding Dong. By Rosina Christelli. Ding Dong, Ding Dong, There goes the gong, Dick, come along, ’Tis time for dinner. Wash your face, Take your place, Where’s your grace You little sinner? “Like an apple?” “Yes, I should. Nice, nice, nicey! Good, good, good!” “Manners, Miss, Please behave. Those you ask Shan’t have.” “Those who don’t, Don’t want. I’ll eat it, You shan’t.” Baby cry, Wipe his eye. Baby good, Give him food. Baby sleepy, Go to bed. Baby naughty, Smack his head! Poor little thrush, Found dead in a bush! When did he die? He is rather high. Bury him deep, He won’t keep. Bury him well, Or he’ll smell. What have horns? Cows and moons. What have crests? Cocks and spoons. What are nice? Ducks and peas. What are nasty? Bites of fleas. What are fast? Tides and times. What are slow? Nursery Rhymes.
From The Light Green. Cambridge, W. Metcalf and Sons, 1872.

WILLIAM MORRIS.
The author of “The Earthly Paradise” is much more than a mere poet, he is a thorough man of business, who works as an art designer, and lectures on the social improvement of the people. His poetry was thus amusingly criticised in London, 1877:—
Rondel. Behold the works of W. Morris, Epics, and here and there wall-papery, Mild, mooney, melancholy vapoury. A sort of Chaucer minus Horace. Spun out like those of William Loris, Who wrote of amourous red-tapery, Behold the works of W. Morris, Epics, and here and there wall-papery! Long ladies, knights, and earles and choris- ters in the most appropriate drapery, Samite and silk and spotless napery, Sunflowers and apple-blossoms and orris, Behold the works of W. Morris!
There are not many good parodies of Mr. Morris, the following is one of the best, though where it first appeared, or by whom it was written, cannot be stated:—
In the cushioned Abbey pew There is space for Me and You. Twine the blossoms in my hair; 77 Never mind if people stare— Never mind, for none knowèth If one flirteth after death! Hark—the organ shakes the pew! Would it were for Me and You! Yea, I would indeed it were! Are they staring? Let them stare! Never mind, for none knowèth If one laugheth after death! We will slumber in the pew— I am weary, so are you, And the cushions in repair! Let the British public stare! Never mind, for none knowèth If one sleepeth after death!
All Sides of the River. The Maidens. We, with distaste, across the water wan, The broadcloth of our modern lovers scan; We each prefer a mediæval man. The Youths. We would not reach you, if we could dry-shod; Not one of us would change, for even, his odd; The Girl we like not of the Period. The Mothers. O daughters! make your markets while you can, For bloom soon groweth like the water wan; The early bird picks up the marrying man. The Maidens. Perhaps, O lovers, if we did our hair A la Medea, and if our garments were Draped classically, we should seem more fair. The Youths. By doing this ye would not us befool; Medea! the idea makes our blood run cool, Besides of classics we’d enough at school. The Boys. Come, I say, now, the girls can darn, and hem, And cook a chop, and clean a meerschaum-stem; Our sisters take, we are so tired of them. The Maidens. Perhaps if ruffs around our necks were tied, Or you with idiotic stare we eyed All angles, with our heads upon one side, In short, the middle age style— The Widows. Suitors! stay, We are less far from middle age than they. The Youths. Maidens, we then to you would make our way. The Maidens, Cross ye the water wan, then,— Mr. Swinburne. I demur To “water wan,” it comes too often, sir; Write next, as I should, rhyming, “wan water,” The Maidens. Lovers, we pray you, gaining our consents, Let us, too, have our mediæval bents, Give us, for cricket-matches, tournaments. The Widowers. We are stout, nor will uncomfortably truss Our arms and legs, like fowls; no jousts for us, In armour we should look ridiculous. The Fathers. Of money, tournaments would cost a heap: Humour your sweethearts, sons, with something cheap But look to settlements before you leap. The Youths. O maidens! we in verse will call you queens, And publicly extol your minds and miens, Sending our poems to the magazines. The Maidens. Sith of Life’s arches bloom hath shortest span, We will give up our mediæval man, And meet you half way in the water wan. The Editors. Alas! the maidens have removed their ban, We, vex’d with verses vile, e’en when they scan, Shall very soon be as the water wan. Anonymous. Once a Week. February 20, 1869.
The Monthly Parodies. AN APOLOGY. After William Morris’s “Earthly Paradise.” Of Love or War this is no hour to sing, But I may ease the burden of your fears (Lest you think death to mirth is happening), And quote from wit of past and present years, Till o’er these pages you forget your tears, And smile again, as presently you say Some idle jingle—or forgotten lay. But when a-weary of the hunt for mirth Thro’ comic journals, with a doleful sigh, You feel unkindly unto all the earth, And grudge the pennies that they cost to buy These “weakly comics,” lingering like to die, Remember, then, a little while, I pray, The clever singers of a former day. The pomp and power and grand majestic air That marches thro’ their poems’ stately tread, These idle verses may catch unaware, And by burlesque call back remembered Some rhymes “that living not can ne’er be dead,” Though what is meant by that I cannot say— But Mr. Morris wrote it one fine day. Here grouped are strains of parody in rhyme, Now classified and placed in order straight, Let it suffice it for the present time That some be old, while some are born but late, A careful choice, from all the crowd that wait, Of those that in forgotten serials stay, Or are, in passing journals, tossed away. 78 Folks say a wizard to a common King, One April-tide such wondrous jest did show That in a mirror men beheld each thing, Like, yet unlike, and saw the pale nose glow, While rosy face looked white as fallen snow, Each visage altered in such comic way That those who came to court, remain’d to play. So with these many Parodies it is, If you will read aright and carefully, Not scathing satire, nor malicious hiss For lack of beauty in the themes to see; Nor jeerings coarse, at what men prize, as we But jest to make some little changeling play Its pranks in classic robes, all crowned with bay. Gleeson White.

OSCAR WILDE.
It would be useless to attempt to give any parodies on the poems of Mr. Oscar Wilde without prefacing them with some account, however brief, of his career. In a few of the skits the allusions are already out of date, and in a short time the reasons will be quite forgotten that led to the silly ridicule and misrepresentations of which Mr. Oscar Wilde, as the Apostle of Æstheticism, was formerly the object.
Mr. Oscar O’Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin on October 15, 1856. His father, Sir William R. Wilde, was an eminent surgeon, and a man of literary tastes and great archæological learning.
In 1851 Sir William (then Mr.) Wilde married a granddaughter of Archdeacon Elgee, of Wexford, a lady well known in literary circles in Dublin as having written many poems which were published in the Nation newspaper at the time of the political excitement in 1848. They appeared over the nom de plume “Speranza,” and were afterwards published in a collected form, entitled “Poems by Speranza.”
Mr. Oscar Wilde early developed talents such as might have been expected in the son of highly gifted parents. Having spent about a year at Portora Royal School, Enniskillen, Mr. Wilde studied for a year at Trinity College, Dublin, where he obtained a classical scholarship at the early age of sixteen, and in 1874, won the Berkeley Gold Medal for Greek, the topic selected for that year being the Greek Comic Poets. Thence he went to Magdalen College, Oxford, where he obtained a first scholarship.
He soon began to show his taste for art and china, and before he had been at Oxford very long, his rooms were the show of the college, and of the university too. He was fortunate enough to obtain the best situated rooms in the college, on what is called the kitchen staircase, having a lovely view over the river Cherwell and the beautiful Magdalen walks, and Magdalen bridge. His rooms were three in number, and the walls were entirely panelled. The two sitting rooms were connected by an arch, where folding doors had at one time stood. His blue china was supposed by connoisseurs to be very valuable and fine, and there was plenty of it. He was hospitable, and on Sunday nights after “Common Room,” his rooms were generally the scene of conviviality, where undergraduates of all descriptions and tastes were to be met, drinking punch, or a B. and S. with their cigars. It was at one of these entertainments that he made his well-known remark, “Oh, that I could live up to my blue china!”
Besides minor scholarships, he took the Newdigate, a prize for English verse, in 1878, and a first in Literis Humanioribus, after which he took his degree.
During this period he produced a number of poems, these were published, some in The Month, others in the Catholic Monitor, and the Irish Monthly. A number of his short poems also appeared in Kottabos, a small magazine written by members of Trinity College, Dublin.
The first number of Mr. Edmund Yates’s Time, April 1879, contained a short poem by Oscar Wilde, entitled “The Conqueror of Time,” and to the July number he contributed “The New Helen.” Some of the foregoing poems, with others not previously published, appeared in a volume, entitled “Poems” by Oscar Wilde, published in 1881 by David Bogue, which speedily ran through several editions.
When referring to this volume in “The Æsthetic Movement in England” mention was made of Mr. Wilde’s exquisite little poem
REQUIESCAT. Tread lightly, she is near, Under the snow, Speak gently, she can hear The daises grow. All her bright golden hair Tarnished with rust, She that was young and fair, Fallen to dust. Lily-like, white as snow, She hardly knew She was a woman, so Sweetly she grew. Coffin board, heavy stone, Lie on her breast, I vex my heart alone, She is at rest. Peace, peace, she cannot hear Lyre or sonnet, All my life’s buried here, Heap earth upon it.
concerning which Mr. G. A. Sala wrote to the Editor (on August 17, 1882.) “I note your book for a proximate ‘Echo.’ I have not read Oscar Wilde’s poems, but in the very sweet stanzas (‘Requiescat’) which you quote, I mark a singular passage:—
“All her bright golden air, Tarnished with rust.”
Golden hair (experto crede) does not tarnish in the tomb. Read the last paragraph in Zola’s Nana, which physiologically, is astoundingly accurate.”
Faithfully always,
George Augustus Sala.
The passage relating to the death of Nana runs thus:— “Et, sur ce masque horrible et grotesque du néant, les cheveux, les beaux cheveux gardant leur flambée de soleil, coulaient en un ruissellement d’or, Vénus se décomposait.”
79 It is also necessary to refer, here to Mr. Wilde’s career in the two other capacities he has assumed of Art Lecturer, and Dress Reformer.
The interest in the Æsthetic School had sometime since spread to the United States, and when the opera of Patience was produced it occurred to Mr. Wilde that a visit to the States to give some lectures, explanatory of real Æstheticism as it exists amongst us, might interest and possibly instruct and elevate our transatlantic cousins.
In some of his early utterances he was unguarded; he admitted, for instance, that he was not strongly impressed with the mighty ocean, and great was the flow of wit from this small cause:—
“There’s Oscar Wilde, that gifted chylde, Fair Poesie’s anointed, Has, like a brick, the Atlantic Crossed, to be disappointed. Poor Oscar Wilde, æsthetic chylde; The Atlantic ought to know it! A fault so grave to misbehave, And disappoint a poet!”
He went to Omaha, where, under the auspices of the Social Art Club, he delivered a lecture on “Decorative Art,” in the course of which he described his impressions of many American houses as being “illy designed, decorated shabbily, and in bad taste, and filled with furniture that was not honestly made, and was out of character.” This statement gave rise to the following verses:—
“What a shame and what a pity, In the streets of London City Mr. Wilde is seen no more. Far from Piccadilly banished, He to Omaha has vanished, Horrid place, which swells ignore. On his back a coat he beareth, Such as Sir John Bennett weareth, Made of velvet—strange array! Legs Apollo might have sighed for, Or great Hercules have died for, His knee breeches now display. Waving sunflower and lily, He calls all the houses “illy” Decorated and designed. For of taste they’ve not a tittle; They may chew and they may whittle; But they are all born colour blind!”
From the States he went to Canada, and thence to Nova Scotia, the Halifax Morning Herald of October 10, 1882, gave an amusing account of an interview held with him by their own “Interviewer.” “The apostle had no lily, nor yet a sunflower. He wore a velvet jacket which seemed to be a good jacket. He had an ordinary necktie and wore a linen collar about number eighteen on a neck half a dozen sizes smaller. His legs were in trousers, and his boots were apparently the product of New York art, judging by their pointed toes. His hair is the colour of straw, slightly leonine, and when not looked after, goes climbing all over his features. Mr. Wilde was communicative and genial; he said he found Canada pleasant, but in answer to a question as to whether European or American women were the more beautiful, he dexterously evaded his querist.”
The remainder of the conversation was devoted to poetry; he expressed his opinion that Poe was the greatest American poet, and that Walt Whitman, if not a poet, is a man who sounds a strong note, perhaps neither prose nor poetry, but something of his own that is grand, original and unique.
On this topic The Century, for November, 1882, contained an exquisitely humorous poem written by Helen Gray Cone, describing an imaginary interview between Oscar Wilde and the great poetical Egotist—Walt Whitman. The style and diction of both are admirably hit off. The parody of Whitman reads, indeed, like an excerpt from his works.
Unfortunately, as the poem is very long, only an extract can be given:—
Narcissus in Camden.
(“In the course of his lecture, Mr. Wilde remarked that the most impressive room he had yet entered in America was the one in Camden Town, where he met Walt Whitman. It contained plenty of fresh air and sunlight. On the table was a simple cruse of water.”)
Paumanokides. Narcissus.
Paumanokides: Who may this be? This young man clad unusually with loose locks, languorous, glidingly toward me advancing, Toward the ceiling of my chamber his orbic and expressive eyeballs uprolling, As I have seen the green-necked wild fowl, the mallard, in the thunderings of the storm, By the weedy shore of Paumanok my fish-shaped island, Sit down, young man! I do not know you, but I love you with burning intensity, I am he that loves the young men, whosoever and wheresoever they are or may be hereafter, or may have been any time in the past, Loves the eye-glassed literat, loves also and probably more the vendor of clams, raucous-throated, monotonous chanting, Loves the elevated Railroad employée of Manahatta, My city; I suppress the rest of the list of the persons I love, solely because I love you, Sit down, élève, I receive you! Narcissus. O clarion, from whose brazen throat Strange sounds across the seas are blown, Where England, girt as with a moat, A strong sea-lion sits alone! A pilgrim from that white-cliffed shore, What joy, large flower of Western land! To seek thy democratic door, With eager hand to clasp thy hand! Paumanokides. Right you are! Take then the electric pressure of these fingers, O my Comrade! * * * * * Dear son, I have learned the secret of the Universe, I learned it from my original bonne, the white-capped ocean, The secret of the Universe is not Beauty, dear son, Nor is it Art, the perpetuator of Beauty, The secret of the Universe is to admire one’s self. Camerado, you hear me! Narcissus. Ah, I too loitering on an eve of June Where one wan narciss leaned above a pool, 80 While overhead Queen Dian rose too soon, And through the Tyrian clematis the cool Night avis came wandering wearily, I too, Beholding that pale flower, beheld Life’s key at last, and knew That love of one’s fair self were but indeed Just worship of pure Beauty; and I gave One sweet sad sigh, then bade my fond eyes feed Upon the mirrored treasure of the wave, Like that lithe beauteous boy in Tempe’s vale, Whom hapless Echo loved—thou knowest the Heliconian tale! And while heaven’s harmony in lake and gold Changed to a faint nocturne in silvern gray, Like rising sea-mists from my spirit rolled The grievous vapors of this Age of Clay, Beholding Beauty’s re-arisen Shrine, And the white glory of this precious loveliness of mine! * * * * * Haply in the far, the orient future, In the dawn we herald like the birds, Men shall read the legend of our meeting, Linger o’er the music of our words; Haply coming poets shall compare me Then to Milton in his lovely youth, Sitting in the cell of Galileo, Learning at his elder’s lips the truth. Haply they shall liken these dear moments, Safely held in History’s amber clear, Unto Dante’s converse bland with Virgil, On the margin of that gloomy mere! Paumanokides. Do not be deceived, dear son; Amid the chorusses of the morn of progress, roaring, hilarious, those names will be heard no longer. Galileo was admirable once, Milton was admirable, Dante the I-talian was a cute man in his way, But he was not the maker of poems, the answerer! I, Paumanokides, am the maker of poems, the answerer, And I calculate to chant as long as the earth revolves, To an interminable audience of haughty, effusive, copious, gritty, and chipper Americanos! Narcissus. What more is left to say or do? Our minds have met; our hands must part. I go to plant in pastures new The love of Beauty and of Art, I’ll shortly start. One town is rather small for two Like me and you! Paumanokides. So long!
Punch also had a very funny burlesque description of
“OSCAR INTERVIEWED.
“New York, Jan., 1882.
“Determined to anticipate the rabble of penny-a-liners ready to pounce upon any distinguished foreigner who approaches our shores, and eager to assist a sensitive Poet in avoiding the impertinent curiosity and ill-bred insolence of the Professional Reporter, I took the fastest pilot-boat on the station, and boarded the splendid Cunard steamer, The Boshnia, in the shucking of a pea-nut.
“His Æsthetic Appearance.
“He stood, with his large hand passed through his long hair, against a high chimney-piece—which had been painted pea-green, with panels of peacock blue pottery let in at uneven intervals—one elbow on the high ledge, the other hand on his hip. He was dressed in a long, snuff-coloured, single-breasted coat, which reached to his heels, and was relieved with a seal-skin collar and cuffs rather the worse for wear. Frayed linen, and an orange silk handkerchief gave a note to the generally artistic colouring of the ensemble, while one small daisy drooped despondently in his button-hole.
“His Glorious Past.
“Precisely—I took the Newdigate. Oh! no doubt, every year some man gets the Newdigate; but not every year does Newdigate get an Oscar. Since then—barely three years, but centuries to such as I am—I have stood upon the steps of London Palaces—in South Kensington—and preached Æsthetic art. I have taught the wan beauty to wear nameless robes, have guided her limp limbs into sightless knots and curving festoons, while we sang of the sweet sad sin of Swinburne, or the lone delight of soft communion with Burne-Jones. Swinburne had made a name, and Burne-Jones had copied illuminations e’er the first silky down had fringed my upper lip, but the Trinity of Inner Brotherhood was not complete till I came forward, like the Asphodel from the wilds of Arcady, to join in sweet antiphonal counterchanges with the Elder Seers. We are a Beautiful Family—we are, we are, we are!”
“Yes; I expect my Lecture will be a success. So does Dollar Carte—I mean D’Oyly Carte. Too-Toothless Senility may jeer, and poor positive Propriety may shake her rusty curls; but I am here, to pipe of Passion’s venturous Poesy, and reap the scorching harvest of Self-Love! I am not quite sure what I mean. The true Poet never is. In fact, true Poetry is nothing if it is intelligible.
“His Kosmic Soul.
“Oh, yes! I speak most languages; in the sweet honey-tinted brogue my own land lends me. La bella Donna della mia Mente exists, but she is not the Jersey Lily, though I have grovelled at her feet; she is not the Juno Countess, though I have twisted my limbs all over her sofas; she is not the Polish Actress, though I have sighed and wept over all the boxes of the Court Theatre; she is not the diaphanous Sarah, though I have crawled after her footsteps through the heavy fields of scentless Asphodel; she is not the golden haired Ellen, more fair than any woman Veronesé looked upon, though I have left my Impressions on many and many a seat in the Lyceum Temple, where she is High Priestess; nor is she one of the little Nameless Naiads I have met in Lotus-haunts, who, with longing eyes, watch the sweet bubble of the frenzied grape. No, Sir, my real Love is my own Kosmic Soul, enthroned in its flawless essence; and when America can grasp the supreme whole I sing in too-too utterance for vulgar lips, then soul and body will blend in mystic symphonies; then, crowned with bellamours and wanton flower-de-luce, I shall be hailed Lord of a new Empery, and as I stain my lips in the bleeding wounds of the Pomegranate, and wreathe my o’ergrown limbs with the burnished disk of the Sunflower, Apollo will turn pale and lashing the restive horses of the Sun, the tamer chariot of a forgotten god will make way for the glorious zenith of the one Oscar Wilde.”
81 Since his return from America Mr. Oscar Wilde has settled in London, and is known in society as a genial and witty gentleman, and a particularly graceful after-dinner speaker. He is the Editor of The Woman’s World, a very high class magazine, published by Cassell and Co., in which he has ample opportunities of advocating his favourite cult, the worship of the beautiful in Nature and in Art.
Sainte Margérie. An Imitation. Slim feet than lilies tenderer,— Margérie! That scarce upbore the body of her, Naked upon the stones they were;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie! White as a shroud the silken gown,— Margérie! That flowed from shoulder to ankle down, With clear blue shadows along it thrown; C’est ça Sainte Margérie! On back and bosom withouten braid,— Margérie! In crisped glory of darkling red, Round creamy temples her hair was shed;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie! Eyes like a dim sea, viewed from far,— Margérie! Lips that no earthly love shall mar, More sweet than lips of mortals are;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie! The chamber walls are cracked and bare;— Margérie! Without the gossips stood astare At men her bed away that bare;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie! Five pennies lay her hand within,— Margérie! So she her fair soul’s weal might win, Little she recked of dule or teen;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie! Dank straw from dunghill gathered, Margérie! Where fragrant swine have made their bed, Thereon her body shall be laid;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie! Three pennies to the poor in dole,— Margérie! One to the clerk her knell shall toll, And one to masses for her soul;— C’est ça Sainte Margérie!
From Poems and Parodies. By Two Undergrads. Oxford. B. H. Blackwell, 1880.
(This little paper-covered pamphlet was originally published at the price of one shilling; it was withdrawn from circulation, and is consequently very scarce.)
Sitting up all Night with a Lily. Oh, fulsome the joy of the fading light! Oh, fainting of lilies with broken stem! When you feel too utterly almost quite, The sunflowers love, yet love not them! Oh, weird is the feeling of thoughtsome doubt When candles, and lamps, and gas are out, And burglarious Philistines prowl about, Chill is the air at four a.m.! Oh, mystic the eyelids all drowsy grown! Oh, fainting of lilies with broken stem! Oh, twitching of limbs that are scarce your own, The sunflowers love, yet love not them! Oh, baleful blessing, the wistful wist Of matters that have not, nor can exist! Oh, say, have you noticed the gladsome list? Chill is the air at four a.m.! You think of your bed with remorseful tears, Oh, fainting of lilies with broken stem! While sounds of the silence attack your ears, The sunflowers love, yet love not them! Oh, mythic deeds by the sightless seen! Oh, lovely past of the has not been! Oh, what in the world do I chance to mean? Chill is the air at four a.m.! Fun’s Academy Skits. 1882.
An Utter Passion uttered Utterly. Meseem’d that Love, with swifter feet than fire, Brought me my Lady crown’d with amorous burs, And drapen in tear-collar’d minivers, Sloped saltire wise in token of desire; My heart she soak’d in tears, and on a pyre Laid, for Love’s sake, in folds of fragrant perse, The while her face, more fair than sunflowers, She gave mine eyes for pasture most entire. Sicklike she seem’d, as with wan-carven smiles Some deal she moved anear, and thereunto Thrice paler wox, and weaker than blown sand Upon the passioning ocean’s beached miles; And as her motion’s music nearer drew My starved lips play’d the vampyre with her hand. John Todhunter. Kottabos. Dublin, William McGee. 1882.
An Æsthete’s Rhapsody. Consummate Dish! full many an ancient crack Is seamed across thy venerable back; And even through to thine æsthetic face Cracks run to lend a more enchanting grace! What matter though the epicure now loses The juice which through thy gaping fissures oozes? Thrice happy Table-cloth, thou knowest not The too-too beauty of yon greasy spot, To think that with a little vulgar butter, This High Art Dish can make thee look so utter. Harper’s Bazaar.
In 1881 and 1882 Punch teemed with parodies on Oscar Wilde, one of the best appeared May 28, 1881:—
More Impressions. (By Oscuro Wildegoose.) La Fuite des Oies. To outer senses they are geese, Dull drowsing by a weedy pool; 82 But try the impression trick, Cool! Cool! Snow-slumbering sentinels of Peace! Deep silence on the shadowy flood Save rare sharp stridence (that means “quack”). Low amber light in Ariel track Athwart the dun (that means the mud). And suddenly subsides the sun, Bulks mystic, ghostly, thrid the gloom (That means the white geese waddling home), And darkness reigns! (See how it’s done?)
The titles of some others are;—
April 9, 1881. A Maudle-in Ballad to his Lily.
June 23, 1881. Maunderings at Marlow.
October 1, 1881. The Æsthete to the Rose.
November 26, 1881. The Downfall of the Dado.
January 14, 1882. Murder made Easy.
March 31, 1883. Sage Green, by a Fading-out Æsthete.
this latter contained the following verses:—
My love is as fair as a lily flower. (The Peacock Hue has a sacred sheen!) Oh, bright are the blooms in her maiden bower. (Sing Hey! Sing Ho! for the sweet Sage Green!) Her face is as wan as the water white. (The Peacock blue has a sacred sheen!) Her eyes are as stars on a moonlit night. (Sing Hey! Sing Ho! for the sweet Sage Green!) The China plate it is pure on the wall. (The Peacock blue has a sacred sheen!) Alack! she heedeth it never at all. (Sing Hey! Sing Ho! for the sweet Sage Green!) * * * * *
The Public House. (With apologies to Oscar Wilde’s “The Harlot’s House.”) We wandered home with weary feet, We lumbered down the lamp-lit street, And stopped beneath a public-house. Outside, in just the usual way, We heard the grand old cornet play A carol to the wild carouse. Like smell of spirits came the blast Of heated air that streetward passed, As “Out yer go” were shoved “the blind.” We watched the reeling roysterers spin From scene of revelry within, Like those who’d left their legs behind. Like idiots they, of foolish face, With grinning, ghastly-pale grimace, They looked so very, very ill! They took each other by the arm, As if in that there were a charm, In short they had had quite their fill. Sometimes a man who out was set Went through the swearing alphabet. Or p’r’aps he’d homeward start and sing. Then turning round to go, I said, “It’s after hours, I’ll home to bed, I will not wait the outward rush!” Just then the Bobby heard the din, And after knocking, entered in, Law passed into the House of Sin. Then suddenly the cornet stopped, The thrumming harp’s drear music dropped, The house it seemed its sails to furl. And down the long and noisy street The staggering legs of “whisky neat” Crawled headlong in a whirl. Tramway Tame. The Sporting Times. June 13, 1885.
A “Rose” Ball.
A Rose, or Maidens’ Ball took place, in July 1885, at Hyde Park House, which was lent for the occasion by Mrs. Naylor-Leyland. It was a complete success, in spite of the absence of Royalty. As a social gathering, it was the smartest dance of the season, while, from a girl’s point of view, there has been no ball in London to equal it for many a day. Each fair donor paid five pounds, for which she was allowed to ask five men, and in almost every case the favoured five put in an appearance; so instead of the dancing-rooms being filled with girls anxiously looking for partners, the tables were turned, and the black coats had to take their turn at playing wallflowers—an amusement, to judge from some of their remarks, that they did not all appreciate. Each maiden carried a bouquet of roses, and almost all the floral decorations were confined to various varieties of the same flower.
Five-and-seventy maidens, free, Bent on dancing, one and all, Did some weeks ago decree They, themselves, would give a ball. Each, they said, would ask five men Who at waltzing were au fait. Settled was their project then, They had even fixed the day! Ah, miserie! For these dancing maidens found That a certain potent Prince, When he heard their details, frowned, His displeasure to evince. “This,” said he, “must not be so!” “That,” he quoth, “should not be thus!” Till the maidens’ tears did flow, As they murmured “Woe to us! Ah, miserie!” These same maidens, though, were wise, And soon ceased to weep or wince; Nor would they their plans revise, E’en to please a potent Prince, But resolved to merry be, Even though he would not come, Much enjoyed their dance, whilst he Had to moan in accents glum— “Ah, miserie!” Truth. July 16, 1885.