← Table of contents
Myths of the Cherokee

II—HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE CHEROKEE (continued 2)

Reading edition

Although frequent pressure was brought to bear to induce him and his people to remove to the West, he firmly resisted every persuasion, declaring that the Indians were safer from aggression among their rocks and mountains than they could ever be in a land which the white man could find profitable, and that the Cherokee could be happy only in the country where nature had planted him. While counseling peace and friendship with the white man, he held always to his Indian faith and was extremely suspicious of missionaries. On one occasion, after the first Bible translation into the Cherokee language and alphabet, some one brought a copy of Matthew from New Echota, but Yonaguska would not allow it to be read to his people until it had first been read to himself. After listening to one or two chapters the old chief dryly remarked: “Well, it seems to be a good book—strange that the white people are not better, after having had it so long.”

In the spring of 1848 the author, Lanman, visited the East Cherokee and has left an interesting account of their condition at the time, together with a description of their ballplays, dances, and customs generally, having been the guest of Colonel Thomas, of whom he speaks as the guide, counselor, and friend of the Indians, as well as their business agent and chief, so that the connection was like that existing between a father and his children. He puts the number of Indians at about 800 Cherokee and 100 Catawba on the “Qualla town” reservation—the name being in use thus early—with 200 more Indians residing in the more westerly portion of the state. Of their general condition he says:

Among the other notables Lanman speaks thus of Salâ′lĭ, “Squirrel,” a born mechanic of the band, who died only a few years since:

In 1852 (Capt.) James W. Terrell was engaged by Thomas, then in the state senate, to take charge of his store at Qualla, and remained associated with him and in close contact with the Indians from then until after the close of the war, assisting, as special United States agent, in the disbursement of the interest payments, and afterward as a Confederate officer in the organization of the Indian companies, holding a commission as captain of Company A, Sixty-ninth North Carolina Confederate infantry. Being of an investigating bent, Captain Terrell was led to give attention to the customs and mythology of the Cherokee, and to accumulate a fund of information on the subject seldom possessed by a white man. He still resides at Webster, a few miles from the reservation, and is now seventy-one years of age.

From 1855 until after the civil war we find no official notice of the East Cherokee, and our information must be obtained from other sources. It was, however, a most momentous period in their history. At the outbreak of the war Thomas was serving his seventh consecutive term in the state senate. Being an ardent Confederate sympathizer, he was elected a delegate to the convention which passed the secession ordinance, and immediately after voting in favor of that measure resigned from the senate in order to work for the southern cause. As he was already well advanced in years it is doubtful if his effort would have gone beyond the raising of funds and other supplies but for the fact that at this juncture an effort was made by the Confederate General Kirby Smith to enlist the East Cherokee for active service.

In 1863, by resolution of February 12, the Confederate House of Representatives called for information as to the number and condition of the East Cherokee, and their pending relations with the Federal government at the beginning of the war, with a view to continuing these relations under Confederate auspices. In response to this inquiry a report was submitted by the Confederate commissioner of Indian affairs, S. S. Scott, based on information furnished by Colonel Thomas and Captain James W. Terrell, their former disbursing agent, showing that interest upon the “removal and subsistence fund” established in 1848 had been paid annually up to and including the year 1859, at the rate of $3.20 per capita, or an aggregate, exclusive of disbursing agent’s commission, of $4,838.40 annually, based upon the original Mullay enumeration of 1,517.

Upon receipt of this report it was enacted by the Confederate congress that the sum of $19,352.36 be paid the East Cherokee to cover the interest period of four years from May 23, 1860, to May 23, 1864. In this connection the Confederate commissioner suggested that the payment be made in provisions, of which the Indians were then greatly in need, and which, if the payment were made in cash, they would be unable to purchase, on account of the general scarcity. He adds that, according to his information, almost every Cherokee capable of bearing arms was then in the Confederate service. The roll furnished by Captain Terrell is the original Mullay roll corrected to May, 1860, no reference being made to the later Mullay enumeration (2,133), already alluded to. There is no record to show that the payment thus authorized was made, and as the Confederate government was then in hard straits it is probable that nothing further was done in the matter.

In submitting his statement of previous payments, Colonel Thomas, their former agent, adds:

Shortly after this event Colonel Thomas was compelled by physical and mental infirmity to retire from further active participation in the affairs of the East Cherokee, after more than half a century spent in intimate connection with them, during the greater portion of which time he had been their most trusted friend and adviser. Their affairs at once became the prey of confusion and factional strife, which continued until the United States stepped in as arbiter.

The status of the lands held by the Indians had now become a matter of serious concern, As has been stated, the deeds had been made out by Thomas in his own name, as the state laws at that time forbade Indian ownership of real estate. In consequence of his losses during the war and his subsequent disability, the Thomas properties, of which the Cherokee lands were technically a part, had become involved, so that the entire estate had passed into the hands of creditors, the most important of whom, William Johnston, had obtained sheriff’s deeds in 1869 for all of these Indian lands under three several judgments against Thomas, aggregating $33,887.11. To adjust the matter so as to secure title and possession to the Indians, Congress in 1870 authorized suit to be brought in their name for the recovery of their interest. This suit was begun in May, 1873, in the United States circuit court for western North Carolina. A year later the matters in dispute were submitted by agreement to a board of arbitrators, whose award was confirmed by the court in November, 1874.

On August 2, 1893, ex-Chief Smith died at Cherokee, in the fifty-seventh year of his life, more than twenty of which had been given to the service of his people. Nimrod Jarrett Smith, known to the Cherokee as Tsa′lădihĭ′, was the son of a half breed father by an Indian mother, and was born near the present Murphy, Cherokee county, North Carolina, on January 3, 1837. His earliest recollections were thus of the miseries that attended the flight of the refugees to the mountains during the Removal period. His mother spoke very little English, but his father was a man of considerable intelligence, having acted as interpreter and translator for Reverend Evan Jones at the old Valleytown mission. As the boy grew to manhood he acquired a fair education, which, aided by a commanding presence, made him a person of influence among his fellows. At twenty-five years of age he enlisted in the Thomas Legion as first sergeant of Company B, Sixty-ninth North Carolina (Confederate) Infantry, and served in that capacity till the close of the war. He was clerk of the council that drafted the first East Cherokee constitution in 1868, and on the death of Principal Chief Lloyd Welch in 1880 was elected to fill the unexpired term, continuing in office by successive reelections until the close of 1891, a period of about twelve years, the longest term yet filled by an incumbent. As principal chief he signed the contract under which the school work was inaugurated in 1881. For several years thereafter his duties, particularly in connection with the suit against the western Cherokee, required his presence much of the time at Washington, while at home his time was almost as constantly occupied in attending to the wants of a dependent people. Although he was entitled under the constitution of the band to a salary of five hundred dollars per year, no part of this salary was ever paid, because of the limited resources of his people, and only partial reimbursement was made to him, shortly before his death, for expenses incurred in official visits to Washington. With frequent opportunities to enrich himself at the expense of his people, he maintained his honor and died a poor man.

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY NINETEENTH ANNUAL REPORT PL. X

CHIEF N. J. SMITH (TSALĂDIHĬ′)
CHIEF N. J. SMITH (TSALĂDIHĬ′)

PHOTOGRAPH, 1886

CHIEF N. J. SMITH (TSALĂDIHĬ′)

While they are industrious, these people are not progressive farmers and have learned nothing of modern methods. The same crops are raised continuously until the soil will yield no more or is washed away, when new ground is cleared or broken. The value of rotation and fertilizing has not yet been discovered or taught....

By the most recent official count, in 1900, the East Cherokee residing in North Carolina under direct charge of the agent and included within the act of incorporation number 1,376, of whom about 1,100 are on the reservation, the rest living farther to the west, on Nantahala, Cheowa, and Hiwassee rivers. This does not include mixed-bloods in adjoining states and some hundreds of unrecognized claimants. Those enumerated own approximately 100,000 acres of land, of which 83,000 are included within the Qualla reservation and a contiguous tract in Jackson and Swain counties. They receive no rations or annuities and are entirely self-supporting, the annual interest on their trust fund established in 1848, which has dwindled to about $23,000, being applied to the payment of taxes upon their unoccupied common lands. From time to time they have made leases of timber, gold-washing, and grazing privileges, but without any great profit to themselves. By special appropriation the government supports an industrial training school at Cherokee, the agency headquarters, in which 170 pupils are now being boarded, clothed, and educated in the practical duties of life. This school, which in its workings is a model of its kind, owes much of its usefulness and high standing to the efficient management of Prof. H. W. Spray (Wĭlsĭnĭ′), already mentioned, who combines the duties of superintendent and agent for the band. His chief clerk, Mr James Blythe (Diskwa′ʻnĭ, “Chestnut-bread”), a Cherokee by blood, at one time filled the position of agent, being perhaps the only Indian who has ever served in such capacity.

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · See the notes to the historical sketch. ↑Note 2 · Jefferson, Thomas, Notes on Virginia, pp. 136–137; ed. Boston, 1802. ↑Note 3 · Schoolcraft, Notes on the Iroquois, p. 163, 1847. ↑Note 4 · Haywood, Natural and Aboriginal History of Tennessee, pp. 233, 236, 269, 1823. ↑Note 5 · Haywood, Nat. and Aborig. Hist. Tennessee, pp. 226, 234, 1823. ↑Note 6 · Bartram, Wm., Travels, p. 365; reprint, London, 1792. ↑Note 7 · Barton, New Views, p. xliv, 1797. ↑Note 8 · Haywood, Nat. and Aborig. Hist. Tennessee, pp. 166, 234–235, 287–289, 1823. ↑Note 9 · See story, “The Great Leech of Tlanusi′yĭ,” p. 328. ↑Note 10 · Garcilaso de la Vega, La Florida del Inca, pp. 129, 133–134; Madrid, 1723. ↑Note 11 · Garcilaso, La Florida del Inca, p. 136, ed. 1723. ↑Note 12 · Ranjel, in Oviedo, Historia General y Natural de las Indias, i, p. 562; Madrid, 1851. ↑Note 13 · Garcilaso, La Florida del Inca, p.137, 1723. ↑Note 14 · Ranjel, op. cit., I, p. 562. ↑Note 15 · Elvas, Hakluyt Society, IX, p. 61, 1851. ↑Note 16 · Garcilaso, op. cit., p. 139. ↑Note 17 · Ranjel, in Oviedo, Historia, I, p. 563, 1861. ↑Note 18 · Garcilaso, La Florida del Inca, p. 139, 1723. ↑Note 19 · See note 8, De Soto’s route. ↑Note 20 · See Elvas, Hakluyt Society, ix, p. 61, 1851; and Ranjel, op. cit., p. 563. ↑Note 21 · See note 8, De Soto’s route. ↑Note 22 · Elvas, op. cit., p.64. ↑Note 23 · Elvas, Hakluyt Society, IX, p. 66, 1851. ↑Note 24 · Garcilaso, La Florida del Inca, p. 141, ed. 1723. ↑Note 25 · Shea, J. G., in Winsor, Justin, Narrative and Critical History of America, II, pp. 260, 278; Boston, 1886. ↑Note 26 · Narrative of Pardo’s expedition by Martinez, about 1568, Brooks manuscripts. ↑Note 27 · Vandera narrative, 1569, in French, B. F., Hist. Colls. of La., new series, pp. 289–292; New York, 1875. ↑Note 28 · Shea, J. G., Catholic Missions, p. 72; New York, 1855. ↑Note 29 · See Brooks manuscripts, in the archives of the Bureau of American Ethnology. ↑Note 30 · Burk, John, History of Virginia, II, pp. 104–107; Petersburg, 1805. ↑Note 31 · Ramsey, J. G. M., Annals of Tennessee, p. 37; Charleston, 1853 (quoting Martin, North Carolina, I, p. 115, 1853). ↑Note 32 · Document of 1699, quoted in South Carolina Hist. Soc. Colls., I, p. 209; Charleston, 1857. ↑Note 33 · Haywood, Nat. and Aborig. Hist. Tennessee, p. 233, 1823. ↑Note 34 · Noted in Cherokee Advocate, Tahlequah, Indian Territory, January 30, 1845. ↑Note 35 · Document of 1691, South Carolina Hist. Soc. Colls., I, p. 126. ↑Note 36 · Hewat, South Carolina and Georgia, I, p. 127, 1778. ↑Note 37 · Documents of 1705, in North Carolina Colonial Records, II, p. 904; Raleigh, 1886. ↑Note 38 · Haywood, Nat. and Aborig. Tenn., p. 237, 1823; with the usual idea that Indians live to extreme old age, Haywood makes her 110 years old at Note 39 · Letter of 1708, in Rivers, South Carolina, p. 238, 1856. ↑Note 40 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 140, 1888; Hewat, op. cit., p. 216 et passim. ↑Note 41 · Hewat, South Carolina and Georgia, I, p. 216 et passim, 1778. ↑Note 42 · See Journal of Colonel George Chicken, 1715–16, with notes, in Charleston Yearbook, pp. 313–354, 1894. ↑Note 43 · Journal of South Carolina Assembly, in North Carolina Colonial Records, II, pp. 225–227, 1886. ↑Note 44 · For notice, see the glossary. ↑Note 45 · Hewat, South Carolina and Georgia, I, pp. 297–298, 1778; Royce, Cherokee Nation, in Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 144 and map, 188Note 46 · Royce, op. cit., p. 142. ↑Note 47 · Document of 1724, in Fernow, Berthold, Ohio Valley in Colonial Days, pp. 273–275; Albany, 1890. ↑Note 48 · Report of Board of Trade, 1721, in North Carolina Colonial Records, II, p. 422, 1886. ↑Note 49 · Adair, James, American Indians, p. 227; London, 1775. ↑Note 50 · Board of Trade report, 1721, North Carolina Colonial Records, II, p. 422, 1886. ↑Note 51 · Pickett, H. A., History of Alabama, pp. 234, 280, 288; reprint, Sheffield, 1896. ↑Note 52 · For notice, see the glossary. ↑Note 53 · Hewat, South Carolina and Georgia, II, pp. 3–11, 1779; treaty documents of 1730, North Carolina Colonial Records, III, pp. 128–133, 1886; JeNote 54 · Documents of 1731 and 1732, North Carolina Colonial Records, III, pp. 153, 202, 345, 369, 393, 1886. ↑Note 55 · Adair, American Indians, pp. 232–234, 1775. ↑Note 56 · Meadows(?), State of the Province of Georgia, p. 7, 1742, in Force Tracts, I, 1836. ↑Note 57 · Jones, C.C., History of Georgia, I, pp.327, 328; Boston, 1883. ↑Note 58 · Adair, American Indians, pp. 240–243, 1775; Stevens, W. B., History of Georgia, I, pp. 104–107; Phila., 1847. ↑Note 59 · Anonymous writer in Carroll, Hist. Colls. of South Carolina, II, pp. 97–98, 517, 1836. ↑Note 60 · Buckle, Journal, 1757, in Rivers, South Carolina, p. 57, 1856. ↑Note 61 · Barcia, A.G., Ensayo Chronologico para la Historia General de la Florida, pp. 335, 336. Madrid, 1723. ↑Note 62 · For more in regard to these intertribal wars see the historical traditions. ↑Note 63 · Walker, Thomas, Journal of an Exploration, etc., pp. 8, 35–37; Boston, 1888; Monette (Valley of the Miss. I, p. 317; New York, 1848) erroneoNote 64 · Letter of Governor Dobbs, 1755, in North Carolina Colonial Records, V, pp. 320, 321, 1887. ↑Note 65 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 50–52, 1853; Royce, Cherokee Nation, in Fifth Ann. Rep. Bur. of Ethnology, p. 145, 1888. ↑Note 66 · Timberlake, Henry, Memoirs, pp. 73, 74; London, 1765. ↑Note 67 · Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 51, 1853; Royce, Cherokee Nation, in Fifth Ann. Kept. Bur. of Ethnology, p. 145, 1888. ↑Note 68 · For notice see Ătă′-gûl′ʻkălû′, in the glossary. ↑Note 69 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 50. ↑Note 70 · Letters of Major Andrew Lewis and Governor Dinwiddie, 1756, in North Carolina Colonial Records V, pp. 585, 612–614, 635, 637, 1887; Ramsey, Note 71 · Letter of Governor Dobbs, 1756, in North Carolina Colonial Records, V, p. 604, 1887. ↑Note 72 · Dinwiddie letter, 1757, ibid., p. 765. ↑Note 73 · Adair, American Indians, 245–246, 1775; North Carolina Colonial Records, V, p. xlviii, 1887; Hewat, quoted in Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 54, 1853Note 74 · For notices see the glossary. ↑Note 75 · Timberlake, Memoirs, p. 65, 1765. ↑Note 76 · Catawba reference from Milligan, 1763, in Carroll, South Carolina Historical Collections, II, p. 519, 1836. ↑Note 77 · Figures from Adair, American Indians, p. 227, 1775. When not otherwise noted this sketch of the Cherokee war of 1760–61 is compiled chiefly Note 78 · Timberlake, Memoirs, p. 9 et passim, 1765. ↑Note 79 · Stevens, Georgia, II, pp. 26–29, 1859. ↑Note 80 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 65–70, 1853. ↑Note 81 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, in Fifth Ann. Rep. Bur. of Ethnology, pp. 146–149, 1888. ↑Note 82 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 149; Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 71, 1853. ↑Note 83 · Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 93–122; Royce, op. cit. pp. 146–149. ↑Note 84 · Ramsey, op. cit., pp, 109–122; Royce, op. cit. p. 146 et passim. ↑Note 85 · Bartram, Travels, pp. 366–372, 1792. ↑Note 86 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 143–150, 1853; Monette, Valley of the Mississippi, I, pp. 400, 401, 431, 432, and II, pp. 33, 34, 1846; Roosevelt, WiNote 87 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 143. ↑Note 88 · Quoted from Stedman, in Ramsey, op. cit., p. 162. ↑Note 89 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 162. ↑Note 90 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 150–159, 1853. ↑Note 91 · Roosevelt, Winning of the West, I, pp. 293–297, 1889. ↑Note 92 · See no. 110, “Incidents of Personal Heroism.” For Rutherford’s expedition, see Moore, Rutherford’s Expedition, in North Carolina University Note 93 · For Williamson’s expedition, see Ross Journal, with Rockwell’s notes, in Historical Magazine, October, 1876; Swain, Sketch of the Indian WarNote 94 · Jones, op. cit., p. 246; Ramsey, op. cit., p. 163; Roosevelt, op. cit., p. 295. ↑Note 95 · For the Virginia-Tennessee expedition see Roosevelt, Winning of the West, I, pp. 303–305, 1889; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 165–170, 1853. ↑Note 96 · Ross Journal, in Historical Magazine, October, 1867. ↑Note 97 · Swain, Sketch of the Indian War of 1776, in Historical Magazine, November, 1867. ↑Note 98 · Moore’s narrative, in North Carolina University Magazine, February, 1888. ↑Note 99 · Roosevelt, Winning of the West, I, pp. 285, 290, 303, 1889. ↑Note 100 · About five hundred sought refuge with Stuart, the British Indian superintendent in Florida, where they were fed for some time at the expenseNote 101 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, in Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 150 and map, 1888; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 172–174, 1853; Stevens, GeorgiaNote 102 · Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 171–177, 185–186, 610 et passim; Royce, op. cit., p. 150; Campbell letter, 1782, and other documents in Virginia StateNote 103 · Hawkins, manuscript journal, 1796, with Georgia Historical Society. ↑Note 104 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 174–178, 1853. ↑Note 105 · Campbell letter, 1782, Virginia State Papers, III, p. 271, 1883. ↑Note 106 · Ramsey, op. cit, pp. 186–188; Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, pp. 236–238, 1889. Ramsey’s statements, chiefly on Haywood’s authority, ofNote 107 · Heckewelder, Indian Nations, p. 827, reprint of 1876. ↑Note 108 · Donelson’s Journal, etc., in Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 197–208, 1853; Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, pp. 324–340, 1889. ↑Note 109 · Ibid., II, p. 337. ↑Note 110 · Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, pp. 241–294, 1889; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 208–249, 1853. ↑Note 111 · Roosevelt, op. cit., p. 256. ↑Note 112 · Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, pp. 298–300, 1889; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 261–264, 1853. There is great discrepancy in the various accouNote 113 · Roosevelt, op. cit., pp. 300–304; Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 265–268; Campbell, report, January 15, 1781, in Virginia State Papers, I, p. 436. HaNote 114 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 266. ↑Note 115 · Roosevelt, op. cit, p. 302. ↑Note 116 · Campbell, letter, March 28, 1781, in Virginia State Papers, I, p. 602, 1875; Martin, letter, March 31, 1781, ibid., p. 613; Ramsey, TennesseNote 117 · Campbell, letter, March 28, 1781, in Virginia State Papers, I, p. 602, 1875. ↑Note 118 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 269. ↑Note 119 · Ibid.; Roosevelt, op. cit., p. 307. ↑Note 120 · Ibid.; Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 267, 268. The latter authority seems to make it 1782, which is evidently a mistake. ↑Note 121 · Stevens, Georgia, II, pp. 282–285, 1859; Jones, Georgia, II, p. 503, 1883. ↑Note 122 · Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, p. 811, 1889. ↑Note 123 · Old Tassel’s talk, in Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 271, 1853, and in Roosevelt, op. cit., p. 315. ↑Note 124 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 272; Roosevelt, op. cit., p. 317 et passim. ↑Note 125 · Stevens, op. cit., pp. 411–415. ↑Note 126 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, in Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 151, 1888. ↑Note 127 · See documents in Virginia State Papers, III, pp. 234, 398, 527, 1883. ↑Note 128 · Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 280, 1853. ↑Note 129 · Ibid., p. 276. ↑Note 130 · See Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., pp. 151, 152; Ramsey, op. cit., p. 299 et passim. ↑Note 131 · Indian Treaties, p. 8 et passim, 1837. For a full discussion of the Hopewell treaty, from official documents, see Royce, Cherokee Nation, inNote 132 · Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 459–461; Agent Martin and Hopewell commissioners, ibid., pp. 318–336; Bledsoe and Robertson letter, ibid., p. 465; RooNote 133 · Roosevelt, Winning of the West, ii, p. 353, 1889. ↑Note 134 · Ibid., p. 355, 1889; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 452–454, 1853. ↑Note 135 · Ibid., pp. 358–366, 1889. ↑Note 136 · Ibid., p. 341, 1853. ↑Note 137 · Martin letter of May 11, 1786, ibid., p. 342. ↑Note 138 · Reports of Tennessee commissioners and replies by Cherokee chiefs, etc., 1786, in Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 343–346, 1853. ↑Note 139 · Martin (?) letter of March 25, 1787, ibid., p. 359. ↑Note 140 · Ibid., p. 370. ↑Note 141 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 393–399, 1853. ↑Note 142 · Ibid., pp. 417–423, 1853. ↑Note 143 · Ibid., pp. 517–519, and Brown’s narrative, ibid., p. 515. ↑Note 144 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 515, 519. ↑Note 145 · Brown’s narrative, etc., ibid., pp. 508–516. ↑Note 146 · Ibid., pp. 459, 489. ↑Note 147 · Bledsoe and Robertson letter of June 12, 1787, in Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 465, 1853. ↑Note 148 · Ibid., with Robertson letter, pp. 465–476. ↑Note 149 · Ibid., pp. 479–486. ↑Note 150 · Monette, Valley of the Mississippi, I, p. 505, 1846. ↑Note 151 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 522, 541, 561, 1853. ↑Note 152 · Washington to the Senate, August 11, 1790, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, p. 83, 1832. ↑Note 153 · Secretary Knox to President Washington, July 7, 1789, ibid., p. 53. ↑Note 154 · Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 550, 551. ↑Note 155 · Indian Treaties, pp. 34–38, 1837; Secretary of War, report, January 5, 1798, in American State Papers, I, pp. 628–631, 1832; Ramsey, TennessNote 156 · Indian Treaties, pp. 37, 38, 1837. ↑Note 157 · Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 557, 1853. ↑Note 158 · Abel deposition, April 16, 1792, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, p. 274, 1832. ↑Note 159 · Henry Knox, Secretary of War, Instructions to Leonard Shaw, temporary agent to the Cherokee Nation of Indians, February 17, 1792, in AmericaNote 160 · Estanaula conference report, June 26, 1792, ibid., p. 271; Deraque, deposition, September 15, 1792, ibid., p. 292; Pickens, letter, SeptembeNote 161 · See letters of Shaw, Casey, Pickens, and Blount, 1792–93, ibid., pp. 277, 278, 317, 436, 437, 440. ↑Note 162 · Knox, instructions to Shaw, February 17, 1792, ibid., p. 247; Blount, letter, March 20, 1792, ibid., p. 263; Knox, letters, October 9, 1792,Note 163 · Governor Telfair’s letters of November 14 and December 5, with inclosure, 1792, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, pp. 332, 336, 337,Note 164 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 562–663, 598, 1853. ↑Note 165 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 562–565, 1853. ↑Note 166 · Blount, letter, October 2, 1792, in American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, p. 294, 1832; Blount, letter, etc., in Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 5Note 167 · Ramsey, op. cit., 569–571. ↑Note 168 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 571–573, 1853. ↑Note 169 · Ibid., pp. 574–578, 1853. ↑Note 170 · Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 579. ↑Note 171 · Ibid., pp. 580–583, 1853; Smith, letter, September 27, 1793, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, p. 468, 1832. Ramsey gives the IndianNote 172 · Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 584–588. ↑Note 173 · Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 590, 602–605, 1853. ↑Note 174 · Haywood, Civil and Political History of Tennessee, pp. 300–302; Knoxville, 1823. ↑Note 175 · Ibid., pp. 303–308, 1823; Ramsey, op. cit., pp. 591–594. Haywood’s history of this period is little more than a continuous record of killingNote 176 · Haywood, Civil and Political History of Tennessee, p. 308, 1823; Ramsey, Tennessee, p. 594, 1853; see also memorial in Putnam, Middle TennesNote 177 · Indian Treaties, pp. 39, 40, 1837; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 171, 172, 1888; Documents of 1797–98, AmNote 178 · Haywood, Civil and Political History of Tennessee, pp. 309–311, 1823; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 594, 595, 1853. ↑Note 179 · Haywood, op. cit., pp. 314–316; Ramsey, op. cit., p. 596. ↑Note 180 · Haywood, Political and Civil History of Tennessee, pp. 392–396, 1823; Ramsey, Tennessee (with Major Ore’s report), pp. 608–618, 1853; Royce,Note 181 · Ramsey, op. cit., p. 618. ↑Note 182 · Tellico conference, November 7–8, 1794, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, pp. 536–538, 1832, Royce, op. cit., p. 173; Ramsey, op. ciNote 183 · Beaver’s talk, 1784, Virginia State Papers, III, p. 571, 1883; McDowell, report, 1786, ibid., IV, p. 118, 1884; McDowell, report, 1787, ibidNote 184 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 173, 1888. ↑Note 185 · Ibid., pp. 174, 175; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 679–685, 1853. ↑Note 186 · Indian Treaties, pp. 78–82, 1837; Ramsey, Tennessee, pp. 692–697, 1853; Royce, Cherokee Nation (with map and full discussion), Fifth Ann. ReNote 187 · See table in Royce, op. cit., p. 378. ↑Note 188 · Adair, American Indians, pp. 230, 231, 1775. ↑Note 189 · See Hawkins, MS journal from South Carolina to the Creeks, 1796, in library of Georgia Historical Society. ↑Note 190 · Hawkins, Treaty Commission, 1801, manuscript No. 5, in library of Georgia Historical Society. ↑Note 191 · Foote (?), in North Carolina Colonial Records, v, p. 1226, 1887. ↑Note 192 · North Carolina Colonial Records, v, p. x, 1887. ↑Note 193 · Reichel, E. H., Historical Sketch of the Church and Missions of the United Brethren, pp. 65–81; Bethlehem, Pa., 1848; Holmes, John, SketchesNote 194 · Morse, American Geography, I, p. 577, 1819. ↑Note 195 · Indian treaties, pp. 108, 121, 125, 1837; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 183, 193, 1888 (map and full discNote 196 · McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, II, p. 92, 1858. ↑Note 197 · Indian Treaties, pp. 132–136, 1837; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 193–197, 1888. ↑Note 198 · Meigs, letter, September 28, 1807, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, p. 754, 1832; Royce, op. cit., p. 197. ↑Note 199 · See treaty, December 2, 1807, and Jefferson’s message, with inclosures, March 10, 1808, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, I, pp. 752–75Note 200 · Ibid., pp. 201, 202. ↑Note 201 · In American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, p. 283, 1834. ↑Note 202 · See contract appended to Washington treaty, 1819, Indian Treaties, pp. 269–271, 1837; Royce map, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, 1888. Note 203 · Author’s personal information. ↑Note 204 · Mooney, Ghost-dance Religion, Fourteenth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 670 et passim, 1896; contemporary documents in American State PapNote 205 · See Mooney, Ghost dance Religion, Fourteenth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 670–677, 1896; McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, II, pp. 93–Note 206 · Letters of Hawkins, Pinckney, and Cussetah King, July, 1813, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 847–849, 1832. ↑Note 207 · Meigs, letter, May 8, 1812, and Hawkins, letter, May 11, 1812, ibid., p. 809. ↑Note 208 · Author’s information from James D. Wafford. ↑Note 209 · McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, II, pp. 96–97, 1858. ↑Note 210 · Drake, Indians, pp. 395–396, 1880; Pickett, Alabama, p. 556, reprint of 1896. ↑Note 211 · Coffee, report, etc., in Drake, Indians, p. 396, 1880; Lossing, Field Book of the War of 1812, pp. 762, 763 [n. d. (1869)]; Pickett, AlabamaNote 212 · Ibid., p. 556. ↑Note 213 · Drake, Indians, p. 396, 1880; Pickett, op. cit., pp. 554, 555. ↑Note 214 · White’s report, etc., in Fay and Davison, Sketches of the War, pp. 240, 241; Rutland, Vt., 1815; Low, John, Impartial History of the War, p.Note 215 · Drake, Indians, pp. 391, 398, 1880; Pickett, Alabama, pp. 557–559, 572–576, reprint of 1896. ↑Note 216 · Ibid., p. 579; Lossing, Field Book of the War of 1812, p. 773. ↑Note 217 · Pay and Davison, Sketches of the War, pp. 247–250, 1815; Pickett, Alabama, pp. 579–584, reprint of 1896; Drake, Indians, pp. 398–400, 1880. Note 218 · Pickett, op. cit., pp. 584–586. ↑Note 219 · Jackson’s report to Governor Blount, March 31, 1814, in Fay and Davison, Sketches of the War, pp. 253, 254, 1815. ↑Note 220 · General Coffee’s report to General Jackson, April 1, 1814, ibid., p. 257. ↑Note 221 · Colonel Morgan’s report to Governor Blount, in Fay and Davison, Sketches of the War, pp. 258, 259, 1815. ↑Note 222 · Coffee’s report to Jackson, ibid., pp. 257, 258. ↑Note 223 · Jackson’s report to Governor Blount, ibid., pp. 255, 256. ↑Note 224 · Jackson’s report and Colonel Morgan’s report, in Fay and Davison, Sketches of the War, pp. 255, 256, 259, 1815. Pickett makes the loss of thNote 225 · McKenney and Hall, op. cit., p. 98. ↑Note 226 · Drake, Indians, p. 401, 1880. ↑Note 227 · Indian Treaties, p. 187, 1837; Meigs’ letter to Secretary of War, August 19, 1816, in American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 113, 11Note 228 · Indian Treaties, pp. 185–187, 1837; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 197–209, 1888. ↑Note 229 · Indian Treaties, pp. 199, 200, 1837; Royce, op. cit., pp. 209–211. ↑Note 230 · Claiborne, letter to Jefferson, November 5, 1808, American State Papers, I, p. 755, 1832; Gatschet, Creek Migration Legend, I, p. 88, 1884. Note 231 · Hawkins, 1799, quoted in Gatschet, op. cit., p. 89. ↑Note 232 · See Treaty of St Louis, 1825, and of Castor hill, 1852, in Indian Treaties, pp. 388, 539, 1837. ↑Note 233 · See number 107, “The Lost Cherokee.” ↑Note 234 · See letter of Governor Estevan Miro to Robertson, April 20, 1783, in Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, p. 407, 1889. ↑Note 235 · See pp. 76–77. ↑Note 236 · Washburn, Reminiscences, pp. 76–79, 1869; see also Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 204, 1888. ↑Note 237 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 202, 203, 1888. ↑Note 238 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 202–204,1888; see also Indian Treaties, pp. 209–215,1837. The preamble to tNote 239 · Indian Treaties, pp. 209–215, 1837; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 212–217, 1888; see also maps in Royce. Note 240 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, 217–218, 1888. ↑Note 241 · Ibid., pp. 218–219. ↑Note 242 · Ibid., p. 219. ↑Note 243 · Morse, Geography, I, p. 577, 1819; and p. 185, 1822. ↑Note 244 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 221–222, 1888. ↑Note 245 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 222–228, 1888. ↑Note 246 · Indian Treaties, pp. 265–269, 1837; Royce, op. cit., pp. 219–221 and table, p. 378. ↑Note 247 · Laws of the Cherokee Nation (several documents), 1820, American State Papers; Indian Affairs, II, pp. 279–283, 1834; letter quoted by McKennNote 248 · List or missions and reports of missionaries, etc., American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 277–279, 459, 1834; personal information Note 249 · G. C., in Cherokee Phœnix; reprinted in Christian Advocate and Journal, New York, September 26, 1828. ↑Note 250 · McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, I, p. 35, et passim, 1858. ↑Note 251 · Phillips, Sequoyah, in Harper’s Magazine, pp. 542–548, September, 1870. ↑Note 252 · Manuscript letters by John Mason Brown, January 17, 18, 22, and February 4, 1889, in archives of the Bureau of American Ethnology. ↑Note 253 · McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, I, p. 45, 1858. ↑Note 254 · See page 43. ↑Note 255 · See number 89, “The Iroquois wars.” ↑Note 256 · McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, I, p. 46, 1858; Phillips, in Harper’s Magazine, p. 547, September, 1870. ↑Note 257 · Indian Treaties, p. 425, 1837. ↑Note 258 · For details concerning the life and invention of Sequoya, see McKenney and Hall, Indian Tribes, i, 1858; Phillips, Sequoyah, in Harper’s MagNote 259 · G. C., Invention of the Cherokee Alphabet, op. cit. ↑Note 260 · (Unsigned) letter of David Brown, September 2, 1825, quoted in American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, p. 652, 1834. ↑Note 261 · Foster, Sequoyah, pp. 120, 121, 1885. ↑Note 262 · Pilling, Iroquoian Bibliography, p. 21, 1888. ↑Note 263 · Brown letter (unsigned), in American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, p. 652, 1834. ↑Note 264 · For extended notice of Cherokee literature and authors see numerous references in Pilling, Bibliography of the Iroquoian Languages, 1888; alNote 265 · Brown letter (unsigned), September 2, 1825, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 651, 652, 1834. ↑Note 266 · See Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 241, 1888; Meredith, in The Five Civilized Tribes, Extra Census BulletinNote 267 · Fort Pitt treaty, September 17, 1778, Indian Treaties, p. 3, 1837. ↑Note 268 · Cherokee Agency treaty, July 8, 1817, ibid., p. 209; Drake, Indians, p. 450, ed. 1880; Johnson in Senate Report on Territories; Cherokee MemNote 269 · Personal information from James D. Wafford. So far as is known this rebellion of the conservatives has never hitherto been noted in print. ↑Note 270 · See Resolutions of Honor, in Laws of the Cherokee Nation, pp. 187–140, 1868; Meredith, in The Five Civilized Tribes, Extra Census Bulletin, Note 271 · See fourth article of “Articles of agreement and cession,” April 24, 1802, in American State Papers: class VIII, Public Lands, I, quoted alsNote 272 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 231–233, 1888. ↑Note 273 · Cherokee correspondence, 1823 and 1824, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 468–473, 1834; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. RepNote 274 · Cherokee memorial, February 11, 1824, in American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 473, 494, 1834; Royce, op. cit., p. 237. ↑Note 275 · Letters of Governor Troup of Georgia, February 28, 1824, and of Georgia delegates, March 10, 1824, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, IINote 276 · Monroe, message to the Senate, with Calhoun’s report, March 30, 1824, American State Papers: Indian Affairs, II, pp. 460, 462, 1834. ↑Note 277 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 241, 242, 1888. ↑Note 278 · Personal information from J. D. Wafford. ↑Note 279 · Nitze, H. B. C., in Twentieth Annual Report United States Geological Survey, part 6 (Mineral Resources), p. 112, 1899. ↑Note 280 · See Butler letter, quoted in Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 297, 1888; see also Everett, speech in the HousNote 281 · For extracts and synopses of these acts see Royce, op. cit., pp. 259–264; Drake, Indians, pp. 438–456, 1880; Greeley, American Conflict, I, Note 282 · Speech of May 19, 1830, Washington; printed by Gales & Seaton, 1830. ↑Note 283 · Speech in the Senate of the United States, April 16, 1830; Washington, Peter Force, printer, 1830. ↑Note 284 · See Cherokee Memorial to Congress, January 18, 1831. ↑Note 285 · Personal information from Prof. Clinton Duncan, of Tahlequah, Cherokee Nation, whose father’s house was the one thus burned. ↑Note 286 · Cherokee Memorial to Congress January 18, 1831. ↑Note 287 · Ibid.; see also speech of Edward Everett in House of Representatives February 14, 1831; report of the select committee of the senate of MassNote 288 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 261, 262, 1888. ↑Note 289 · Ibid., p. 262. ↑Note 290 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 264–266, 1888; Drake, Indians, pp. 454–457,1880; Greeley, American ConflictNote 291 · Drake, Indians, p. 458, 1880. ↑Note 292 · Royce, op. cit., pp. 262–264, 272, 273. ↑Note 293 · Ibid., pp.274, 275. ↑Note 294 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Report Bureau of Ethnology, p. 276, 1888. ↑Note 295 · Commissioner Elbert Herring, November 25, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 240, 1834; author’s personal information from Major R. C. JacksoNote 296 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 278–280, 1888; Everett speech in House of Representatives, May 31, 1838, ppNote 297 · Royce, op. cit., pp. 280–281. ↑Note 298 · Ibid., p. 281. ↑Note 299 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit. (Ross arrest), p. 281; Drake, Indians (Ross, Payne, Phœnix), p. 459, 1880; see also Everett speech of May 3Note 300 · Royce, op. cit., pp. 281, 282; see also Everett speech, 1838. ↑Note 301 · See Fort Gibson treaty, 1833, p. 142. ↑Note 302 · See New Echota treaty, 1835, and Fort Gibson treaty, 1833, Indian Treaties, pp. 633–648 and 561–565, 1837; also, for full discussion of bothNote 303 · Royce, op. cit., p. 289. The Indian total is also given in the Report of the Indian Commissioner, p. 369, 1836. ↑Note 304 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., pp. 283, 284; Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 285, 286, 1836. ↑Note 305 · Quoted by Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., pp. 284–285; quoted also, with some verbal differences, by Everett, speech in House of RepresentNote 306 · Quoted in Royce, op. cit., p. 286. ↑Note 307 · Letter of General Wool, September 10, 1836, in Everett, speech in House of Representatives, May 31, 1838. ↑Note 308 · Letter of June 30, 1836, to President Jackson, in Everett, speech in the House of Representatives, May 31, 1838. ↑Note 309 · Quoted by Everett, ibid.; also by Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 286. ↑Note 310 · Letter of J. M. Mason, jr., to Secretary of War, September 25, 1837, in Everett, speech in House of Representatives, May 31, 1838; also quotNote 311 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit. pp. 287, 289. ↑Note 312 · Ibid., pp. 289, 290. ↑Note 313 · Ibid., p. 291. The statement of the total number of troops employed is from the speech of Everett in the House of Representatives, May 31, 1Note 314 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 291. ↑Note 315 · Ibid, p. 291. ↑Note 316 · The notes on the Cherokee round-up and Removal are almost entirely from author’s information as furnished by actors in the events, both CherNote 317 · Author’s personal information, as before cited. ↑Note 318 · As quoted in Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 292, 1888, the disbursing agent makes the number unaccounted foNote 319 · Agent Stokes to Secretary of War, June 24, 1839, in Report Indian Commissioner, p. 355, 1839; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. BureauNote 320 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., pp. 294, 295. ↑Note 321 · Council resolutions, August 23, 1839, in Report Indian Commissioner, p. 387, 1839; Royce, op. cit., p. 294. ↑Note 322 · See “Act of Union” and “Constitution” in Constitution and Laws of the Cherokee Nation, 1875; General Arbuckle’s letter to the Secretary of WNote 323 · See ante, pp. 105–106; Nuttall, who was on the ground, gives them only 1,500. ↑Note 324 · Washburn, Cephas, Reminiscences of the Indians, pp. 81, 103; Richmond, 1869. ↑Note 325 · Nuttall, Journal of Travels into the Arkansas Territory, etc., p. 129; Philadelphia, 1821. ↑Note 326 · Ibid., pp. 123–136. The battle mentioned seems to be the same noted somewhat differently by Washburn, Reminiscences, p. 120; 1869. ↑Note 327 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 222. ↑Note 328 · Washburn, op. cit., p. 160, and personal information from J. D. Wafford. ↑Note 329 · Royce, op. cit., pp. 242, 243; Washburn, op. cit., pp. 112–122 et passim; see also sketches of Tahchee and Tooantuh or Spring-frog, in McKenNote 330 · Washburn, Reminiscences, p. 178, 1869; see also ante p. 206. ↑Note 331 · Ibid, p. 138. ↑Note 332 · See Treaty of 1817, Indian Treaties, 1837. ↑Note 333 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Report Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 243, 244, 1888. ↑Note 334 · Ibid, p. 243. ↑Note 335 · Author’s personal information; see p. 143. ↑Note 336 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 245. ↑Note 337 · Ibid., pp. 247, 248. ↑Note 338 · Treaty of Washington, May 6, 1828, Indian Treaties, pp. 423–428, 1837; treaty of Port Gibson, 1833, ibid., pp. 561–565; see also for synopsiNote 339 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 248, 1888. ↑Note 340 · For a sketch of Tahchee, with portraits, see McKenney and Hall, I, pp. 251–260, 1858; Catlin, North American Indians, II, pp. 121, 122, 1844Note 341 · Treaties at Fort Gibson, February 14, 1833, with Creeks and Cherokee, in Indian Treaties, pp. 561–569, 1837. ↑Note 342 · Treaty of 1833, Indian Treaties, pp. 561–565, 1837; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 249–253, 1888; see alsoNote 343 · Author’s personal information. In 1891 the author opened two Uchee graves on the grounds of Cornelius Boudinot, at Tahlequah, finding with oNote 344 · Bonnell, Topographic Description of Texas, p. 141; Austin, 1840; Thrall, History of Texas, p. 58; New York, 1876. ↑Note 345 · Author’s personal information from J. D. Wafford and other old Cherokee residents and from recent Cherokee delegates. Bancroft agrees with BNote 346 · Thrall, op. cit., p. 58. ↑Note 347 · Thrall, Texas, p. 46, 1879. ↑Note 348 · Bonnell, Texas, pp. 142, 143, 1840. ↑Note 349 · Ibid., p. 143, 1840. ↑Note 350 · Bonnell, Texas, pp. 143, 144. ↑Note 351 · Ibid., pp. 144, 146. ↑Note 352 · Thrall, Texas, pp. 116–168, 1876. ↑Note 353 · Bonnell, op. cit., pp. 146–150; Thrall, op. cit., pp. 118–120. ↑Note 354 · Author’s personal information from J. D. Wafford and other old western Cherokee, and recent Cherokee delegates; by some this is said to haveNote 355 · Thrall, Texas, p. 120, 1876. ↑Note 356 · Author’s personal information from Mexican and Cherokee sources. ↑Note 357 · W. A. Phillips, Sequoyah, in Harper’s Magazine, September, 1870; Foster, Sequoyah, 1885; Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of ENote 358 · For full discussion see Royce, op. cit., pp. 298–312. ↑Note 359 · Pilling, Bibliography of the Iroquoian Languages (bulletin of the Bureau of Ethnology), p. 174, 1888. ↑Note 360 · See treaties with Cherokee, October 7, 1861, and with other tribes, in Confederate States Statutes at Large, 1864; Royce, op. cit., pp. 324–Note 361 · In this battle the Confederates were assisted by from 4,000 to 5,000 Indians of the southern tribes, including the Cherokee, under command oNote 362 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 329, 330, 1888. ↑Note 363 · Ibid, p. 331. ↑Note 364 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 376. ↑Note 365 · Ibid., p. 376. A census of 1807 gives them 13,566 (ibid., p. 351). ↑Note 366 · See synopsis and full discussion in Royce, op. cit., pp. 334–340. ↑Note 367 · Act of Citizenship, November 7, 1865, Laws of the Cherokee Nation, p. 119; St. Louis, 1868. ↑Note 368 · See Resolutions of Honor, ibid., pp. 137–140. ↑Note 369 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 356–358, 1888; Constitution and Laws of the Cherokee Nation, pp. 277–284; SNote 370 · Royce, op. cit., p. 367. ↑Note 371 · Foster, Sequoyah, pp. 147, 148, 1885; Pilling, Iroquoian Bibliography, 1888, articles “Cherokee Advocate” and “John B. Jones.” The schoolbooNote 372 · Commissioner H. Price, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. lxv, 1881, and p. lxx, 1882; see also p. 175. ↑Note 373 · Report of Indian Commissioner, p. lxv, 1883. ↑Note 374 · Commissioner J. D. C. Atkins, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. xlv, 1886, and p. lxxvii, 1887. ↑Note 375 · Agent L. E. Bennett, in Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 93, 1890. ↑Note 376 · Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 22, 1889. ↑Note 377 · See proclamation by President Harrison and order from Indian Commissioner in Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. lxxii–lxxiii, 421–422, 1890.Note 378 · Commissioner T. J. Morgan, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 79–80, 1892. ↑Note 379 · Commissioner D. M. Browning, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 33–34, 1893. ↑Note 380 · Quotation from act, etc., Report of Indian Commissioner for 1894, p. 27, 1895. ↑Note 381 · Report of Agent D. M. Wisdom, ibid., p. 141. ↑Note 382 · Ibid., and statistical table, p. 570. ↑Note 383 · Report of Agent D. M. Wisdom, ibid., p. 145. ↑Note 384 · Agent D. M. Wisdom, in Report Indian Commissioner for 1895, p. 155, 1896. ↑Note 385 · Commissioner D. M. Browning, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 81, 1896. ↑Note 386 · Report of Agent D. M. Wisdom, Report of Indian Commissioner for 1895, pp. 159, 160, 1896. ↑Note 387 · Letter of A. E. Ivy, Secretary of the Board of Education, in Report of Indian Commissioner for 1895, p. 161, 1896. The author can add personNote 388 · Report of Agent Wisdom, ibid., p. 162. ↑Note 389 · Letter of Bird Harris, May 31, 1895, in Report of Indian Commissioner for 1895, p. 160, 1896. ↑Note 390 · Synopsis of Curtis act, pp. 75–79, and Curtis act in full, p. 425 et seq., in Report of Indian Commissioner for 1898; noted also in Report oNote 391 · Commissioner W. A. Jones, ibid., pp. i, 84 et seq. (Curtis act and Dawes commission). ↑Note 392 · Report of Agent D. M. Wisdom, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 141–144, 1897. ↑Note 393 · Author’s personal information; see also House bill No. 1165 “for the relief of certain Indians in Indian Territory,” etc., Fifty-sixth CongrNote 394 · Report of Agent D. M. Wisdom, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 159, 1898. ↑Note 395 · See page 131. ↑Note 396 · Charley’s story as here given is from the author’s personal information, derived chiefly from conversations with Colonel Thomas and with WasNote 397 · See New Echota treaty, December 29, 1835, and supplementary articles, March 1, 1836, in Indian Treaties, pp. 633–648, 1837; also full discusNote 398 · Royce, op. cit., p. 292. ↑Note 399 · Ibid., p. 314. ↑Note 400 · In the Cherokee language Tsiskwâ′hĭ, “Bird place,” Ani′-Wâ′dihĭ, “Paint place,” Waʻyâ′hĭ, “Wolf place,” E′lawâ′di, “Red earth” (now CherokeeNote 401 · The facts concerning Colonel Thomas’s career are derived chiefly from the author’s conversations with Thomas himself, supplemented by informNote 402 · The facts concerning Yonaguska are based on the author’s personal information obtained from Colonel Thomas, supplemented from conversations Note 403 · The name in the treaties occurs as Yonahequah (1798), Yohanaqua (1805), and Yonah, (1819).—Indian Treaties, pp. 82, 123, 268; Washington, 18Note 404 · The name refers to something habitually falling from a leaning position. ↑Note 405 · Act quoted in Report of Indian Commissioner for 1895, p. 636, 1896. ↑Note 406 · The facts concerning Junaluska are from the author’s information obtained from Colonel Thomas, Captain James Terrell, and Cherokee informantNote 407 · Author’s information from Colonel Thomas. ↑Note 408 · Commissioner Crawford, November 25, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 333, 1839. ↑Note 409 · Author’s information from Colonel Thomas, Captain Terrell, and Indian sources; Commissioner W. Medill, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 399Note 410 · Synopsis of the treaty, etc., in Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 300–313, 1888; see also ante, p. 148. ↑Note 411 · Lanman, Letters from the Alleghany Mountains, pp. 94–95, 1849. ↑Note 412 · Lanman, Letters from the Alleghany Mountains, p. 111. ↑Note 413 · See act quoted in “The United States of America v. William H, Thomas et al.”; also Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of EthnoloNote 414 · See Royce, op. cit., pp. 313–314; Commissioner H. Price, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. li, 1884; Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 495, Note 415 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, op. cit., p. 313 and note. ↑Note 416 · Report of the Indian Commissioner, pp. 459–460, 1845. ↑Note 417 · Commissioner Crawford, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 3, 1842. ↑Note 418 · Royce, op. cit., p. 314. ↑Note 419 · The history of the events leading to the organization of the “Thomas Legion” is chiefly from the author’s conversations with Colonel Thomas Note 420 · This is believed to be a correct statement of the strength and make-up of the Thomas Legion. Owing to the imperfection of the records and thNote 421 · Personal Information from Colonel W. H. Thomas, Lieutenant-Colonel W. W. Stringfield, Captain James W. Terrell, Chief N. J. Smith (first serNote 422 · Thomas-Terrell manuscript East Cherokee roll, with accompanying letters, 1864 (Bur. Am. Eth. archives). ↑Note 423 · Personal information from Colonel W. H. Thomas, Captain J. W. Terrell, Chief N. J. Smith, and others; see also Carrington, Eastern Band of CNote 424 · Author’s information from Colonel Thomas and others. Various informants have magnified the number of deaths to several hundred, but the estiNote 425 · Royce, Cherokee Nation, Fifth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, p. 314, 1888. ↑Note 426 · Commissioner F. A. Walker, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 26, 1872. ↑Note 427 · Royce, op. cit., p. 353. ↑Note 428 · Constitution, etc., quoted in Carrington, Eastern Band of Cherokees, Extra Bulletin Eleventh Census, pp. 18–20, 1892; author’s personal infoNote 429 · See award of arbitrators, Rufus Barringer, John H. Dillard, and T. Ruffin, with full statement, in Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians against Note 430 · See Royce, op. cit., pp. 315–318; Commissioner T. J. Morgan, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. xxix, 1890. The final settlement, under the lNote 431 · Royce, op. cit., pp. 315–318; Carrington, Eastern Band of Cherokees, with map of Temple survey, Extra Bulletin of Eleventh Census, 1892. ↑Note 432 · Report of Agent W. C. McCarthy, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 343–344, 1875; and Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 118–119, 1876. ↑Note 433 · Author’s personal information; see also Carrington, Eastern Band of Cherokees; Zeigler and Grosscup, Heart of the Alleghanies, pp. 35–36, 18Note 434 · Commissioner H. Price, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. lxiv-lxv, 1881, and Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. lxix–lxx, 1882; see also anNote 435 · See Commissioner T. J. Morgan, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 141–145, 1892; author’s personal information from B. C. Hobbs, Chief N. J.Note 436 · Zeigler and Grosscup, Heart of the Alleghanies, pp. 36–42, 1883. ↑Note 437 · Commissioner H. Price, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. lxix–lxx, 1882. ↑Note 438 · Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. li-lii, 1884. ↑Note 439 · Commissioner H. Price, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. lxix-lxxi, 1882, also “Indian legislation,” ibid., p. 214; Commissioner H. Price, Note 440 · Commissioner J. D. C. Atkins, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. lxx, 1885. ↑Note 441 · Same commissioner, Report of the Indian Commissioner, p. xlv, 1886; decision quoted by same commissioner, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. Note 442 · Same commissioner, Report of the Indian Commissioner, p. li, 1886; reiterated by him in Report for 1887, p. lxxvii. ↑Note 443 · See act in full, Report of Indian Commissioner, vol. I, pp. 680–681, 1891. ↑Note 444 · From author’s personal acquaintance; see also Zeigler and Grosscup, Heart of the Alleghanies, pp. 38–39, 1883; Agent J. L. Holmes, in ReportNote 445 · Commissioner D. M. Browning, Report of Indian Commissioner for 1894, pp. 81–82, 1895; also Agent T. W. Potter, ibid., p. 398. ↑Note 446 · Agent T. W. Potter, Report of Indian Commissioner for 1895, p. 387, 1896. ↑Note 447 · Agent J. C. Hart, Report of Indian Commissioner, p. 208, 1897. ↑Note 448 · Agent J. C. Hart, Report of Indian Commissioner, pp. 218–219, 1898. ↑Note 449 · At the recent election in November, 1900, they were debarred by the local polling officers from either registering or voting, and the matterNote 450 · He died, aged about eighty, in April, 1839, within a year after the Removal. Shortly before the end he had himself carried into the townhousNote 451 · Yonaguska had succeeded in authority to Yane′gwa, “Big-bear,” who appears to have been of considerable local prominence in his time, but whoNote 452 · Another of the old notables among the East Cherokee was Tsunu′lăhûñ′skĭ, corrupted by the whites to Junaluska, a great warrior, from whom thNote 453 · As illustrative of his shrewdness it is told that he once tracked a little Indian girl to Charleston, South Carolina, where she had been carNote 454 · Christianity was introduced among the Kituhwa Cherokee shortly before the Removal through Worcester and Boudinot’s translation of Matthew, fNote 455 · In the fall of 1839 the Commissioner of Indian Affairs reported that the East Cherokee had recently expressed a desire to join their brethreNote 456 · In 1840 about one hundred Catawba, nearly all that were left of the tribe, being dissatisfied with their condition in South Carolina, moved Note 457 · On August 6, 1846, a treaty was concluded at Washington with the representatives of the Cherokee Nation west by which the rights of the EastNote 458 · About three-fourths of the entire population can read in their own language, and, though the majority of them understand English, a very fewNote 459 · He is quite a young man and has a remarkably thoughtful face. He is the blacksmith of his nation, and with some assistance supplies the wholNote 460 · On July 29, 1848, Congress approved an act for taking a census of all those Cherokee who had remained in North Carolina after the Removal, aNote 461 · Upon the appointment of Chapman to make the per capita payment above mentioned, the Cherokee Nation west had filed a protest against the payNote 462 · In 1855 Congress directed the per capita payment to the East Cherokee of the removal fund established for them in 1848, provided that North Note 463 · The agent sent for this purpose was Washington Morgan, known to the Indians as Â′ganstâ′ta, son of that Colonel Gideon Morgan who had commanNote 464 · The “Thomas Legion,” recruited in 1862 by William H. Thomas for the Confederate service and commanded by him as colonel, consisted originallNote 465 · In accordance with Thomas’s plan the Indians were employed chiefly as scouts and home guards in the mountain region along the Tennessee-CaroNote 466 · As the North Carolina Cherokees have, like their brethren west, taken up arms against the Lincoln government, it is not probable that any fuNote 467 · In a skirmish near Bryson City (then Charleston), Swain county, North Carolina, about a year after enlistment, a small party of Cherokee—perNote 468 · One of these Union Cherokee had brought back with him the smallpox from an infected camp near Knoxville. Shortly after his return he became Note 469 · In 1868 Congress ordered another census of the East Cherokee, to serve as a guide in future payments, the roll to include only those personsNote 470 · After the retirement of Thomas, in the absence of any active governmental supervision, need was felt of some central authority. On December Note 471 · The award finds that Thomas had purchased with Indian funds a tract estimated to contain 50,000 acres on Oconaluftee river and Soco creek, aNote 472 · To enable the Indians to clear off this lien on their lands and for other purposes, Congress in 1875 directed that as much as remained of thNote 473 · The titles and boundaries having been adjusted, the Indian Office assumed regular supervision of East Cherokee affairs, and in June, 1875, tNote 474 · In the meantime Kâ′lahû′ had been succeeded as chief by Lloyd R. Welch (Da′siʻgiya′gĭ), an educated mixed-blood of Cheowa, who served about Note 475 · We find no further official notice of the East Cherokee until 1881, when Commissioner Price reported that they were still without agent or sNote 476 · The neglected condition of the East Cherokee having been brought to the attention of those old-time friends of the Indian, the Quakers, throNote 477 · From some travelers who visited the reservation about this time we have a pleasant account of a trip along Soco and a day with Chief Smith aNote 478 · In 1882 the agency was reestablished and provision was made for taking a new census of all Cherokee east of the Mississippi, Joseph G. HesteNote 479 · The East Cherokee had never ceased to contend for a participation in the rights and privileges accruing to the western Nation under treatiesNote 480 · In order to acquire a more definite legal status, the Cherokee residing in North Carolina—being practically all those of the eastern band haNote 481 · In person Chief Smith was a splendid specimen of physical manhood, being six feet four inches in height and built in proportion, erect in fiNote 482 · In 1894 the long-standing litigation between the East Cherokee and a number of creditors and claimants to Indian lands within and adjoining Note 483 · In 1895 the Cherokee residing in North Carolina upon the reservation and in the outlying settlements were officially reported to number 1,47Note 484 · That these people can live at all upon the products of their small farms is due to the extreme simplicity of their food, dress, and manner oNote 485 · The exact legal status of the East Cherokee is still a matter of dispute, they being at once wards of the government, citizens of the United
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings