Part 2 / Book 6 — Book VI (continued 6)

A.D. 1781–1783.—Don Gauthey—Gauthier or Gualtier—a monk of the Order of Citeaux, improved upon the invention of Dupuis (at A.D. 1778) and constructed a telegraph, which he submitted at the Académie des Sciences to Dr. Franklin as well as to Condorcet and De Milly, by whom it was recommended to the French Government. In his prospectus, published during 1783, he relates that he has discovered a new mode of rapid transmission enabling him to convey intelligence and sound, by means of water pipes, a distance of fifty leagues in fifty minutes. Ternant, who states this at pp. 33 and 34 of Le Télégraphe, Paris, 1881, adds that, as no action was taken at the time upon the prospectus, it doubtless still lies in the archives of the Academy.

References.—Laurencin, Le Télégraphe, p. 9; Eng. Cycl., “Arts and Sciences,” Vol. VIII. p. 65; “Penny Cycl.,” 1842, Vol. IV. p. 146.

A.D. 1782.—Nairne (Edward), an English mathematical instrument maker, publishes papers on electricity describing his invention of a cylinder machine which is illustrated and described at p. 15 of the chapter on “Electricity” in “Library of Useful Knowledge,” 1829. In this, as has been truly said, are seen all the essential parts of the frictional apparatus now in use.

This machine, according to Cuthbertson, was originally constructed in 1774, and was far more powerful than any before made. Nairne also constructed the largest battery known up to that time. It contained 50 square feet of coated surface, and it could be given so high a charge as to ignite 45 inches of iron wire ¹⁄₁₅₀ of an inch diameter, which up to that period was the greatest length of wire ever ignited. Nairne, while improving upon some of Priestley’s experiments, found that a piece of hard drawn iron wire, ten inches long and one-hundredth of an inch diameter, after receiving successively the discharge of 26 feet of coated glass (nine jars), was shortened three-fortieths of an inch by such discharge. Dr. Priestley had previously observed that a chain 28 inches long was shortened one quarter of an inch after having had transmitted through it a charge of 64 square feet of coated glass, and Brooke Taylor found that by passing a charge of nine bottles of 16 feet of coated surface nine times in succession through a steel wire 12 inches long and one one-hundredth of an inch diameter, the wire was shortened one and one-half inches, or one-eighth its entire length.

To Nairne was granted the third English patent in the Class of Electricity and Magnetism, the first having been issued to Gowin Knight in 1766 (see A.D. 1746) and the second to Gabriel Wright, June 25, 1779, for “a new constructed azimuth and amplitude compass.” Knight subsequently covered other similar inventions, July 5, 1791, and Jan. 19, 1796. Nairne’s patent bears date Feb. 5, 1782, No. 1318, and is for what he calls “The Insulated Medical Electrical Machine,” the conductors of which are so arranged as to readily give either shocks or sparks. He says that “by means of the conductors and jointed tubes, the human body can be in any part affected with either kind of electricity in any convenient manner.”

References.—Philosophical Transactions for 1772, 1774, 1778, 1780, 1783, Vol. LXIV. p. 79; Vol. LXVIII. p. 823; Vol. LXX. p. 334; also Hutton’s abridgments, Vol. XIII. pp. 360 (dipping needle), 498; Vol. XIV. pp. 427–446, 688; Vol. XV. p. 388; “General Biog. Dict.,” London, 1833, by John Gorton, Vol. I. (n. p.); Cuthbertson, “Practical Electricity,” London, 1807, pp. 165–168; article “Electricity,” in the “Encycl. Britannica”; “Description of ... Nairne’s ... Machine,” London, 1783 and 1787; Caullet de Veaumorel, “Description de la machine électrique négative et positive de Mr. Nairne,” Paris, 1784; Delaunay’s “Manuel,” etc., Paris, 1809, pp. 7, 12–14.

A.D. 1782–1783.—Linguet (Simon, Nicolas, Henri), French advocate (1736–1794), who was an associate of Mallet du Pan in the preparation of the Annales Politiques and who was later on committed to the Bastille in consequence of a visit which he imprudently made to Paris, writes a letter to the French Ministry proposing a novel method of transmitting messages of any length or description by means of some kind of a telegraph, “nearly as rapidly as the imagination can conceive them.” He adds, “I am persuaded that in time it will become the most useful instrument of commerce for all correspondence of that kind; just as electricity will be the most powerful agent of medicine; and as the fire-pump will be the principle of all mechanic processes which require, or are to communicate, great force.”

To Linguet has been attributed the authorship of the anonymous letter which appeared in the Journal de Paris of May 30, 1782, and in Le Mercure de France of June 8, 1782, wherein it is proposed to employ twenty-four pairs of gilt wires, placed underground in separate wooden tubes filled with resin and bearing a knob at each extremity. Between each pair of knobs was to be placed a letter of the alphabet, which would become discernible whenever the electric spark was passed through the wire by means of the Leyden phial.

References.—Ternant, Le Télégraphe, Paris, 1881, p. 11; Linguet, “Mém. manuscrit ... signaux par la lumière,” Paris, 1782; all about the “Mercure de France,” in “Bulletin du Bibliophile” No. 7 of July 15, 1902; “Biog. Dict.,” Alex Chalmers, 1815, Vol. XX. p. 290; “Nouv. Biog. Gén.” (Hœfer), Paris, 1860, Vol. XXXI. p. 279; “Biog. Univ.” (Michaud), Vol. XXIV. p. 565.

A.D. 1782–1791.—Cassini (Jean Jacques Dominique, Comte de), son of Cassini de Thury, eminent astronomer, makes the very important announcement that, besides the secular variation of the declination, the magnetic needle is subject to an annual periodical fluctuation depending on the position of the sun in reference to the equinoctial and solstitial points.

Cassini’s discovery is contained in a Memoir consisting of two parts, the first part being a letter addressed to L’Abbé Rosier and published by him in the Journal de Physique, while the second part, composed at request of the Académie des Sciences, is that which specially treats of the annual variation in declination.

Besides the last named, we have thus far learned of the secular variation discovered by Gellibrand (Hellibrand) in 1635, as well as of the diurnal and horary variations, first accurately observed by George Graham during the year 1722, and we have likewise been informed of the earliest observations of the dip or inclination, made independently by both Georg Hartmann (A.D. 1543–1544) and by Robert Norman (A.D. 1576), as well as of the determination of the intensity of the inclination by J. C. Borda (at A.D. 1776). For accounts of the secular and annual, as well as of the diurnal and horary variations of the dip, the reader should consult the First Section of Humboldt’s “Cosmos” treating of telluric phenomena and some of the very numerous references therein given.

Speaking of the influence of the sun’s position upon the manifestation of the magnetic force of the earth, Humboldt remarks that the most distinct intimation of this relation was afforded by the discovery of horary variations, although it had been obscurely perceived by Kepler, who surmised that all the axes of the planets were magnetically directed toward one portion of the universe. He says that the sun may be a magnetic body, and that on that account the force which impels the planets may be centred in the sun (Kepler, in “Stella Martis,” pp. 32–34—compare with it his treatise, “Mysterium Cosmogr.,” cap. 20, p. 71). He further observes that the horary variations of the declination, which, although dependent upon true time are apparently governed by the sun as long as it remains above the horizon, diminish in angular value with the magnetic latitude of place. Near the equator, for instance, in the island of Rawak, they scarcely amount to three or four minutes, whilst the variations are from thirteen to fourteen minutes in the middle of Europe. As in the whole northern hemisphere the north point of the needle moves from east to west on an average from 8½ in the morning until 1½ at midday, in the southern hemisphere the same north point moves from west to east (Arago, Annuaire, 1836, p. 284, and 1840, pp. 330–358). Attention has been drawn, with much justice, to the fact that there must be a region of the earth, between the terrestrial and the magnetic equator, where no horary deviations in the declination are to be observed. This fourth curve (in contradistinction to the isodynamic, isoclinic and isogonic lines, or those respectively of equal force, equal inclination and equal declination), which might be called the curve of no motion, or rather the line of no variation of horary declination, has not yet been discovered. No point has hitherto been found at which the needle does not exhibit a horary motion, and, since the erection of magnetic stations, the important and very unexpected fact has been evolved that there are places in the southern magnetic hemisphere at which the horary variations of the dipping needle alternately participate in the phenomena (types) of the hemispheres.

Humboldt also alludes, in the article on “Magnetic Variation,” to his recognition of the “four motions of the needle, constituting, as it were, four periods of magnetic ebbing and flowing, analogous to the barometrical periods,” which will be found recorded in Hansteen’s “Magnetismus der Erde,” 1819, s. 459, and he likewise refers to the long-disregarded nocturnal alterations of variation, for which he calls attention to Faraday “On the Night Episode,” ss. 3012–3024. (See also, Poggendorff’s Annalen der Physik, Bd. XV. s. 330, and Bd. XIX. s. 373.)

The Phil. Trans. for 1738, p. 395, contain the description of a new compass for ascertaining the variation “with greater ease and exactness than any ever yet contrived for that purpose.” This was devised by Capt. Christopher Middleton, whose many interesting observations are to be found in the same volume of the Phil. Trans., p. 310, as well as in the volumes for 1726, p. 73; 1731–1732, 1733–1734, p. 127; 1742, p. 157, and in John Martyn’s abridgment, Vol. VIII. part i. p. 374. Reference should also be made to the volumes for 1754 (p. 875) and 1757 (p. 329), giving the reports of W. Mountaine and J. Dodson upon the magnetic chart and tables of 50,000 observations, likewise to the volume for 1766 containing the report of W. Mountaine on Robert Douglass’ observation, as well as for the record of investigations of the variation made by David Ross on board the ship “Montagu” during the years 1760–1762.

References.—Sabine, “On the Annual and Diurnal Variations” in Vol. II of “Observations made ... at Toronto,” pp. xvii-xx, also his Memoir “On the Annual Variation of the Magnetic Needle at Different Periods of the Day,” in Phil. Trans. for 1851, Part II. p. 635, as well as the Introduction to his “Observations ... at Hobart Town,” Vol. I. pp. xxxiv-xxxvi, and his Report to the British Association at Liverpool, 1854, p. 11—Phil. Trans. for 1857, Art. 1, pp. 6, 7—relative to the lunar diurnal magnetic variation. See likewise C. Wolf, “Histoire de l’observatoire depuis sa fondation à 1793”; Houzeau et Lancaster, “Bibl. Gen.,” Vol. II. p. 102; “Mém. de Paris,” Vol. II. p. 74, and Vol. VII. pp. 503, 530; Walker, “Ter. and Cos. Magn.,” Chap. III; Mme. J. Le Breton, “Histoire et Applic.,” etc., Paris, 1884, p. 17; Robison, “Mech. Phil.,” Vol. IV. p. 356; Thos. Young, “Nat. Phil.,” 1845, p. 583.

Cassini Family

This celebrated family, to which allusion was made under A.D. 1700, deserves here additional notice.

Giovanni Domenico Cassini (1625–1712), the first and greatest of the name, succeeded Buonaventura Cavaliéri in the astronomical chair of the Bologna University in 1650, and remained there until given the directorship of the Paris Royal Observatory upon its completion in 1670. Partly with the assistance of his learned nephew, James Philip Maraldi, Cassini made many important discoveries, among which may be signalled the finding of the first, second, third and fifth satellites of Saturn, as well as the dual character of that planet’s ring, the determination of the rotation of Jupiter, Mars and Venus, and the laws of the moon’s axial rotation. (See Thomson, “Hist. of the Roy. Soc.,” p. 331; “Anc. Mém. de Paris,” I, VIII, X; Thos. Morrell, “Elem. of the Hist. of Phil. and Sc.,” London, 1827, pp. 377–379.)

Jacques (James) Cassini (1677–1756), the only son of the preceding, became director of the Paris Observatory upon the death of his father, made many very important astronomical observations, and wrote several treatises upon electricity, etc. In one of his works, “De la Grandeur et de la Figure de la Terre,” Paris, 1720, he gives an account of the continuation of the measurement of Picard’s arc of the meridian from Paris northward, begun by Domenico Cassini and La Hire in 1680, and recommenced by Domenico and Jacques Cassini in 1700. (See “Mém. de Paris,” Vol. VII. pp. 455, 456, 508, 572; and for years 1705, pp. 8, 80; 1708, pp. 173, 292; 1729, Hist. I., Mem. 321.)

Cesar François Cassini de Thury (1714–1784), son of Jacques, whom he in turn succeeded at the Observatory, was, as above stated, the father of Jean Dominique Cassini (1747–1845). He made numerous researches while in the Director’s Chair, his most remarkable work being the large triangulation of France published in 1744, under the title of “La Méridienne,” etc. (See “Hist. de l’Acad. des Sciences de Paris” pour 1752, p. 10.)

A.D. 1783.—Robespierre (François-Maximilien-Joseph-Isidore de), who afterward became leader of the famous French Jacobin Club, and was at the time practising law in his native town of Arras, distinguishes himself by successfully defending the cause of the Sieur de Vissery de Boisvalé, a landed proprietor of that place, who had erected a lightning conductor on his house, “much to the scandal of the discreet citizens” of the locality—“Deistical philosophy; away with it!” (Eighth “Britannica,” Vol. XIX. p. 233).

Mr. de Boisvalé’s case was an appeal from a judgment delivered by the sheriff of Saint-Omer, ordering the destruction of the lightning conductor, and its printed report bears the following epigraph:

Jean Paul Marat, docteur en médecine et médecin des Gardes de corps de M. le Comte d’Artois, who, like Robespierre, was a member of the French National Convention as well as a declared enemy of the Girondins, and who was killed by Charlotte Corday, July 13, 1793, made many electrical experiments. These greatly interested Benjamin Franklin, who used to visit him (Ninth “Encycl. Brit.,” Vol. XV. p. 526). He was the author of many electrical works during the years 1779–1784, notably “Découvertes sur le feu, l’électricité et la lumière,” “Recherches Physiques,” and a memoir on medical electricity (“Œuvres de Marat,” Paris, 1788; A. Bougeart, “Marat, l’ami du peuple,” 1864; F. Chevremont, “Jean Paul Marat,” 1881).

References.—Ronalds’ “Catalogue,” p. 434; La Lumière Electrique for Sept. 5, 1891; the Electrician, London, Sept. 11, 1891.

A.D. 1783.—Wilkinson (C. H.), Scotch physician, publishes at Edinburgh his “Tentamen Philosophico-medicum de Electricitate,” which is followed, during 1798 and 1799, by other works upon electricity, wherein he cites a number of marvellous cures of intermittent fevers similar to those made by Cavallo, also of amaurosis (goutte sereine) and of quinsy (squinancie) like those performed by Lovet, Becket and Mauduyt.

During the year 1804 appeared the first edition, in two volumes, of his “Elements of Galvanism in Theory and Practice,” containing a very comprehensive review of the discovery from the time of Galvani’s early experiments. In this last-named work, however, he shows that incipient amaurosis and the completely formed gutta serena have not yielded to his own treatment by galvanic influence as had been the case with Dr. C. J. C. Grapengieser, who published many accounts of surprising cures (Grapengieser, “Versuche den Galvanismus ...” Berlin, 1801 and 1802, or Brewer and Delaroche, “Essai ...” Paris, 1802). The whole of Chap. XXXVI is devoted to the application of galvanism to medicine, whereto allusion had already been made in the first chapter of the same work.

Wilkinson refers also to the electricity of the torpedo, and to the observations made thereon by Hippocrates, Plato, Theophrastus, Pliny and Ælian, also by Belon, Rondelet, Salviana and Gesner, as well as by Musschenbroek, Redi, Réaumur, Walsh, Hunter, Spallanzani, ’Sgravesande, Steno, Borelli, Galvani and others. Much space is likewise given to the observations recorded on animal electricity, notably by Fontana, De La Méthérie, Berlinghieri, Vassali-Eandi, Humboldt, Pfaff, Lehot, Hallé, Aldini, and to the experiments of Valli as they were repeated before the French Academy of Sciences and before the Royal Society of Medicine of Paris, in presence of M. Mauduyt. When treating of the powers of galvanism as a chemical agent, reference is made to the decomposition of water, thus first effected in 1795 by Creve, the discoverer of metallic irritation, and to the operations of Nicholson and Carlisle, Dr. Henry, Cruikshanks, Haldane, Henry Moyes, Richter, Gibbes, etc.

References.—J. J. Hemmer, “Commentat Palatinæ,” VI, Phys., p. 47; Bertholon, “Elec. du Corps Humain,” 1786, Vol. I. pp. 314, 330, 483, and Vol. II. p. 299; “Bibl. Britan.,” 1808, Vol. XXXVIII. p. 270 (Phil. Mag., No. 105); Annales de Chimie, Vol. LXXVIII. p. 247; Phil. Mag., Vol. XXIX. p. 243, and Vol. XLIX. p. 299; F. Buzzi, “Osservazione ... amaurosi ... elettricita,” Milano, 1783 (“Opus. Scelti,” Vol. VI. p. 359); Nicholson’s Journal, Vol. VIII. pp. 1, 70, 206; also Vol. X. pp. 30–32, for letter relative to certain erroneous observations of Mr. Wilkinson respecting galvanism, by Mr. Ra. Thicknesse, who also wrote in Vol. IX. pp. 120–122, explaining the production of the electric fluid by the galvanic pile.

A.D. 1783.—Saussure (Horace-Benedict de), Professor of Physics at the University of Geneva and founder of the Society for the Advancement of the Arts in the same city, is the inventor of an electrometer designed to ascertain the electrical state of the atmosphere, which will be found described in Vol. VIII. p. 619 of the 1855 “Encycl. Britannica.”

He observed that electricity is strongest in the open-air, that it is weak in streets, under trees, etc., and that during the summer and winter, by night as well as by day, when the atmosphere is free from clouds, the electricity of the air is always positive. In contradistinction, Mr. T. Ronayne found in Ireland that the electricity of the atmosphere is positive in winter when the air is clear, but that it diminishes in frosty or foggy weather and that he could detect no electricity in the air during summer except on the approach of fogs, when the electricity proved to be positive. During the year 1785, M. de Saussure observed at Geneva that, during the winter, the intensity of atmospherical electricity attained its first maximum at 9 a.m., diminishing from that hour until it reached its minimum at 6 p.m., after which it began to increase until attaining its second maximum at 8 p.m., diminishing gradually thereafter till it recorded its second minimum at 6 a.m. During the summer he found the electricity increasing from sunrise till between 3 and 4 p.m., when it would reach its maximum; after that it appeared to diminish till the dew fell, when it again became stronger, but was scarcely sensible during the night.

Sir David Brewster informs us in his able article on “Electricity” in the “Britannica” that De Saussure made a number of elaborate experiments on the electricity of evaporation and combustion. He observed at first that the electricity was sometimes positive and sometimes negative when water was evaporated from a heated crucible, but in his subsequent trials he found it to be always positive in an iron and in a copper crucible. In a silver, also in a porcelain crucible, the electricity was negative and the evaporation of both alcohol and of ether in a silver crucible also gave negative electricity. M. de Saussure made many fruitless attempts to obtain electricity from combustion, and he likewise failed in his efforts to procure it from evaporation without ebullition.

To De Saussure is often erroneously attributed the authorship of Lullin’s “Dissertatio physica de electricitate,” alluded to at A.D. 1766.

References.—De Saussure’s “Dissertatio de Igne,” “Exposition abrégée,” etc. (translated by Giuseppe Toaldo, in both his “Della maniera,” etc., and “Dei conduttori,” etc., Venezia, 1772 and 1778), “Voyage dans les Alpes,” all published at Geneva, 1759, 1771, 1779, also the important 1786 Neuchatel edition of the last-named work, more particularly at pp. 194, 197, 203, 205, 206, 211, 212, 216, 218, 219, 228, 252, 254 of Vol. II, and at pp. 197, 257 of Vol. IV; likewise his Memoirs relative to the electricity of the atmosphere, of vegetables, of microscopic animals, etc., etc., alluded to in Journal de Physique for 1773, 1784, 1788; in Journal de Paris for 1784, 1785; in Vol. I of Lazaro Spallanzani’s “Opuscoli di fisica,” etc., for 1776; in Vol. III of the “Opuscoli Scelti di Milano,” and in the Philosophical Transactions. See also Jean Senebier, “Mémoire historique,” etc., Genève, 1801; Louis Cotte in his “Traité,” etc., “Mémoires,” etc., “Observation,” etc., Paris, 1762, 1769, 1772; in the “Mémoires de Paris,” Année 1769, “Hist.,” p. 19; Année 1772, “Hist.,” p. 16, and in the Journal de Physique for 1783, Vol. XXIII; the experiments of MM. Becquerel and Brachet in Becquerel’s “Traité d’El. et de Magn.,” Paris, 1836, Vol. IV. p. 110; Theodor Ægidius von Heller, “Beobach d. Atmosphär. Elektricität.” (F. A. C. Gren, “Neues Journal der Physik” for 1797, Vol. IV); Faujas de St. Fond, “Description,” etc., Vol. II. p. 271, as per George Adams’ “Essay on Electricity,” London, 1799, p. 419; Noad, “Manual,” etc., London, 1859, p. 16; Poggendorff, Vol. II. p. 755; Rozier, XXXI. pp. 317, 374; XXXIV. p. 161; articles “Meteorology and Electricity” in the “Encyclopædia Britannica”; Thomas Young, “Course of Lectures,” etc., London, 1807, Vol. II. pp. 447, 466–471.

A.D. 1784.—Swinden (Jan Hendrik Van) (1746–1823), who had been made Professor in the University of Franequer at the early age of twenty (1767), and was at this time occupying the Chair of Natural Philosophy and Mathematics at Amsterdam, publishes in three volumes, at La Haye, his “Recueil de Mémoires sur l’Analogie de l’Electricité et du Magnétisme,” etc. (“De Analogia ...” in Vol. II of the “Neue Abhandl. der Baierischen Akad. Phil.”). The latter contains all the essays sent to the Electoral Academy of Bavaria on the subject—“Is There a Real and Physical Analogy Between Electric and Magnetic Forces; and, if Such Analogy Exist, in What Manner Do These Forces Act Upon the Animal Body?”

Van Swinden’s essay, which gained him one of the prizes, shows that, in his opinion, the similarity between electricity and magnetism amounts merely to an apparent resemblance, and does not constitute a real physical analogy. He infers from this that these two powers are essentially different and distinct from one another, but the contrary opinion was maintained by Profs. Steiglehuer and Hubner, who contended that so close an analogy as that exhibited by these two classes of phenomena indicated the effects of a single agent, varied only in consequence of a diversity of circumstances.

The eminent professor, Gerard Moll, of Utrecht, has communicated to the Edinburgh Journal of Science (1826, Vol. I. part ii. pp. 197–208) a biographical notice of Van Swinden, wherein he gives a list of the latter’s principal works and there speaks of one of his best-known productions in following manner: “The Positiones Physicæ (Opusc. Scelti, X. 7), as far as they are published (Harderovici, 1786, Vol. I and Vol. II. part i.), are allowed to rank among the best elements of natural philosophy, and have been found by actual experience to belong to the best sources from which the young student could draw his information on those parts of natural philosophy, and its general principles, as are contained in the first volume and part of the second, which is all that was published. The work itself is on a most extensive plan; and the multifarious avocations which crowded on Van Swinden in Amsterdam delayed the publications, and made him afterward abandon all thoughts of completing a work which would have done the greatest honour to its author, and which even now, unfinished as it is, is celebrated as an excellent specimen of sound reasoning and profound learning.”

Van Swinden was the first President of the Royal Institute of the Netherlands. He entered with ardour into all the new discoveries of his day and kept up an extensive correspondence with many of the leading scientific characters of the time, notably with the Swiss philosopher, Charles Bonnet (whose “Contemplations de la Nature” he annotated extensively); with Dr. Matthew Maty (who became secretary of the Royal Society upon the resignation of Dr. Birch in 1765, and who was appointed, by the king, principal librarian of the British Museum upon the death of Dr. Gowin Knight, 1772); with the eminent French physician, Michel-Augustin Thouret, Dean of the Paris “Faculté de Médecine”; as well as with Delambre, Euler, De Saussure, and many others who have been named elsewhere in this “Bibliographical History.”

The following is further extracted from Prof. Moll’s interesting paper: “Mr. Biot, in his treatise on Natural Philosophy (Tome III. p. 143) asserts that we are indebted to Cassini IV. (see Jean Dominique, Comte de Cassini, at A.D. 1782–1791) for much of what we know even about the diurnal variation of the needle. This, I think, is not fair. We do not mean to undervalue Mr. Cassini’s observations, but it is unquestionable that long before the publication of that philosopher’s work, Mr. Van Swinden had observed and published (‘Recherches sur les aiguilles aimantées et leurs variations’—Mémoires présentés à l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Tome VIII—prize essay 1777) that which Mr. Biot less accurately is pleased to ascribe to his countryman. In this respect, however, Mr. Van Swinden was treated with more justice by other eminent philosophers, such as Haüy, Halley and Burkhardt.” (Consult also the “Acta Acad. Petrop.” for 1780, Part I. Hist. p. 10.)

In the afore-named very meritorious work, “Recueil de Mémoires,” etc., crowned by the Bavarian Academy, Van Swinden has treated fully of the then current theories relative to electrical and magnetical phenomena, reviewing the entire field of their application. In so doing he has necessarily made numerous references to discoverers and experimenters of all countries, the names of many of which appear in the present compilation, and while it is, of course, useless here to quote these anew, it has been thought best, for a record, to specify such as are infrequently met with, and which appear in many of his most important articles, even at the risk of being accused of diffuseness or prolixity. They are as follows:

References.—John T. Needham (Vol. IV, Mem. Brussels Acad. for 1783); Phil. Trans., 1746, p. 247; J. G. Lehmann (“Abhandlung von Phosph.”; “Von Magnet Theilen im Sande,” “Novi Com. Acad. Petrop.,” Vol. XII. p. 368, etc.); M. De La Cépède, “Essai sur l’El. nat et artif.”; C. E. Gellert (“Com. Acad. Petrop.,” Vol. XIII. p. 382, Exp. 15, 16); J. F. Henckel, “Pyritologia,” etc.; J. E. Von Herbert, “Theor. Phæn. Elect.,” cap. 4, prop. 8; C. F. M. Déchales, “Mundus Mathematicus,” lib. 1, Quartus Exper. Ordo., exp. 16, Tome II. p. 488, ed. 2, etc.; M. Marcel’s Dissertation on powdered magnets, which appears in the Dutch “Uitgezogte Verhandelingen,” Vol. I. p. 261, etc.; Jean M. Cadet (“Nova Acta. Physico. Med. Acad. Natur. Curios.,” Tome III); Abbé Giraud-Soulavie (“Comment. ... Œuvres de Mr. Hamilton,” note 4, p. 303); J. B. Le Roy (“Mém. de l’Acad. de Paris,” for 1753, p. 447; for 1772, p. 499; Jour. de Phys., Vol. II); Rudolph Richard (“Magazin d. Hamb.,” IV. p. 681); Gilles A. Bazin, “Descrip. des Cour, Mag.,” Plates 14, 16–18; J. F. Gross, “Elektrische Pausen,” Leipzig, 1776; Jour. de Phys., Vol. X. p. 235; Niccolo Bammacaro, “Tentamen de vi Electrica,” etc., s. 6; Samuel Colepress (Phil. Trans., 1667, No. 27, Vol. I. p. 502); E. F. Du Tour, “Discours sur l’aimant,” s. 27; “Recueil des Prix de l’Acad. de Paris,” Tome V. mém. ii. p. 49; “Mém. Math, et Phys.”; Mr. Calendrin, at Van Swinden’s, Vol. I. pp. 233, etc.; M. Blondeau (“Mém. de l’Acad. de Marine,” Brest., Tome I. s. 46, pp. 401–431, 438); J. A. Braun, “Observations,” etc.; “Novi. Comment. Acad. Petrop.,” Vol. VII. pp. 388, 407; M. Antheaulme (“Mém. sur les aimants artif.” (prize essay), 1760; “Mém. de l’Acad. Roy.,” 1761, p. 211; Van Swinden, 1784, Vol. II. pp. 95, 170); J. N. Reichenberger, “Directorium magneticum magneticis,” etc., and “Hydrotica,” as at Van Swinden, 1784, Vol. II. pp. 272–273; Geo. C. Schmidt, “Beschr., einer Elektrisir Masch.,” etc., 1778; M. De la Folie (Jour, de Phys., 1774, Vol. III. p. 9); Cölestin Steiglehner, “Obs. phaenom. elect.,” “Ueber die Annal der Elek. und des Magn.”; Lorenz Hubner, “Abh. u. d. Annal. u. mag. Kraft”; Jos. Thad. Klinkosch, “Schreiben,” etc., “Beschreib. d. Volta ... Elektrophors.” Reference should also be made to Noad, “Manual,” etc., p. 641; Encycl. Brit., 1857, Vol. XIV. p. 6; “Messager des Sciences et des Arts,” Gand, 1823, pp. 185–201, detailing all of Van Swinden’s works; Antoine Thillaye’s treatise presented to the Ecole de Médecine le 15 Floréal, An. XI; Butet (“Bull, des Sc. de la Soc. Philom.,” No. 43, Vendémiaire, An. IX).

A.D. 1784.—Cotugno (Domenico), Professor of Anatomy at Naples, thus addresses Le Chevalier G. Vivenzio under date October 2, 1784: “The observation which I mentioned some days ago, when we were discoursing together of the electrical animals, upon which I said I believed the mouse to be one of that number, is the following: Toward the latter end of March, I was sitting with a table before me and observing something to move about my foot, which drew my attention. Looking toward the floor I saw a small domestic mouse, which, as its coat indicated, must have been very young. As the little animal could not move very quick, I easily laid hold of it by the skin of the back and turned it upside down; then with a small knife that laid by me, I intended to dissect it. When I first made the incision into the epigastric region, the mouse was situated between the thumb and finger of my left hand, and its tail was got between the last two fingers. I had hardly cut through part of the skin of that region, when the mouse vibrated its tail between the fingers, and was so violently agitated against the third finger that, to my great astonishment, I felt a shock through my left arm as far as the neck, attended with an internal tremor, a painful sensation in the muscles of the arm, and such giddiness of the head, that, being affrighted, I dropped the mouse. The stupor of the arm lasted upward of a quarter of an hour, nor could I afterwards think of the incident without emotion. I had no idea that such an animal was electrical; but in this I had the positive proof of experience.” (See G. Vivenzio, “Teoria e pratica della elettricità med.” ... Napoli, 1784.)

Cotugno’s observations attracted much attention throughout Italy and gave rise to many experiments, notably by Vassalli, who, however, merely concluded from them that the animal’s body could retain accumulated electricity in some unaccountable manner.

References.—Essai sur l’histoire, etc., J. B. Biot, p. 9; Journal de Physique, XLI. p. 57; Mémoires Récréatifs, etc., par Robertson, Paris, 1840, Vol. I. p. 233; Cavallo, Electricity, London, 1795, Vol. III. p. 6; Izarn, Manuel, Paris, 1804, p. 4; Journal Encyclopédique de Bologne, 1786, No. 8; Poggendorff, Vol. I. p. 417; Sue, aîné “Hist. du Galv.,” Vol. I. pp. 1–2.

A.D. 1785.—Coulomb (Charles Augustin de), the founder of electro-statics and of the school of experimental physics in France, invents the torsion balance, with which he discovers the true law of electric and magnetic attractions and repulsions. Some have asserted that Lord Stanhope had previously established the law with regard to electricity, but it has not been seriously questioned that its extension to magnetism belongs exclusively to Coulomb. Johann Lamont (“Handbuch ...” p. 427) gives the credit of the latter discovery to Giovannantonio Della Bella, of Padua, who is mentioned by Poggendorff (“Biog.-Liter. Handwörterbuch,” Vol. I. p. 139) as the author of several works on electricity and magnetism, but the claim does not appear to be established upon any satisfactory foundation.

With his torsion balance, or rather electrometer, Coulomb measured the force by the amount of twist it gave to a long silken thread carrying a horizontal needle, constructed, preferably, of a filament of gum-lac or of straw covered with sealing-wax. From his experiments he concluded: That the attractive force of two small globes, one electrified positively and the other negatively, is in the inverse ratio of the squares of the distances of their centres, and that the repulsive force of two small globes, charged either with positive or negative electricity, is inversely as the squares of the distances of the centres of the globes (“Mém. de l’Acad. Roy. des Sciences,” 1784, 1785).

In one of his three memoirs to the French Academy during 1785, he states that a balance used by him was so delicate that each degree of the circle of torsion expressed a force of only one hundred-thousandth of an English grain, that another, suspended by a single fibre of silk four inches long, made a complete revolution with a force of one seventy-thousandth of a grain, and turned to the extent of a right angle when a stick of sealing-wax, which had been rubbed, was presented to it at the distance of a yard. It is said that a similar electrometer has been constructed in which the movement of one degree recorded a force not exceeding twenty-one million six-hundred-thousandths of a grain.

The many valuable experiments made by Coulomb on the dissipation of electricity and upon the distribution of electricity upon the surfaces of bodies are fully recorded in the able article of Sir David Brewster in the “Encyclopædia Britannica” (F. C. Achard, “Mém. de Berlin,” 1780, p. 47); M. Vernier, “De la dist. ... conducteurs,” Paris, 1824; J. L. F. Bertrand, “Programme d’une thèse ...” Paris, 1839; D. Bourdonnay, “Sur la dist. ... conducteurs,” Paris, 1840; Ed. A. Roche in “Montp. Acad. Sect. Sciences,” Vol. II. p. 115).

He discovered that shellac is the most perfect of all insulators, also that a thread of gum-lac insulates ten times better than a dry silken thread of the same length and diameter: and he established the law that the densities of electricity insulated by different lengths of fine cylindrical fibres, such as those of gum-lac, hair, silk, etc., vary as the square root of the lengths of the fibre.

Besides the communications above alluded to, Coulomb sent to the French Academy, during the years 1786, 1787, 1788 and 1789, many papers upon Electricity and Magnetism, and, up to within two years of his death (1806), he made many notable experiments, especially in magnetism, of which full accounts are given in several of the Mémoires noted at foot. The theory of the two magnetic fluids appeared in his 1789 paper. It is also in this same paper that Coulomb describes his improved method of making artificial magnets by employing compound magnets as first made use of by Gowin Knight and as explained at A.D. 1746. Still further improvements in these were brought about more particularly by the young Flemish scientist, Etienne Jean Van Geuns (1767–1795), by Jean Baptiste Biot (see A.D. 1803), and by the Rev. Dr. Scoresby during the year 1836.

Coulomb found that a steel wire is, by twisting, rendered capable of being nine times more strongly magnetized; that the magnetic power dwells on the surface of iron bodies and is independent of their mass; that the directive force of a magnetized bar reached its maximum when tempered to a bright cherry-red heat at 900 degrees, and that every substance is susceptible of magnetism to a degree of actual measurement. This last important research was communicated by him to the French Institute during the year 1802. His experiments proved that a grain of iron could communicate sensible magnetism to twenty pounds’ weight of another substance, and that when even beeswax had incorporated with it a portion of iron filings equal only to the one hundred-and-thirty-thousandth part of its weight it was yet sensibly affected by the magnet.

According to Dr. Thomas Young, Coulomb’s improvements in the theory of electricity may be considered as having immediately prepared the way for the elegant inventions of Volta and for the still more marvellous discoveries of Davy. Dr. Young gives reports of some of Coulomb’s experiments at p. 439, Vol. II of his “Course of Lectures” London, 1807 (“Journal of the Royal Institution” Vol. I. p. 134; “Décade Philosophique,” No. 21).

References.—“Mém. de l’Acad. Royale des Sciences,” Paris, 1784, p. 266; 1785, pp. 560, 569, 578, 612; 1786, p. 67; 1787, p. 421; 1788, p. 617; 1789, p. 455; “Mém. de l’Institut,” Vol. III. p. 176; Vol. IV. p. 565, and Vol. VI. for 1806; “Mém. de Math. et de Phys.” Vols. VIII and IX; “Mémoires de Coulomb,” Vol. I of the “Collection de Mémoires relatifs à la Physique,” Paris, 1884; “Cat. of Sc. Papers Roy. Soc.,” Vol. III. p. 73; “Abstracts of Papers of Roy. Soc.,” Vol. II. p. 402; “Bull. de la Soc. Philom.,” Nos. 3, 31, 61, 63, and for 1795, 1802; Journal de Physique, Vols. XLV (II), pp. 235, 448; LIV. pp. 240, 267, 454; LV. p. 450 (for Carradori’s report); Ch. N. A. De Haldat du Lys (“Mém. de Nancy” for 1841); Phil. Magazine, Vols. XI. p. 183; XII. p. 278; XIII. p. 401; XV. p. 186; Rozier, XXVII. p. 116; XLIII. p. 247; Gilbert, XI. pp. 254, 367; XII. p. 194; Dr. Young, “Course of Lectures,” London, 1807, Vol. I. pp. 682, 685, 686; “Royal Society Cat. of Sc. Papers,” Vol. II. p. 73; Eighth “Britannica,” Vol. XIV. pp. 37–38; Humboldt, “Cosmos,” 1859, Vol. V. p. 61; Schaffner, “Manual,” 1859, p. 56; Biot’s article in the “Biographie Universelle” and Biot’s “Traité de Physique,” Paris, 1816, Vols. II, III; Dr. Thomas Thomson, “Outline of the Sciences,” etc., London, 1830, pp. 350, 351, 379–422; Harris, “Rudim. Magn.,” Parts I, II. p. 56. See also description of the electrometer of Colardeau and the electro-micrometer of Delaunay, in the latter’s “Manuel,” etc., Paris, 1809, pp. 66, 76–80, and Plate V. fig. 61, as well as Libes’ “Dict. de Phys.,” Vol. I. p. 406.

A.D. 1785.—The Canon Gottoin de Coma, friend of Alessandro Volta, observes that an iron wire about thirty feet in length will give a sound under certain conditions of the atmosphere when stretched in the open air. The circumstances that accompany, as well as those that favour the production of the phenomenon, says Prescott, demonstrate that it must be attributed to the transmission of atmospheric electricity. This transmission does not occur in a continuous manner, like that of a current, but is observable by a series of discharges.

References.—Knight’s Mechanical Dictionary, 1876, Vol. III. p. 2515; Prescott’s “The Speaking Telephone,” etc., 1879, p. 122; Encyl. Britannica, 1860, Vol. XXI. p. 631.

A.D. 1785.—Marum (Martin Van), a Dutch electrician who had in 1776 taken the degree of M.D. at the Academy of Gröningen, constructs for the Teylerian Society at Haarlem, with the assistance of John Cuthbertson, an electrical machine said to be the most powerful theretofore made. According to Cavallo (Nat. Phil., 1825, Vol. II. p. 194) it consisted of two circular plates of French glass, each sixty-five inches in diameter, parallel with each other on a common axis, and about seven and a half inches apart. Each plate was excited by four rubbers, the prime conductor being divided into two branches which entered between the plates and, by means of points, collected the electric fluid from their inner surfaces only.

In Van Marum’s machine, the positive and negative electricity could only be obtained in succession, but Dr. Hare, of the University of Pennsylvania, remedied this by causing the plates to revolve horizontally. It is said the machine was so powerful that bodies at a distance of forty feet were sensibly affected; a single spark from it melted a leaf of gold and fired various kinds of combustibles; a thread became attracted at the distance of thirty-eight feet, and a pointed wire was tipped with a star of light at a distance of twenty-eight feet from the conductor.

Descriptions of his machines are given by Dr. Van Marum in letters to the Chevalier Marsiglio Landriani and to Dr. Ingen-housz, both printed in Haarlem during 1789 and 1791. The first quarto volume of Nicholson’s Journal also contains a reference thereto and gives (p. 83) the extract from a letter read June 24, 1773 (Phil. Trans., Vol. LXIII. pp. 333–339), addressed to Dr. Franklin, F.R.S., by John Merwin Nooth, M.D., who describes improvements by which machines are rendered effective in all kinds of weather. Nooth was the inventor of the silk flap, of which mention was made in the description of Cavallo’s machine (under A.D. 1775).

Van Marum also constructed a powerful battery, the metallic coatings of which were equal to 225 square feet, enabling him to give polarity to steel bars nine inches long, nearly half an inch wide and one-twelfth of an inch thick, as well as to sever a piece of boxwood four inches diameter and four inches long, and to melt three hundred inches of iron wire one hundred-and-fiftieth of an inch in diameter, or ten inches of one-fortieth of an inch in diameter. It is said that, during these experiments, the report was so loud as to stun the ears, and the flash so bright as to dazzle the sight.

Dr. Van Marum likewise made experiments upon the electricity developed during the melting and cooling of resinous bodies, which are detailed in the article “Electricity” 8th Edit. “Encyclopædia Britannica,” Vol. VIII. p. 565, and also upon the effects of electricity on animals and vegetables, which are given at pp. 49–51 of the article “Electricity” in the “Library of Useful Knowledge,” as well as in the 1855 Edit. “Encyclopædia Britannica,” Vol. VIII. pp. 602, 603.

In 1785 again Van Marum discovered that electric sparks, on passing through oxygen gas, gave rise to a peculiar sulphurous or electrical odour, which Cavallo called “electrified air,” and the presence of which Dr. John Davy, brother of Sir Humphry Davy, found the means of detecting.

During the month of October 1801 Volta wrote a letter to Van Marum asking him to make, in concert with Prof. C. H. Pfaff, of Kiel, several experiments on the electricity of the pile with the very powerful apparatus of the Teylerian Society. The extended researches of these two scientists are embodied in the Phil. Mag., Vol. XII. p. 161, as well as in the “Lettre à Volta” etc., published at Haarlem during 1802, and are likewise treated of in a very complete manner throughout Chaps. XVI and XXXII of Wilkinson’s well-known work on galvanism. Their united observations confirm the doctrine of Volta as to the identity of the current of the fluid put in motion by the voltaic pile and that to which an impulsion is given by an electrical machine. Thus is answered the question asked during May 1801 by the Haarlem Society of Sciences, viz. “Can the voltaic pile be explained in a satisfactory manner by the known laws and properties of electricity; or is it necessary to conclude the existence of a particular fluid, distinct from the one which is denominated electrical?” They also demonstrated that the current put in motion by the voltaic pile has an enormous celerity “which surpasses all that the imagination can conceive.” With a pile of one hundred and ten pairs of very large copper and zinc plates, they made experiments on the fusion of iron wires and ascertained the causes of the more considerable effects of large piles in the fusion and oxidation of metals, proving, among other facts, as Biot and Cuvier had already done, that a part of the oxygen is absorbed whether the operation be carried on in the open air or in vacuo (Biot and Cuvier, Soc. Philomathique, An. IX. p. 40; Annales de Chimie, Vol. XXXIX. p. 247).

Another of Van Marum’s experiments is related in a letter to M. Berthollet, wherein he says: “... I have succeeded in the decomposition of water, by means of the current of the electrical machine, provided with a plate of thirty-one inches diameter, constructed by me on a new plan (see the Journal de Physique for June, 1795).... I took a thermometrical tube, of the kind employed in making the most sensitive thermometers of Crawford and Hunter, for which purpose I had procured several of these tubes some time before in London. Its diameter interiorly was not more than the one-hundredth part of an inch; and I introduced into it an iron wire of the diameter of about the three-hundredth part of an inch, to the depth of about twelve inches. I now closed the end of my thermometrical tube with sealing wax in such a way that the extremity of the iron wire should scarcely project, and I placed the tube itself, by means of a cork, within a larger tube containing water. The rest of the apparatus was arranged in the customary manner. By directing the powerful current of the above-mentioned machine to this apparatus, the copper ball belonging to which, placed on the thermometrical tube, was at the distance of about three or four lines from the conductor, I succeeded in decomposing the water with a promptitude nearly equal to that which results from a voltaic pile of a hundred pairs of metallic plates.” This method of decomposing water is a very tedious one, and is in fact the result of an interrupted explosion, while the process of Dr. Wollaston (alluded to at A.D. 1801) is tranquil and progressive.

References.—“Biogr. Univ.,” Vol. XLII. p. 600; J. G. Heinze, “Neue elekt. versuche ...” Oldenberg, 1777; Tries’ claim to Van Marum’s machine in Rozier, XL. p. 116; Prieur’s extract in Annales de Chimie, Vol. XXV. p. 312; “Verhand. Genootsch. Rott.,” VI for 1781 and VIII for 1787; Journal de Physique, XXXI, 1787; XXXIII, 1788 (Marum en Troostwyk); XXXIV, 1789; XXXVIII, 1791; XL, 1792; “Journal du Galvanisme,” XI, Cahier, p. 187; “Journal des Savants” for August 1905; “Revue Scientifique,” Paris, April 8, 1905, pp. 428–429; Nicholson’s Journal for March 1799, Vol. II. p. 527; Harris, “Electricity,” pp. 62, 90, 171; Cuthbertson, “Practical Electricity,” London, 1807, pp. 166, 172, 197, 225; Cavallo, “Electricity,” 4th ed., Vol. II. p. 273; “Lib. of Useful Knowledge,” “Electricity,” p. 45; Wilkinson, “Elements of Galvanism,” etc., London, 1804, Vol. II. pp. 106–128, 384; “Teyler’s Tweede Genootschap”; Gilbert, Annalen, I. pp. 239, 256; X. p. 121; Rozier, XXVII. pp. 148–155; XXXI. p. 343; XXXIV. p. 274; XXXVIII. pp. 109, 447; XL. p. 270; “Opus. Scelti,” IX. p. 41; XIV. p. 210.

A.D. 1785.—Sigaud de la Fond, Professor at the Collège d’Harcourt in Paris, publishes in the latter city his “Précis historique et expérimental des phénomènes electriques,” wherein he states having, as far back as 1756, made use of a circular plate machine provided with cushions and similar in shape to that which many claim to have originated with Ingen-housz and with Ramsden. (See A.D. 1779 and A.D. 1768.)

Sigaud de la Fond is also the author of “Description d’un Cabinet de Physique” (1784), “Cours de Physique,” etc. (1786), “Examen.,” etc. (1803) and of several treatises on medical electricity.

References.—“Journal de Physique,” Vol. II. 1773; Figuier, “Exposition et Histoire,” Paris, 1857, pp. 50, 74–76, 178; Poggendorff, Vol. II. p. 927.

A.D. 1785.—In the “Nachricht von einer neuen Elektrisirmaschine des Herrn Walkiers von Saint Amand,” the last named gives a description of the electrical machine presented by him in 1784 to the Belgian Academy of Sciences.

It is also described and outlined in Delaunay’s “Manuel” named below, but, although very powerful in its effects, cannot be made readily available in consequence of its huge dimensions. M. Caullet de Veaumorel suggested the feasibility of changing the cylinders from a horizontal to a vertical position.

References.—“Lichtenberg’s Mag.,” Vol. III. 1 st. p. 118; Delaunay, “Manuel,” etc., 1809, pp. 14–16.

A.D. 1785.—Adams (George), mathematical instrument maker to his Majesty, writes an enlarged edition of his “Essay on Electricity,” etc., which first appeared the year previous and wherein, as its full title indicates, he endeavours to explain the theory and practice of that science and the mode of applying it to medical purposes. He illustrates many experiments and gives an Essay on Magnetism, in the treatment of which latter he acknowledges the valuable aid of Dr. J. Lorimer.

The fifth and last edition of the “Essay,” which was issued by William Jones in 1799, four years after Adams’ death, contains a communication on the subject of Medical Electricity by John Birch, the author of “Della Forza dell’ Elettricita,” etc., Napoli, 1778.

At p. 86 of the 1799 “Essay,” etc., Adams relates that, while M. Loammi Baldwin (“Memoirs of Amer. Acad.,” Vol. I. p. 257) held the cord of his kite during the approach of a thunderstorm, he “observed himself to be surrounded by a rare medium of fire, which, as the cloud rose nearer the zenith, and the kite rose higher, continued to extend itself with some gentle faint flashes.” At pp. 137, 186 and 222, he alludes to “A. Brook’s Miscellaneous Experiments and Remarks on Electricity,” etc., as well as to the Rev. John Lyon’s “Experiments and Observations of Electricity,” and refers to the “Journal of Natural Philosophy” (Vol. II. p. 438) for Nicholson’s experiments on the plus and minus of electricity.

A.D. 1785.—La Méthérie (Jean Claude de), French physicist naturalist, becomes sole editor of the “Journal de Physique, de chimie et d’histoire naturelle,” and publishes in Paris his “Essai Analytique,” etc., wherein amongst other observations he asserts that the electric spark results from the combination of oxygen with hydrogen.

He considers that all bodies exist in an electrical or magnetical condition, that we are only a temporary aggregation of molecules of matter governed in different ways by nature’s laws, and that excitability is produced by galvanic action resulting from the superposition of nervous and muscular fibres.

He is also the author of very interesting treatises on animal electricity communicated to the Journal de Physique (Vol. XLII. pp. 252, 255, 292), and of which an account is given in Sue’s “Histoire du Galvanisme,” Paris, 1802, Vol. I. pp. 64–68. The last-named work also gives, at p. 80, an account of the letter on “Galvanism” sent to M. De La Méthérie by M. Leopold Vacca-Berlinghieri (Journal de Physique, Vol. XLI. p. 314).

References.—“Biographie Générale,” Vol. XXIX. p. 209; Rozier, XLI. p. 437; Delaunay, “Manuel,” etc., 1809, p. 15, also Delaunay’s letter in Phil. Mag., Vol. XXVII. p. 260; C. H. Wilkinson, “Elements of Galvanism,” London, 1804, Vol. I. p. 62; Vol. II. p. 9; “Opus. Scelti,” XXI. p. 373; Journal de Physique et Chimie (of which La Méthérie remained editor up to the time of his death, during 1817), Vols. LIII, LIV, Pluviose, An. XI. p. 161; also p. 157 for letter sent him by Giuseppe Izarn; Ann. di Chim. di Brugnatelli, Vol. XIX. p. 156; Aubert, “Elektrometische Flasche,” Paris, 1789.

A.D. 1785.—According to Prof. Tyndall, George Cadogan Morgan sought to produce the electric spark in the interior of solid bodies. He inserted two wires into wood and caused the spark to pass between them; the wood was illuminated with blood-red light or with yellow light according as the depth at which the spark was produced proved greater or less. The spark shown within an ivory ball, an orange, an apple, or under the thumb, illuminates these bodies throughout. A lemon is especially suited to this experiment, flashing forth, at every spark, as a spheroid of very brilliant golden light, and a row of eggs is also brilliantly illuminated throughout, at the passage of every spark from a Leyden jar. Morgan likewise made several experiments to ascertain the influence of electricity on the animal functions. These are alluded to at p. 602, Vol. VIII of the 1855 “Britannica,” and at p. 49 of “Electricity” in the “Library of Useful Knowledge.”

This George Cadogan Morgan (1754–1798) was an English physician and also a Professor of Natural Philosophy at Hackney, in an establishment founded by his uncle, Dr. Price. His “Lectures on Electricity” appeared in Norwich during the year 1794. In the second volume he describes (pp. 225–236) “the form, noise, colours and devastation of the electric flash,” and treats (pp. 383–397) of the “relation of the electric fluid to vegetation,” alluding more particularly to the experiments of Maimbray, Nollet, Achard, Duvernier, Ingen-housz, Van Breda, Dr. Carmoy and the Abbé d’Ormoy. He likewise gives an account of the northern lights, as well as descriptions of Bennet’s movable doubler and electroscope, and of Lane’s electrometer.

References.—Morgan’s biography in Larousse, “Dict. Universel,” Tome XI. p. 562, and in “Biog. Générale,” Tome XXXVI. p. 570; “Bibl. Britan.” An. VII. vol. ii. pp. 129, 223, and Vol. XII. p. 3.

A.D. 1786.—Rittenhouse (David), an American physicist and astronomer who afterward became F.R.S. and succeeded Dr. Franklin as President of the Am. Philos. Soc., publishes his theory of magnetism in a letter to John Page at Williamsburg, which is reproduced at folio 178 of Vol. II, old series, of the Transactions of the above-named Society.

“Were we called upon,” says Renwick, “to assign him a rank among the philosophers whom America has produced, we should place him, in point of scientific merit, as second to Franklin alone.”

References.—“Trans. Am. Phil. Soc.,” Vol. II, O.S., pp. 173, 175, for Page and Rittenhouse, and Vol. III. for Rittenhouse and Jones, as well as Rittenhouse and Hopkinson, upon “Meteors and Lightning.”

A.D. 1786.—Galvani (Aloysio or Luigi), an Italian physician, who, at the age of twenty-five, was Professor of Anatomy at the University of Bologna, is led to the discovery of that important branch of electricity which bears his name. The manuscript giving the result of his experiments upon the Electricity of Metals is dated Sept. 20, 1786.

From papers in the “Bolognese Transactions” noted below, it would appear that he had, even before the year 1780, made many observations on the muscular contraction of frogs by electrical agency. Upon one occasion his wife happened to be holding a scalpel against the dissected legs and parts of the spine of a frog, which lay in close proximity to the conductor of an electrical machine recently charged by one of Galvani’s pupils. She noticed that whenever the dissecting knife touched the muscles they were violently convulsed, and, upon communicating the fact to her husband, he repeated and extended the experiment and found it necessary to pass the electric fluid through a metallic substance in order to develop the result originally observed. At first the frogs had been hung upon a copper hook fastened to an iron railing, but he afterward substituted an arc composed of both metals and with which he could readily produce the same results as were obtainable with an electrical machine.

Galvani also made experiments to ascertain the effect of atmospheric electricity upon the nerves of frogs. He connected the latter with rods leading to lightning conductors erected upon the roof of his house, attaching also ground wires to the legs of the animals, and found that the same convulsions appeared whenever lightning was seen and likewise when heavy storm clouds passed over the house.

The results of his many interesting observations were first made public in the celebrated work entitled “Aloysii Galvani de viribus electricitatis in motu musculari. Commentarius: cum Aldini dissertatione et notis,” which appeared during 1791–1792. Therein, he expresses the belief that the bodies of animals possess a peculiar kind of electricity by which motion is communicated through both nerve and muscle, positive electricity going to the nerve, while negative electricity goes to the muscle, and that the muscles represent the exterior and the nerves the interior of the Leyden jar, the discharge being similarly produced by the metal which communicates with both.

Galvani’s singular experiments naturally attracted everywhere the attention of philosophers, by whom they were repeated and varied, but by none were they more assiduously prosecuted than by Volta, who was then a Professor at the Pavia University, and who, as already indicated, was led by them to the discovery of the voltaic pile and of voltaic or galvanic electricity.

The announcement of Galvani’s observations was made in Germany, notably by J. F. Ackermann (“Medicinisch-chirurgische Zeitung”), by M. Er (“Physiologische Darstellung der Lebenskräfte”), by M. Smuck (“Beiträge zur weiteren Kenntniss,” etc.), and by F. A. C. Gren (“Journal der Physik,” Vols. VI, VII and VIII), while experiments were continued upon an extensive scale by the Italians F. Fontana, Carlo Francesco Bellingeri, M. Giulio and F. Rossi, as well as by Samuel T. Von Sömmering, by Wilhelm Behrends and by Karl Friedrich Kielmayer (Kielmaier), Professor of Medicine at the Tübingen University (Poggendorff, Vol. I. p. 1253). For the curious galvanic experiments of the celebrated French physician Larrey, and of Stark, Richerand, Dupuytren and Dumas, see “Bulletin des Sciences de la Société Philomathique,” 1793, Nos. 23, 24, and “Principes de Physiologie,” Vol. II. p. 312.

References.—C. Alibert, “Eloges Historiques de Galvani, Spallanzani, Roussel et Bichat ...” Paris and Bologna, 1802–1806 (“Mém. de la Soc. d’Emul. de Paris,” Vol. IV; S. Gherardi, “Rapporto sui Manoscrotti,” Bologna, 1840, p. 19); Poggendorff, Vol. I. p. 839; Thomas Thomson, “History of the Royal Society,” London, 1812, pp. 450, etc.; Thomas Young, “Course of Lectures,” London, 1807, Vol. II; “Bolognese Transactions” for papers dated April 9, 1772, April 22, 1773 and Jan. 20, 1774; Sabine, “El. Tel.,” 1872, pp. 16–18; Knight’s “Mech. Dict.,” Vol. II. pp. 936, 937, for extract from report of Nat. Inst. of France, July 4, 1798; “Johnson’s Encyclop.,” 1877, Vol. I. p. 1510; Bakewell’s “Electricity,” p. 26; “Encyclop. Britannica,” 1855, Vol. VIII. p. 530, and Vol. XXI. pp. 609, etc.; Fahie’s “History,” etc., 1884, pp. 180–185; Phil. Trans., 1793; Miller, “History Philos. Illustrated,” London, 1849, Vol. IV. p. 333; Thomson, “Hist. of Chemistry,” Vol. II. pp. 251, 252; Matteucci, “Traité des phénomènes,” etc., Part I. p. 7; the Address of M. Gavarret made in 1848 before the Paris Medical Faculty; J. C. I. A. Creve’s treatise on Galvanism (“Jour. de la Soc. de Méd.,” Vol. XVIII. p. 216); “Mém. de la Soc. Méd. d’Emul.,” Vol. I. p. 236); Biot et Cuvier (Ann. de Ch., Vol. XXXIX. p. 247); A. Richerand (“Mém. de la Soc. Méd. d’Em.” Vol. III. p. 311); “Opus. Scelt.,” Vol. XV. p. 113; “Giornale Fis. Med.,” Vol. II. pp. 115, 131 (letter of B. Carminati); Marsiglio Landriani, “Lettera,” etc., 1776; Lettre d’un ami au Comte Prosper Albo (“Bibl. de Turin,” 1792, Vol. I. p. 261; Jour. de Phys., Tome XLI. P. 57); “Comment Bonon. Scient.,” Vol. VII. p. 363; account of the experiments made by MM. Cortambert and Gaillard, reported in “Mém. de la Soc. Méd. d’Em.,” Vol. I. pp. 232, 235; G. Klein’s “Dissert. de Métal,” etc., Maintz, 1794; Ostwald’s Klassiker, No. 52, p. 4; C. H. Wilkinson, “Elements of Galvanism,” etc., London, 1804, 2 Vols. passim; Wm. C. Wells, “Obs. on the Influence,” etc. (Phil. Trans., 1795, Pt. XI. p. 246); E. G. Robertson (An. de Ch., 1801, Vol. XXXVII. p. 132; Jour. de Paris, 10, 15 and 17 Fructidor de l’An. VIII); Paul Louis Simon, “Beschreibung neuengalvanisch,” etc., “Resultate,” etc., and “Versuche,” etc., all published in 1801 (L. W. Gilbert’s Annalen, 1801, Book V, An. de Chimie, No. 121, p. 106); L. W. Gilbert’s Book VI of the Annalen, containing the “Memoirs on Galvanism,” by J. L. Boeckmann, L. A. von Arnim, Paul Erman, M. Gruner and C. H. Pfaff; C. Dupuytren, “Faits Particuliers,” etc., 1801; J. B. Trommsdorff, “Expér. Galv.,” 1801; M. Rouppe’s letter of Aug. 28, 1801, in Van Mons’ Jour. de Ch., Vol. I. pp. 106, 108; M. Bichat (Sue, “Hist. du Galv.,” II. p. 216); A. M. Vassalli-Eandi (Jour. de Phys., Frimaire, An. X. p. 476); C. F. Hellwag and M. Jacobi fils, “Erfahrungen,” etc., 1802; M. le Comte de Pusckin’s experiments on Galvanism, made Sept. and Dec. 1801, with a colonne tournante (Sue, “Hist. du Galv.,” Vol. II. pp. 257, 258); Al. Volta, in Jour. de Leipzig, and in “Comment ... Med. gestis,” 1792; Johann Mayer, “Abh. ... Galvani, Valli, Carminati u. Volta ...” Prag, 1793); Junoblowiskiana Society (“Comment ... Med. gestis,” 1793); “Imperial Dictionary of Universal Biography,” Wm. McKenzie London, n. d., Vol. II. p. 546; M. Cortambert (“Mém ... Soc. ... d’Emul.,” I. p. 232); M. Payssé (“Jour. de la Soc. des Pharm.,” first year, p. 100); Geo. Couvier (Jour. de Physique, Vol. VII. p. 318; “Mém. des Soc. Sav. et Lit.,” Vol. I. p. 132), 1801; C. Mathieu (“Rec. de la Soc. d’Agr. ... d’Autun,” An. X. p. 21), 1802; Ponton d’Amécourt, “Exposé du Galvanisme,” Paris, 1803; Joseph Weber’s works, published in 1802–1803, 1815, 1816, and those of J. K. F. Hauff, Marburg and Leipzig, 1803, 1804; M. Curtet (Jour. de Van Mons., No. VI. p. 272; Jour. de Physique, An. XI. p. 54), 1803; William Meade (“On the origin and progress of Galvanism”), Dublin, 1805; J. C. Reil (Jour. de Van Mons., No. IV. p. 104; Sue, “Hist. du Galv.,” Vol. IV. p. 26); J. A. Heidmann (Phil. Mag., Vol. XXVIII. p. 97), 1807; Sir Richard Phillips, “Electricity and Galvanism explained ...” (Phil. Mag., Vol. LVI. p. 195), London, 1820; B. G. Sage, “Recherches ... Galvanisme”; Leopold Nobili, “Sur le courant....” Genève, 1827.

A.D. 1786.—Hemmer (J. J.), celebrated physician and secretary of the Meteor. Society of Mannheim, gives, in the “Transactions of the Electoral Society,” an account of what have been pronounced the most complete series of experiments ever made upon the electricity of the human body. They absolutely show that the human subject possesses no species of electrical organs which are under the regulation of the will. Of his many observations, the following are worth recording: He found that the electricity of the body is common to all ages and sexes; that its intensity and character often vary in the same body (in 2422 experiments, it was 1252 times positive, 771 times negative and 399 times imperceptible); that the electricity of the body is naturally positive, it being always so when subject to no violent exertion, and that when the body is subjected to sudden or violent motion the electricity becomes negative, the case also when the body experiences either cold or extreme lassitude.

References.—“Encycl. Brit.,” Vol. VIII, 1855, p. 571; “Rheinische Beiträgen zur Gelehrsamkeit” for 1781, Fifth Book, pp. 428–466; Van Swinden, “Recueil,” etc., La Haye, 1784, Vols. I and II passim; “Observ. sur la Phys.,” July, 1780; Phil. Mag., 1799, Vol. V. pp. 1, 140; “Comment. Acad. Theod.-Palat.,” Vols. IV, V and VI of Phys.; “Mém. de l’Acad. de Mannheim,” Vol. IV; “Pfalzbayr. Beiträge” for 1782.

A.D. 1787.—Lomond—Lomont—(Claude Jean-Baptiste), a very capable French machinist, and “one who has a genius for invention,” is the first to introduce a successful electric telegraph consisting of but one wire. Of this the following account appears under date Oct. 16, 1787, in Arthur Young’s “Voyage Agronomique en France” (“Travels”), fourth edition, Vol. I. p. 79: “You write two or three words on a paper; he takes it with him into an adjoining room and turns a machine in a cylinder case, on the top of which is an electrometer having a pretty little ball of pith of a quill suspended by a silk thread; a brass wire connects it to a similar cylinder and electrometer in a distant apartment, and his wife, on observing the movements of the corresponding ball, writes the words which it indicates. From this it appears that he (Lomond) has made an alphabet of motions. As the length of the brass wire makes no difference in the effect, you could correspond with it at a great distance, as, for example, with a besieged city or for objects of much more importance. Whatever be the use that shall be made of it, the discovery is an admirable one.”

References.—Ed. Highton, “Elec. Tel.,” 1852, p. 38; Sabine, “Elec. Tel.,” pp. 10–11; Shaffner, “Manual,” pp. 132, 133; Vail’s “History,” etc., p. 121; “Appleton’s Encycl.,” 1871, Vol. XV. p. 335.

A.D. 1787.—Brard (Cyprien Prosper), French mineralogist, first observes that some crystals of axinite (consisting mainly of silica, alumina, lime and peroxide of iron) become electric by heat.

References.—Gmelin, article “Electricity,” etc., Vol. I. p. 319; Larousse, “Dict. Univ.,” Vol. II. p. 1205; Thomas, “Dict. of Biog.,” Vol. I. p. 429; “Enc. Brit.,” 8th ed., Vol. VIII. p. 530; Brard, “Manuel du Minéralogiste,” etc., Bordeaux Academy of Sciences Report for 1829, p. 39, and for 1838, p. 84—the latter containing M. Hatchett’s observations on one of M. Brard’s meteorolites.

A.D. 1787.—Haüy (Le Père René Just), native of Picardie and member of the Académie Royale des Sciences, publishes an abridgment of the doctrines of Æpinus (at A.D. 1759) under the title of “Exposition raisonnée de la Théorie de l’Électricité et du Magnétisme.” He was doubtless the first to observe that in all minerals the pyro-electric state has an important connection with the want of symmetry of the crystals, and no proof of the extent to which he directed his investigations in that line can more readily be had than by consulting general “Encyclopædia” articles relative to the pyro-electricity of boracite (borate of magnesia), of prehnite (silica, alumina and lime), of mesotype (hydrated silicate of alumina and of lime or of soda), of sphene (silica, titanic acid and lime), calamine (silicate of zinc) and of Siberian topaz.

At pp. 480, 481 of his “Outline of the Sciences,” etc., London, 1830, Dr. Thomas Thomson states:

“There is a hill of sulphate of lime, called Kalkberg, situated near Lunebourg, in the duchy of Brunswick, in which small cubic crystals are found. These cubes are white, have a specific gravity of 2·566, and are composed of two atoms of boracic acid combined with one atom of magnesia. They are distinguished among mineralogists by the name of boracite. If we examine the cubic crystals of boracite, we shall find that only four of the solid angles are complete, constituting alternate angles placed at the extremity of two opposite diagonals at the upper and lower surface of the cube. The other four solid angles are replaced by small equilateral triangles. When the boracite is heated all the perfect solid angles become charged with negative electricity, while all the angles replaced by equilateral triangles become charged with positive electricity. So that the boracite has eight poles: four positive and four negative. Those are obviously the extremities of four diagonals connecting the solid angles with each other. One extremity of each of these diagonals is charged with positive and the other extremity with negative electricity. In general, the electricity of boracite is not so strong as that of the tourmaline.” This curious law of the excitability of the boracite and of its eight poles was discovered by Haüy in 1791 (Haüy’s “Minéralogie,” 260, second edition).

Axinite, mesotype, and the silicate of zinc are also minerals which become electric when heated, and which, like the tourmaline, exhibit two opposite poles, the one positive, the other negative. It is not every crystal of axinite and mesotype which possesses this property, but such only as are unsymmetrical, that is to say, such as have extremities of different shapes. No doubt this remark applies also to the silicate of zinc; though as the crystals of that mineral are usually acicular it is not so easy to determine by observation the degree of symmetry which they may possess.

The topaz, prehnite, and the titaniferous mineral called sphene are also capable of being excited by heat, and have two opposite poles like those already mentioned.

Haüy also made the most extensive and accurate observations known upon the development of electricity in minerals by friction. Detailed lists of the different classes of minerals, as well as the conclusions arrived at through various experiments, are given in the “Encyclopedia Britannica,” Vol. VIII, 1855, pp. 538, 539, while at pp. 529 and 558 of the same work are to be found accounts of his observations on the electricity of the tourmaline, as well as a description of the different electroscopes employed in his many experiments.

References.—Priestley, “History of Electricity,” 1767, pp. 314–326; Gmelin’s “Chemistry,” Vol. I. p. 319; Noad, “Manual,” pp. 27–31; also article “Electricity” in “Library Useful Knowledge,” pp. 3, 54, 56; M. Lister, “Collection Académique,” Tome VI; “Société Philomathique,” An. V. p. 34; An. XII. p. 191; “Mém. du Museum d’Hist. Nat.,” Vol. III; “Mém. de l’lnstitut,” An. IV. tome i., “Sciences Math. et Phys.” p. 49; “Mém. de l’Académie,” 1785, Mem. p. 206; Philosophical Magazine, Vols. XX. p. 120; XXXVIII. p. 81; Thomas Thomson, “Hist. of the Roy. Soc.,” London, 1812, pp. 180, etc.; Young’s “Lectures,” London, 1807, Vol. II; Haüy, “Traité Élémentaire de Physique,” Chap VII, “Magnetism”; Experiments of J. L. Treméry (author of “Observations sur les Aimants Elliptiques,” recorded in Journal des Mines, Vol. VI for 1797, also in Jour. de Phys., Vols. XLVIII and LIV) and of M. De Nelis, some of whose observations are given in the Phil. Mag., Vol. XLVIII. p. 127, and in the Jour. de Phys., Vols. LXI. p. 45; LXII. p. 150; LXIII. p. 147; LXIV. p. 130; LXVI. pp. 336, 456, as shown and illustrated at pp. 153–162 of Delaunay’s “Manuel,” etc., of 1809; “Séances de l’Acad. de Bordeaux” for 1835, giving M. Vallot’s report on the difference existing between the chalcedony and the tourmaline. Regarding the latter, consult S. Rinmann (“K. Schwed. Akad. Abh.,” XXVIII. pp. 46, 114); C. Rammelsberg, “Die Zuzam ... und Feldspaths”; Mr. Magellan’s edition of Cronstedt’s Mineralogy for Steigliz’s tourmaline; Cesare G. Pozzi, on the tourmaline; H. Von Meyer (“Archiv. ... Ges. Natural,” XIV. 3, p. 342); M. Lechman (Berlin Academy Reports); Carl Von Linné (Linnæus), “Flora Zeylanica,” Stockholm, 1747; M. Leymerie (Toulouse Acad. Reports); Brewster, “Journal” I. p. 208; J. K. Wilcke (“Vetensk. Akad. Handl.,” 1766 and 1768); Jos. Muller, “Schreiben ... Tourmaline,” Wien, 1773; F. J. Muller von Reichenstein, “Nachr. ... an Born,” Wien, 1778; H. B. de Saussure (“Jour. de Paris”), 1784; Louis Delaunay’s letter on the tourmaline, 1782; D. G. Fischer’s works, published at Mosk, 1813, 1818; J. D. Forbes (“Edin. Trans.,” Vol. XIII), 1834.

A.D. 1787.—Charles (Jacques Alexandre César), a singularly able French physicist and experimentalist, who became the Secretary of the Académie des Sciences, relates many of his electrical experiments in the thirtieth volume of the Journal de Physique.

He was one of the first to study and develop the theories of Franklin, who, in company with Volta, frequently attended the brilliant lectures which Charles was enabled to give in what was then considered the most complete philosophical laboratory of Europe. In many of his experiments on atmospherical electricity, Charles has been known to produce thousands of sparks, beams or flashes, which exceeded 12 feet in length and which made reports similar to those of fire-arms. The French Academy endorsed the opinion given the Minister of War by Charles to the effect that “a conductor will effectually protect a circular space whose radius is twice the length of the rod.”

Charles invented the megascope and was the first to make an ascension in a hydrogen balloon, which he did in company with M. Robert on the 1st of December (not on the 2nd of August) 1783, ten days after the first trip made by Pilatre de Rozier and Comte d’Arlandes in a Montgolfière from the Paris Bois de Boulogne.

References.—“Biographie Générale,” Vol. IX. pp. 929–933; Larousse, “Dict. Univ.,” Vol. III. p. 1020; Journal de Physique for 1791, p. 63; “Mémoires de l’Acad. des Sciences” for 1828; George Adams, “Lectures on Nat. and Exp. Philosophy,” London, 1799, Vol. III. pp. 462–464; Edin. Encycl., 1813, article “Aeronautics,” Vol. I. p. 160, “Franklin in France,” 1888, Part II. pp. 256, 270, 276–280; M. Veau Delaunay, Introduction to his “Manuel,” etc., Paris, 1809, pp. 19, 25 and 61–63; also pp. 23, 68, 92, 96, 122, 176 and 214.

A.D. 1787.—Mann (Théodore Augustin), Abbé, Flemish writer and antiquary, becomes perpetual secretary of the Brussels Academy of Sciences ten years after leaving the Nieuport Monastery (1777), and is charged with the duty of making meteorological observations, which are regularly transmitted to the Mannheim Academy officials, who receive similar reports regularly from different parts of Europe and publish them under the title of “Ephémérides Météorologiques.”

His many investigations made with electrical machines are embraced in the last-named publication and are also alluded to in his “Marées Aériennes,” etc., which appeared in Brussels during the year 1792.

References.—“Biog. Générale,” Tome XXXIII. p. 231; Larousse, “Dict. Universel,” Tome X. p. 1085; Phil. Mag., Vol. IV. p. 337; “Comm. Ac. Theod. Pal.,” 1790, Vol. VI. p. 82.

A.D. 1787.—Bennet (Rev. Abraham), F.R.S., first describes in the Philosophical Transactions for this year, pp. 26–32, the gold-leaf electroscope which bears his name and which is considered the most sensitive and the most important of all known instruments for detecting the presence of electricity. It consists of a glass cylinder which is covered with a projecting brass cap, made flat in order to receive upon it whatever article or substance is to be electrified, and having an opening for the insertion of wires and of a metallic point to collect the electricity of the atmosphere. The interior of the cap holds a tube which carries two strips of gold leaf in lieu of the customary wires or threads, and upon two opposite sides of the interior of the cylinder are pasted two pieces of tinfoil directly facing the gold-leaf strips. The cap is turned around until the strips hang parallel to the pieces of tinfoil, so that any electricity present will cause the strips to diverge and make them strike the tinfoil, which will carry the electricity through the support of the cylinder to the ground.

This electroscope, says Wilkinson, possesses great sensibility, and through the movable coatings introduced by Mr. Pepys, very small portions of electricity are discernible. Another very excellent electroscope is formed with either extremely fine silver thread, prepared after the manner of Mr. Read, or with the minutest thread found in a bundle of very fine flax, having a little isinglass glue applied gently over it with the finger and thumb.

Of the numerous observations made by Bennet, the following interesting extract relative to the phenomenon of evaporation is taken from the Philosophical Transactions for the year 1787. “If a metal cup with a red hot coal in it be placed upon the cap of a gold leaf electroscope, a spoonful of water thrown in electrifies the cup resinously; and if a bent wire be placed in the cup with a piece of paper fastened to it to increase its surface, the vitreous electricity of the ascending column of vapour may be seen by introducing the paper into it. The experiments on the evaporation of water may be tried with more ease and certainty of success by heating the small end of a tobacco pipe and pouring water into the head, which, running down to the heated part, is suddenly expanded, and will show its electricity when projected upon the cap of the electrometer more sensibly than any other way that I have tried. If the pipe be fixed in a cloven stick and placed in the cup of one electrometer while the steam is projected upon another, it produces both electricities at once.”

Some of Mr. Bennet’s experiments with the electroscope on the electricity of sifted powders, upon the electricity of the atmosphere, etc., are recorded at pp. 564 and 566 of the “Britannica,” Vol. VIII, and at p. 56 of “Library of Useful Knowledge.”

Mr. Bennet also invented the electrical doubler, designed to increase small quantities of electricity by continually doubling them until visible in sparks or until the common electrometer indicates their presence and quality (Phil. Trans. for 1787, p. 288). It consists of three plates of brass, illustrated and explained at Fig. 9, p. 20, Vol. I of Prescott’s “Electricity and the Electric Telegraph,” 1885 edition, wherein it is stated that in forty seconds the electricity can thus, by continual duplication, be augmented five hundred thousand times. (See, for doublers, C. B. Désormes and J. N. P. Hachette, in Annales de Chimie, Vol. XLIX for 1804; J. Read (Phil. Trans. for 1794, p. 266); Sir Francis Ronalds (Edin. “Phil. Journal,” Vol. IX. pp. 323–325).)

At p. 105 of his “Rudim. Magnetism,” Snow Harris mentions the fact that, in some of his experiments, Mr. Bennet employed a magnetic needle suspended by filaments of a spider’s web as a magnetometer. In this connection, it may be said that, in the Philosophical Transactions for 1792, the assertion is made that a fine, and weakly magnetic steel wire suspended from a spider’s thread of three inches in length will admit of being twisted around eighteen thousand times and yet continue to point accurately in the meridian, so little is the thread sensible of torsion (Young’s “Course of Lectures,” 1807, Vol. II. p. 445). The use of the spider’s line had, during the year 1775, been recommended as a substitute for wires by Gregorio Fontana, who, it is said, obtained threads as fine as the eight-thousandth part of a line. In a lecture delivered at Boston, Mass., during the year 1884, Prof. Wood alluded to spiders’ threads estimated to be one two-millionths of a hair in thickness.

References.—Bennet, “New Experiments on Electricity,” etc., Derby, 1789, and “A New Suspension of the Magnetic Needle,” etc., London, 1792; Introduction to “Electrical Researches,” by Lord Henry Cavendish; Sc. Am. Supplement, No. 647, pp. 10, 327; Noad, “Manual,” p. 27; Cavallo, “Nat. Phil.,” 1825, Vol. II. pp. 199, 216; Phil. Trans., Vol. LXXVII. pp. 26–31, 32–34, 288–296; also the abridgments by Hutton, Vol. XVI. pp. 173, 176, 282 and Vol. XVII. p. 142; Sc. American, Vol. LI. p. 19; Annales de Chimie, Vol. XLIX. p. 45; Ezekiel Walker, Phil. Mag. for 1813, Vol. XLI. p. 415 and Vol. XLII. pp. 161, 215, 217, 371, 476, 485; also Vol. XLIII. p. 364.

A.D. 1788.—Barthélémy (Jean Jacques), who, after completing his studies in a French seminary of Jesuits, succeeded Gros de Boze as keeper of the king’s cabinet of medals, publishes in four volumes, at Paris, the first edition of his “Voyage du Jeune Anacharsis.” In this well-known work, begun by him in 1757, and translated into English under the title “Travels of Anacharsis the Younger in Greece,” Barthélémy alludes to the possibility of telegraphing by means of clocks (pendules, not horloges), having hands similarly magnetized in conjunction with artificial magnets. These were “presumed to be so far improved that they could convey their directive power to a distance, thus, by the sympathetic movements of the hands or needles in connection with a dial alphabet, communications between distant friends could be carried on.”

Writing to Mme. du Deffand in 1772, he observes:

“It is said that with two timepieces the hands of which are magnetic, it is enough to move one of these hands to make the other take the same direction, so that by causing one to strike twelve the other will strike the same hour. Let us suppose that artificial magnets were improved to the point that their virtue could communicate itself from here to Paris; you have one of these timepieces, we another of them; instead of hours we find the letters of the alphabet on the dial. Every day at a certain hour we turn the hand, and M. Wiard [Mme. du Deffand’s secretary] puts together the letters and reads.... This idea pleases me immensely. It would soon be corrupted by applying it to spying in armies and in politics, but it would be very agreeable in commerce and in friendship.”

References.—“Correspondance inédite de Mad. Du Deffand,” Vol. II. p. 99; letter of J. MacGregor in Journal Society of Arts, May 20, 1859, pp. 472, 473.

A.D. 1789.—Adriaan Paets Van Troostwÿk and Jean Rodolphe Deimann, Dutch chemists, associated for the purpose of scientific research, complete the experiments of Lord Cavendish and announce, in the Journal de Physique, their discovery of the decomposition of water through the electric spark, which latter is conveyed by means of very fine gold wires. As is now well known, water is by this means resolved into its two elements of oxygen and hydrogen, both of which assume their gaseous form.

The electric machine they employed was a very powerful double-plate one, of the Teylerian mode of construction, causing the Leyden jar to discharge itself twenty-five times in fifteen revolutions.

References.—“Mém. de la Soc. de Phys. Exp. Rotterdam,” Tome VIII; Journal de Physique, Vol. XXXIII; Noad, “Manual,” p. 161; “Encyl. Brit.,” Vol. VIII, 1855, pp. 530, 565; “Biog. Universelle,” Vol. X. p. 282; De La Rive, “Electricity,” Vol. II. p. 443; Wm. Henry, “Elements of Experimental Chemistry,” London, 1823, Vol. I. pp. 251, 252; Delaunay’s “Manuel,” etc., 1809, pp. 180–183; “Verhandl. van het Genootsch te Rotterdam” (“Mém. de la Soc. de Phys. Exp. de Rotterdam”) Vol. VIII; Poggendorff, Vol. I. p. 1555; Dove, p. 243; G. Carradori (Brugnatelli’s Annali di chimica, Vol. I. p. 1); John Cuthbertson, “Beschreibung einer Elekt. ...” Leipzig, 1790.

A.D. 1790.—Reveroni—Saint-Cyr (Jacques Antoine, Baron de), French Colonel and author, best known by his very interesting work, “Mécanismes de la Guerre,” proposes an electric telegraph for the purpose of announcing the drawings of lottery numbers; no satisfactory information as to its construction, however, appears obtainable.

References.—Fahie, “History,” etc., London, 1884, p. 96; Etenaud, “La Télégraphie Electrique,” 1872, Vol. I. p. 27; Sc. Am. Supp., No. 384, pp. 6, 126.

A.D. 1790.—Mr. Downie, master of his Majesty’s ship “Glory,” makes a report on local attraction wherein he observes “that in all latitudes, at any distance from the magnetic equator, the upper ends of iron bolts acquire an opposite polarity to that of the latitude,” an observation, Harris remarks, which accords with Marcel’s experiment (at A.D. 1702).

“I am convinced,” says Mr. Downie, “that the quantity and vicinity of iron, in most ships, has an effect in attracting the needle; for it is found by experience that the needle will not always point in the same direction when placed in different parts of a ship; also, it is very easily found that two ships, steering the same course by their respective compasses, will not go exactly parallel to each other; yet when their compasses are on board the same ship they will agree exactly.”

References.—William Walker, “The Magnetism of Ships,” London, 1853, p. 20; J. Farrar, “Elements,” p. 376; Harris, “Rudim. Magn.,” 1852, Part III. p. 161.

A.D. 1790.—Tralles (Johann Georg), a German scientist, is the first to make known the negative electricity of cascades. This he communicates through his “Uber d. Elektricität d. Staubbachs,” published at Leipzig.

In the Report on Atmospheric Electricity of Francis J. F. Duprez, translated from the Memoirs of the Royal Academy of Brussels by Dr. L. D. Gale, we read that one day while in the Alps, opposite the cascade of Staubbach, near Lauterbrunnen, Tralles “presented his atmospheric electrometer, not armed with the metallic wire, to the fine spray which resulted from the dispersion of the water. He immediately obtained very distinct signs of negative electricity. The same effect was exhibited at the cascade of Reichenbach. Volta, a short time after, verified the correctness of this observation, not only above the great cascades, but also wherever a fall of water existed, however small, provided the intervention of the wind caused the dispersion of the drops. The electricity always appeared to him, as it did to Tralles, negative. Schübler repeated the same experiments in his journey to the Alps in 1813. He observed farther, that this negative electricity was very strong, since it became perceptible at a distance of 300 feet from the cascade of Reichenbach; and at a distance of 100 feet his electrometer indicated 400 and even 500 degrees.... Tralles attributed it at first to the friction of the minute drops of water against the air; but soon after he thought, with Volta, that the cause was to be found in the evaporation which the same minute drops experience in falling....”

The Italian physicist, Giuseppe Belli, who published at Milan, during 1836, “Sulla Elettricità negativa delle cascate,” entertains an opinion contrary to that advanced by M. Becquerel, and believes “that the electrical phenomenon of the water of cascades is owing to the development of electricity by the induction which the positive electricity of the atmosphere exercises on the water. The water, he says, is by induction in the negative state, when the atmosphere is, as it is ordinarily, charged with positive electricity. At the moment when this water divides into thousands of minute drops, it cannot fail to carry the electricity with which the electrical induction of the atmosphere has impregnated it to all bodies which it meets.”

References.—“Œuvres de Volta,” Vol. II. p. 239; Franz Samuel Wilde, “Expériences sur l’électricité des cascades” (“Mémoires de Lausanne,” Vol. III, “Histoire,” p. 13, 1790); “Bibliographie Universelle,” N. S., 1836, Vol. VI. p. 148; Houzeau et Lancaster, “Bibl. Générale,” Vol. II. p. 265; “Biblio. Ital.,” LXXXIII. p. 32; Schweigger, Journal f. Chemie u. Physik, Vol. IX. p. 358; Tralles, “Beyträge zur Lehre von der Electricität”; L. W. Gilbert’s Annalen der Physik und Chemie, Vol. XXVIII for 1808; F. A. C. Gren’s Journal der Physik, Vol. I. for 1790; Humboldt, “Cosmos,” London, 1849, Vol. I. p. 344, and the reference to Gay-Lussac in Ann. de chimie et de physique, Vol. VIII. p. 167.

A.D. 1790.—Eandi (Giuseppe Antonio Francesco Geronimo), an able physicist, native of Saluces (1735–1799), reads, May 10, before the Academy of Sciences of Turin, a Memoir upon Electricity in vacuo which is printed in the Collections of that Institution. He studied for the priesthood and entered the Normal College of Turin, where he followed protracted courses of literature under Bartoli and of natural philosophy under Beccaria, becoming the assistant of the latter, whom he finally replaced from 1776 to 1781. He afterward became Professor of Natural Philosophy at the College of Fine Arts, where he gave particular attention to electrical studies, and published several papers on that science, as well as upon natural philosophy generally.

He bequeathed all his possessions to his nephew Vassalli, upon condition of the latter’s taking the name of Eandi.

Besides the above, he wrote: “Memorie istorische,” etc., or “Historical Memoir upon the Studies of Father Beccaria,” Turin, 1783, which is dedicated to Count Balbi and gives the new theories of electricity, also an “Essay upon the Errors of Several Physicists in Regard to Electricity,” Turin, 1788.

References.—“Notice sur la vie ... d’ Eandi par Vassalli-Eandi,” Turin, 1804; “Biographie Générale,” Vol. XV. p. 589; Larousse, “Dict. Universel,” Vol. VII. p. 5; the Turin Academy Memoirs for the years 1802–1804; Eandi e Vassalli-Eandi, “Physicæ Experimentalis,” etc., Turin, 1793–1794.

A.D. 1790.—Vassalli-Eandi (Antonio Maria), Italian savant (1761–1825), nephew of G. A. F. G. Eandi, who was, like his uncle, a pupil of Beccaria, publishes his views concerning the electricity of bodies and regarding other investigations, as well as a report upon experiments relative to the electricity of water and of ice, which appear respectively in L. V. Brugnatelli’s Annali di Chimica, Vol. I. p. 53, in the “Bibl. Fis. d’Europa,” Vol. XVII. p. 144, and in the third volume of “Mem. della Soc. Italiana.”

He was one of the most prolific of Italian writers, his more important essays, which number 160, being written in Italian, Latin and French, and covering almost every leading branch of physical science. One of his biographers tells us, Il a embrassé, pour ainsi dire, l’ensemble des connaissances humaines, and that he is one of whom his country may justly be proud.

In his investigations concerning aerolites, which appeared in 1786 (“Memoria ... sopra ... bolidi in generale”), he explains the movements of those bodies much more satisfactorily than had previously been done by any scientist. Essays published by him during the same year, as well as in 1789 and 1791, treat of the effect of electricity upon vegetables; then follow his papers relative to Bertholon’s “Electricité des Météores,” to Haüy’s theories and to the meteorological observations of Senebier, De Saussure, Toaldo and Monge, up to 1792, when Vassalli was made Professor of Natural Philosophy at the Turin University. He had also in the meantime carefully looked into the scientific knowledge possessed by the ancients, and was led to believe, as shown in his “Conghietture sopra l’arte,” etc., that they had the means of attracting and directing thunder and lightning. The latter fact has been alluded to in this “Bibliographical History,” under the B.C. 600 entry. (See J. Bouillet, “De l’état des connaissances,” etc., Saint Etienne, 1862.)

He was after this made perpetual secretary of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Turin, then became Director of the Museum of Natural History, as well as of the Observatory situated in the last-named city, which position he held at the time of his death.

His other essays treat more particularly of animal electricity, the electricity of fishes, the effects of electricity upon recently decapitated bodies, the application of electricity and of galvanism to medicine, and cover very extended observations on meteorology. He was the editor of both the “Memoirs of the Academy of Sciences of Turin, from 1792 to 1809,” and of the “Annals of the Turin Observatory, from 1809 to 1818” (Larousse, “Dictionnaire Universel,” Vol. XV. p. 801); was likewise editor of the “Bibliothèque Italienne,” in conjunction with Giulio Gioberti and Francesco Rossi, and is said to have devised an electrometer superior to that of Volta.

References.—Vassalli-Eandi, Giulio (or Julio) e Rossi, “Rapport présenté,” etc., Turin, 1802, or “Transunto del Rapporto,” etc., Milano, 1803 (“Opusc. Scelti,” Vol. XXII. p. 51), translated into English, London, 1803 (Phil. Mag., Vol. XV. p. 38); also Vassalli-Eandi, F. Rossi et V. Michelotti, “Précis de nouvelles expériences galvaniques,” Turin, 1809 (“Mém. de Turin,” Années, 1805–1808, p. 160). See likewise, S. Berrutti, “Elogio,” etc., 1839; “Saggio sulla vita ... Vassalli-Eandi,” Torino, 1825; “Notizie biografiche ... Vassalli Eandi” (“Mem. di Torino,” Vol. XXX. p. 19); “Elogio, scritto dal Berrutti” (“Mem. of the Ital. Soc.,” Vol. XXII. p. liv); Phil. Mag., Vol. XV. p. 319; Journal de Physique, An. VII. p. 336 and Vols. XLIX, L; “Ital. Soc. Mem.,” Vols. VIII. p. 516; X. p. 802; XIII. p. 85; XVII. p. 230; XIX. p. 347; “Mémoires de Turin,” Vols. X-XIII; “Mem. dell’ Acad. di Torino,” Vols. VI, X, XXII, XXIV, XXVI, XXVII, XXIX; “Mem. della Soc. Agrar. di Torino,” Vol. I; “Opuscoli Scelti,” Vols. XIX. pp. 215, etc.; XXII. p. 76; “Nuova Scelta d’Opuscoli,” Vol. I. p. 167; “Opuscoli Scelti di Milano,” quarto, Vol. XIV; “Mem. Soc. Ital.,” Vols. IV. p. 263; X. p. 733; “Biblioteca Oltramontana”; Brugnatelli’s Annali di Chimica; “Giornale Scientifico ... di Torino,” Vols. I, III; “Giornale Fis. Med.,” Vol. II. p. 110; “Biblioteca Italiana”—“Bibliothèque Italienne,” Vols. I. p. 128; II. p. 25; “Recueil périodique ... de Sédillot,” Vol. II. p. 266.

A.D. 1790–1800.—Morozzo—Morotius—(Carlo Luigi, Comte de), Italian savant, who studied mathematics under Lagrange, and was President of the Turin Academy of Sciences, publishes numerous scientific memoirs in French through the reports of the last-named institution, in one of which he is said to have described an experiment suggesting the electro-magnet.

References.—Biography in Larousse, “Dictionnaire Universel,” Tome XI. p. 577, and in the “Biographie Générale,” Tome XXXVI. p. 643.

A.D. 1791.—Leslie (Sir John), an able English scientist (April 1766–Nov. 1832), who, upon the death of Prof. John Playfair, was called to the Chair of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh, writes a very interesting paper entitled “Observations on Electric Theories,” which is read the following year at the meeting of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and is published at the latter place during 1824.

According to Carnevale Antonio Arella, “Storia dell’ Elettricità,” Alessandria, 1839, Vol. I. p. 130, Sir John Leslie is the author of quite an interesting treatise on the inefficacy of lightning conductors, and the “English Cyclopædia” (Biography), Vol. III. p. 866, gives a list of many of the numerous contributions he made to the leading publications of his day, more particularly in the “Edinburgh Philos. Transactions,” the “Encyclopædia Britannica,” the “Edinburgh Review,” and “Nicholson’s Philos. Journal.” The reviewer adds, what will surprise many readers, that, although some papers by Sir John Leslie treating of physical subjects were also read before the Royal Society of London, none were ever printed in their “Philos. Transactions.”

Professor John Playfair above alluded to (1748–1819), became, during 1785, Joint Professor of Mathematics with Dr. Adam Ferguson in the University of Edinburgh and, in 1805, exchanged this for the Professorship of Natural Philosophy in the same university.

References.—Macvey Napier, “Memoir of Sir John Leslie,” 1838, which appeared in seventh edition of “Encycl. Britan.,” Vol. XIII; “Engl. Cycl.” (Biography); Rose, “New Gen. Biogr.”; Hœfer, “Nouv. Biogr. Gen.,” Paris, 1862, Vol. XXX. pp. 949–952 (giving full account of his works); “Encycl. Britan.,” ninth edition, Edinburgh, 1882, Vol. XIV. pp. 476–477; Sidney Lee, “Dict. Nat. Biogr.,” Vol. XXXIII. pp. 105–107 and Vol. XLVIII. pp. 413–414; Pierre Larousse, “Grand Dict. Univ.,” Vol. X. pp. 406–407; “Caledonian Mercury,” article of Prof. Napier summarized in the “Gentleman’s Magazine” for 1833, Vol. I. pp. 85–86. Consult also A.D. 1751 at Adanson; “Dove,” p. 256; Philosophical Magazine, Vols. XL and XLII.

A.D. 1791.—At p. 353, Chap. III of the first volume of Gmelin’s “Handbook of Chemistry,” it is stated that during 1791 James Keir (Kier) first showed, by immersing iron in a solution of nitrate of silver or fuming nitric acid, that many metals can be made to pass from their ordinary active state into a passive or electro-negative state and lose either wholly or in part their tendency to decompose acids and metallic oxides.

At pp. 167–170, Sixth Memoir, of Wm. Sturgeon’s “Scientific Researches” (Bury, 1850), treating of the application of electro-chemistry to the dissolution of simple metals in fluids, reference is made to the long line of investigations carried on by both Bergman and Keir, the last named having demonstrated that iron “acquires that altered state by the action of nitric acid which Sir John Herschel met with in his experiments, and has called prepared state, and that Schönbein and others call the peculiar or the inactive state” (Noad’s “Manual of Electricity,” London, 1859, p. 534). The iron which is active in nitric acid was called by Keir “fresh iron,” while that which became inactive he designated as “altered iron” (Sturgeon’s “Annals of Electricity,” Vol. V. p. 439).

Some remarkable phenomena in the display of which but one individual piece of metal is used, as first shown by Keir, remain, Sturgeon says, “without even an attempt at explanation by any of the philosophers under whose notice they have appeared.” Sir John Herschel pronounces them as of an “extraordinary character”; Prof. Andrews, after giving some very satisfactory explanations of several phenomena, acknowledges that he “can offer no explanation of most of the particular facts which have been described,” and Professor Schönbein “has not made public any conclusive explanation of them whatever” (Phil. Mag. for October 1837, p. 333, and for April 1838, p. 311).

This same James Keir, called by Watt “a mighty chemist” (1735–1820), has strangely by some been confounded with Robert Kerr, also a Scotchman, who was an able scientific writer and lived at about the same period (1755–1813). Kerr made valuable translations from Lavoisier and Linnæus which, during 1805, won for him a fellowship in the Edinburgh Royal Society. (Consult Sidney Lee, “Dict. of Nat. Biogr.,” London, 1892, Vol. XXI. p. 64, also the references therein given; and the article “Faraday” in the “Encycl. Britan.,” ninth edition, Edinburgh, 1879, Vol. IX. p. 30.)