Notes to The Foot-prints of the Creator — Reading edition
41 notes · Reading edition
HUGH MILLER, AUTHOR OF “OLD RED SANDSTONE” AND “FOOTPRINTS OF THE CREATOR.” · Note 1HUGH MILLER, AUTHOR OF “OLD RED SANDSTONE” AND “FOOTPRINTS OF THE CREATOR.” · Note 2STROMNESS AND ITS ASTEROLEPIS. THE LAKE OF STENNIS. · Note 1STROMNESS AND ITS ASTEROLEPIS. THE LAKE OF STENNIS. · Note 2STROMNESS AND ITS ASTEROLEPIS. THE LAKE OF STENNIS. · Note 3THE DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. · Note 1THE DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. · Note 2THE RECENT HISTORY OF THE ASTEROLEPIS. ITS FAMILY. · Note 1THE RECENT HISTORY OF THE ASTEROLEPIS. ITS FAMILY. · Note 2THE RECENT HISTORY OF THE ASTEROLEPIS. ITS FAMILY. · Note 3THE RECENT HISTORY OF THE ASTEROLEPIS. ITS FAMILY. · Note 4CEREBRAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLIER VERTEBRATA. ITS APPARENT PRINCIPLE. · Note 1CEREBRAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLIER VERTEBRATA. ITS APPARENT PRINCIPLE. · Note 2CEREBRAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLIER VERTEBRATA. ITS APPARENT PRINCIPLE. · Note 3CEREBRAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLIER VERTEBRATA. ITS APPARENT PRINCIPLE. · Note 4CEREBRAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLIER VERTEBRATA. ITS APPARENT PRINCIPLE. · Note 5CEREBRAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EARLIER VERTEBRATA. ITS APPARENT PRINCIPLE. · Note 6THE ASTEROLEPIS, ITS STRUCTURE, BULK, AND ASPECT. · Note 1THE ASTEROLEPIS, ITS STRUCTURE, BULK, AND ASPECT. · Note 2THE ASTEROLEPIS, ITS STRUCTURE, BULK, AND ASPECT. · Note 3THE ASTEROLEPIS, ITS STRUCTURE, BULK, AND ASPECT. · Note 4FISHES OF THE SILURIAN ROCKS—UPPER AND LOWER. THEIR RECENT HISTORY, ORDER, AND SIZE. · Note 1FISHES OF THE SILURIAN ROCKS—UPPER AND LOWER. THEIR RECENT HISTORY, ORDER, AND SIZE. · Note 2FISHES OF THE SILURIAN ROCKS—UPPER AND LOWER. THEIR RECENT HISTORY, ORDER, AND SIZE. · Note 3THE PLACOID BRAIN. EMBRYONIC CHARACTERISTICS NOT NECESSARILY OF A LOW ORDER. · Note 1THE PLACOID BRAIN. EMBRYONIC CHARACTERISTICS NOT NECESSARILY OF A LOW ORDER. · Note 2THE PROGRESS OF DEGRADATION. ITS HISTORY. · Note 1THE PROGRESS OF DEGRADATION. ITS HISTORY. · Note 2THE PROGRESS OF DEGRADATION. ITS HISTORY. · Note 3THE PROGRESS OF DEGRADATION. ITS HISTORY. · Note 4THE PROGRESS OF DEGRADATION. ITS HISTORY. · Note 5EVIDENCE OF THE SILURIAN MOLLUSCS—OF THE FOSSIL FLORA. ANCIENT TREE. · Note 1EVIDENCE OF THE SILURIAN MOLLUSCS—OF THE FOSSIL FLORA. ANCIENT TREE. · Note 2LAMARCKIAN HYPOTHESIS OF THE ORIGIN OF PLANTS. ITS CONSEQUENCES. · Note 1LAMARCKIAN HYPOTHESIS OF THE ORIGIN OF PLANTS. ITS CONSEQUENCES. · Note 2LAMARCKIAN HYPOTHESIS OF THE ORIGIN OF PLANTS. ITS CONSEQUENCES. · Note 3THE TWO FLORAS, MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL. BEARING OF THE EXPERIENCE ARGUMENT. · Note 1THE DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS IN ITS EMBRYONIC STATE. OLDER THAN ITS ALLEGED FOUNDATIONS. · Note 1THE DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS IN ITS EMBRYONIC STATE. OLDER THAN ITS ALLEGED FOUNDATIONS. · Note 2THE DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS IN ITS EMBRYONIC STATE. OLDER THAN ITS ALLEGED FOUNDATIONS. · Note 3FINAL CAUSES.—THEIR BEARING ON GEOLOGIC HISTORY. CONCLUSION. · Note 1