CONTENTS.

INTRODUCTION.

§ 1. Idea and Task of Church History.

§ 2. Distribution of Church History according to Contents.

(1) The Various Branches Included in a Complete Course of Church History.

(2) The Separate Branches of Church History.

§ 3. Distribution of Church History according to Periods.

§ 4. Sources and Auxiliaries of Church History.

(1) Literature of the Sources.

(2) Literature of the Auxiliary Sciences.

§ 5. History of General Church History.

(1) Down to the Reformation.

(2) The 16th and 17th Centuries.

(3) The 18th Century.

(4) The 19th Century.

(5) The 19th Century―Continued.

(6) The 19th Century―Continued.

HISTORY OF THE PREPARATION FOR CHRISTIANITY. The pre-Christian World preparing the way of the Christian Church.

§ 6. The Standpoint of Universal History.

§ 7. Heathenism.

(1) The Religious Character of Heathenism.

(2) The Moral Character of Heathenism.

(3) The Intellectual Culture in Heathenism.

(4) The Hellenic Philosophy.

(5) The Heathen State.

§ 8. Judaism.

(1) Judaism under special Training of God through the Law and Prophecy.

(2) Judaism after the Cessation of Prophecy.

(3) The Synagogues.

(4) Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes.

§ 9. Samaritanism.

§ 10. Intercourse between Judaism and Heathenism.

(1) Influence of Heathenism upon Judaism.

(2) Influence of Judaism upon Heathenism.

§ 11. The Fulness of Time.

THE HISTORY OF THE BEGINNINGS. The Founding of the Church by Christ and His Apostles.

§ 12. Character of the History of the Beginnings.

I. THE LIFE OF JESUS.

§ 13. Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the World.

(1) Year of Birth and Year of Death of Jesus.

(2) Earliest Non-Biblical Witnesses to Christ.

II. THE APOSTOLIC AGE. A.D. 30-70.

§ 14. The Ministry of the Apostles before Paul.

Beginning and Close of Apostolic Age.

§ 15. The Ministry of the Apostle Paul.

Details of Paul’s Life.

§ 16. The Other Apostles after the Appearance of the Apostle Paul.

(1) The Roman Episcopate of Peter.

(2) The Apostle John.

(3) James, the brother of the Lord.

(4) The Later Legends of the Apostles.

§ 17. Constitution, Worship, and Discipline.

(1) The Charismata of the Apostolic Age.

(2) The Constitution of the Mother Church at Jerusalem.

(3) The Constitution of the Pauline Churches.

(4) The Church in the Pauline Epistles.

(5) Congregational and Spiritual Offices.

(6) The Question about the Original Position of the Episcopate and Presbyterate.

(7) Christian Worship.

(8) Christian Life and Ecclesiastical Discipline.

§ 18. Heresies in the Apostolic Age.

(1) Jewish Christianity and the Council of Apostles.

(2) The Apostolic Basis of Doctrine.

(3) False Teachers.

FIRST DIVISION. History of the Development of the Church during the Græco-Roman and Græco-Byzantine Periods.

§ 19. Content, Distribution and Boundaries of those Periods.

FIRST SECTION. History of the Græco-Roman Church during the Second and Third Centuries (A.D. 70-323).

§ 20. Content, Distribution and Boundaries of this Period.

(1) The Post-Apostolic Age.

(2) The Age of the Old Catholic Church.

(3) The Point of Transition from the One Age to the Other.

I. THE RELATIONSHIP OF EXTRA-CHRISTIAN PAGANISM AND JUDAISM TO THE CHURCH.

§ 21. The Spread of Christianity.

§ 22. Persecutions of the Christians in the Roman Empire.

(1) Claudius, Nero and Domitian.

(2) Trajan and Hadrian.

(3) Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius.

(4) Septimius Severus and Maximinus Thrax.

(5) Decius, Gallus and Valerian.

(6) Diocletian and Galerius.

(7) Maximinus Daza, Maxentius and Licinius.

§ 23. Controversial Writings of Paganism.

(1) Lucian’s Satire De Morte Peregrini.

(2) Worshippers of an Ass.

(3) Polemic properly so-called.

§ 24. Attempted Reconstruction of Paganism.

(1) Apollonius of Tyana.

(2) Neo-platonism.

§ 25. Jewish and Samaritan Reaction.

(1) Disciples of John.

(2) The Samaritan Heresiarchs.

a. Dositheus.

b. Simon Magus.

c. Menander.

II. DANGER TO THE CHURCH FROM PAGAN AND JEWISH ELEMENTS WITHIN ITS OWN PALE.

§ 26. Gnosticism in General.

(1) Gnosticism.

(2) The Problems of Gnostic Speculation.

(3) Distribution.

(4) Sources of Information.

§ 27. The Gentile Christian Gnosticism.

(1) Cerinthus.

(2) The Gnosticism of Basilides.

(3) Irenæus’ Sketch of Basilideanism.

(4) Valentinian Gnosticism.

(5) Two Divisions of the Valentinian School.

(6) The Ophites and related Sects.

(7) The Gnosis of the Ophites.

(8) Antinomian and Libertine Sects.

a. The Nicolaitans.

b. The Simonians.

c. The Carpocratians.

d. The Prodicians.

(9) Saturninus.

(10) Tatian and the Encratites.

(11) Marcion and the Marcionites.

(12) Marcion’s Disciples.

(13) Hermogenes.

§ 28. Ebionism and Ebionitic Gnosticism.

(1) Nazareans and Ebionites.

(2) The Elkesaites.

(3) The Pseudo-Clementine Series of Writings.

a. Homiliæ XX Clementis.

b. Recognitiones Clementis.

c. Epitomæ.

(4) The Pseudo-Clementine Doctrinal System.

§ 29. Manichæism.

(1) The Founder.

(2) The System.

(3) Constitution, Worship, and Missionarizing.

III. THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT AND APOLOGETICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CHURCH.

§ 30. The Theological Literature of the Post-Apostolic Age, A.D. 70-170.

(1) The Beginnings of Patristic Literature.

(2) The Theology of the Post-Apostolic Age.

(3) The so-called Apostolic Fathers.

a. Clement of Rome.

(4) b. Barnabas.

c. Pastor Hermas.

(5) d. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch.

(6) e. Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna.

f. Papias, Bishop of Hierapolis.

g. Epistle to Diognetus.

(7) The Didache or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles.

(8) The Writings of the Earliest Christian Apologists.

(9) Extant Writings of Apologists of the Post-Apostolic Age.

a. Justin Martyr.

(10) b. Tatian.

c. Athenagoras.

d. Theophilus, Bishop of Antioch.

e. Hermias.

§ 31. The Theological Literature of the Old Catholic Age, A.D. 170-323.

(1) The Theological Schools and Tendencies.

1. Church Fathers Writing in Greek.

(2) Church Teachers of the Asiatic Type.

a. Irenæus.

(3) b. Hippolytus.

(4) The Alexandrian Church Teachers.

a. Pantænus.

b. Titus Flavius Clement.

(5) c. Origen.

(6) d. Dionysius of Alexandria.

e. Gregory Thaumaturgus.

f. Pamphilus.

(7) Greek-speaking Church Teachers in other Quarters.

a. Hegesippus.

b. Caius of Rome.

(8) c. Sextus Julius Africanus.

(9) d. Methodius.

e. Lucian of Samosata.

2. Church Fathers Writing in Latin.

(10) The Church Teachers of North Africa.

Tertullian.

(11) Cyprian.

(12) Various Ecclesiastical Writers using the Latin Tongue.

a. Minucius Felix.

b. Commodus.

c. Novatian.

d. Arnobius.

e. Victorinus of Pettau.

f. Lucius Lactantius.

§ 32. The Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphical Literature.

(1) Professedly Old Heathen Prophecies.

(2) Old Testament Pseudepigraphs.

a. Book of Enoch.

b. Assumptio Mosis.

c. Fourth Book of Ezra.

d. Book of Jubilees.

(3) Pseudepigraphs of Christian Origin.

a. History of Assenath.

b. The Testaments of the XII. Patriarchs.

c. Ascensio Isaiæ and Visio Isaiæ.

d. Spelunca thesaurorum.

(4) New Testament Apocrypha and Pseudepigraphs.

I. Apocryphal Gospels.

(5) II. Apocryphal Histories and Legends of the Apostles.

(6) ―― Apocryphal Monographs.

(7) III. Apostolic Epistles.

IV. Apocryphal Apocalypses.

V. Apostolical Constitutions.

(8) The Acts of the Martyrs.

§ 33. The Doctrinal Controversies of the Old Catholic Age.

(1) The Trinitarian Questions.

(2) The Alogians.

(3) The Theodotians and Artemonites.

(4) Praxeas and Tertullian.

(5) The Noëtians and Hippolytus.

(6) Beryllus and Origen.

(7) Sabellius; Dionysius of Alexandria; Dionysius of Rome.

(8) Paul of Samosata.

(9) Chiliasm.

IV. CONSTITUTION, WORSHIP, LIFE AND DISCIPLINE.

§ 34. The Inner Organization of the Church.

(1) The Continuation of Charismatic Endowments into Post-Apostolic Times.

(2) The Development of the Episcopal Hierarchy.

(3) The Regular Ecclesiastical Offices of the Old Catholic Age.

(4) Clergy and Laity.

(5) The Synods.

(6) Personal and Epistolary Intercourse.

(7) The Unity and Catholicity of the Church.

(8) The Roman Primacy.

§ 35. The Administration of Baptism.

(1) The Preparation for Receiving Baptism.

(2) The Baptismal Formula.

(3) The Administration of Baptism.

(4) The Doctrine of Baptism.

(5) The Controversy about Heretics’ Baptism.

§ 36. Public Worship and its Various Parts.

(1) The Agape.

(2) The Missa Catechumenorum.

(3) The Missa Fidelium.

(4) The Disciplina Arcani.

(5) The Doctrine of the Lord’s Supper.

(6) The Sacrificial Theory.

(7) The Use of Scripture.

(8) Formation of a New Testament Canon.

(9) The Doctrine of Inspiration.

(10) Hymnology.

§ 37. Feasts and Festival Seasons.

(1) The Festivals of the Christian Year.

(2) The Paschal Controversies.

(3) The Ecclesiastical Institution of Fasting.

§ 38. The Church Buildings and the Catacombs.

(1) The Catacombs.

(2) The Antiquities of the Catacombs.

(3) Pictorial Art and the Catacombs.

(4) Pictorial and Artistic Representations.

a. Significant Symbols.

b. Allegorical Figures.

c. Parabolic Figures.

d. Historical Pictures of O. T. Types.

e. Figures from the Gospel History.

f. Liturgical Figures.

§ 39. Life, Manners, and Discipline.

(1) Christian Morals and Manners.

(2) The Penitential Discipline.

(3) Asceticism.

(4) Paul of Thebes.

(5) Beginning of Veneration of Martyrs.

(6) Superstition.

§ 40. The Montanist Reformation.

(1) Montanism in Asia Minor.

(2) Montanism at Rome.

(3) Montanism in Proconsular Africa.

(4) The Fundamental Principle of Montanism.

(5) The Attitude of Montanism toward the Church.

§ 41. Schismatic Divisions in the Church.

(1) The Schism of Hippolytus at Rome about A.D. 220.

(2) The Schism of Felicissimus at Carthage in A.D. 250.

(3) The Schism of the Presbyter Novatian at Rome in A.D. 251.

(4) The Schism of Meletius in Egypt in A.D. 306.

SECOND SECTION. The History of the Græco-Roman Church from the 4th-7th centuries. A.D. 323-692.

I. CHURCH AND STATE.

§ 42. The Overthrow of Paganism in the Roman Empire.

(1) The Romish Legend of the Baptism of Constantine.

(2) Constantine the Great and his Sons.

(3) Julian the Apostate (A.D. 361-363).

(4) The Later Emperors.

(5) Heathen Polemics and Apologetics.

(6) The Religion of the Hypsistarians.

§ 43. The Christian Empire and the Ecclesiastical Law.

(1) The Jus Circa Sacra.

(2) The Institution of Œcumenical Synods.

(3) Canonical Ordinances.

(4) Pseudepigraphic Church Ordinances.

(5) The Apostolic Church Ordinances.

II. MONASTICISM, CLERICALISM AND HIERARCHISM.

§ 44. Monasticism.

(1) The Biography of St. Anthony.

(2) The Origin of Christian Monasticism.

(3) Oriental Monasticism.

(4) Western Monasticism.

(5) Institution of Nunneries.

(6) Monastic Asceticism.

(7) Anti-Ecclesiastical and Heretical Monasticism.

§ 45. The Clergy.

(1) Training of the Clergy.

(2) The Injunction of Celibacy.

(3) Later Ecclesiastical Offices.

(4) Church Property.

§ 46A. The Patriarchal Constitution and the Primacy.

(1) The Patriarchal Constitution.

(2) The Rivalry between Rome and Byzantium.

§ 46B. History of the Roman Chair and its Claims to the Primacy.

(3) From Melchiades to Julius I., A.D. 310 to A.D. 352.

(4) From Liberius to Anastasius, A.D. 352 to A.D. 402.

(5) From Innocent I. to Zosimus, A.D. 402 to A.D. 418.

(6) From Boniface I. to Sixtus III., A.D. 419 to A.D. 440.

(7) From Leo the Great to Simplicius, A.D. 440 to A.D. 483.

(8) From Felix III. to Boniface II., A.D. 483 to A.D. 532.

(9) From John II. to Pelagius II., A.D. 532 to A.D. 590.

(10) From Gregory I. to Boniface V., A.D. 590 to A.D. 625.

(11) From Honorius I. to Gregory III., A.D. 625 to A.D. 741.

III. THEOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND LITERATURE.

§ 47. The Theological Schools and their most celebrated Representatives.

(1) The Theological Schools and Tendencies.

a. In the 4th and 5th centuries.

b. Of the 6th and 7th Centuries.

1. THE MOST IMPORTANT TEACHERS OF THE EASTERN CHURCH.

(2) The Most Celebrated Representative of the Old Alexandrian School――Eusebius.

(3) Church Fathers of the New Alexandrian School.

a. Athanasius.

(4) The Three Great Cappadocians.

b. Basil the Great.

c. Gregory Nazianzen.

d. Gregory of Nyssa.

(5) e. Apollinaris.

f. Didymus the Blind.

(6) g. Macarius Magnes.

h. Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandria.

i. Isidore of Pelusium.

(7) Mystics and Philosophers.

k. Macarius the Great or the Elder.

l. Marcus Eremita.

m. Synesius of Cyrene.

n. Nemesius, Bishop of Emesa.

o. Æneas of Gaza.

(8) The Antiocheans.

a. Eusebius of Emesa.

b. Diodorus of Tarsus.

c. John of Antioch (Chrysostom).

(9) d. Theodore, Bishop of Mopsuestia.

e. Polychronius, Bishop of Apamea.

f. Theodoret, Bishop of Cyrus.

(10) Other Teachers of the Greek Church during the 4th and 5th Centuries.

a. Cyril, Bishop of Jerusalem.

b. Epiphanius, Bishop of Salamis.

c. Palladius.

d. Nilus.

(11) Greek Church Fathers of the 6th and 7th Centuries.

a. Johannes Philoponus.

b. Dionysius the Areopagite.

(12) c. Leontius Byzantinus.

d. Maximus Confessor.

e. Johannes Climacus.

f. Johannes Moschus.

g. Anastasius Sinaita.

(13) Syrian Church Fathers.

a. Jacob of Nisibis.

b. Aphraates.

c. Ephraim the Syrian.

d. Ibas, Bishop of Edessa.

e. Jacob, Bishop of Edessa.

2. THE MOST IMPORTANT TEACHERS OF THE WESTERN CHURCH.

(14) f. During the Period of the Arian Controversy. a. Jul. Firmicus Maternus. b. Lucifer of Calaris. c. Marius Victorinus. d. Hilary of Poitiers. e. Zeno, Bishop of Verona. f. Philaster, Bishop of Brescia. g. Martin of Tours.

(15) g. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan.

h. Ambrosiaster.

i. Pacianus, Bishop of Barcelona.

(16) During the Period of Origenistic Controversy.

a. Jerome.

(17) b. Tyrannius Rufinus.

c. Sulpicius Severus.

d. Peter Chrysologus, Bishop of Ravenna.

(18) The Hero of the Soteriological Controversy―Augustine.

(19) Augustine’s Works.

a. Philosophical Treatises.

b. Dogmatic Treatises.

c. Controversial Treatises.

d. Apologetical Treatises.

e. Exegetical Works.

(20) Augustine’s Disciples and Friends.

a. Paulinus, Deacon of Milan.

b. Paul Orosius.

c. Marius Mercator.

d. Prosper Aquitanicus.

e. Cæsarius, Bishop of Arelate.

f. Fulgentius, Bishop of Ruspe.

(21) Pelagians and semi-Pelagians.

I. Pelagius.

II. Semi-Pelagians or Massilians. a. Johannes Cassianus. b. Vincent Lerinensis. c. Eucherius, Bishop of Lyons. d. Salvianus, Presbyter at Marseilles. e. Faustus of Rhegium. f. Arnobius the Younger.

(22) The Most Important Church Teachers among the Roman Popes.

a. Leo the Great.

b. Gelasius I.

c. Gregory the Great.

(23) The Conservators and Continuators of Patristic Culture.

a. Boëthius.

b. Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus.

c. Dionysius Exiguus.

§ 48. Branches of Theological Science and Christian Poetry.

(1) Exegetical Theology.

(2) Historical Theology.

(3) Systematic Theology.

a. Apologetics.

b. Polemics.

c. Positive Dogmatics.

d. Morals.

(4) Practical Theology.

(5) Christian Poetry.

(6) Christian Latin Poetry.

(7) Poetry of National Syrian Church.

(8) The Legendary History of Cyprian.

IV. DOCTRINAL CONTROVERSIES AND HERESIES.

§ 49. The Development of Doctrine Generally.

Heretical Developments.

§ 50. The Trinitarian Controversy, A.D. 318-381.

(1) Preliminary Victory of the Homoousia, A.D. 318-325.

(2) Victory of Eusebianism, A.D. 328-356.

(3) Victory of Homoiousianism, A.D. 357-361.

(4) Final Victory of the Nicene Creed, A.D. 361-381.

(5) The Pneumatomachians, A.D. 362-381.

(6) The Literature of the Controversy.

(7) Post-Nicene Development of the Dogma.

(8) Schisms in consequence of the Arian Controversy.

I. The Meletian Schism at Antioch.

II. The Schism of the Luciferians.

III. The Schism of Damasus and Ursacius at Rome.

§ 51. The Origenist Controversies, A.D. 394-438.

(1) The Monks of the Scetic and Nitrian Deserts.

(2) The Controversy in Palestine and Italy, A.D. 394-399.

(3) The Controversy in Alexandria and Constantinople, A.D. 399-438.

§ 52. The Christological Controversy.

(1) The Apollinarian Controversy, A.D. 362-381.

(2) Christology of the Opposing Theological Schools.

(3) The Dyoprosopic or Nestorian Controversy, A.D. 428-444.

(4) The Monophysite Controversy.

I. Eutychianism, A.D. 444-451.

(5) II. Imperial Attempts at Union, A.D. 451-519.

(6) III. Justinian’s Decrees, A.D. 527-553.

(7) IV. The Monophysite Churches.

(8) The Monothelite Controversy, A.D. 633-680.

(9) The Case of Honorius.

§ 53. The Soteriological Controversies, A.D. 412-529.

(1) Preliminary History.

(2) The Doctrine of Augustine.

(3) Pelagius and his Doctrine.

(4) The Pelagian Controversy, A.D. 411-431.

(5) The Semi-Pelagian Controversy, A.D. 427-529.

§ 54. Reappearance and Remodelling of Earlier Heretical Sects.

(1) Manichæism.

(2) Priscillianism, A.D. 383-563.

V. WORSHIP, LIFE, DISCIPLINE AND MORALS.

§ 55. Worship in General.

The Age of Cyril of Alexandria.

§ 56. Festivals and Seasons for Public Worship.

(1) The Weekly Cycle.

(2) Hours and Quarterly Fasts.

(3) The Reckoning of Easter.

(4) The Easter Festivals.

(5) The Christmas Festivals.

(6) The Church Year.

(7) The Church Fasts.

§ 57. Worship of Saints, Relics and Images.

(1) The Worship of Martyrs and Saints.

(2) The Worship of Mary and Anna.

(3) Worship of Angels.

(4) Worship of Images.

(5) Worship of Relics.

(6) The Making of Pilgrimages.

§ 58. The Dispensation of the Sacraments.

(1) Administration of Baptism.

(2) The Doctrine of the Supper.

(3) The Sacrifice of the Mass.

(4) The Administration of the Lord’s Supper.

§ 59. Public Worship in Word and Symbol.

(1) The Holy Scriptures.

(2) The Creeds of the Church.

I. The Nicæno-Constantinopolitan Creed.

II. The Apostles’ Creed.

III. The Athanasian Creed.

(3) Bible Reading in Church and Preaching.

(4) Hymnology.

(5) Psalmody and Hymn Music.

(6) The Liturgy.

(7) Liturgical Vestments.

(8) Symbolical Acts in Worship.

(9) Processions.

§ 60. Places of Public Worship, Buildings And Works of Art.

(1) The Basilica.

(2) Secular Basilicas.

(3) The Cupola Style.

(4) Accessory and Special Buildings.

(5) Church furniture.

(6) The Graphic and Plastic Arts.

§ 61. Life, Discipline and Morals.

(1) Church Discipline.

(2) Christian Marriage.

(3) Sickness, Death and Burial.

(4) Purgatory and Masses for Souls.

§ 62. Heretical Reformers.

(1) Audians and Apostolics.

(2) Protests against Superstition and External Observances.

(3) Protests against the Over-Estimation of Doctrine.

§ 63. Schisms.

(1) The Donatist Schism, A.D. 311-415.

(2) The Concilium Quinisextum, A.D. 692.

VI. THE CHURCH OUTSIDE OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.

§ 64. Missionary Operations in the East.

(1) The Ethiopic-Abyssinian Church.

(2) The Persian Church.

(3) The Armenian Church.

(4) The Iberians.

§ 65. The Counter-Mission of the Mohammedans.

(1) The Fundamental Principle of Islam.

(2) The Providential Place of Islam.

THIRD SECTION. HISTORY OF THE GRÆCO-BYZANTINE CHURCH IN THE 8TH-15TH CENTURIES (A.D. 692-1453).

I. Developments of the Greek Church in Combination with the Western.

§ 66. Iconoclasm of the Byzantine Church (A.D. 726-842).

(1) Leo III., the Isaurian, A.D. 717-741.

(2) Constantine V. A.D. 741-775.

(3) Leo IV., Chazarus, A.D. 775-780.

(4) Leo V., the Armenian, A.D. 813-820.

§ 67. Division between Greek and Roman Churches and Attempts at Union, A.D. 857-1453.

(1) Foundation of the Schism, A.D. 867.

(2) Leo VI., the Philosopher, A.D. 886-911.

(3) Completion of the Schism, A.D. 1054.

(4) Attempts at Reunion.

(5) Andronicus III. Palæologus and Barlaam.

(6) Council of Florence.

(7) Decay of Byzantine Empire.

II. Developments in the Eastern Church without the Co-operation of the Western.

§ 68. Theological Science and Literature.

(1) Revival of Classical Studies.

(2) Aristotle and Plato.

(3) Scholasticism and Mysticism.

(4) The Branches of Theological Science.

(5) Distinguished Theologians.

(6) Barlaam and Josaphat.

§ 69. Doctrinal Controversies in the 12th-14th Centuries.

(1) Dogmatic Questions.

(2) The Hesychast Controversy, A.D. 1341-1351.

§ 70. Constitution, Worship and Life.

(1) The Arsenian Schism, A.D. 1262-1312.

(2) Public Worship.

(3) Monasticism.

(4) Endeavours at Reformation.

§ 71. Dualistic Heretics.

(1) The Paulicians.

(2) The Children of the Sun.

(3) The Euchites.

(4) The Bogomili.

§ 72. The Nestorian and Monophysite Churches of the East.

(1) The Persian Nestorians.

(2) Monophysite Churches.

(3) The Maronites.

(4) The Legend of Prester John.

§ 73. The Slavonic Churches adhering to the Orthodox Greek Confession.

(1) Slavs in the Greek Provinces.

(2) The Chazari.

(3) The Bulgarians.

(4) The Russian Church.

(5) Russian Sects.

(6) Romish Efforts at Union.

SECOND DIVISION. THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE GERMAN AND ROMAN CHURCH DURING THE MIDDLE AGES.

§ 74. Character and Divisions of this Period of the Development.

(1) The Character of Mediæval History.

(2) Periods in the Church History of the German-Roman Middle Ages.

FIRST SECTION. HISTORY OF THE GERMAN-ROMAN CHURCH FROM THE 4TH TO THE 9TH CENTURY (DOWN TO A.D. 911).

I. Founding, Spread, and Limitation of the German Church.

§ 75. Christianity and the Germans.

(1) The Predisposition of the Germans for Christianity.

(2) Unopposed Adoption of Christianity.

(3) Mode of Conversion in the Church of these Times.

§ 76. The Victory of Catholicism over Arianism.

(1) The Goths in the lands of the Danube.

(2) The Visigoths in Gaul and Spain.

(3) The Vandals in Africa.

(4) The Suevi.

(5) The Burgundians.

(6) The Rugians.

(7) The Ostrogoths.

(8) The Longobards in Italy.

(9) The Franks in Gaul.

§ 77. Victory of the Romish over the Old British Church.

(1) The Conversion of the Irish.

(2) The Mission to Scotland.

(3) The Peculiarities of the Celtic Church.

(4) The Romish Mission to the Anglo-Saxons.

(5) Celtic Missions among the Anglo-Saxons.

(6) The Celtic Element Driven out of the Anglo-Saxon Church.

(7) Spread and Overthrow of the British Church on the Continent.

(8) Overthrow of the Old British System in the Iro-Scottish Church.

§ 78. The Conversion and Romanizing of Germany.

(1) South-Western Germany.

(2) South-Eastern Germany.

(3) North-Western Germany.

(4) The Missionary Work of Boniface.

(5) The Organization Effected by Boniface.

(6) Heresies Confronted by Boniface.

(7) The End of Boniface.

(8) An Estimate of Boniface.

(9) The Conversion of the Saxons.

§ 79. The Slavs in German Countries.

(1) The Carantanians and Avars.

(2) The Moravian Church.

(3) The Beginnings of Christianity in Bohemia.

§ 80. The Scandinavian Nations.

(1) Ansgar.

(2) Ansgar’s Successor―Rimbert.

§ 81. Christianity and Islam.

(1) Islam in Spain.

(2) Islam in Sicily.

II. THE HIERARCHY, THE CLERGY AND THE MONKS.

§ 82. The Papacy and the Carolingians.

(1) The Period of the Founding of the States of the Church.

(2) Stephen III., A.D. 768-772.

Hadrian I., A.D. 772-795.

(3) Charlemagne and Leo III., A.D. 795-816.

(4) Louis the Pious and the Popes of his Time.

(5) The Sons of Louis the Pious and the Popes of their Days.

(6) The Legend of the Female Pope Joanna.

(7) Nicholas I. and Hadrian II.

(8) John VIII. and his Successors.

(9) The Papacy and the Nationalities.

§ 83. The Rank of Metropolitan.

(1) The Position of Metropolitans in General.

(2) Hincmar of Rheims.

(3) Metropolitans in other lands.

§ 84. The Clergy in General.

(1) The Superior Clergy.

(2) The Inferior Clergy.

(3) Compulsory Celibacy.

(4) Canonical life.

§ 85. Monasticism.

(1) Benedict of Nursia.

(2) Benedict of Aniane.

(3) Nunneries.

(4) The Greater Monasteries.

(5) Monastic Practices among the Clergy.

(6) The Stylites.

§ 86. The Property of Churches and Monasteries.

(1) The Revenues of Churches and Monasteries.

(2) The Benefice System.

§ 87. Ecclesiastical Legislation.

(1) Older Collections of Ecclesiastical Law.

(2) The Collection of Decretals of the Pseudo-Isidore.

(3) Details of the History of the Forgery.

(4) The Edict and Donation of Constantine.

III. THE CHURCH AND THE PEOPLE.

§ 88. Public Worship and Art.

(1) Liturgy and Preaching.

(2) Church Music.

(3) The Sacrifice of the Mass.

(4) The Worship of Saints.

(5) Times and Places for Public Worship.

(6) Ecclesiastical Architecture and Painting.

§ 89. National Customs, Social Life and Church Discipline.

(1) Superstition.

(2) Popular Education.

(3) Christian Popular Poetry.

(4) Social Condition.

(5) Practice of Pubic Law.

(6) Church Discipline and Penitential Exercises.

IV. THEOLOGY AND ITS BATTLES.

§ 90. Scholarship and Theological Science.

(1) Rulers of the Carolingian Line.

Charlemagne, A.D. 768-814.

Louis the Pious, A.D. 814-840.

Charles the Bald, A.D. 840-877.

(2) The most distinguished Theologians of the Pre-Carolingian Age.

1. Merovingian France.

2. South of the Pyrenees.

3. England.

(3) The most distinguished Theologians of the Age of Charlemagne.

1. Alcuin.

2. Paulus Diaconus.

3. Theodulf, Bishop of Orleans.

4. Paulinus, Patriarch of Aquileia and Bishop Leidrad of Lyons.

5. Hatto, Abbot of Reichenau.

(4) The most distinguished Theologians of the Age of Louis the Pious.

1. Agobard of Lyons.

2. Claudius, Bishop of Turin.

3. Jonas of Orleans.

4. Amalarius of Metz.

5. Christian Druthmar.

6. Rabanus Magnentius Maurus.

7. Walafrid Strabo.

(5) The Most Distinguished Theologians of the Age of Charles the Bald.

1. Hincmar of Rheims.

2. Paschasius Radbertus.

3. Ratramnus.

4. Florus Magister.

5. Haymo, Bishop of Halberstadt.

6. Servatus Lupus.

7. Remigius of Auxerre.

8. Regius of Prüm.

(6) 9. Anastasius Bibliothecarius.

10. Eulogius of Cordova.

(7) 11. Joannes Scotus Erigena.

(8) The Monastic and Cathedral Schools.

(9) Various Branches of Theological Science.

1. Exegesis.

2. Systematic Theology.

3. Practical Theology.

4. Historical Theology.

(10) Anglo-Saxon Culture under Alfred the Great, A.D. 871-901.

§ 91. Doctrinal Controversies.

(1) The Adoptionist Controversy, A.D. 782-799.

(2) Controversy about the Procession of the Holy Spirit.

(3) The Eucharistic Controversy, A.D. 844.

(4) Controversy about the Conception of the Virgin.

(5) The Predestinarian Controversy A.D. 847-868.

(6) The Trinitarian Controversy, A.D. 857.

§ 92. Endeavours After Reformation.

(1) The Carolingian Opposition to Image Worship, A.D. 790-825.

(2) Agobard of Lyons and Claudius of Turin.

INTRODUCTION.

§ 1. Idea and Task of Church History.

The Christian Church is to be defined as the one, many-branched communion, consisting of all those who confess that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ who in the fulness of time appeared as the Saviour of the world. It is the Church’s special task to render the saving work of Christ increasingly fruitful for all nations and individuals, under all the varying conditions of life and stages of culture. It is the task of Church History to describe the course of development through which the Church as a whole, as well as its special departments and various institutions, has passed, from the time of its foundation down to our own day; to show what have been the Church’s advances and retrogressions, how it has been furthered and hindered; and to tell the story of its deterioration and renewal.

§ 2. Distribution of Church History according To Contents.

The treatment of Church History, on account of its manifold ramifications, demands a distribution of its material, on the one hand, according to definite periods, during which the end hitherto aimed at in the whole course of development has been practically attained, so that either entirely new phenomena gain prominence, or else the old go forth in an altogether different direction; on the other hand, according to the various phases of endeavour and development, which in respect of time are evolved alongside of one another. When this last-mentioned method of division is adopted, we may still choose between two different modes of treatment. First, we may deal with national churches, in so far as these are independent and have pursued some special direction; or with particular churches, which have originated from the splitting up of the church universal over some important difference in doctrine, worship, and constitution. Secondly, we may group our material according to the various departments of historical activity, which are essential to the intellectual and spiritual life of all national churches and denominations, and are thus common to all, although in different churches in characteristic ways and varying degrees. It follows however from the very idea of history, especially from that of the universal history of the church, that the distribution according to periods must be the leading feature of the entire exposition. At the same time, whatever may now and again, in accordance with the other principles of arrangement, be brought into prominence will be influenced materially by the course of the history and formally by the facility afforded for review by the mode of treatment pursued.

§ 2.1. The Various Branches Included in a Complete Course of Church History.―The Christian Church has undertaken the task of absorbing all peoples and tongues. Hence it is possessed of an eager desire to enlarge its borders by the conversion of all non-Christian races. The description of what helps or hinders this endeavour, the history of the spread and limitation of Christianity, is therefore an essential constituent of church history. Since, further, the church, in order to secure its continued existence and well-being, must strive after a legally determined position outwardly, as well as a firm, harmonious articulation, combination and order inwardly, it evidently also belongs to our science to give the history of the ecclesiastical constitution, both of the place which the church has in the state, and the relation it bears to the state; and also of its own internal arrangements by superordination, subordination, and co-ordination, and by church discipline and legislation. Not less essential, nay, even more important for the successful development of the church, is the construction and establishment of saving truth. In Holy Scripture the church indeed has possession of the fountain and standard, as well as the all-sufficient power and fulness, of all saving knowledge. But the words of Scripture are spirit and life, living seeds of knowledge, which, under the care of the same Spirit who sows them, may and shall be developed so as to yield a harvest which becomes ever more and more abundant; and therefore the fulness of the truth which dwells in them comes to be known more simply, clearly, fully, and becomes always more fruitful for all stages and forms of culture, for faith, for science, and for life. Hence church history is required to describe the construction of the doctrine and science of the church, to follow its course and the deviations from it into heresy, whenever these appear. The church is, further, in need of a form of public worship as a necessary expression of the feelings and emotions of believers toward their Lord and God, as a means of edification and instruction. The history of the worship of the church is therefore also an essential constituent of church history. It is also the duty of the church to introduce into the practical life and customs of the people that new spiritual energy of which she is possessor. And thus the history of the Christian life among the people comes to be included in church history as a further constituent of the science. Further, there is also included here, in consequence of the nature and aim of Christianity as a leaven (Matt. xiii. 33), an account of the effects produced upon it by the development of art (of which various branches, architecture, sculpture, painting, music, have a direct connexion with Christian worship), and likewise upon national literature, philosophy, and secular science generally; and also, conversely, an estimate of the influence of these forms of secular culture upon the condition of the church and religion must not be omitted. The order of succession in the historical treatment of these phases under which the life of the church is manifested, is not to be rigidly determined in the same way for all ages after an abstract logical scheme. For each period that order of succession should be adopted which will most suitably give prominence to those matters which have come to the front, and so call for early and detailed treatment in the history of that age.

§ 2.2. The Separate Branches of Church History.―The constituent parts of church history that have been already enumerated are of such importance that they might also be treated as independent sciences, and indeed for the most part they have often been so treated. In this way, not only is a more exact treatment of details rendered possible, but also, what is more important, the particular science so limited can be construed in a natural manner according to principles furnished by itself. The history of the spread and limitation of Christianity then assumes a separate form as the History of Missions. The separate history of the ecclesiastical constitution, worship, and customs is known by the name of Christian Archæology, which is indeed, in respect of title and contents, an undefined conglomeration of heterogeneous elements restricted in a purely arbitrary way to the early ages. The treatment of this department therefore requires that we should undertake the scientific task of distinguishing these heterogeneous elements, and arranging them apart for separate consideration; thus following the course of their development down to the present day, as the history of the constitution, of the worship, and of the culture of the church. The history of the development of doctrine falls into four divisions:

The History of Doctrines in the form of a regular historical sketch of the doctrinal development of the church.

Symbolics, which gives a systematic representation of the relatively final and concluded doctrine of the church as determined in the public ecclesiastical confessions or symbols for the church universal and for particular sects: these again being compared together in Comparative Symbolics.

Patristics, which deals with the subjective development of doctrine as carried out by the most distinguished teachers of the church, who are usually designated church Fathers, and confined to the first six or eight centuries.

And, finally, the History of Theology in general, or the History of the particular Theological Sciences, which treats of the scientific conception and treatment of theology and its separate branches according to its historical development; while the History of Theological Literature, which when restricted to the age of the Fathers is called Patrology, has to describe and estimate the whole literary activity of the church according to the persons, motives, and tendencies that are present in it.

As the conclusion and result of church history at particular periods, we have the science of Ecclesiastical Statistics, which describes the condition of the church in respect of all its interests as it stands at some particular moment, “like a slice cut cross-wise out of its history.” The most important works in these departments are the following:

History of Missions.― Brown, “Hist. of Propag. of Christ. among Heathen since Reformation.” 3rd Ed., 3 vols., Edin., 1854. Warneck, “Outlines of Hist. of Prot. Miss.” Edin., 1884. Smith, “Short Hist. of Christ. Miss.” Edin., 1884.

History of the Papacy.― Ranke, “History of Papacy in 16th and 17th Cent.” 2 vols., Lond., 1855. Platina (Lib. of Vatican), “Lives of Popes.” (1481). Trans. by Rycaut, Lond., 1685. Bower, “Hist. of Popes.” 7 vols., Lond., 1750. Bryce, “Holy Rom. Empire.” Lond., 1866. Creighton, “Hist. of Papacy during the Reformation.” Vols. I.-IV., from A.D. 1378-1518, Lond., 1882-1886. Janus, “Pope and the Council.” Lond., 1869. Pennington, “Epochs of the Papacy.” Lond., 1882.

History of Monasticism.― Hospinianus [Hospinian], “De Monachis.” Etc., Tigur., 1609. Maitland, “The Dark Ages.” Lond., 1844.

History of Councils.― Hefele, “Hist. of Councils.” Vols. I.-III., to A.D. 451, Edin., 1871-1883. (Original German work brought down to the Council of Trent exclusive.)

Church law.― Haddan and Stubbs, “Councils and Eccl. Documents illust. Eccl. Hist. of Gr. Brit. and Ireland.” 3 vols., Lond., 1869 ff. Phillimore, “Eccl. Law.” Lond., 1873.

Archæology.― By Cath. Didron, “Christ. Iconography; or, Hist. of Christ. Art in M. A.” Lond., 1886. By Prot. Bingham, “Antiq. of Christ. Church.” 9 vols., Lond., 1845. “Dictionary of Christ. Antiquities.” Ed. by Smith & Cheetham, 2 vols., Lond., 1875 ff.

History of Doctrines.― Neander, “Hist. of Christ. Doct.” 2 vols., Lond. Hagenbach, “Hist. of Christ. Doctrines.” 3 vols., Edin., 1880 f. Shedd, “Hist. of Christ. Doc.” 2 vols., Edin., 1869.

Symbolics and Polemics.― Winer, “Confessions of Christendom.” Edin., 1873. Schaff, “Creeds of Christendom.” 3 vols., Edin., 1877 ff. Möhler, “Symbolism: an Expos. of the Doct. Differences between Catholics and Protestants.” 2 vols., Lond., 1843.

Patrology and History of Theolog. Literature.― Dupin, “New History of Ecclesiastical Writers.” Lond., 1696. Cave, “Script. Eccl. Hist. Lit.” 2 vols., Lond., 1668. Fabricii, “Biblioth. Græca.” 14 vols., Hamb., 1705; “Biblioth. Mediæ et infinæ Latin.” 6 vols., Hamb., 1734. Teuffel, “Hist. of Rom. Lit.” 2 vols., Lond., 1873.

History of the Theological Sciences.― Buddæus, “Isagoge Hist. Theol. ad Theol. Univ.” Lps., 1727. Räbiger, “Encyclopædia of Theology.” 2 vols., Edin., 1884. Dorner, “Hist. of Prot. Theol.” 2 vols., Edin., 1871. History of Exegesis.― Davidson, “Sacred Hermeneutics; including Hist. of Biblical Interpretation from earliest Fathers to Reformation.” Edin., 1843. Farrar, “Hist. of Interpretation.” Lond., 1886. History of Morals.― Wuttke’s “Christian Ethics.” Vol. I., “Hist. of Ethics.” Edin., 1873.

Biographies.― “Acta Sanctorum.” 63 vols. fol., Ant., 1643 ff. Mabillon, “Acta Ss. ord. S. Bened.” 9 vols. fol., Par., 1666 ff. Flaccius [Flacius], “Catalog. Testium Veritatis.” 1555. Piper, “Lives of Leaders of Church Universal.” 2 vols., Edin. Smith and Wace, “Dict. of Chr. Biog.” etc., 4 vols., Lond., 1877 ff.

§ 3. Distribution of Church History according to Periods.

In the history of the world’s culture three historical stages of universal development succeed each other: the Oriental, the Franco-German, and the Teutono-Romanic. The kingdom of God had to enter each of these and have in each a distinctive character, so that as comprehensive a development as possible might be secured. The history of the preparation for Christianity in the history of the Israelitish theocracy moves along the lines of Oriental culture. The history of the beginnings of Christianity embraces the history of the founding of the church by Christ and His Apostles. These two together constitute Biblical history, which, as an independent branch of study receiving separate treatment, need be here treated merely in a brief, introductory manner. This holds true also of the history of pagan culture alongside of and subsequent to the founding of the church. Church history, strictly so-called, the development of the already founded church, begins therefore, according to our conception, with the Post-Apostolic Age, and from that point pursues its course in three principal divisions. The ancient church completes its task by thoroughly assimilating the elements contributed by the Græco-Roman forms of civilization. In the Teutono-Romanic Church of the middle ages the appropriation and amalgamation of ancient classical modes of thought with modern tendencies awakened by its immediate surroundings were carried out and completed. On the other hand, the development of church history since the Reformation has its impulse given it by that Teutono-Christian culture which had maturity and an independent form secured to it by the Reformation. This distribution in accordance with the various forms of civilization seems to us so essential, that we propose to borrow from it our principle for the arrangement of our church history.

The chronological distribution of the material may be represented in the following outline:

History of the Preparation for Christianity: Preparation for Redemption during the Hebraic-Oriental stage of civilization, and the construction alongside of it in the universalism of classical culture of forms that prepared the way for the coming salvation.

History of the Beginnings of Christianity: a sketch of the redemption by Christ and the founding of the Church through the preaching of it by the Apostles.

History of the Development of Christianity, on the basis of the sketch of the redemption given in the history of the Beginnings: In the Græco-Roman and Græco-Byzantine Period, under Ancient Classical Forms of Civilization. First Section, A.D. 70 to A.D. 323,―down to the final victory of Christianity over the Græco-Roman paganism; the Post-Apostolic and Old Catholic Ages. Second Section, from A.D. 323 to A.D. 692,―down to the final close of œcumenical development of doctrine in A.D. 680, and the appearance of what proved a lasting estrangement between the Eastern and the Western Churches in A.D. 692, which was soon followed by the alliance of the Papacy with the Frankish instead of the Byzantine empire; the Œcumenico-Catholic Church, or the Church of the Roman-Byzantine Empire. Third Section, from A.D. 692 to A.D. 1453,―down to the overthrow of Constantinople. Languishing and decay of the old church life in the Byzantine Empire; complete breach and futile attempts at union between East and West. The Church of the Byzantine Empire. In the Mediæval Period, under Teutono-Romanic Forms of Civilization. First Section, 4-9th cent.―from the first beginnings of Teutonic church life down to the end of the Carlovingian Age, A.D. 911. The Teutonic Age. Second Section, 10-13th cent.―down to Boniface VIII., A.D. 1294; rise of mediæval institutions―the Papacy, Monasticism, Scholasticism; Germany in the foreground of the ecclesiastico-political movement. Third Section, the 14-15th cent.―down to the Reformation in A.D. 1517; deterioration and collapse of mediæval institutions; France in the foreground of the ecclesiastico-political movement. In the Modern Period, under the European Forms of Civilization. First Section, the 16th cent. Age of Evangelical-Protestant Reformation and Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation. Second Section, the 17th cent. Age of Orthodoxy on the Protestant side and continued endeavours after restoration on the side of Catholicism. Third Section, the 18th cent. Age of advancing Illuminism in both churches,―Deism, Naturalism, Rationalism. Fourth Section, the 19th cent. Age of re-awakened Christian and Ecclesiastical life. Unionism, Confessionalism, and Liberalism in conflict with one another on the Protestant side; the revival of Ultramontanism in conflict with the civil power on the Catholic side. In opposition to both churches, widespread pantheistic, materialistic, and communistic tendencies.

§ 4. Sources and Auxiliaries of Church History.1

The sources of Church history are partly original, in the shape of inscriptions and early documents; partly derivative, in the shape of traditions and researches in regard to primitive documents that have meanwhile been lost. Of greater importance to church history than the so-called dumb sources, e.g. church buildings, furniture, pictures, are the inscriptions coming down from the earliest times; but of the very highest importance are the extant official documents, e.g. acts and decisions of Church Councils, decrees and edicts of the Popes,―decretals, bulls, briefs,―the pastoral letters of bishops, civil enactments and decrees regarding ecclesiastical matters, the rules of Spiritual Orders, monastic rules, liturgies, confessional writings, the epistles of influential ecclesiastical and civil officers, reports by eye witnesses, sermons and doctrinal treatises by Church teachers, etc. In regard to matters not determined by any extant original documents, earlier or later fixed traditions and historical researches must take the place of those lost documents.―Sciences Auxiliary to Church History are such as are indispensable for the critical estimating and sifting, as well as for the comprehensive understanding of the sources of church history. To this class the following branches belong: Diplomatics, which teaches how to estimate the genuineness, completeness, and credibility of the documents in question; Philology, which enables us to understand the languages of the sources; Geography and Chronology, which make us acquainted with the scenes and periods where and when the incidents related in the original documents were enacted. Among auxiliary sciences in the wider sense, the history of the State, of Law, of Culture, of Literature, of Philosophy, and of Universal Religion, may also be included as indispensable owing to their intimate connection with ecclesiastical development.

§ 4.1. Literature of the Sources.―

Inscriptions: de Rossi, “Inscriptt. chr. urbis Rom.” Vols. I. II., Rome, 1857.

Collections of Councils: Harduin [Hardouin], “Conc. coll.” (to A.D. 1715), 12 vols., Par., 1715. Mansi, “Conc. nova et ampl. coll.” 31 vols., Flor., 1759.

Papal Acts: Jaffe, “Regesta pont. Rom.” (to A.D. 1198), 2 ed., Brl., 1881. Potthast, “Regesta pont. Rom.” (A.D. 1198-1304), 2 Vols., Brl., 1873. The Papal Decretals in “Corp. jur. Canonici.” ed., Friedberg, Lips., 1879. “Bullarum, diplom. et privil. SS. rom. pont.” Taurenensis editio, 24 vols., 1857 ff. Nussi, “Conventiones de reb. eccl. inter s. sedem et civ. pot. initæ.” Mogunt., 1870.

Monastic Rules: Holstenii, “Cod. regul. mon. et. can.” 6 vols., 1759.

Liturgies: Daniel, “Cod. liturg. eccl. univ.” 4 vols., Leipz., 1847 ff. Hammond, “Ancient Liturgies.” Oxf., 1878.

Symbolics: Kimmel, “Ll. Symb. eccl. Orient.” Jena., 1843. Danz, “Ll. Symb. eccl. Rom. Cath.” Weimar, 1835. Hase, “Ll. Symb. eccl. evang.” Ed. iii., Leipz., 1840. Niemeyer, “Coll. Conf. eccl. Ref.” Leipz., 1840. Schaff, “Creeds of Christendom.” 3 vols., Lond., 1882.

Martyrologies: Ruinart, “Acta prim. Mart.” 3 vols., 1802. Assemanni [Assemani], “Acta SS. Mart. orient. et occid.” 2 vols., Rome, 1748.

Greek and Latin Church Fathers and Teachers: Migne, “Patrologiæ currus completus.” Ser. I., Eccl. Græc., 162 vols., Par., 1857 ff.; Ser. II., Eccl. Lat., 221 vols., Par., 1844 ff. Horoy, “Media ævi biblioth. patrist.” (from A.D. 1216 to 1564), Paris, 1879. “Corpus Scriptorum eccl. lat.” Vindob., 1866 ff. Grabe, “Spicilegium SS. Pp. et Hærett.” Sæc. I.-III., 3 vols., Oxford, 1698. Routh, “Reliquiæ sac.” 4 vols., Oxford, 1814 ff. “Ante-Nicene Christian Library; a collection of all the works of the Fathers of the Christian Church prior to the Council of Nicæa.” 24 vols., Edin., 1867 ff.

Ancient Writers of the East: Assemanus [Assemani], “Biblioth. orient.” 4 vols., Rome, 1719.

Byzantine Writers: Niebuhr, “Corp. scr. hist. Byz.” 48 vols., Bonn, 1828 ff. Sathas, “Biblioth. Græc. Med. ævi.” Vols. I.-VI., Athens, 1872 ff.

§ 4.2. Literature of the Auxiliary Sciences.―

Diplomatics: Mabillon, “De re diplomatic.” Ed. ii., Par., 1709.

Philology: Du Fresne (du Cange), “Glossarium ad scriptt. med. et infim. Latin.” 6 vols., Par., 1733; New ed., Henschel and Favre, in course of publication. Du Fresne, “Glossarium, ad scriptt. med. et infim. Græc.” 2 vols., Leyden, 1688. Suiceri, “Thesaurus ecclesiast. e patribus græcis.” Ed. ii., 2 vols., Amst., 1728.

Geography and Statistics: Mich. le Quien, “Oriens christianus in quatuor patriarchatus digestus.” 3 vols., Par., 1704.

Chronology: Nicolas, “The Chronology of History.” 2 ed., Lond., 1838. “L’art de verifier les dates, by d’Antine.” Etc., ed. by Courcelles, 19 vols., Par., 1821-1824.

§ 5. History of General Church History.

The earliest writer of church history properly so called is Eusebius, Bishop of Cæsarea, † 340. During the fifth century certain members of the Greek Church continued his work. The Western Church did not so soon engage upon undertakings of that sort, and was contented with translations and reproductions of the materials that had come down from the Greeks instead of entering upon original investigations. During the middle ages, in consequence of the close connection subsisting between Church and State, the Greek Scriptores historiæ Byzantinæ, as well as the Latin national histories, biographies, annals, and chronicles, are of the very utmost importance as sources of information regarding the church history of their times. It was the Reformation, however, that first awakened and inspired the spirit of true critical research and scientific treatment of church history, for the appeal of the Reformers to the pure practices and institutions of the early days of the church demanded an authoritative historical exposition of the founding of the church, and this obliged the Catholic church to engage upon the studies necessary for this end. The Lutheran as well as the Catholic Church, however, down to the middle of the 17th century, were satisfied with the voluminous productions of the two great pioneers in Church history, Flacius and Baronius. Afterwards, however, emulation in the study of church history was excited, which was undoubtedly, during the 17th century, most successfully prosecuted in the Catholic Church. In consequence of the greater freedom which prevailed in the Gallican Church, these studies flourished conspicuously in France, and were pursued with exceptional success by the Oratorians and the Order of St. Maur. The Reformed theologians, especially in France and the Netherlands, did not remain far behind them in the contest. Throughout the 18th century, again, the performances of the Lutheran Church came to the front, while a laudable rivalry leads the Reformed to emulate their excellencies. In the case of the Catholics, on the other hand, that zeal and capacity which, during the 17th century, had won new laurels in the field of honour, were now sadly crippled. But as rationalism spread in the domain of doctrine, pragmatism spread in the domain of church history, which set for itself as the highest ideal of historical writing the art of deducing everything in history, even what is highest and most profound in it, from the co-operation of fortune and passion, arbitrariness and calculation. It was only in the 19th century, when a return was made to the careful investigation of original authorities, and it came to be regarded as the task of the historian, to give a conception and exposition of the science as objective as possible, that this erroneous tendency was arrested.

§ 5.1. Down to the Reformation.―The church history of Eusebius, which reaches down to A.D. 324, was to some extent continued by his Vita Constantini, down to A.D. 337 (§ 47, 2). The church history of Philostorgius, which reaches from A.D. 318-423, coming down to us only in fragments quoted by Photius, was an Arian party production of some importance. During the 5th century, however, the church history of Eusebius was continued down to A.D. 439 by the Catholic Socrates, an advocate at Constantinople, written in a simple and impartial style, yet not altogether uncritical, and with a certain measure of liberality; and down to A.D. 423, by Sozomen, also an advocate at Constantinople, who in large measure plagiarizes from Socrates, and is, in what is his own, uncritical, credulous, and fond of retailing anecdotes; and down to A.D. 428 by Theodoret, Bishop of Cyrus in Syria, who produces much useful material in the shape of original authorities, confining himself, however, like both of his predecessors, almost exclusively to the affairs of the Eastern Church. In the 6th century, Theodorus, reader at Constantinople, made a collection of extracts from these works, continuing the history down to his own time in A.D. 527. Of this we have only fragments preserved by Nicephorus Callisti. The continuation by Evagrius of Antioch, reaching from A.D. 431-594, is characterized by carefulness, learning, and impartiality, along with zealous orthodoxy, and an uncritical belief in the marvellous. Collected editions of all these works have been published by Valesius (Par., 1659), and Reading (Cantab., 1720), in each case in 3 vols. folio.―In the Latin Church Rufinus of Aquileia translated the work of Eusebius and enlarged it before the continuations of the three Greek historians had appeared, carrying it down to his own time in A.D. 395 in an utterly uncritical fashion. Sulpicius Severus, a presbyter of Gaul, wrote about the same time his Historia Sacra, in two books, from the creation of the world down to A.D. 400. In the 6th century, Cassiodorus fused together into one treatise in 12 books, by means of extracts, the works of the three Greek continuators of Eusebius, under the title Hist. ecclesiastica tripartita, which, combined with the history of Rufinus, remained down to the Reformation in common use as a text-book. A church history written in the 6th century in Syriac, by the monophysite bishop, John of Ephesus, morbidly fond of the miraculous, first became known to us in an abridged form of the third part embracing the history of his own time. (Ed. Cureton, Oxf., 1853. Transl. into Engl. by Payne Smith, Oxford, 1859.)―Belonging to the Latin church of the middle ages, Haymo of Halberstadt deserves to be named as a writer of universal history, about A.D. 850, leaning mainly upon Rufinus and Cassiodorus. The same too may be said about the work entitled, Libri XIII. historiæ ecclesiasticæ written by the Abbot Odericus Vitalis in Normandy, about A.D. 1150, which forms upon the whole the most creditable production of the middle ages. In the 24 books of the Church history of the Dominican and Papal librarian, Tolomeo of Lucca, composed about A.D. 1315, church history is conceived of as if it were simply a historical commentary on the ecclesiastical laws and canons then in force, as an attempt, that is, to incorporate in the history all the fictions and falsifications, which Pseudo-Isidore in the 9th century (§ 87, 2-4), Gratian in the 12th century, and Raimundus [Raimund] de Penneforti [Pennaforte] in the 13th century (§ 99, 5), had wrought into the Canon law. Toward the end of the 15th century, under the influence of humanism there was an awakening here and there to a sense of the need of a critical procedure in the domain of church history, which had been altogether wanting throughout the middle ages. In the Greek Church again, during the 14th century, Nicephorus Callisti of Constantinople, wrote a treatise on church history, reaching down to A.D. 610, devoid of taste and without any indication of critical power.

§ 5.2. The 16th and 17th Centuries.―About the middle of the 16th century the Lutheran Church produced a voluminous work in church history, the so-called Magdeburg Centuries, composed by a committee of Lutheran theologians, at the head of which was Matthias Flacius, of Illyria in Magdeburg. This work consisted of 13 folio vols., each of which embraced a century. (Eccles. Hist., integram eccl. ideam complectens, congesta per aliquot studiosos et pios viros in urbe Magdb. Bas., 1559-1574.) They rest throughout on careful studies of original authorities, produce many documents that were previously unknown, and, with an unsparingly bitter polemic against the Romish doctrinal degeneration, address themselves with special diligence to the historical development of dogma. In answer to them the Romish Oratorian, Cæsar Baronius, produced his Annales ecclesiastici, in 12 vols. folio, reaching down to A.D. 1198 (Rome, 1588-1607). This work moves entirely along Roman Catholic lines and is quite prejudiced and partial, and seeks in a thoroughly uncritical way, by every species of ingenuity, to justify Romish positions; yet, as communicating many hitherto unknown, and to others inaccessible documents, it must be regarded as an important production. It secured for its author the cardinal’s hat, and had wellnigh raised him to the chair of St. Peter. In the interests of a scholarly and truth-loving research, it was keenly criticised by the Franciscan Anthony Pagi (Critica hist-chronol. 4 vols., Antw., 1705), carried down in the 17th century from A.D. 1198-1565, in 9 vols. by Oderic. Raynaldi, in the 18th century from A.D. 1566-1571, in 3 vols. by de Laderchi, and in the 19th century down to A.D. 1585 in 3 vols. by August Theiner. A new edition was published by Mansi (43 vols., 1738 ff.), with Raynaldi’s continuation and Pagi’s criticism.―During the 17th century the French Catholic scholars bore the palm as writers of Church history. The course was opened in general church history by the Dominican Natalis Alexander, a learned man, but writing a stiff scholastic style (Selecta hist. eccl. capita et diss. hist. chron. et dogm. 24 vols., Par., 1676 ff.). This first edition, on account of its Gallicanism was forbidden at Rome; a later one by Roncaglia of Lucca, with corrective notes, was allowed to pass. Sebast. le Nain de Tillemont, with the conscientiousness of his Jansenist faith, gave an account of early church history in a cleverly grouped series of carefully selected authorities (Memoires pour servir à l’hist. eccl. des six premiers siècles, justifiés par les citations des auteurs originaux. 16 vols., Par., 1693 ff.). Bossuet wrote, for the instruction of the Dauphin, what Hase has styled “an ecclesiastical history of the world with eloquent dialectic and with an insight into the ways of providence, as if the wise Bishop of Meaux had been in the secrets not only of the king’s but also of God’s councils” (Discours sur l’hist. universelle depuis le commencement du monde jusqu’à l’empire de Charles M. Par., 1681). Claude Fleury, aiming at edification, proceeds in flowing and diffuse periods (Histoire ecclst. 20 vols., Par., 1691 ff.).―The history of the French Church (A.D. 1580) ascribed, probably erroneously, to Theodore Beza, the successor of Calvin, marks the beginning of the writing of ecclesiastical history in the Reformed Church. During the 17th century it secured an eminence in the department of church history, especially on account of learned special researches (§ 160, 7), but also to some extent in the domain of general church history. J. H. Hottinger overloaded his Hist. ecclst. N. T. (9 vols., Fig., 1651 ff.) by dragging in the history of Judaism, and Paganism, and even of Mohammedanism, with much irrelevant matter of that sort. Superior to it were the works of Friedr. Spanheim (Summa hist. eccl. Leyd., 1689) Jas. Basnage (Hist. de l’égl. 2 vols., Rotd., 1699). Most important of all were the keen criticism of the Annals of Baronius by Isaac Casaubon (Exercitt. Baronianæ. Lond., 1614), and by Sam. Basnage (Exercitt. hist. crit. Traj., 1692; and Annales polit. ecclst. 3 vols., Rotd., 1706).

§ 5.3. The 18th Century.―After the publication of the Magdeburg Opus palmare the study of church history fell into the background in the Lutheran Church. It was George Calixtus († A.D. 1658) and the syncretist controversies which he occasioned that again awakened an interest in such pursuits. Gottfr. Arnold’s colossal party-spirited treatise entitled “Unparteiische Kirchen- und Ketzerhistorie” (2 vols. fol., Frkf., 1699), which scarcely recognised Christianity except in heresies and fanatical sects, gave a powerful impulse to the spirit of investigation and to the generous treatment of opponents. This bore fruit in the irenical and conciliatory attempts of Weismann of Tübingen (Introd. in memorabilia ecclst. 2 vols., Tüb., 1718). The shining star, however, in the firmament of church history during the 18th century was J. Lor. v. Mosheim in Helmstedt [Helmstadt] and Göttingen, distinguished alike for thorough investigation, with a divinatory power of insight, and by a brilliant execution and an artistic facility in the use of a noble Latin style (Institutionum hist. ecclst. Libri IV. Helmst., 1755; transl. into English by Murdock, ed. by Reid, 11th ed., Lond., 1880). J. A. Cramer, in Kiel, translated Bossuet’s Einl. in die Gesch. d. Welt u. d. Relig., with a continuation which gave a specially careful treatment of the theology of the middle ages (7 vols., Leipz., 1757 ff.). J. Sal. Semler, in Halle, shook, with a morbidly sceptical criticism, many traditional views in Church history that had previously been regarded as unassailable (Hist. eccl. selecta capita. 3 vols., Halle, 1767 ff.; Versuch e. fruchtb. Auszugs d. K. Gesch. 3 vols., Halle, 1773 ff.). On the other hand, Jon. Matt. Schröckh of Wittenberg produced a gigantic work on church history, which is characterized by patient research, and gives, in so far as the means within his reach allowed, a far-sighted, temperate, and correct statement of facts (Christl. K. G. 45 vols., Leipz., 1772 ff., the last two vols. by Tzschirner). The Würtemburg [Württemberg] minister of state, Baron von Spittler, sketched a Grundriss der K. Gesch., in short and smartly expressed utterances, which in many cases were no better than caricatures (5th ed. by Planck, Gött., 1812). In his footsteps Henke of Helmstedt [Helmstadt], followed, who, while making full acknowledgment of the moral blessing which had been brought by true Christianity to mankind, nevertheless described the “Allg. Gesch. der Kirche” as if it were a bedlam gallery of religious and moral aberrations and strange developments (6 vols., Brsweig., 1788 ff.; 5th ed. revised and continued by Vater in 9 vols.).―In the Reformed Church, Herm. Venema, of Franeker, the Mosheim of this church, distinguished himself by the thorough documentary basis which he gave to his exposition, written in a conciliatory spirit (Institutt. hist. eccl. V. et N. T. 7 vols., Leyd., 1777 ff.). In the Catholic Church, Royko of Prague, favoured by the reforming tendencies of the Emperor Joseph II., was able with impunity to give expression to his anti-hierarchical views in an almost cynically outspoken statement (Einl. in d. chr. Rel. u. K. G. Prague, 1788).

§ 5.4. The 19th Century. In his Handb. d. chr. K. G., publ. in 1801 (in 2nd ed. contin. by Rettberg, 7 vols., Giessen, 1834), Chr. Schmidt of Giessen expressly maintained that the supreme and indeed the only conditions of a correct treatment of history consisted in the direct study of the original documents, and a truly objective exhibition of the results derived therefrom. By objectivity, however, he understood indifference and coolness of the subject in reference to the object, which must inevitably render the representation hard, colourless, and lifeless. Gieseler of Göttingen, † 1854, commended this mode of treatment by his excellent execution, and in his Lehrbuch (5 vols., Bonn, 1824-1857; Engl. transl. “Compendium of Church History.” 5 vols., Edinb., 1846-1856), a master-piece of the first rank, which supports, explains and amplifies the author’s own admirably compressed exposition by skilfully chosen extracts from the documents, together with original and thoughtful criticism under the text. A temperate, objective, and documentary treatment of church history is also given in the Handbuch of Engelhardt of Erlangen (5 vols., Erlang., 1832 ff.). Among the so-called Compendia the most popular was the Universalgeschichte d. K. by Stäudlin, of Göttingen (Hann., 1807; 5th ed. by Holzhausen, 1833). It was superseded by the Lehrbuch of Hase, of Jena (Leipz., 1834; 10th ed., 1877; Engl. transl. from 7th Germ. ed., New York, 1855), which is a generally pregnant and artistically tasteful exposition with often excellent and striking features, subtle perception, and with ample references to documentary sources. The Vorlesungen of Schleiermacher, † 1834, published after his death by Bonell (Brl., 1840), assume acquaintance with the usual materials, and present in a fragmentary manner the general outlines of the church’s course of development. Niedner’s Lehrbuch (2nd ed., Brl., 1866), is distinguished by a philosophical spirit, independent treatment, impartial judgment, and wealth of contents with omission of customary matter, but marred by the scholastic stiffness and awkwardness of its style. Gfrörer’s († 1861) Kirchengeschichte (7 vols. reaching down to A.D. 1000, Stuttg., 1840) treats early Christianity as purely a product of the culture of the age, and knows of no moving principles in the historical development of the Christian church but clerical self-seeking, political interests, machinations and intrigues. Nevertheless the book, especially in the portion treating of the middle ages, affords a fresh and lively account of researches among original documents and of new results, although even here the author does not altogether restrain his undue fondness for over subtle combinations. After his entrance into the Catholic Church his labours in the domain of church history were limited to a voluminous history of Gregory VII., which may be regarded as a continuation of his church history, the earlier work having only reached down to that point. Baur of Tübingen began the publication of monographical treatises on particular periods, reaching down to the Reformation (3 vols., 2nd ed., Tüb., 1860 ff.), a continuation to the end of the 18th cent. (published by his son F. Baur, 1863), and also a further volume treating of the 19th cent. (publ. by his son-in-law Zeller, 2nd ed., 1877). These works of this unwearied investigator show thorough mastery of the immense mass of material, with subtle criticism and in many cases the first establishment of new views. Böhringer’s massive production (Die Kirche Christi und ihre Zeugen, oder Kirchengeschichte in Biographien. 24 vols., Zur., 1842; 2nd ed., Zur., 1873), upon the basis of an independent study of the several ages down to the Reformation, characterizes by means of detailed portraiture the personalities prominent during these periods. In the second edition, thoroughly recast with the assistance of his two sons, there is evidence of a more strictly critical research and a judicial frame of mind, so that the predominantly panegyrical character of the first edition is considerably modified. Rothe’s lectures, edited after his death, with additions from his literary remains, by Weingarten (2 vols., Hdlb., 1875) are quite fragmentary because the usual historical matter was often supplied from Gieseler, Neander, or Hase. The work is of great value in the departments of the Constitution and the Life of the Church, but in other respects does not at all satisfy the expectations which one might entertain respecting productions bearing such an honoured name; thoroughly solid and scholarly, however, are the unfortunately only sparse and short notes of the learned editor.

§ 5.5. Almost contemporaneously with Gieseler, Aug. Neander of Berlin, † 1850, began the publication of his Allg. Gesch. d. chr. Kirche in xi. divisions down to A.D. 1416 (Ham., 1824-1852. Engl. Transl. 9 vols., Edin., 1847-1855), by which ground was broken in another direction. Powerfully influenced by the religious movement, which since the wars of independence had inspired the noblest spirits of Germany, and sympathizing with Schleiermacher’s theology of feeling, he vindicated the rights of subjective piety in the scientific treatment of church history, and sought to make it fruitful for edification as a commentary of vast proportions on the parable of the leaven. With special delight he traces the developments of the inner life, shows what is Christian in even misconceived and ecclesiastically condemned manifestations, and feels for the most part repelled from objective ecclesiasticism, as from an ossification of the Christian life and the crystallization of dogma. In the same way he undervalues the significance of the political co-efficients, and has little appreciation of esthetic and artistic influences. The exposition goes out too often into wearisome details and grows somewhat monotonous, but is on every side lighted up by first hand acquaintance with the original sources. His scholar, Hagenbach of Basel, † 1874, put together in a collected form his lectures delivered before a cultured public upon several periods of church history, so as to furnish a treatise dealing with the whole field (7 vols., Leipz., 1868). These lectures are distinguished by an exposition luminous, interesting, sometimes rather broad, but always inspired by a warm Christian spirit and by circumspect judgment, inclining towards a mild confessional latitudinarianism. What, even on the confessional and ecclesiastical side, had been to some extent passed over by Neander, in consequence of his tendency to that inwardness that characterizes subjective and pectoral piety, has been enlarged upon by Guericke of Halle, † 1878, another of Neander’s scholars, in his Handbuch (2 vols., Leipz., 1833; 9th ed., 3 vols., 1866; Eng. transl. “Manual of Ch. Hist.” Edinb., 1857), by the contribution of his own enthusiastic estimate of the Lutheran Church in a strong but clumsy statement; beyond this, however, the one-sidedness of Neander’s standpoint is not overcome, and although, alongside of Neander’s exposition, the materials and estimates of other standpoints are diligently used, and often the very words incorporated, the general result is not modified in any essential respect. Written with equal vigour, and bearing the impress of a freer ecclesiastical spirit, the Handbuch of Bruno Lindner (3 vols., Leipzig, 1848 ff.) pursues with special diligence the course of the historical development of doctrine, and also emphasizes the influence of political factors. This same end is attempted in detailed treatment with ample production of authoritative documents in the Handbuch of the author of the present treatise (vol. I. in three divisions, in a 2nd ed.; vol. II. 1, down to the end of the Carlovingian Era. Mitau, 1858 ff.). Milman (1791-1868) an English church historian of the first rank (“Hist. of Chr. to Abolit. of Pag. in Rom. Emp.” 3 vols., London, 1840; “History of Latin Christianity to the Pontificate of Nicholas V.” 3 vols., London, 1854), shows himself, especially in the latter work, learned, liberal and eloquent, eminently successful in sketching character and presenting vivid pictures of the general culture and social conditions of the several periods with which he deals. The Vorlesungen of R. Hasse [Hase], published after his death by Köhler (2nd ed., Leipz., 1872), form an unassuming treatise, which scarcely present any trace of the influence of Hegel’s teaching upon their author. Köllner of Giessen writes an Ordnung und Uebersicht der Materien der chr. Kirchengeschichte, Giess., 1864, a diligent, well-arranged, and well packed, but somewhat dry and formless work. H. Schmid of Erlangen has enlarged his compendious Lehrbuch (2nd ed., 1856), into a Handbuch of two bulky volumes (Erlang., 1880); and O. Zöckler of Greifswald has contributed to the Handbuch d. theolog. Wissenschaften (Erlang., 1884; 2nd ed., 1885) edited by him an excellent chronological summary of church history. Ebrard’s Handbuch (4 vols., Erlang., 1865 ff.) endeavours to give adequate expression to this genuine spirit of the Reformed conception of historical writing by bringing church history and the history of doctrines into organic connection. The attempt is there made, however, as Hase has expressed it, with a paradoxical rather than an orthodox tendency. The spirit and mind of the Reformed Church are presented to us in a more temperate, mild and impartial form, inspired by the pectoralism of Neander, in the Handbuch of J. J. Herzog of Erlangen, † 1882 (3 vols., Erlang., 1876), which assumes the name of Abriss or Compendium. This work set for itself the somewhat too ambitious aim of supplying the place of the productions of Gieseler and Neander,―which, as too diffuse, have unfortunately repelled many readers―by a new treatise which should set forth the important advances in the treatment of church history since their time, and give a more concise sketch of universal church history. The Histoire du Christianisme of Prof. Chastel of Geneva, (5 vols., Par., 1881 ff.) in its earlier volumes occupies the standpoint of Neander, and we often miss the careful estimation of the more important results of later research. In regard to modern church history, notwithstanding every effort after objectivity and impartiality, theological sympathies are quite apparent. On the other hand, in the comprehensive History of the Christian Church by Philip Schaff (in 8 vols., Edinb., 1885, reaching down to Gregory VIII., A.D. 1073), the rich results of research subsequent to the time of Neander are fully and circumspectly wrought up in harmony with the general principles of Neander’s view of history. Herzog’s Realencyclopædie für protest. Theol. u. Kirche, especially in its 2nd ed. by Herzog and Plitt, and after the death of both, by Hauck (18 vols., Leipz., 1877 ff.), has won peculiar distinction in the department of church history from the contributions of new and powerful writers. Lichtenberger, formerly Prof. of Theol. in Strassburg, now in Paris, in his Encyclopédie des sciences relig. has produced a French work worthy of a place alongside that of Herzog. The Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines during the first eight centuries, edited with admirable circumspection and care by Dr. Wm. Smith and Prof. Wace, combines with a completeness and richness of contents never reached before, a thoroughgoing examination of the original sources. (4 vols., Lond., 1877 ff.) Weingarten’s Chronological Tables for Church History (Zeittafeln z. K.G. 2nd ed., Brl., 1874) are most useful to students as the latest and best helps of that kind.

§ 5.6. In the Catholic Church of Germany too a great activity has been displayed in the realm of church history. First of all in general Church history we have the diffuse work of the convert von Stolberg (Gesch. d. Rel. Jesu, 15 vols., down to A.D. 430, Hamb., 1806 ff., continued by von Kerz, vols. 16-45, and by Brischar, vols. 46-52, Mainz, 1825-1859), spreading out into hortatory and uncritical details. The elegant work of Katerkamp (K.G., 5 vols., down to 1153, Münst., 1819 ff.) followed it, inspired by a like mild spirit, but conceived in a more strictly scientific way. Liberal, so far as that could be without breaking with the hierarchy, is the Handbuch der K.G. (3 vols., Bonn, 1826 ff.; 6th ed. by Ennen, 2 vols., 1862), by I. Ign. Ritter. The ample and detailed Gesch. d. Chr. Rel. u. d. K. (8 vols., down to 1073, Ravensb., 1824 ff.) of Locherer reminds one of Schröckh’s work in other respects than that of its voluminousness. A decidedly ultramontane conception of church history, with frequent flashes of sharp wit, first appears in Hortig’s Handbuch (2 vols., Landsh., 1826). Döllinger in 1828 publ. as a 3rd vol. of this work a Handbuch d. Neuern K.G., which, with a similar tendency, assumed a more earnest tone. This theologian afterwards undertook a thoroughly new and independent work of a wider range, which still remains incomplete (Gesch. d. chr. K., I. 1, 2, partially down to A.D. 630, Landsh., 1833-1835). This work with ostensible liberality exposed the notorious fables of Romish historical literature; but, on the other hand, with brilliant ingenuity, endeavoured carefully to preserve intact everything which on ultramontane principles and views might seem capable of even partial justification. His Lehrbuch (I. II. 1., Rgsb., 1836 ff.), reaching down only to the Reformation, treats the matter in a similar way, and confines itself to a simple statement of acknowledged facts. In the meantime J. A. Möhler, by his earlier monographical works, and still more decidedly by his far-reaching influence as a Professor at Tübingen, gave rise to an expectation of the opening up of a new epoch in the treatment of Catholic church history. He represented himself as in spiritual sympathy with the forms and means of Protestant science, although in decided opposition and conflict with its contents, maintaining his faithful adhesion to all elements essential to Roman Catholicism. This master, however, was prevented by his early death, † 1838, from issuing his complete history. This was done almost thirty years after his death by Gams, who published the work from his posthumous papers (K. G., 3 vols., Rgsb., 1867 ff.), with much ultramontane amendment. It shows all the defects of such patchwork, with here and there, but relatively, very few fruitful cases. Traces of his influence still appear in the spirit which pervades the Lehrbücher proceeding from his school, by Alzog († 1878) and Kraus. The Universalgeschichte d. K., by J. Alzog (Mainz, 1841; 9th ed., 2 vols., 1872; transl. into Engl., 3 vols., Lond., 1877), was, in its earlier editions, closely associated with the lectures of his teacher, not ashamed even to draw from Hase’s fresh-sparkling fountains something at times for his own yet rather parched meadows, but in his later editions he became ever more independent, more thorough in his investigation, more fresh and lively in his exposition, making at the same time a praiseworthy endeavour at moderation and impartiality of judgment, although his adhesion to the Catholic standpoint grows more and more strict till it reaches its culmination in the acceptance of the dogma of Papal Infallibility. The 10th ed. of his work appeared in 1882 under the supervision of Kraus, who contributed much to its correction and completion. The Lehrbuch of F. Xav. Kraus of Freiburg (2nd ed., Trier, 1882) is without doubt among all the Roman Catholic handbooks of the present the most solid from a scientific point of view, and while diplomatically reserved and carefully balanced in its expression of opinions, one of the most liberal, and it is distinguished by a clever as well as instructive mode of treatment. On the other hand, the Würzburgian theologian, J. Hergenröther (since 1879 Cardinal and Keeper of the Papal Archives at Rome), who represents the normal attitude of implicit trust in the Vatican, has published a Handbuch (2 vols. in 4 parts, Freib., 1876 ff.; 2nd ed., 1879, with a supplement: Sources, Literat., and Foundations). In this work he draws upon the rich stores of his acknowledged scholarship, which, however, often strangely forsakes him in treating of the history of Protestant theology. It is a skilful and instructive exposition, and may very fitly be represented as “a history of the church, yea, of the whole world, viewed through correctly set Romish spectacles.” Far beneath him in scientific importance, but in obstinate ultramontanism far above him, stands the Lehrbuch of H. Bruck [Brück] (2nd ed., Mainz, 1877). A far more solid production is presented in the Dissertatt. selectæ in hist. ecclst. of Prof. B. Jungmann of Louvain, which treat in chronological succession of parties and controversies prominent in church history, especially of the historical development of doctrine, in a thorough manner and with reference to original documents, not without a prepossession in favour of Vaticanism (vols. i.-iii., Ratisb., 1880-1883, reaching down to the end of the 9th cent.). The Kirchenlexikon of Wetzer and Wette (12 vols., Freib., 1847 ff.) gained a prominent place on account of the articles on church history contributed by the most eminent Catholic scholars, conceived for the most part in the scientific spirit of Möhler. The very copious and of its kind admirably executed 2nd ed. by Kaulen (Freib., 1880 ff.), under the auspices of Card. Hergenröther, is conceived in a far more decidedly Papistic-Vatican spirit, which often does not shrink from maintaining and vindicating even the most glaring productions of mediæval superstition, illusion and credulity, as grounded in indubitable historical facts. Much more important is the historical research in the Hist. Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft, edited from 1880 by G. Hüffer, and from 1883 by B. Gramich, which presents itself as “a means of reconciliation for those historians with whom Christ is the middle point of history and the Catholic Church the God-ordained institution for the education of the human race.”―In the French Church the following are the most important productions: the Hist. de l’égl. of Berault-Bercastel (24 vols., Par., 1778 ff.), which have had many French continuators and also a German translator (24 vols., Vienna, 1784 ff.); the Hist. ecclst. depuis la création, etc., of Baron Henrion, ed. by Migne (25 vols., Par., 1852 ff.); and the very diffuse compilation, wholly devoted to the glorification of the Papacy and its institutions, Hist. universelle de l’égl. Cath. of the Louvain French Abbé Rohrbacher (29 vols., Par., 1842 ff.; of which an English transl. is in course of publication). Finally, the scientifically careful exposition of the Old Catholic J. Rieks, Gesch. d. chr. K. u. d. Papstthums, Lahr., 1882, though in some respects onesided, may be mentioned as deserving of notice for its general impartiality and love of the truth.

HISTORY OF THE PREPARATION FOR CHRISTIANITY. The pre-Christian World preparing the way of the Christian Church.

§ 6. The Standpoint of Universal History.

The middle point of the epochs and developments of the human race is the incarnation of God in Christ. With it begins, upon it rests, the fulness of the time (Gal. iv. 4), and toward it the whole pre-Christian history is directed as anticipatory or progressive. This preparation has its beginning in the very cradle of humanity, and is soon parted in the two directions of Heathenism and Judaism. In the former case we have the development of merely human powers and capacities; in the latter case this development is carried on by continuous divine revelation. Both courses of development, distinguished not only by the means, but also by the task undertaken and the end aimed at, run alongside of one another, until in the fulness of the time they are united in Christianity and contribute thereto the fruits and results of what was essential and characteristic in their several separate developments.

§ 7. Heathenism.

The primitive race of man, surrounded by rich and luxuriant forms of nature, put this abundance of primeval power in the place of the personal and supramundane God. Surrounded by such an inexhaustible fulness of life and pleasures, man came to look upon nature as more worthy of sacrifice and reverence than a personal God removed far off into supramundane heights. Thus arose heathenism as to its general features: a self-absorption into the depths of the life of nature, a deification of nature, a worshipping of nature (Rom. i. 21 ff.), therefore, the religion of nature, in accordance with which, too, its moral character is determined. Most conspicuously by means of its intellectual culture has heathenism given preliminary aid to the church for the performing of her intellectual task. And even the pagan empire, with its striving after universal dominion, as well as the active commercial intercourse in the old heathen world, contributed in preparing the way of the church.

§ 7.1. The Religious Character of Heathenism.―The hidden powers of the life of nature and the soul, not intellectually apprehended in the form of abstract knowledge, but laid hold of in immediate practice, and developed in speculation and mysticism, in natural magic and soothsaying, and applied to all the relations of human life, seemed revelations of the eternal spirit of nature, and, mostly by means of the intervention of prominent personalities and under the influence of various geographical and ethnographical peculiarities, produced manifold systems of the religion of nature. Common to all, and deeply rooted in the nature of heathenism, is the distinction between the esoteric religion of the priests, and the exoteric religion of the people. The former is essentially a speculative ideal pantheism; the latter is for the most part a mythical and ceremonial polytheism. The religious development of heathenism has nevertheless been by no means stripped of all elements of truth. Apart from casual remnants of the primitive divine revelation, which, variously contorted on their transmission through heathen channels, may lie at the foundation or be inwrought into its religious systems, the hothouse-like development of the religion of nature has anticipated many a religious truth which, in the way of divine revelation, could only slowly and at a late period come to maturity, but has perverted and distorted it to such a degree that it was little better than a caricature. To this class belong, for example, the pantheistic theories of the Trinity and the Incarnation, the dualistic acknowledgment of the reality of evil, etc. To this also especially belongs the offering of human victims which has been practised in all religions of nature without exception,―a terrible and to some extent prophetic cry of agony from God-forsaken men, which is first toned down on Golgotha into hymns of joy and thanksgiving. Witness is given to the power and energy, with which the religions of nature in the time of their bloom took possession of and ruled over the minds and emotions of men, by the otherwise unexampled sacrifices and self-inflictions, such as hecatombs, offerings of children, mutilation, prostitution, etc., to which its votaries submitted, and not less the almost irresistible charm which it exercised again and again upon the people of Israel during the whole course of their earlier history. It also follows from this that the religion of heathenism does not consist in naked lies and pure illusions. There are elements of truth in the lies, which gave this power to the religion of nature. There are anticipations of redemption, though these were demoniacally perverted, which imparted to it this charm. There are mysterious phenomena of natural magic and soothsaying which seemed to establish their divine character. But the worship of nature had the fate of all unnatural, precocious development. The truth was soon swallowed up by the lies, the power of development and life, of which more than could possibly be given was demanded, was soon consumed and used up. The blossoms fell before the fruit had set. Mysteries and oracles, magic and soothsaying, became empty forms, or organs of intentional fraud and common roguery. And so it came to pass that one harauspex could not look upon another without laughing. Unbelief mocked everything, superstition assumed its most absurd and utterly senseless forms, and religions of an irrational mongrel type sought in vain to quicken again a nerveless and soulless heathenism.

§ 7.2. The Moral Character of Heathenism.―Religious character and moral character go always hand in hand. Thus, too, the moral life among heathen peoples was earnest, powerful, and true, or lax, defective, and perverse, in the same proportion as was the religious life of that same period. The moral faults of heathenism flow from its religious faults. It was a religion of the present, to whose gods therefore were also unhesitatingly ascribed all the imperfections of the present. In this way religion lost all its power for raising men out of the mire and dust surrounding them. The partly immoral myths sanctioned or excused by the example of the gods the grossest immoralities. As the type and pattern of reproductive power in the deified life of nature, the gratification of lust was often made the central and main point in divine service. The idea of pure humanity was wholly wanting in heathenism. It could only reach the conception of nationality, and its virtues were only the virtues of citizens. In the East despotism crushed, and in the West fierce national antipathies stifled the acknowledgment of, universal human rights and the common rank of men, so that the foreigner and the slave were not admitted to have any claims. As the worth of man was measured only by his political position, the significance of woman was wholly overlooked and repudiated. Her position was at most only that of the maid of the man, and was degraded to the lowest depths in the East by reason of the prevalent polygamy. Notwithstanding all these great and far-reaching moral faults, heathenism, in the days of its bloom and power, at least in those departments of the moral life, such as politics and municipal matters, in which pantheism and polytheism did not exert their relaxing influence, had still preserved much high moral earnestness and an astonishing energy. But when the religion of their fathers, reduced to emptiness and powerlessness, ceased to be the soul and bearer of those departments of life, all moral power was also withdrawn from them. The moral deterioration reached its culminating point in the dissolute age of the Roman Emperors. In this indescribable state of moral degeneration, the church found heathenism, when it began its spiritual regeneration of the world.

§ 7.3. The Intellectual Culture in Heathenism.―The intellectual culture of heathenism has won in regard to the church a twofold significance. On the one hand it affords a pattern, and on the other it presents a warning beacon. Pagan science and art, in so far as they possess a generally culturing influence and present to the Christian church a special type for imitation, are but the ultimate results of the intellectual activity which manifested itself among the Greeks and Romans in philosophy, poetry and historical writing, which have in two directions, as to form and as to contents, become the model for the Christian church, preparing and breaking up its way. On the one side they produced forms for the exercise of the intellectual life, which by their exactness and clearness, by their variety and many-sidedness, afforded to the new intellectual contents of Christianity a means for its formal exposition and expression. But, on the other side, they also produced, from profound consideration of and research into nature and spirit, history and life, ideas and reflections which variously formed an anticipation of the ideas of redemption and prepared the soil for their reception. The influence, however, on the other hand, which oriental forms of culture had upon the development and construction of the history of redemption, had already exhausted itself upon Judaism. What the symbolism of orientalism had contributed to Judaism, namely the form in which the divine contents communicated by Old Testament prophesy should be presented and unfolded, the dialectic of classical heathenism was to Christianity, in which the symbolic covering of Judaism was to be torn off and the thought of divine redemption to be manifested and to be laid hold of in its purely intellectual form. The influence of heathenism upon the advancing church in the other direction as affording a picture of what was to be avoided, was represented not less by Eastern culture than by the classical culture of the Greeks and Romans. Here it was exclusively the contents, and indeed the ungodly anti-Christian contents, the specifically heathen substance of the pagan philosophy, theosophy, and mysteriosophy, which by means of tolerated forms of culture sought to penetrate and completely paganize Christianity. To heathenism, highly cultured but pluming itself in the arrogance of its sublime wisdom, Christianity, by whose suggestive profundity it had been at first attracted, appeared altogether too simple, unphilosophical, unspeculative, to satisfy the supposed requirements of the culture of the age. There was needed, it was thought, fructification and enriching by the collective wisdom of the East and the West before religion could in truth present itself as absolute and perfect.

§ 7.4. The Hellenic Philosophy.―What is true of Greek-Roman culture generally on its material and formal sides, that it powerfully influenced Christianity now budding into flower, is preeminently true of the Greek Philosophy. Regarded as a prefiguration of Christianity, Greek philosophy presents a negative side in so far as it led to the dissolution of heathenism, and a positive side in so far as it, by furnishing form and contents, contributed to the construction of Christianity. From its very origin Hellenic philosophy contributed to the negative process by undermining the people’s faith in heathenism, preparing for the overthrow of idolatry, and leading heathenism to take a despondent view of its own future. It is with Socrates, who died in B.C. 399, that the positive prefiguring of Christianity on the part of Greek philosophy comes first decidedly into view. His humble confession of ignorance, his founding of the claim to wisdom on the Γνῶθι σεαυτόν, the tracing of his deepest thoughts and yearnings back to divine suggestions (his Δαιμόνιον), his grave resignation to circumstances, and his joyful hope in a more blessed future, may certainly be regarded as faint anticipations and prophetic adumbrations of the phenomena of Christian faith and life. Plato, who died B.C. 348, with independent speculative and poetic power, wrought the scattered hints of his teacher’s wisdom into an organically articulated theory of the universe, which in its anticipatory profundity approached more nearly to the Christian theory of the universe than any other outside the range of revelation. His philosophy leads men to an appreciation of his God-related nature, takes him past the visible and sensible to the eternal prototypes of all beauty, truth and goodness, from which he has fallen away, and awakens in him a profound longing after his lost possessions. In regard to matter Aristotle, who died B.C. 322, does not stand so closely related to Christianity as Plato, but in regard to form, he has much more decidedly influenced the logical thinking and systematizing of later Christian sciences. In these two, however, are reached the highest elevation of the philosophical thinking of the Greeks, viewed in itself as well as in its positive and constructive influence upon the church. As philosophy down to that time, consciously or unconsciously, had wrought for the dissolution of the religion of the people, it now proceeded to work its own overthrow, and brought into ever deeper, fuller and clearer consciousness the despairing estimate of the world regarding itself. This is shown most significantly in the three schools of philosophy which were most widely spread at the entrance of the church into the Græco-Roman world, Epicureanism, Stoicism, and Scepticism. Epicurus, who died B.C. 271, in his philosophy seeks the highest good in pleasure, recognises in the world only a play of fortune, regards the soul as mortal, and supposes that the gods in their blissful retirement no longer take any thought about the world. Stoicism, founded by Zeno, who died in B.C. 260, over against the Epicurean deism set up a hylozoistic pantheism, made the development of the world dependent upon the unalterable necessity of fate, which brings about a universal conflagration, out of which again a new world springs to follow a similar course. To look on pleasure with contempt, to scorn pain, and in case of necessity to end a fruitless life by suicide―these constitute the core of all wisdom. When he has reached such a height in the mastery of self and of the world the wise man is his own god, finding in himself all that he needs. Finally, in conflict with Stoicism arose the Scepticism of the New Academy, at the head of which were Arcesilaus who died B.C. 240 and Carneades who died B.C. 128. This school renounced all knowledge of truth as something really unattainable, and in the moderation (ἐποχή) of every opinion placed the sum of theoretic wisdom, while it regarded the sum of all practical wisdom to consist in the evidence of every passionate or exciting effort.

§ 7.5. The Heathen State.―In the grand endeavour of heathenism to redeem itself by its own resources and according to its own pleasure, the attempt was finally made by the concentration of all forces into one colossal might. To gather into one point all the mental and bodily powers of the whole human race, and through them also all powers of nature and the products of all zones and lands, and to put them under one will, and then in this will to recognise the personal and visible representation of the godhead―to this was heathenism driven by an inner necessity. Hence arose a struggle, and in consequence of the pertinacity with which it was carried on, one kingdom after another was overthrown, until the climax was reached in the Roman empire. Yet even this empire was broken and dissolved when opposed by the spiritual power of the kingdom of God. Like all the endeavours of heathenism, this struggle for absolute sovereignty had a twofold aspect; there are thereby made prominent men’s own ways and God’s ways, the undivine aims of men, and the blessed results which God’s government of the world could secure for them. We have here to do first of all simply with the Roman universal empire, but the powers that rose in succession after it are only rejuvenations and powerful continuations of the endeavour of the earlier power, and so that is true of every state which is true of the Roman. Its significance as a preparer of the way for the church is just this, that in consequence of the articulation of the world into one great state organisation, the various stages and elements of culture found among the several civilized races hitherto isolated, contributed now to one universal civilization, and a rapid circulation of the new life-blood driven by the church through the veins of the nations was made possible and easy. With special power and universal success had the exploits of Alexander the Great in this direction made a beginning, which reached perfection under the Roman empire. The ever advancing prevalence of one language, the Greek, which at the time of the beginning of the church was spoken and understood in all quarters of the Roman empire, which seemed, like a temporary suspension of the doom of the confusion of languages which accompanied the rise of heathenism (Gen. xi.), to celebrate its return to the divine favour, belongs also pre-eminently to those preparatory influences. And as the heathen state sought after the concentration of all might, Industry and Trade, moved by the same principle, sought after the concentration of wealth and profit. But as worldly enterprise for its own ends made paths for universal commerce over wastes and seas, and visited for purposes of trade the remotest countries and climes, it served unwittingly and unintentionally the higher purposes of divine grace by opening a way for the spread of the message of the gospel.

§ 8. Judaism.

In a land which, like the people themselves, combined the character of insular exclusiveness with that of a central position in the ancient world, Israel, on account of the part which it was called to play in universal history, had to be the receiver and communicator of God’s revelations of His salvation, had to live quiet and apart, taking little to do with the world’s business; having, on the other hand, the assurance from God’s promise that disasters threatened by heathenish love of conquest and oppression would be averted. This position and this task were, indeed, only too often forgotten. Only too often did the Israelites mix themselves up in worldly affairs, with which they had no concern. Only too often by their departure from their God did they make themselves like the heathen nations in religion, worship, and conversation, so that for correction and punishment they had often to be put under a heavy yoke. Yet the remnant of the holy seed (Isa. iv. 3; vi. 13) which was never wholly wanting even in times of general apostasy, as well as the long-suffering and faithfulness of their God, ensured the complete realisation of Israel’s vocation, even though the unspiritual mass of the people finally rejected the offered redemption.

§ 8.1. Judaism under special Training of God through the Law and Prophecy.―Abraham was chosen as a single individual (Isa. li. 2), and, as the creator of something new, God called forth from an unfruitful womb the seed of promise. As saviour and redeemer from existing misery He delivered the people of promise from the oppression of Egyptian slavery. In the Holy Land the family must work out its own development, but in order that the family might be able unrestrainedly to expand into a great nation, it was necessary that it should first go down into Egypt. Moses led the people thus disciplined out of the foreign land, and gave them a theocratic constitution, law, and worship as means for the accomplishment of their calling, as a model and a schoolmaster leading on to future perfection (Gal. iii. 24; Heb. x. 1). The going out of Egypt was the birth of the nation, the giving of the law at Sinai was its consecration as a holy nation. Joshua set forth the last condition for an independent people, the possession of a country commensurate with the task of the nation, a land of their own that would awaken patriotic feelings. Now the theocracy under the form of a purely popular institution under the fostering care of the priesthood could and should have borne fruit, but the period of the Judges proves that those two factors of development were not sufficient, and so now two new agencies make their appearance; the Prophetic order as a distinct and regular office, constituted for the purpose of being a mouth to God and a conscience to the state, and the Kingly order for the protecting of the theocracy against hurt from without and for the establishment of peace within her borders. By David’s successes the theocracy attained unto a high degree of political significance, and by Solomon’s building of the temple the typical form of worship reached the highest point of its development. In spite, however, of prophecy and royalty, the people, ever withdrawing themselves more and more from their true vocation, were not able outwardly and inwardly to maintain the high level. The division of the kingdom, internal feuds and conflicts, their untheocratic entanglement in the affairs of the world, the growing tendency to fall away from the worship of Jehovah and to engage in the worship of high places, and calves, and nature, called down incessantly the divine judgments, in consequence of which they fell a prey to the heathen. Yet this discipline was not in vain. Cyrus decreed their return and their independent organization, and even prophecy was granted for a time to the restored community for its establishment and consolidation. Under these political developments has prophecy, in addition to its immediate concern with its own times in respect of teaching, discipline, and exhortation, given to the promise of future salvation its fullest expression, bringing a bright ray of comfort and hope to light up the darkness of a gloomy present. The fading memories of the happy times of the brilliant victories of David and the glorious peaceful reign of Solomon formed the bases of the delineations of the future Messianic kingdom, while the disasters, the suffering and the humiliation of the people during the period of their decay gave an impulse to Messianic longings for a Messiah suffering for the sins of the people and taking on Himself all their misery. And now, after it had effected its main purpose, prophecy was silenced, to be reawakened only in a complete and final form when the fulness of time had come.