← Table of contents
The influence of Greek ideas and usages upon the Christian church

INDEX, CONTAINING THE CHIEF TOPICS, PROPER NAMES, AND TECHNICAL TERMS, REFERRED TO IN THE LECTURES.

Reading edition

Italicized subdivisions of a title are elsewhere treated in more detail as separate titles

Abstract ideas, Greek tendency to, 116-118.

Æon, common Gnostic idea, 190;

two ways of viewing the Æons, 258 fin., 259.

Africanus, Julius, as an exegete, 81.

Alexandrine School, its philosophy, 81;

on moral probation, 232;

on God’s transcendence, 255.

See also Philo and Origen.

Allegorism, 58 ff.;

connection with the “mysteries,” 59, cf. 66;

ethical, 60;

physical, 61;

the Stoics, 61-63;

later exponents, 64;

The temper widespread in religion, 65;

Hellenistic Jews, 65 ff., e.g. Aristobulus and Philo, 66-69, 72, 128;

early Christian exegesis, especially Gnostic, 69 ff.;

compared with Philo’s, 72;

prophecy its main subject, 72-74;

an O. T. Apologetic, 77-79;

Reactions, 79-82;

dogmatic complication, 82;

irony of its history, ib.;

use and abuse, 83;

its place in modern life, 83-85.

Alogi, 252, n. ².

Ambrose of Milan, his ethics Stoic, 169.

Antiochene School, its exegesis, 81, 82.

Apologists mark transition, e.g. 126-131;

idea of creation, 196;

free-will, 231;

transcendence of God, 252, 253;

Logos doctrine, 261-263, 267, 268.

Apostolic doctrine, idea of, 316, 317;

“Apostles’ Creed,” 317-319.

Apostolical Constitutions, Bk. i., its ethical type of teaching, 161, cf. 132, 336;

Bk. ii., on place of discipline, 162, 163;

Bks. ii. and viii., on Lord’s Supper, 301.

Aristobulus, his allegorism, 66 fin.

Aristotle, his use of ousia, 269, 270;

of pistis, 311.

Askesis (ἄσκησις), Greek, 148 ff.;

in Philo, 148;

reduced to system, e.g. “retreats,” 148-150, Christian, 164 ff.;

its germ, 164, 165;

ran parallel to Greek, 166, 167;

Monachism, 167, 168.

Association at first voluntary, 334, 335.

Associations, Greek religious, 290 ff.

Syncretistic, akin to “mysteries,” 290, 291;

purity of life required, 141;

mixed elements, 291, 292;

effects on Christianity, 292-295, cf. 141.

Athenagoras on absolute creation, 196;

transcendence of God, 253;

his Monism, 265.

Baptism and dualism, 19.

Primitive simplicity, 294, 295;

its formula, 315;

its ethical character among the Elchasaites, 337;

later change in name, 295, 296;

in time, 296, 297;

minor features—“symbolum,” lights, &c., 298, 299;

late ritual, 299, 300;

Gnostic realism, 306;

and unction, 307.

Its importance, 341, 342.

Basilides characterized, 9, n. ²;

his view of creation, 195, 196;

of transcendence, 254, 255;

genesis of the Logos, 263.

Bishops, and the “rule of faith,” 317, 318;

speculative interpretation by consensus, 326, 327;

results, 327 ff.

Canon of N. T., development of the idea, 319-321.

Catholic Church, its genesis, 11, 132;

put an end to “prophesying,” 107;

a fusion of Christianity and Greek philosophy, 125;

unconsciously Hellenized, 132-135;

as a “corpus permixtum,” 164.

Celsus, his and Porphyry’s polemic against Christian allegorism, 80;

on relation of Christianity and philosophy, 127, 128, cf. 11 init.

Christianity, primitive:

the New Law, 158-162;

its ethical idea of God, 224, 225;

its theological basis, 238, 239, 251, 252.

Church, its early character, 335;

holiness, 335-337;

hope, 337, 338.

Clement of Alexandria, his allegorism, 70;

appeal to hieroglyphics, 71;

and N. T. allegories, 76;

on Christianity and philosophy, 127;

on the Conservatives, 130, 131.

Clementines, the: their Old Testament criticism, 71;

God just and good, 229, 230.

Consecration of the elements: the formula secret, 302, n. ⁶.

Conservatism: Clement and Tertullian on it, 130, 131;

in Ebionites and Elchasaites, 252, 337;

often not recognized as such (cf. Ebionites), e.g. in Origen, 323;

the simpler sort, 324;

Paul of Samosata, 327, cf. 345, 346;

in Puritanism, 347, 348;

Monachism, 348, 349.

Creed, the, 313 ff.;

its germs, 313, 314;

the baptismal formula, 314, 315;

becomes a test, 315;

expanded, 315, 316;

by “Apostolic teaching,” 316, 317;

the “Apostles’ Creed” of the Bishops (παράδοσις ἐκκλησιαστική), 317-319.

Cyprian characterized, 8.

Dæmons, 246, especially n. ³.

Definition among the Greeks, 118;

influence on Catholic Church, 135, 330, 331.

Development not arrested, 332, 351, 352.

Dialectic, Greek, 118 fin.

Didaché, the: the “Two Ways” emphasizes conduct, 160, 161, 335, 336;

and the idea of wages, 225;

its simple theology, 251, 252;

Baptism, 294, 295, cf. 315;

the Lord’s Supper, 300, 301;

intercommunion based on moral test, 343, 344.

Dio Chrysostom characterized, 6;

on “askesis,” 150.

Dionysius Areopagites sums up the influence of the “mysteries,” 303, 304.

Discipline, early Christian, 162 ff.;

in Apost. Const. Bk. ii., 162, 163;

its Puritan ideal, 163;

later “corpus permixtum” idea, 164.

Dogma (δόγμα), its original sense, 119, 120;

later Dogmatism, 121-123;

the age of Dogmatism, 280.

Dualism and Baptism, 19;

and Stoicism, ib.;

its basis, 175;

Platonic, 177;

variously expressed, 178-180;

later modified, 181;

in Christian theories of creation, 194, 195;

transition in Tatian, 195.

Ebionites become “heretics,” 132;

as Conservatives, 252, n. ².

Education, Greek, 26 ff.;

its forms literary, 27;

mainly Grammar and Rhetoric, 28 ff.;

the poets its main study, 30;

also a littérateur philosophy, 32 ff.;

spite of protest, 34;

its extent, 35 ff.

Epictetus characterized, 6;

as moral reformer, 142 ff.;

his attitude, 143, 144;

quoted, 144-147;

on “askesis,” 149;

his two planes of ethics, 152:

“follow Nature,” 152-155;

“follow God,” 155-158.

Essentia: its bad Latinity a source of disuse, 277, especially n. ³.

Ethics, Greek, 139 ff.

Average morality, 139;

philosophic ethics, 140;

moral reformation in first centuries A.D., 140, 141;

in religious guilds and philosophy, 141;

its relation to Logic and Literature, 142, 143;

in Epictetus, 143 ff.;

moral gymnastic, 147;

askesis, 148 ff.;

the “philosopher,” 150 ff.;

contents of ethical teaching, e.g. in Epictetus, 152 ff.

Ethics, Christian, 158-170.

Compared with Greek, 158;

its basis and characteristic idea (sin), 158, 159;

agreement upon value of conduct, 159;

the “Two Ways,” 160, 161;

Apost. Const. Bk. i., 161;

discipline, earlier and later, 162-164;

Christian askesis, 164-168;

deterioration of average ethics, 168, 169;

victory of Greek ethics in Roman Law of Rights, 169, 170.

Evolutionary ideas among the Gnostics, as regards creation, 177, 190-193;

revelation, 257 ff.;

genesis of the Logos, 263 ff.

Exorcism in relation to Monism, 20, especially n.;

in Baptism, 307, 308, n. ¹.

Faith (πίστις), history of its usage, 310 ff.;

in Old Testament, 310, 331;

Greek philosophy, 311;

Philo, 311, 312.

Christian form issuing in the Creed, 313 ff.;

relation to New Testament Canon, 319 ff.

Further speculative development, 321, 322;

“gnosis” by the side of “pistis,” 323 ff. and 339-341;

check found in consensus of Bishops, 326;

expansion of Creed, 327;

contrasted uses of term “belief,” 328;

majority and minority views, 229;

recapitulation, 330.

Fitting, the, as a Stoic category, 153, 154;

root of “officium” and “debitum,” 154, 155.

“Generation, eternal,” 267;

essential, 268;

Origen’s contributions, ib.

Gnosis (γνῶσις) as a tendency, 129, 130;

side by side with “pistis” in Catholicism, 130-134, cf. 323 ff. and 339-341;

as well as in Neo-Platonism, 133.

Gnosticism between two fires, 9;

allegorizes the Old Testament, 70;

also the Gospel, 75.

Its cosmogonies, 190;

evolutional types, 190-198;

hypothesis of a lapse, 198;

opposition from without and within, 193 fin.;

Basilides on matter and God, 195, 196.

Idea of transcendence, 251:

e.g. Basilides and Marcus, 254.

Modalism, 257 ff.

Connecting link with the Mysteries, 305 ff.;

e.g. unction and sacramental realism, 306, 308, 309.

Attitude to tradition and the Scriptures, 325.

Grammar in Greek education, 28 ff.

γραμματική, and γραμματιστική, 28 fin.;

its elements, 29, 30.

Guilds: see Associations.

Hellenism characterized, 13, 14.

Heresy, original use of term, 340, n. ³.

Hippolytus, 6;

his theory of creation, 203.

History, its difficulties and rewards, 22-24.

Homer in Greek thought, 51 ff.;

in Christian theology, 69, 70.

Homily, the, 109-113.

Homoousios (ὁμοούσιος) shared senses of “ousia,” 272;

first used of God by the Gnostics, 274;

its ambiguity, 274-276.

Hyparxis (ὕπαρξις) = “hypostasis,” 275, especially n. ².

Hypostasis (ὑπόστασις), relation to “ousia,” 275;

gradually specialized = πρώτη οὐσία, 276 f.;

further defined by aid of “prosôpon” (πρόσωπον) through use of “persona,” 277, 278;

usage often doubtful, 278.

ἱεράρχης and cognate terms for ministrants, 303, n. ¹.

Immortality in the Mysteries, 289, 290.

Initiation (τελετή): its stages, 284, n. ³;

its idea, 285.

Proclamation, 285, 286;

confession and baptism (κάθαρσις, λουτρόν), 287;

sacrifice, procession, &c., 287, 288;

mystic drama, its nature, 288-290.

Inspiration in Greece, connected with rhythm, 51.

Irenæus, 8:

his theory of creation, 202, 203;

on Justice and Goodness in God, 228;

on free-will, 231;

his Logos doctrine, 262, 263, cf. 266, n. ¹, 267, n. ⁴;

view of the Eucharistic elements, 302, n. ¹.

Judaism as basis of Christian theology, 238, 239.

Justin Martyr, 8;

on Christianity and philosophy, 126;

on free-will, 231;

on God’s transcendence, 253;

Logos doctrine, 261, 262;

genesis of the Logos, 266;

nature of the Logos, 267, 268.

Logoi (λόγοι), Stoical (= laws), 180;

compared with Platonic “ideas,” 181, 182, cf. 180;

appear in Philo’s “forces,” 185;

their sum the Logos, 176, 180, 182.

Logos, the, in Philo, 247 ff.;

relation to God, 249, 250;

and “logoi,” 259-261;

growth of Logos doctrine, 261-263;

genesis of the Logos, 263, 264;

προφορικὸς and ἐνδιάθετος, 265, n. ¹;

nature of the Logos, 267, 268.

Lucian and the Antiochene exegesis, 81, 82.

Marcion, his ditheistic tendency, 227, 230;

his idea of a Canon, 321;

his literal method, 325.

Marcus: syncretistic grouping of metaphors under term “logoi,” 190;

God’s transcendence, 255.

Maximus of Tyre, 6;

quoted for God’s transcendence, 242.

Mediation of God’s transcendence: see Logos.

Metaphysics and revelation, 137, 138.

Modalism, its two types, 257 ff.

Monachism: parallel of Greek and Christian, 167, 168;

a reaction, 348, 349.

Monarchianism a witness to older “Monarchia,” 206, 207.

Monism, in baptism and exorcism, 20;

its basis, 175;

Stoic, 175-177;

self-evolution of God, 177.

Montanism: a survival of “prophecy,” 107;

a reaction, 339.

Mysteries: their connection with allegory, 66;

Greek, 283;

initiation at Eleusis, 284 ff.;

together with religious guilds affect Christianity, 292 ff.;

generally, 293;

specially as to Baptism, 294 ff.;

and Lord’s Supper, 300 ff.;

culmination of influence, 303-305;

Gnostics a bridge, 305 ff.

General result, 309.

μύησις, μυσταγωγός, 296, 297.

Natura: see φύσις.

νόμος καινός, 158, cf. 159-162 (especially note).

Novatianism a Puritan reaction, 347, 348.

Ocellus Lucanus on idea of transcendence (supra-cosmic), 242, n. ¹.

Origen, 8:

his apologetic use of allegorism, 77, 78;

defence of it, 80;

his cosmogony a theodicy, 204-206;

its grand scale, 233-237;

shapes Logos doctrine, 267 (especially n. ⁴), 268;

his De principiis the first dogmatic system, 323.

Ousia (οὐσία), three Aristotelian senses [(i.) = hylê; (ii.) = substantia concreta; (iii.) = subst. abstracta], 269, 270.

Its later history in Platonic realism, 271, 272.

Difficulties in its application to God, 273 f.;

not popularly understood, 279.

Paul of Samosata, his case, 345, 346, cf. 326.

Persona appropriated for hypostasis, 277, 278.

Philo and Philonian writings a valuable bridge, 7, 128, 182;

his allegorism, 67-69;

his “literal” v. “deeper” sense compared with Christian exegesis, 72;

God the ultimate cause, 182, 183;

monistic elements, 183, 184;

dualistic, 184, 185;

his “forces,” in plurality, 185, 186;

and unity, 186, 187;

but God is Creator or Father, 187, 188;

God’s transcendence, 244 ff.;

intermediaries, 247;

distinctions in God’s nature, 247 ff.

Philosophy in Greek education, 32 ff.;

as a profession, 40 ff.;

its “damnosa hereditas,” 138;

its decay amid dogma, and legacy to Christendom, 280, 281.

Philosopher, the, as moral reformer, 150;

outward marks, 151.

Platonism and Christianity, 81, 129;

its theological affinity, 238;

Plato author of transcendence proper, 240, 241, and n. ¹;

God’s transcendence, 241-243;

dæmons, 246.

Plotinus on transcendence, 243;

genesis of Logos, 266, n. ⁵.

Plutarch, 6;

quoted for transcendence, 242;

immortality through “initiation,” 289.

Poetry, its place in the Greek mind, 51 ff.

Political analogies in the Church, 331.

Preaching and “prophesying,” 105 ff.;

of composite origin, 107-109;

the “homily,” 109-113.

Prophecy and divination, 72, 73;

and apologetic, 74;

died with formation of Catholic Church, 107.

πρόσωπον, how used, 278, especially n. ¹;

see hypostasis.

Ptolemæus, on God’s transcendence, 251;

his idea of “Æons,” 258 fin., 259.

Puritanism in early Church, 347, 348.

Pythagoreanism and Christianity, 81, 129.

Religion, its political aspect to the Roman, 21;

connected with usage (νόμος), 21, n.

Revelation and metaphysics, 137, 138.

Rhetoric, Greek, 87, 88.

“Rule of Faith:” see Faith.

σοφός, its later usage, 26.

Sophistic, its genesis, 87, 88;

mainly on lines of the older Rhetoric, 88-90;

popularized in διαλέξεις, 91;

and itinerant, 92-94;

manner of discourse, 94-97;

its rewards, 97, 98;

and airs, 99.

Objections, 99-101;

reaction led by Stoics like Epictetus, 101-105.

Speculation, its true place in Christianity, 332, 333.

State, its interference with doctrine, 279 f., 345-347.

Stoicism: its view of substance, 19, n.;

and the moral reformation, 141 ff.;

its ethics in Ambrose, 169;

ethical affinities with Christianity, 238;

dæmons, 246.

Substantia at first = hypostasis, then ousia, 277, cf. 278.

Supper, the Lord’s:

extra-biblical developments, 300 ff.;

in Didaché, 300, 301;

Apost. Const. Bks. ii. and viii, 301;

the “altar,” its “mysteries,” the sacred formula, 302 and n. ⁶;

“priest,” 303;

culmination in Dionysius, 303, 304;

realism first among Gnostics, 308, 309.

Symboli traditio, 298:

cf. contesseratio, 344.

σφραγίς, of baptism, 295.

Tatian:

his view of creation, 196;

free-will, 231;

on genesis of Logos, 266, n. ¹ and n. ⁵, 267, n. ³.

Teaching profession, 37 ff.;

endowed, 38;

excused public burdens, 39.

τελετή, τελεῖσθαι: see initiation, cf. 296.

Tertullian, 8;

his Stoic view of substance, 19, n., 20, n., cf. 254;

on Christianity and philosophy, 126, 127;

the Conservatives, 131, 257, n. ¹;

on creation, 197;

on God as just and good, 229;

on free-will, 232;

transcendence in him supra-cosmic, 254;

genesis of the Logos, 265, n. ¹;

nature of the Logos, 268;

on ecclesiastical tradition and speculation, 322.

Theodore of Mopsuestia as exegete, 82.

Theophilus on creation, 196;

God’s transcendence, 253;

on genesis of Logos, 265, n. ¹, cf. 268.

Transcendence, as of absolute Unity, Being, Mind, 240;

in Plutarch and Maximus, 242;

Plotinus, 243;

its two forms, 244;

Philo, 244, 245.

Absent from earliest Christian teaching, 251 f.;

appears in Apologists, 252, 253;

Gnostics, 254 f.;

Alexandrines, 255 f.;

mediation of, 256 ff., especially 257, n. ².

Unction of (1) exorcism, (2) thanksgiving, 307, 308, especially n. ¹.

φύσις (= natura), later use = ousia, 278;

sometimes = hypostasis, ib.

φωτισμός, of baptism, 295.

Writing as mysterious, 50.

Illustration from The influence of Greek ideas and usages upon the Christian church

Richard Clay and Sons, Limited, BRUNSWICK STREET, STAMFORD STREET, S.E., AND BUNGAY, SUFFOLK.

Notes in this chapter

Note 4 · Examples are the accounts of Basilides in Clement of Alexandria and Hippolytus, compared with those in Irenæus and Epiphanius; and the accouNote 6 · This was the common view of the Stoics, probably following Anaxagoras or his school; cf. Plutarch [Aetius], de Plac. Philos. 4. 3 (Diels, DoNote 7 · The conception underlies the whole of Tertullian’s treatise, de Baptismo: it accounts for the rites of exorcism and benediction of both the Note 8 · These conceptions are found in Xenophon’s account of Socrates, who quotes more than once the Delphic oracle, ἥ τε γὰρ Πυθία νόμῳ πόλεως ἀναιNote 63 · Καινὸς νόμος, Barn. 2. 6, and note, in Gebhardt and Harnack’s edition.Note 4 · This is a post-Platonic summary of Plato’s conception; into the inner development, and consequently varying expressions, of it in Plato’s owNote 6 · Plutarch, de Ei ap. Delph. 18; cf. Ocellus Lucanus in the Augustan Age, ap. Diels, 187, Mullach, i. p. 383 sq. The universe has no beginningNote 21 · Cf. Hesiod in Sext. Emp. ix. 86. Similarly, Thales, τὸ πᾶν ἔμψυχον ἅμα καὶ δαιμόνων πλῆρες (Diels, 301); Pythagoras, Empedocles in HippolytuNote 41 · Cf. the Ebionites, Alogi, and the Clementines.Note 59 · The older sort, who clung to tradition pure and simple, were dubious of the introduction of dialectic methods into Christianity: see Eus. v.Note 60 · Pantænus, when asked by outside philosophers, “How can God know the world, if like knows like?” replied (Routh, Rel. Sac. i. p. 379): μήτε αNote 78 · Leg. 16; cf. Clem. Al. Strom. 5. 1; cf. Theophilus, 2, 22, for distinction of λόγος προφορικός as well as ἐνδιάθετος, denied by Clement (locNote 80 · Justin, Dial. c. Tryph. 61 A, cf. 62 E, προβληθὲν γέννημα; and Hipp. c. Noet. 8, 10, 16; Tatian, c. 5; Irenæus ap. Schmid, p. 31.Note 84 · Justin, c. Tryph. 128: δυνάμει καὶ βουλῇ αὐτοῦ ἀλλ’ οὐ κατ’ ἀποτομὴν ὡς ἀπομεριζομένης τῆς τοῦ πατρὸς οὐσίας; cf. Plotinus ap. Harn. Dogm. 4Note 87 · For metaphor of light, cf. Monoïmus ap. Hipp. 8. 12; also Tatian, c. 5.Note 88 · There is uncertainty as to eternal generation in Justin; see Engelhardt, p. 118. It is not in Hippolytus, c. Noet. 10. Though implied in IreNote 118 · It is found, e.g., in Athan. ad Afr. episc. 4, vol. i. 714, ἡ γὰρ ὑπόστασις καὶ ἡ οὐσία ὕπαρξίς ἐστι. The distinction is found in Stoical wrNote 129 · Cf. Quintilian, who ascribes it in turn to Plautus and to Sergius Flavius, 2. 14. 2; 3. 6. 23; 8. 3. 33: Seneca, Ep. 58. 6, to Cicero, and mNote 131 · E.g. Ath. et Cyr. in Expos. orth. fid., ὑπόστασις = πρόσωπον ὁμοούσιον. In Epictetus, 1. 2. 7, 14, 28, it denotes individuality of characterNote 3 · The successive stages or acts of initiation are variously described and enumerated, but there were at least four: κάθαρσις—the preparatory pNote 56 · The earlier offerings were those of Irenæus, 4. 17. 5, where he speaks of Christ “suis discipulis dans consilium, primitias Deo offerre ex sNote 61 · Isid. Pelus. Epist. 3. 340, p. 390, προσῆλθε μὲν τῷ σεπτῷ θυσιαστηρίῳ τῶν θείων μυστηρίων μεταληψόμενος; also 4. 181, p. 516, τὰ θεῖα μῂ διδNote 62 · In Dionysius Areop. (s. v. ἱεράρχης, ed. Corderius, i. 839), the bishops are τελεσταί, ἱεροτελεσταί, τελεστάρχαι, μυσταγωγοί, τελεστουργοί, Note 70 · For the Eastern custom, see Cyril Hier. Catech. Myst. ii. 3, 4, p. 312: the candidate is anointed all over before baptism with exorcised oilNote 11 · The very terms heresy and heterodox bear witness to the action of the Greek philosophical schools on the Christian Church: αἵρεσις is used i
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings