← Table of contents
The Daguerreian Journal, Vol. II, No. 2, June 1, 1851

SOME EXPERIMENTS AND REMARKS

Reading edition

ON THE CHANGES WHICH BODIES ARE CAPABLE OF UNDERGOING IN DARKNESS, AND ON THE AGENT PRODUCING THESE CHANGES.

BY ROBERT HUNT.

[Concluded.]

With the view of testing Dr. Draper's results, I carefully iodized two silver plates and exposed them to light. I then placed them so that half of one plate was covered by half of the other, and allowed them to remain in the dark 1-24th of an inch apart for four hours. On mercurialization I could not detect the slightest difference between the covered and uncovered portions of either of the plates.

Another silver plate was iodized and exposed to light. It was then placed in the dark wish a sensitive plate which had been carefully kept from the light, 1-16th of an inch above it, and a small engraving placed between them. They were allowed to remain thus for six hours. When exposed to the vapor of mercury, the plate which had been subjected to the light whitened all over, and the space occupied by the engraving was distinctly marked by lines of vapor thicker than the other parts. The plate which had been preserved in the dark was scarcely at all influenced by the vapor, except on those parts which had been touched by the supports of card-board on which it rested. These were so arranged that no radiation could have influenced those parts of the plates.

An iodized silver plate was placed in the dark with a little fine string coiled over parts of it, and a polished silver plate supported 1-8th of an inch above it. After four hours both plates were subjected to mercurial vapor. On the iodized plate the deposit of vapor was uniform, although slight; but on the superposed plate of silver a strong and beautiful image of the string on the under plate became visible. I found that neither of the two iodized plates had lost their sensitiveness by the operations to which they had been subjected in the dark.

Hoping to detect some evidence of the process by which these singular results were produced, I instituted a series of experiments, of which the following are some of the most interesting results.

A. A silver plate was iodized, a piece of card was placed upon it, and a well-polished mercurial plate (amalgamated copper) was suspended 1-8th of an inch above it, and left in this state for a night. The space on the silver plate corresponding with the mercurial plate, except under the card, was nearly freed of its iodine, which had evidently combined with the mercury on the upper plate. On exposing the mercurial plate to the vapor of mercury the image of the card was rendered visible, the vapor covering every part of the plate except that opposite the card. The silver plate received the vapor only on those parts which were not influenced by the mercurial plate. The upper plate was suspended by strings; these were faithfully imaged on both plates; by a thick line of mercurial vapor on the under plate, by the absence of it in the upper one.

B. An iodized silvered plate was exposed to light until brown, and a mercurial plate suspended above it for twelve hours. The browned silver plate was whitened, and all the irregularities of the mercurial plate strikingly marked on it: the mercurial plate was slightly tarnished. On rubbing the silvered plate it was found that the silver was removed more readily over the whitened portion, but had lost none of its adhesion in other parts.

C. Over an iodized silver plate, plates of gold, platina, silver, brass, copper, copper amalgamated, and zinc were placed at the distance of 1-8th of an inch. After three hours the amalgamated plate had made a decidedly visible impression on the silver one. On exposure to vapor, the mercury lodged on every part of the plate except that affected by the mercurial plate; some irregularities were observed, but none which could be decidedly traced to the other metals in juxtaposition. I have some evidence that different metals near each other seriously interfere with each other's influence.

D. A mercurial plate was iodized, and another mercurial plate placed 1-8th of an inch above it. The upper plate became covered with a bright yellow film; and on exposing them to mercurial vapor, marks became apparent which corresponded with those in the opposite plate.

E. A silver plate was iodized and placed in the dark with an engraving, face down, upon it. An amalgamated copper plate was laid on this, and left for fifteen hours. The mercurial plate was reddened, and on exposure to the vapor of mercury, a very nice impression of the engraving was brought out, it having been effected through the thickness of the paper. On the silvered plate the space covered by the paper was well marked; but vaporization produced no trace of the engraving. The space beyond the paper was rendered white. It was curious that both plates had several spots which corresponded, particularly two, distinguished by a well-defined circle and a comet-like appendage, in length ten times the diameter of the circle. These spots could not be traced to anything visible in the print or either of the plates, and must, I think, be referred to some electrical influence. I find it indeed commonly the case, that the plates, after being subjected to these kind of experiments a few times, become mottled, or present on their polished faces all the appearances of a finely-grained wood, and in this state they are less susceptible of receiving any impression than when not so.

F. A silver plate was iodized and placed upon an engraving laid on a brightly polished mercurial plate, and left in the dark for twenty-four hours. The mercurial plate was turned brown, and the silver plate was left in the same state as if it had been exposed to sunshine, being brown and black. Neither of these plates gave a copy of the picture.

G. A mercurial plate was iodized, and above it was placed a plate of polished iron, a disc of paper being first laid on the mercurial plate, and they were left in this state for some hours. On exposing the iron plate to mercurial vapor, it was abundantly lodged over that space opposite the paper disc, but not at all on the other parts. The mercurial plate was attacked by vapor over every part but that which the paper disc protected.

Lead and zinc plates were used instead of the iron one, with nearly similar results.

H. A Daguerreotype was taken, and without removing the iodine a mercurial plate was placed a little above it, and left for ten hours. When removed, well-defined traces of the Daguerreotype picture were evident on the mercurial plate, which leads me to hope that by careful manipulation we may succeed in multiplying these beautiful productions by an easy method.

I became desirous of ascertaining whether the mercurial plates would produce any change upon the precipitated iodide of silver. I find by many experiments, that if the iodide of silver is pure, no more change is produced than is produced upon it by diffused light; but if it is rendered sensitive by a trace of the nitrate of silver, it is then darkened as by solar influence.

Sensitive iodide of silver being placed upon a plate of glass, a mercurial plate was fixed 1-8th of an inch above it. In three days the iodide of silver had become a deep brown, almost a black, and the mercurial plate was covered with the yellow iodide of mercury. Nitric acid dissolved the dark portion of the silver salt, as did also ammonia, on which was formed Faraday's oxide of silver, thereby proving the change, either by a primary or a secondary process, of the iodide into the oxide of silver. This experiment has been repeated at least a dozen times, and always with the same results. If a little heap of the iodide of silver is placed under a mercurial plate, it is exceedingly interesting to witness the gradual formation of the very beautiful colored rings on the mercury in the progress of its conversion into an iodide. By prolonged action the yellow iodide passes into the bright red biniodide of mercury. I have some experiments now in hand, which convince me that similar chemical changes are to be effected through considerable spaces. I have succeeded in decomposing the iodide of copper and the iodide of gold by mercurial plates placed nearly a quarter of an inch above them.

I have an extensive record of results similar to those I have now detailed, all of them showing that the changes brought about by this mysterious agent, whether it be heat, light, or an undiscovered element, cannot be referred to those rays which the admirable researches of Sir John Herschel have shown to be the operative ones in producing the photographic phenomena which have so interested the world by their novel beauty, and which professor Draper includes within his general term—tithonicity. With regard to the detithonizing influence of the gases mentioned by Dr. Draper in his paper in your March number, I can only consider the results, which I find to be as he has stated, as the simple reconversion of the decomposed iodide of silver into another definite chemical compound. An iodized plate is exposed to light, the iodide of silver or other sensitive salt is decomposed, and in a state to receive mercurial vapor. It is now passed through an atmosphere of iodine, of chlorine, of bromine, or of nitrous gas. Chemists are well aware of the surprising energy with which these bodies attack the metals, consequently the exposure of a moment is quite sufficient to convert the surface which has undergone a change, into an iodide, chloride, bromite, or nitrite of silver. I certainly cannot see the necessity of going so far out of our way for an explanation of this effect as Dr. Draper has done.

I fear I have already occupied too much of your valuable space, or I might be inclined to trespass further. I shall, however drop my pen for the present, again assuring you that I only desire to keep the image of Truth which is just shadowing our path, as free as possible from mists which might in any way obscure it.—Philosophical Magazine, 1843.

Illustration from The Daguerreian Journal, Vol. II, No. 2, June 1, 1851

Railroad to the Pacific.—Forest Shepherd, of Sacramento City, says it is now ascertained almost beyond doubt, that a railroad can be constructed from the Mississippi to the Pacific, without crossing any mountains, or meeting more impediment from snow than between Albany and Boston.

Illustration from The Daguerreian Journal, Vol. II, No. 2, June 1, 1851
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings