← Table of contents
Religious Life of Virginia in the Seventeenth Century

APPENDIX B

Reading edition

A List of Parishes in Virginia, and the Clergy in them under date of July 8, 1702.

Parishes and Incumbent Ministers Charles City County. Bristol Parish, (part) George Robertson [Robinson] Westover Parish Charles Anderson Martin's Brandon Parish Weyanoke Parish James Bushell Elizabeth City County Elizabeth City Parish James Wallace Essex County South Farnham Parish Lewis Latanè Sittenbourn Parish (part) Bartholomew Yates St. Mary's Parish William Andrews Gloucester County Petsoe (Petsworth) Parish Emmanuel Jones Abingdon Parish Guy Smith Ware Parish James Clack Henrico County Bristol Parish (part) George Robinson Varina als Henrico Parish James Ware King William Parish Benjamin De Joux James City County Wallingford Parish Wilmington Parish John Gordon James City Parish James Blair Martin's Hundred Parish Stephen Fouace Bruton Parish (part) Cope D'Oyley Isle of Wight County Warrosqueake Parish Thomas Sharpe Newport Parish Andrew Monroe King and Queen County St. Stephen's Parish Ralph Bowker Stratton-Major Parish Edward Portlock King William County St. John's Parish John Monroe Lancaster County Christ Church Parish Andrew Jackson St. Mary's White Chapel Parish John Carnegie Middlesex County Christ Church Parish Robert Yates Nansemond County Upper Parish Lower Parish Chuchatuck Parish Norfolk County Elizabeth River Parish William Rudd New Kent County Blisland Parish St. Peter's Parish James Bowker Northumberland County Fairfield Parish John Farnifold Wiccocomico Parish John Urquhart Northampton County Hungars Parish Peter Collier Princess Anne County Lynnhaven Parish Solomon Wheatley Richmond County Sittènbourn Parish (part) Bartholomew Yates North Farnham Parish Peter Kippax Surry County Southwark Parish Alexander Walker Lawne's Creek Parish Thomas Burnet Stafford County St. Paul's Parish Overwharton Parish John Frazier Warwick County Mulberry Island Parish Denbigh Parish Westmoreland County Cople Parish Washington Parish James Breechin York County Bruton Parish (part) Yorke Parish Cope D'Oyley Hampton Parish Stephen Fouace Charles Parish James Slater James Blair, Commissary to the Bishop of London Peregrine Cony, Chaplain to the Governor.

It will be noted that the above list reports fifty-one parishes, or after deducting three which appear as partly in two counties, a total of forty-eight parishes. These covered the whole territory in which English settlers lived. The incumbent clergymen total thirty-five but some five or six of the parishes for which no incumbent was named were very small in extent or population, and looked to the minister of an adjoining parish for services and sacraments. Probably this list includes five or six parishes which were vacant. Because of the great length of time required to secure clergymen from England this fact is evidence of the growing strength and organization of the Church under the influence of the Commissary.

Most of the clergymen who came to Virginia were graduates of the English and Scottish universities, and brought an element and influence of education and culture to the growing life of the Colony. Dr. Philip Alexander Bruce, in his notable Institutional History of Virginia in the Seventeenth Century, makes the following statement:

If we consider as a body the ministers who performed the various duties of their calling in Virginia during the Seventeenth Century, there is no reason to think they fell below the standard of conscientiousness governing the conduct of the English clergyman in the same age. The early history of the New World was adorned by no nobler group of divines than the group which gives so much distinction from the point of view of character and achievement to the years in which the foundation of the colony at Jamestown was being permanently laid.

From the middle of the century to the end as from the beginning to the middle, a large proportion of the clergymen were not only graduates of English universities, but also men of more or less distinguished social connections in England. Outside the great towns in England, or the wealthiest and most populous of the English rural parishes, there was in the course of the century, perhaps no single English living filled by a succession of clergymen superior to this body of men, (i.e., incumbents at Jamestown) in combined learning, talents, piety, and devotion to duty. And yet there is no reason to think that the ability, zeal and fidelity of these ministers who occupied the pulpit at Jamestown were overshadowing as compared with the same qualities in the clergymen who, one after another, occupied any of the more important benefices in York, Surry, Elizabeth City, or Gloucester Counties, or the counties situated in the Northern Neck, or Eastern Shore.... All the surviving records of the seventeenth century go to show that, whatever during that long period may have been the infirmities or unworthy acts of individual clergymen, the great body of those officiating in Virginia were men who performed all the duties of their sacred calling in a manner entitling them to the respect, reverence and gratitude of their parishioners.

Very little is known of the activities of the clergy outside of their professional duties beyond the fact that a great many of them conducted schools at their homes; and these "parsons schools" became a widespread influence for good upon the youth of their day. In the generations before the founding of the College these schools became the great agency throughout the colony for the education of the sons of the gentry, and of the occasional youth of a lesser privileged family who was taken free by the parson, or supported by a school endowment given by some charitable person. In the later days there were many such parish funds. We read of George Washington, in the following generation attending the school conducted by Parson Marye in Fredericksburg, and of his future wife, Martha Dandridge attending another.

It is a notable fact that throughout the whole seventeenth century the ideal shown by the General Assembly was to provide for the clergy an adequate salary for the comfortable home of an educated man. In 1695 when the question of increase in clerical salaries was raised, the House of Burgesses made a report to Governor Andros upon the purchasing value of salaries paid in tobacco, and stated, "They have duly weighed the present provision made for the ministers of this country in their respective parishes together with their other considerable perquisites by marriages, burials, etc., and glebes,——that most if not all the ministers of this country are in as good a condition in point of livelihood as a gentleman that is well seated and hath twelve or fourteen servants." They had previously stated that the tobacco salary of the parson would in normal years in the past yield eighty pounds sterling when sold.

In contrast with this salary of the clergymen in Virginia attention may be called to the statement made in England in 1714, that there were in England at that time "5,082 livings under eighty pounds in annual value, of which more than 3,000 were under forty pounds, and 471 under ten pounds. This report was made to show the importance of the fund established by Queen Anne, called Queen Anne's Bounty, for increasing the endowment of these weak parishes."

Transcriber's Notes

Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U. S. copyright on this publication was renewed.

The Table of Contents was added for convenience. Page 3: Guilt is an obsolete form of gilt (a plate of silver guilt). Page 16: Changed ecclestiastical to ecclesiastical (after an ecclestiastical trial by the bishop). Page 23: Changed cattel to cattle (great plenty of cattel and hogs). Page 50: Changed priviliged to privileged (youth of a lesser priviliged family).

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings