← Table of contents
Poetic diction

INDEX

Reading edition

Abercrombie, Lascelles, 197 n., 201 n.

Addison, Joseph, 21

“Ælla” (T. Chatterton’s), 163

Akenside, Mark, 16, 27, 69-70, 138-9, 189, 195

Dr. Johnson’s criticism, 16

“Epistle to Curio,” 195

Latinism, 69-70

Personification, 138-9

“Pleasures of the Imagination,” 69

“Alma” (M. Prior’s), 75

“Amyntor and Theodora,” 142

“Anti-Jacobin, The,” 173 n.

“Approach of Summer, The,” 179

“Archaism,” 17-21, 80-101

Aristotle, 10-12, 185

Armstrong, John, 69-70, 110

Arnold, Matthew, 2, 41, 181, 198, 201

“Art of Preserving Health,” 69, 110

Babbitt, I., 13 n., 203 n.

Bailey, J. C., 169 n.

Ballads, 95-7, 196

Barfield, Owen, 202 n.

“Bastard, The,” 111

Beattie, James, 19, 93 n., 125

Beers, H. A., 97 n.

“Beowulf, The,” 104 n.

Binyon, Laurence, 13 n.

“Biographia Literaria,” 13 n., 24 n., 48 n., 51 n., 127 n., 156 n., 173 n., 185 n.

“Birth of Flattery, The” (G. Crabbe’s), 168

Blair, Robert, 110, 176 n.

Blake, William, 28, 46-7, 77, 99, 124, 129, 136-59, 163-7, 179-80, 181, 187 n., 198, 202

Allegory and Vision, remarks on, 165

Artist, as, 136, 159 n.

Compounds, 124, 129

Felicity of diction, 46-7, 202

“Imitation of Spenser,” 47, 165

“Letters,” 47 n., 164 n., 187 n.

“Muses, To the,” 47

Mysticism, 164

Personifications, 163-7, 179-80

“Piper, The,” 202

“Songs of Experience,” 46, 165 n., 166

“Songs of Innocence,” 46, 165

Stock diction, 46-7

Blount, T., 93

Boswell’s “Life of Johnson,” 16 n.

“Botanic Garden” (E. Darwin’s), 12, 51-2, 126, 173-5

Bowles, William Lisle, 48

Boyce, S., 162

Bruce, Michael, 122

Burns, Robert, 28, 100, 198

Bysshe, Edward, 30

“By-ways Round Helicon”, 195 n.

Campbell, Dykes, 128 n.

Canning, George, 139, 173 n.

Capell, Edward, 95-6

“Castaway, The,” 49, 170

“Castle of Indolence,” 90-2, 161

Chapman, George, 105

“Charge to the Poets” (W. Whitehead’s), 20 n.

“Chase, The” (W. Somerville’s), 68, 110, 142

Chatterton, Thomas, 19, 42-3, 97-8, 123-4, 162-3

Compounds, 123-4

Personifications, 162-3

“Rowley Poems,” 97-8

Stock diction, 42-3

Chaucer, Geoffrey, 26, 84-6, 133

Chaucerian imitations, 84-6

Chesterfield, Lord, 20

“Child of Quality, Lines to” (M. Prior’s), 195

“Choice, The” (J. Pomfret’s), 195

Churchill, John, 139-40, 169-70

Classical literature (connexion with romantic), 181-2

Coleridge, H. N., 156 n.

Coleridge, S. T., 1, 13, 24, 31, 32, 51, 100, 127-8, 156, 173, 182, 193, 204

Archaisms, 100

Compounds, 127-8

Darwin, E., remarks, on, 13, 173

Gray’s personifications, on, 156

Imagination, on, 13

“Letters,” 173 n.

Pope’s style, on, 24, 32, 193

Collins, William, 16, 40-1, 71, 98, 116-7, 129, 149, 150-5, 166, 167, 191, 196

Archaisms, 98

Compounds, 116-7, 129

Dr. Johnson’s criticisms of, 16, 40, 151

“Odes,” 149 n., 150-5

Personifications, 150-5, 166, 167, 178, 179, 191

Romantic forerunner, a, 196

Stock diction, 40-1

Compound epithets, 4, 102-31, 204

“Convention and Revolt in Poetry,” 200 n.

Courthope, W. J., 9 n., 17 n., 45 n., 50 n., 57 n., 133 n., 149 n., 194 n.

Coventry, F., 147

Cowper, William, 20, 24, 31, 48-50, 73-4, 76, 126, 168-73

Archaism, on, 20

Compounds, 126

Familiar style, on the, 24

“Homer” translation, 48, 74, 126

Latinism, 73-5

“Letters,” 20 n., 48 n., 74 n.

“Olney Hymns,” 49, 169

Personifications, 169-73, 179

Stock diction, 48-9

“Table Talk,” 49

“Task, The,” 49, 73-4, 170-1

Crabbe, George, 50-1, 124-5, 167-8, 179, 195, 204

Compounds, 124-5

Dryden’s style, on, 204

Personifications, 167-8, 179

Stock diction, 50-1

Croxall, Samuel, 93 n.

Cunningham, John, 27, 189

Darwin, Erasmus, 12, 37, 51-2, 53, 120, 173-5

Davenant, Sir William, 21

Denham, Sir John, 15

Dennis, John, 11 n.

De Quincey, Thomas, 52

“Descriptive Sketches,” 52, 175, 176 n.

“Deserted Village, The,” 45-6, 111-2, 195

Diderot, Denis, 203

Dodsley, Robert, 147, 195

Doughty, Oswald, 98 n., 195 n.

Drayton, Michael, 107

Drinkwater, John, 9 n.

Dryden, John, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 18, 21, 22, 26-7, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 58-9, 81-2, 83, 105-6, 109, 134, 181, 194, 204

“Annus Mirabilis,” 8

Archaisms, 18, 81-2

Chaucer “translations,” 26-7

Compounds, 105-6

“Essays” and “Prefaces,” 7-11

“Hind and Panther,” 195

Language of poetry, on, 8-9

Latinism, 58-9

Periphrasis, use of, 28, 33

Personifications, 134

“Religio Laici,” 194

Royal Society, 7

Satire, 106, 140

Technical terms, on, 21

“Duellist, The” (Charles Churchill’s), 140 n.

Dyer, John, 39, 70, 109, 142, 188-9

Earle, J., 35 n.

“Economy of Vegetation,” 12, 126, 173-4

Edmonds, C., 173 n.

“Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard,” 42, 72, 157, 159, 195, 198

“Eloisa to Abelard,” 134

Elton, Oliver, 10 n., 135 n., 182 n., 186 n., 197 n.

Emerson, O., 104 n.

“English Lyric in the Age of Reason,” 195

“Enthusiast, The,” 71, 121, 149

“Epistle to Curio” (M. Akenside’s), 195 n.

Epithalamium (W. Thompson’s), 160

“Essay on Criticism,” 9-10, 29 n., 195

“Eton College, Ode on a Distant View of,” 156

Evelyn, John, 7

“Evening, Ode to,” 41, 116, 155

“Evening Walk, The,” 52, 127, 175-6

“Excursion, The” (David Mallet’s), 142

“Faerie Queene,” 87, 94, 99, 133, 159-60, 192

Falconer, William, 22, 43-4

“Fleece, The,” (J. Dyer’s), 39, 70

Fletcher, Giles, 57

Fletcher, Phineas, 57

“Fugitive Poets” (Bell’s), 122, 147 n., 195

Furetière, Antoine, 5

Gay, John, 33, 109

Gibbon, Edward, 198

Glanvill, Joseph, 7

Goldsmith, Oliver, 14-15, 20, 44-6, 72, 111-2, 140-1, 195

Archaism, on, 20

Compounds, in, 117-8

Diction of poetry, on, 15

Latinism, 72-3

Personifications, 141-2, 179

Stock diction, 44-6

Graeme, James, 122

Grainger, James, 70, 110, 142

“Grave,” the (Robert Blair’s), 110

Gray, Thomas, 8, 16-17, 18-19, 21-2, 31, 41-2, 67, 71-2, 93 n., 98-9, 117-20, 146, 155-9, 177, 196

Archaisms, on, 18-19, 98-9

Coinages, on, 21

Compounds, 117-20

Diction of poetry, on, 8, 16-17

“Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard,” 42, 72, 157, 159, 195, 198

Latinism, 71-2

Letters, 8 n., 16 n.

Personifications, 155-9, 177, 191

Plain colloquial style, 17, 195

Romantic forerunner, A, 150, 196

Stock diction, 41-2

Technical terms, on, 22

Grierson, H. J. C., 159 n.

“Grongar Hill,” 39, 109, 184, 188, 190

Hamilton, William (of Bangor), 146

Hill, G. B., 8 n., 15 n., 16 n., 23 n., 112 n., 151 n.

“Hind and Panther, The,” 195

“Horror, Ode to,” 148

Hughes, John, 83

Hume, David, 198

Hutchinson, T., 52 n., 68 n., 97 n., 132 n., 176 n.

“Hymn to May” (W. Thompson’s), 160

“Il Bellicoso,” 147

“Il Pacifico,” 147

“Il Penseroso,” 71, 176

“Inebriety,” 167

Jago, R., 122

Johnson, Dr., 15-16, 17, 19-20, 23, 31, 40-2, 44, 72-3, 111, 119, 140-1, 151, 159, 177, 179

Archaism, 19-20

Collins, on, 150, 151

Compounds, 111, 119-20

Diction, on, 15-16

“Dictionary,” 140 n.

Dryden, on, 8

Gray’s personifications, on, 156 n.

Latinism, 73

Personifications, 140-1, 177, 179

Pope’s style, on, 23, 31, 193

Satire, 139

Stock diction, 45

Jonson, Ben, 17-18

Keats, John, 126, 128, 129, 144, 187, 188, 192, 196, 203, 204

Ker, W. P., 7 n., 8 n., 9 n., 11 n., 18 n., 21 n.

Kersey, John, 97

“L’Allegro,” 162, 176

Langhorne, J., 122

Langland, William, 133

Latinism, 56-79, 191-2

Lee, Vernon, 197 n.

“Legacy of Greece, The,” 199

Legouis, E., 53 n., 127 n., 175 n.

Lessing’s “Laokoon,” 12 n.

Lloyd, Robert, 88 n.

“London” (Dr. Johnson’s), 111, 140-1

“Loves of the Plants” (E. Darwin’s), 12, 173

“Loves of the Triangles” (G. Canning’s), 173 n.

Lowes, Professor J. L., 200

“Lyrical Ballads,” 1, 2, 175

Lyttleton, G., 119

Maeterlinck, M., 200

Mallet, D., 110, 144 n., 142

Marlowe, Christopher, 105 n.

Marriott, Dr., 147

Mason, William, 86, 146-7

Masson, David, 58 n.

Mendez, Moses, 88, 122

Mickle, William, 93, 125, 162 n., 171 n.

Milton, John, 8, 33-6, 41, 57-8, 60, 61, 62, 66, 70, 71, 72, 76, 77, 81, 94, 107, 133, 136, 142, 146-7, 148, 149, 150, 176-7, 191-2

Archaism, 81, 94

Compound epithets, 105

Diction, 34-6, 57-8

Imitated in eighteenth century, 60-70, 76-7, 146-50, 191-2

Latinism, 57-8, 177

Personification, 133, 137, 142, 146-7, 176-7

“Monody written near Stratford-on-Avon,” 149 n.

Morel, Leon, 39 n., 63 n., 78 n., 91 n., 114 n., 145 n.

Murray, Gilbert, 199

Nashe, Thomas, 105 n.

Neo-classicism, 9-13, 53-4

“Night Thoughts” (E. Young’s), 28, 68-9, 136-8

“Nocturnal Reverie” (Countess of Winchilsea’s), 187

Old English Compounds, 104

“Ossian” poems, 19, 166

“Paradise Lost,” 34-6, 57-8, 76, 133, 136, 184

Parnell, Thomas, 135-6

“Passions, Ode to the,” 153

“Penshurst” (F. Coventry’s), 147

Percy, Bishop, 96-7

Personification and abstraction, 133-80, 190-1

Phelps, W. L., 142 n.

Philips, John, 37, 60-1, 86, 109, 142

“Pity, Ode to” (W. Collins’), 153

“Pleasures of the Imagination” (M. Akenside’s), 69, 138-9, 189

“Pleasures of Melancholy, The” (T. Warton’s), 71, 121

“Poetical Character, Ode on the” (W. Collins’s), 152

“Poetical Sketches” (W. Blake’s), 99, 167, 181

Pomfret, John, 195

Pope, Alexander, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21-2, 23-4, 25, 29, 31-4, 36-7, 40, 42, 45, 46, 48, 50, 54, 59-60, 67, 73, 81, 82-3, 85, 106-9, 111, 115, 130, 134, 135, 136, 139, 140, 183, 184, 185, 189, 193-4, 204

Archaism, 18, 82-3

Compounds, 21, 106-9

Diction, 33, 36-7

“Dunciad,” 18, 134

“Essay on Criticism,” 14, 29 n., 195

Heroic couplet, 29-30, 31-2

“Homer,” 2, 14, 17, 31-2, 40, 48, 184

Language of poetry, 9-10

Latinism, 59-60

Personifications, 134

Satire, 139, 140

Potter, R., 122

Prior, Matthew, 75, 87, 95, 195

“Progress of Error” (W. Cowper’s), 170

“Progress of Poetry” (Thomas Gray’s), 72

“Prolusions” (E. Capell’s), 95-6

Raleigh, Sir Walter, 35 n., 58 n., 66 n.

“Rape of the Lock,” 134

“Religio Laici,” 194

“Reliques of Ancient English Poetry,” 19, 96-7

Reynolds, Myra, 28 n., 61 n., 75 n.

Ritson, Joseph, 96 n.

Robertson, J. L., 6 n., 62

Rogers, Samuel, 125-6

Romanticism, connexion with classicism, 181-2

Rowley poems, 42-4, 97-8, 162-3

“Ruins of Rome” (J. Dyer’s), 109, 142

Ruskin, John, 180

Russell, A. J. B., 164 n.

Saintsbury, George, 29-30, 76 n., 106, 130, 131, 194 n.

Sampson, John, 47 n., 99 n., 165 n.

Savage, Richard, 75, 111, 136

Schmidt’s “Shakespeare Lexicon,” 35

“Schoolmistress, The,” 88-9, 161

Scott, John, 123

Scott, Sir Walter, 100, 192

“Seasons, The” (J. Thomson’s), 37-9, 62-8, 112-6, 142-6, 190, 196, 198

Selincourt, B. de, 35 n., 128 n.

Shakespeare, William, 35, 105 n., 129

Shawcross, T. (see “Biographia Literaria”).

Shelley, P. B., 126, 178, 203, 204

Shenstone, W., 26, 29, 75, 88-9, 118 n., 161

“Shorter Poems of the Eighteenth Century,” 195 n.

Sidney, Sir Philip, 105 n.

Skeat, W. W., 43 n., 97, 98 n., 102 n.

Smart, Christopher, 169 n.

Smith, Gregory, 14 n., 18 n., 56 n.

Somerville, William, 110, 142

“Song to David,” 169 n.

Spence, Joseph, 12

Spenser, Edmund, 80-1, 105 n., 133, 159-60, 191, 192

Spenserian imitations, 18, 84, 86-94, 160-2, 178, 191, 192

Spingarn, J. E., 5 n., 6 n., 7 n.

Sprat, Thomas, 6, 7

Stock diction, The, 25-55, 183-7

“Stones of Venice, The” (J. Ruskin’s), 180 n.

“Storie of William Canynge,” 163

“Sugar Cane, The,” 70, 110, 142

Sweet, Henry, 102 n., 103 n.

Swift, Jonathan, 139

Symbolism, 13, 164, 179, 180

Symons, Arthur, 47 n.

“Syr Martin,” 93, 125, 162 n.

“Table Talk” (S. T. Coleridge’s), 156 n.

“Table Talk” (W. Cowper’s), 49, 170

Taine, H., 183

“Task, The” (W. Cowper’s), 49, 73-4, 170-1

Theory of diction, 5-24

Thomson, James, 37-9, 62-8, 76, 77, 78, 90-2, 94, 112-6, 131, 142-6, 161, 167, 179, 186, 188

“Castle of Indolence,” 90-2, 161

Compounds, 112-6, 131

Diction generally, 37, 67

Latinism, 62-8, 78, 192

Miltonic borrowings, 37, 66

Nature poet, a, 37, 78, 186

Personifications, 142-6, 161, 166, 178-9

Romantic forerunner, a, 196

“Seasons, The,” 37-9, 62-8, 112-6, 142-6, 190, 195, 196, 198

Stock diction, 37-8

Thompson, W., 61-2, 85, 89-90, 118 n.

“Tintern Abbey, Lines written above,” 131

“Traveller, The” (O. Goldsmith’s), 45, 72, 112, 141

Trenery, Grace R., 95 n.

“Triumph of Isis,” 149 n.

Tyrwhitt, Thomas, 86, 98 n.

Upton, John, 93 n.

“Vacation, The,” 147

“Vale Abbey, Lines written at” (T. Warton’s), 149

“Valetudinarian, The,” 147

“Vanity of Human Wishes,” 73, 111, 140-1, 195

“Village, The” (G. Crabbe’s), 167, 168, 195

“Vision of Patience” (S. Boyce’s), 162

“Vision of Solomon” (W. Whitehead’s), 162

Wakefield, Benjamin, 95 n.

Waller, Edmund, 15

Walpole, Horace, 119, 156 n.

“Wanderer, The” (R. Savage’s), 111, 136

Ward, A. W., 204 n.

Warton, Joseph, 21, 70-1, 121, 134, 148-9

Warton, Thomas, 71, 83, 84, 85, 86, 120-1, 149

Watson, George, 100 n.

Watts, Isaac, 49

Welsted, Leonard, 59 n.

Wesley, John, 49, 50, 198

Wesley, Charles, 49

West, Gilbert, 118 n.

White, Gilbert (of Selborne), 28

White, H. O., 148 n.

Whitehead, W., 20 n., 122, 162

Williams, I. O., 195 n.

Wilson, Sir James, 100 n.

Winchilsea, Anne, Countess of, 61, 109, 187-8

“Windsor Forest,” 134

Wordsworth, William, 1, 3, 13, 15, 24, 25, 27 n., 28, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 48, 51-3, 67, 68, 77, 79, 97, 115, 132, 175, 182, 185, 187, 189, 192, 193, 197, 201, 204

Archaism, 100

Compounds, 127

Darwin’s (Erasmus) influence, 52-4, 175

Latinism, 79, 192

Percy’s “Reliques,” on, 97

Personifications, 133, 175-6, 178, 180

Pope’s style, on, 24

“Prefaces,” 1, 53, 132, 182, 197, 204

“Prelude, The,” 184-5

Wyche, Sir Peter, 7

“Yardley Oak” (W. Cowper’s), 131, 172

Yeats, W. B., 164 n.

Young, Edward, 9 n., 28, 68-9, 136-8, 151

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · A brief summary, which is here utilized, is given by Spingarn, “Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century,” I, Intro. xxxvi, foll. (Oxford,Note 2 · Vide Spingarn, op. cit., Intro. XXXVI-XLVIII; and also Robertson, “Studies in the Genesis of Romantic Theory in the XVIIIth Century” (CambriNote 3 · Spingarn, op. cit., II, p. 118.Note 6 · “Apology for Heroic Poetry”: “Essays of John Dryden,” ed. W. P. Ker (1909), Vol. I, p. 190.Note 8 · “Lives”: Dryden, ed. G. B. Hill (1905), Vol. I, p. 420; and cp. Goldsmith, “Poetry Distinguished from other Writing” (Miscellaneous Works), Note 9 · “Letters” (To R. West), 1742, ed. Tovey (1900); Vol. II, pp. 97-8.Note 10 · Ker, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 17-8.Note 12 · Ker, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 234.Note 13 · Edward Young, the author of “Night Thoughts,” was later to express this tersely enough: “Words tarnished, by passing through the mouths of tNote 14 · Pope’s Works, ed. Courthope and Elwin: “Life,” Vol. V, p. 69.Note 15 · That is to say, as Mr. John Drinkwater has recently put it, it was “the common language, but raised above the common pitch, of the coffee-hoNote 16 · Vide Elton, “The Augustan Ages,” 1889, pp. 419 foll.Note 18 · John Dennis, of course, at the beginning of the century, is to be found pleading that “passion is the chief thing in poetry,” (“The AdvancemNote 19 · “A Parallel of Poetry and Painting,” ed. Ker, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 147.Note 21 · Lessing’s “Laokoon,” which appeared in 1766, may in this, as in other connexions, be regarded as the first great Romantic manifesto. The limNote 23 · “Biographia Literaria,” Chap. XXII.Note 25 · Vide especially Babbitt, “The New Laocoon, An Essay on the Confusion of the Arts” (1910), to which these paragraphs are indebted; and for a Note 26 · Vide “Elizabethan Critical Essays,” ed. Gregory Smith, Vol. I, Intro. (Oxford, 1904).Note 30 · “Lives,” Hill, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 420.Note 32 · Cp. Boswell’s “Life” (1851 edition), Vol. I, p. 277: “He enlarged very convincingly upon the excellence of rhyme over blank verse in EnglishNote 33 · “Lives,” ed. Hill, op. cit., Vol. III, pp. 416 foll.Note 35 · This is of course exemplified in his own poetic practice, and it has been held sufficient to explain the oft-debated scantiness of his literNote 36 · Cp. Courthope, “History of English Poetry,” Vol. V, pp. 218 foll.Note 37 · Vide “Elizabethan Critical Essays,” op. cit., Intro., pp. LV-LX.Note 38 · Preface to the “Fables,” Ker, op. cit., Vol. II, pp. 266-67.Note 43 · “Lines written in Imitation of Certain Poems Published in 1777”; and cp. William Whitehead’s “Charge to the Poets” (1762), which may be takeNote 46 · Letter to Lady Hesketh, March 22, 1790 (“Correspondence of William Cowper—Arranged in Chronological Order by T. Wright,” 4 vols., 1904).—VolNote 51 · “Dedication of the Æneis,” Ker, op. cit., Vol. II, pp. 154, foll.; cp. Addison, “Spectator,” 297, January 9, 1712.Note 53 · “Lives of the Poets. Pope,” ed. Birbeck Hill, Vol. III, p. 251.Note 57 · “Biographia Literaria,” ed. Shawcross (1907), p. 26, Note; cp. also Southey, “Works of Cowper” (1884 edition), Vol. I, p. 313.Note 2 · Wordsworth himself of course stigmatized the “hubbub of words” which was often the only result of these eighteenth century attempts to parapNote 3 · For a detailed description of the stock diction of English “Classical” poetry, see especially Myra Reynolds, “Nature in English Poetry from Note 4 · “Essay on Criticism,” I, l. 350 foll.Note 11 · But, as de Selincourt points out in “Poems of John Keats” (1905, Appendix C, p. 580), it is only the excessive and unnatural use of these adNote 12 · Especially in the case of compound epithets. Cf. Earle, “Philology of the English Tongue,” p. 601, for examples from the works of the poets Note 13 · But compare “Milton,” by Walter Raleigh (p. 249), where it is justly pointed out that not a few of these circuitous phrases are justified byNote 17 · For a detailed study of Thomson’s diction, see especially Leon Morel, “James Thomson. Sa Vie et Ses Œuvres” (Paris, 1895), Chap. IV, pp. 412Note 19 · Vide “The Poems of Chatterton, with an Essay on the Rowley Poems,” by W. W. Skeat (1871).Note 21 · “A Paladin of Philanthropy” (1899), p. 59 (quoted by Courthope, “History English Poetry,” V, 216).Note 23 · Arthur Symons, “William Blake” (1907), p. 39.Note 24 · To Mrs. Butts: “Poetical Works,” ed. Sampson (Oxford, 1914), p. 187.Note 25 · “Biographia Literaria,” ed. Shawcross, p. 16. (Oxford, 1907.)Note 26 · Cf. “Letters,” to Samuel Rose, December 13, 1787: “Correspondence” arranged by W. Wright (1904), Vol. III, p. 190. To C. Rowley, February 21Note 28 · Vide Courthope, op. cit., Book V, Ch. XI; and cp. the confident and just claims put forward by John Wesley himself on behalf of the languageNote 29 · Cf. Coleridge “Biographia Literaria,” ed. Shawcross, op. cit., p. 11.Note 31 · In both the first and the final forms “Poetical Works,” ed. Hutchinson (Oxford, 1916) Appendix, pp. 592 foll.Note 32 · For a detailed account see E. Legouis, “La Jeunesse de Wordsworth” (English translation, 1897; Revised edition, 1921).Note 1 · Vide “Elizabethan Critical Essays,” ed. Smith, Vol. I, Intro., pp. lv foll.Note 3 · E.g. by Courthope, “History of English Poetry” (1910), Vol. III, p. 339, where a list is given (“only a few of the examples”) of Milton’s “cNote 5 · Cf.“Milton,” by Walter Raleigh (1915), pp. 247 foll.Note 6 · Vide Masson, “Milton’s Poetical Works,” Vol. III, pp. 77-78 (1890-).Note 8 · That it could easily become absurd was not unperceived in the eighteenth century. Vide Leonard Welsted: “Epistle to Mr. Pope,” May, 1730 (“WNote 9 · Vide “Poems of Anne, Countess of Winchilsea,” ed. Myra Reynolds, pp. 210-213 (Chicago, 1903).Note 13 · Cp. Morel, op. cit., pp. 419-424.Note 18 · Cp. “Milton,” Raleigh, op. cit., pp. 252-3.Note 21 · In the “Essay Supplementary to the Preface,” Hutchinson, op. cit., p. 949.Note 27 · Apparently after he had done some pruning amongst them (vide “Letter” to Joseph Hill, March 29, 1793, Wright, op. cit., Vol. IV, p. 390), anNote 28 · For an account of the parallelism between certain of the eighteenth century stock epithets and various words and phrases from the Latin poetNote 30 · Cp. Saintsbury, “History of Literary Criticism” (1900-1904), Vol. II, p. 479, note 1.Note 32 · Cp. also Morel, op. cit., pp. 423-424.Note 16 · E.g. Robert Lloyd, 1733-1764, in his “Progress of Envy” (Anderson, Vol. V), defines wimpled as “hung down”; “The Squire of Dames,” by Moses Note 23 · There are at least forty stanzas in the First Canto, without a single archaic form, and an equal proportion in Canto Two: Cf. Morel, op. citNote 26 · Among the last examples was Beattie’s “Minstrel” (1771-74), which occasioned some of Gray’s dicta on the use of archaic and obsolete words.Note 27 · Spenserian “forgeries” had also made their appearance as early as in 1713, when Samuel Croxall had attempted to pass off two Cantos as the oNote 28 · See Phelps, op. cit., Chap. VIII, and Grace R. Trenery, “Ballad Collections of the Eighteenth Century,” “Modern Language Review,” July, 1915Note 29 · Vide “Preface to A Collection of Old Ballads,” 3 vols. (1723-52), and cf. Benjamin Wakefield’s “Warbling Muses” (1749), Preface.Note 30 · Yet thirty years later the collections of Joseph Ritson, the last and best of the eighteenth century editors, failed to win acceptance. His Note 32 · Vide Henry A. Beers, “A History of English Romanticism in the Eighteenth Century,” 1899, Chap. VIII, pp. 298-302.Note 33 · Hutchinson, op. cit., p. 950.Note 34 · “Chatterton—Poetical Works,” with an Essay on the Rowley Poems, by W. W. Skeat, and a memoir by Bell (2 vols., 1871-1875); and vide TyrwhittNote 35 · Vide Oswald Doughty, “English Lyric in the Age of Reason” (1922), p. 251.Note 36 · Vide John Sampson, “The Poetical Works of William Blake” (Oxford, 1905), Preface, viii.Note 38 · Vide “The Dialect of Robert Burns,” by Sir James Wilson (Oxford Press, 1923), and for happy instances of beautiful words still lingering on Note 1 · Sweet, “New English Grammar” (1892), Part II, pp. 208-212, and Skeat, “Principles of English Etymology” (1887), Part I, pp. 418-420.Note 3 · Cp. Sweet, op. cit., p. 449.Note 4 · In the “Beowulf” there are twenty-three compounds meaning “Ocean,” twelve meaning “Ship,” and eighteen meaning “Sword” (vide Emerson, “OutliNote 6 · Cp. Sidney’s remarks in the “Defence of Poesie—Elizabethan Critical Essays,” ed. Smith, Vol. I, p. 204.Note 7 · E.g. Spenser’s “sea-shouldering whales” (an epithet that especially pleased Keats), Nashe’s “sky-bred chirpers,” Marlowe’s “gold-fingered InNote 13 · “Lives” ed. Hill, op. cit., Vol. III, p. 298.Note 14 · Vide Leon Morel, op. cit., Ch. IV, pp. 412 foll., for a detailed examination of Thomson’s compound formations.Note 16 · “Works,” op. cit., Vol. IV, p. 203. In point of fact, there is little or no evidence in favour of it. Even the Spenserian imitations that flNote 30 · Vide Legouis, op. cit. (English translation, 1897), pp. 133 foll.Note 31 · Shawcross, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 2, Note.Note 32 · See, e.g., de Selincourt’s remarks on Keats’ compound epithets; “Poems” (1904), Appendix C, p. 581.Note 33 · “Biog. Lit.,” op. cit., and cp. “Poetical Works,” ed. Dykes Campbell, Appendix K, p. 540.Note 1 · Prefaces, “Poetical Works,” ed. Hutchinson (Oxford, 1916), p. 936.Note 2 · Vide Courthope, “History of English Poetry” (1910), Vol. I, Chap. IX, for an account of mediaeval allegory and personification.Note 5 · Elton, “The Augustan Ages” (1895), p. 209.Note 8 · Especially in Book III of “The Duellist,” where the reader is baffled and wearied by the unending array of bloodless abstractions.Note 9 · It may be noted incidentally that, according to the “New English Dictionary,” the term personification owes its first literary appearance toNote 10 · Phelps, op. cit., pp. 37-38.Note 11 · “Letter” to Mallet, August 11, 1726: “I thank you heartily for your hint about personizing of Inspiration: it strikes me.”Note 13 · For some happy instances of its use in English poetry, as well as for a detailed account of Thomson’s use of personification, see especiallyNote 20 · Vide also Bell’s “Fugitive Poetry” (1791). Vol. XI, where there is a section devoted to “Poems in the manner of Milton.”Note 22 · At the same time there appeared a similar volume of the Odes of William Collins, “Odes on Several Descriptive and Allegoric Subjects,” the oNote 23 · Cf. “Pope’s Works,” ed. Courthope and Elwin, Vol. V, p. 365.Note 24 · Vide also “The Triumph of Isis” (1749), and “The Monody written near Stratford-on-Avon.” (“Poets of Great Britain,” 1794, Vol. XI, pp. 1061-Note 27 · “Lives,” ed. G. Birkbeck Hill, Vol. III, p. 341.Note 30 · “Biographia Literaria” (ed. Shawcross, 1907), p. 12; cf. also “Table Talk” (October 23, 1833), ed. H. N. Coleridge (1858), p. 340. “Gray’s pNote 31 · Two of Gray’s mechanical figures were marked down for special censure by Dr. Johnson (“Lives,” Gray, ed. Birbeck Hill, Vol. III, p. 440), whNote 33 · In this connexion mention may be made of “William Blake’s Designs for Gray’s Poems,” recently published for the first time with a valuable iNote 35 · Cp. also the detailed personification of “Thrift,” given by Mickle in his “Syr Martyn” (1787).—“Poets of Great Britain” (1794), Vol. XI, p. Note 37 · “Works” ed. Ellis and Yeats, Vol. I, Pref., x.Note 38 · July 6, 1803, “Letters,” ed. A. G. B. Russell (1906), p. 121.Note 39 · In the parallel verses of “The Songs of Experience” the human attributes are attributed respectively to Cruelty, Jealousy, Terror, and SecreNote 40 · “Poetical Works,” ed. John Sampson (Oxford), 1914, p. 187.Note 43 · A similar type of abstraction is found here and there in the stanzas of the “Song to David” (1763), e.g.: ’Twas then his thoughts self-conquNote 44 · Cf. “Poems of William Cowper,” ed. J. C. Bailey (1905), Intro., p. xl.Note 45 · There are faint personifications of the other seasons in Book III, ll. 427 foll., but none perhaps as effective as William Mickle had alreadNote 47 · “Letters,” edited E. Coleridge, 1895, p. 215.Note 48 · “Biographia Literaria,” Chap. I.Note 49 · The ridicule was crystallized in Canning’s famous parody, “The Loves of the Triangles,” which appeared in “The Anti-Jacobin,” Nos. 23, 24 anNote 51 · For details see Legouis, op. cit.Note 52 · Both the original and the final versions of the “Evening Walk” and the “Descriptive Sketches” are given by Hutchinson, op. cit., Appendix, pNote 53 · But the artistic possibilities of Personification were not unrecognized by writers and critics in the eighteenth century. Vide Blair’s lectuNote 54 · “The Stones of Venice” (1851), Vol. II, Chap. VIII, pp. 312 foll.—The Ducal Palace, “Personification is, in some sort, the reverse of symbolNote 1 · For an illuminating analysis, see Elton, “A Survey of English Literature,” 1780-1830 (1912), pp. 1-29.Note 3 · Cf. Coleridge’s remarks in “Biographia Literaria,” ed. Shawcross, Chap. I (Oxford, 1907).Note 4 · Elton, “The Augustan Ages” (1895), p. 211.Note 6 · Hutchinson, op. cit., p. 948.Note 8 · Cf. “Works” (1889), ed. Courthope and Elwin, Vol. V., p. 360-364.Note 9 · George Saintsbury, “Eighteenth Century Poetry” (“The London Mercury,” December, 1919, pp. 155-163); an article in which a great authority onNote 10 · The best of them have been garnered by Mr. Iola A. Williams into a little volume, “By-ways Round Helicon” (London, 1922), where the interestNote 11 · The fountain head of all such studies is, of course, the “Biographia Literaria,” for which see especially Shawcross’s edition, 1907, Vol. IINote 12 · Elton, “Survey of English Literature” (1780-1830), Vol. II, pp. 88 foll.Note 15 · “Convention and Revolt in Poetry” (London, 1921), p. 13.Note 16 · Just as this book was about to go to press, there appeared “The Theory of Poetry,” by Professor Lascelles Abercrombie, in which a poet and cNote 18 · O. Barfield, “Form in Poetry” (“New Statesman” August 7, 1920, pp. 501-2).Note 19 · “Œuvres” (ed. Assézat), I, p. 377 (quoted by Babbitt), op. cit., p. 121.Note 20 · Preface to “The Tales” (Poems), ed. A. W. Ward, (Cambridge, 1906), Vol. II, p. 10.
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings