← Table of contents
Mediæval London, Volume 1

Part 2 — CHAPTER XIV CHRISTIAN NAMES AND SURNAMES

Reading edition

The best method of treatment as regards the Christian names borne by the people during this period is to give a list of the more common names. Now there is a list ready to hand giving the names—Christian and surname—of Cade’s Kentish followers. The whole number of men on the list amounts to 1719. I have gone through the list and transcribed the Christian names. The following is the result, classified according to frequency. The names present themselves to us rather unexpectedly. Thus, we have them as follows:—

John 546 Andrew ┐ each 2

William 277 Benedict │

Thomas 233 Augustine ├

Richard 196 Salmon │

Robert 115 Herman ┘

Henry 53

Nicolas and Stephen each 37

Alexander ┐ each 1

Alexius │

Roger 33 Christopher │

Simon 22 David │

Laurence 21 Gerard │

Peter and Walter each 17 Marcus │

Lodowik │

James 15 Vincentius ├

Ralph 12 Valentine │

Hugh 8 Goodman │

Adam 7 Gilbert │

Philip 6 Daniel │

Alan ┐ each 5 Waldus │

Elias │ Clement │

Dionysius ├ Sampson ┘

George │

Galfrid │

Hamo ┘

Guy ┐ each 3

Bernard │

Bartholomew ├

Michael ┘

It will be seen that there are only forty-eight names in all. One-third of the men are named John, one-sixth William, one-seventh Thomas, one-eighth Richard, one-fifteenth Robert, one-thirtieth Henry; and that more than thirty out of the forty-eight names are used less than six times each. Two-thirds of the people are called either John, William, Thomas, Richard, or Robert. And all the Saxon names except one are clean gone and forgotten. Not one Alfred, Edward, Ethelred among them all.

Here, again, is another list containing the names of 130 men. They come out in the following order:—

John 34 Henry 8 Nicholas 4

William 17 Roger 5 Walter 3

Thomas 15 Adam 5 Alexander 2

Richard 10 Stephen 3 Simon 2

Robert 8 Geoffrey 3

And once:—Laurence, James, Peter, Godfrey, Alan, Giles, Gilbert, Andrew, Raynard.

Here, too, Saxon names have gone quite out of use. Among the names of women we find Johanna or Joan very common. Also frequently met with are the names of Isabel, Matilda, Alison, Lucy, Petronilla (Parnel), Agnes, Idonia, Avica, Elecota, Richolda, Ecota, Claricia, Arabella, Theophania (Tiffany), Massanda, Desiderata, Fynea, Massilia, Auncelia, Godiyeva.

As regards the women’s names, I have taken them from the Calendar of Wills and arranged them in alphabetical order. It will be observed that though Saxon Christian names have entirely died out among men, many are preserved among women. It will also be observed that many beautiful names have been lost to us, though they might very well be revived. In spelling there are varieties, of which a few are here marked:—

┌ Adrey ┌ Collecta ┌ Helen Mary

└ Awdrey │ Collet └ Helyn Massia

└ Coletta Heliwysa Massilia

┌ Agata Constance Hester Matilda

└ Agatha Creyna Hilda ┌ Maudelyn

Agnes Cristina Hodierna └ Mawdlyne

Alana Custance Mawde

Albreda Ibbota Mazerb

Albrica Denys Ida Melina

Alditha ┌ Deonisia Idania Milicent

Aleisia └ Dionisia Idonea Milsenda

Alianora Diamanda Imania Muriel

Alice Dorkes Isabella

Alielma Dulce ┌ Isolda Olive

Allesia └ Isoude Orabilia

Alusia Earilda Izan Osey

Alveva ┌ Edith

Amabillia Edyth Jacobina Pavya

┌ Amia Egidia Jacomine ┌ Pernella

└ Amy Edelena Jane └ Petronilla

Eleanora Jenet Philippa

┌ Amisia Elena ┌ Joane

└ Amicia Elicia └ Johan ┌ Rayna

Anabilla Elizabeth ┌ Johanetta └ Reyna

Anebla ┌ Em └ Johanna Rebecca

Anastasia └ Emma Joyce Richolda

Anna Emota ┌ Jouette Roberga

Anneys Ermina └ Juetta ┌ Roesia

┌ Anselina Erneburga Juliana │ Roisia

└ Auncelina Essabella Julyan └ Roysia

Argentilla Estrilda Judith ┌ Rosa

Athelene Etheldreda └ Rose

Auncilla Eustachia Kastanya Rosamund

Auncillia Eve Katherine

Aundryna ┌ Sabina

Avelina Felicia Laurencia └ Sabine

Avice Filiat ┌ Lecia Sallerna

Florence │ Liecia Sandrissa

Barbara Floria └ Letia Sarah

Basilia Floricia Leticia Scolastica

┌ Beatrice Frechesaunchi Lenota Senicla

└ Beatrix Fridiswida Loraa Secilia

Bersabe Frances Loreta Sibil

Blanche Lucebetta Sita

Bona Gena Luceky Suzanna

Boneioya Gencelina Lucy Susan

Bridgett Gennora Luma Swanilda

Goda Lydia

Cassandra Godeleva Thomasina

Castania Gonilda Mabel Thomasyn

┌ Cecilley Grace Magota ┌ Thypphanya

└ Cecilia Grecia Margery │ Tyffaniaa

Charity Gunnilda Margaret └ Theophani

Chera Gunnora ┌ Marion

Cisceley └ Mariona Willelma

Clarice ┌ Hanna ┌ Marsilia Wynmarka

Claricia └ Hawisia └ Massilia Wyleholta

Clemence Hawysa Martha

I have also drawn up a list of surnames belonging to London citizens in the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries. Such a list very properly belongs to the history of London. It may be analysed by any who desire to investigate the origins of names. For the purpose of this work, I have found it to be sufficient to take the analysis made by Riley for his Memorials of London and London Life. It is in substance as follows:—

1. The surname of the native country, William Waleys—“the Welshman”; Walter Noreys—“the Norwegian”; John Frauncis—“the Frenchman.”

2. The surname of the native town—Riley found nearly every town and village of England represented in the London names.

3. The surname taken from the position of the man’s residence, as Hugh de Stone Crouche—Hugh near the Stone Cross of Cheapside; John atte Strond—in the Strand; Ralph de Honeylane.

4. From the sign of a house. Hence the class of names such as Gander, Buck, Hind, etc.

5. From the trade of the man or that of his father or his ancestor. All such names as Brewer, Baker, Smith, etc., belong to this class. The name of Chaucer (shoemaker) came to the poet from his grandfather presumably, as his father was not a shoemaker.

6. From a nickname, descriptive or sobriquet. Among these Riley enumerates Bon Valet, Godgrom (good groom), Cache marke (Hide halfpenny), Piggesfleshe, Brokedishei, Black in the Mouth, Weathercock, Spillwyne, Gollylolly.

The learned editor of the Memorials very justly argues that at that time most men had no need of a surname. If a man were poor he would never have to sign any document at all during the whole of his life. If he were a servant or a craftsman, a Christian name would be quite enough for him; as, at the present day, we may have servants in the house without knowing their surnames at all; and among the better sort a Christian name with something to distinguish the holder from others with the same Christian name would be quite enough.

By the fourteenth century the old names of the ancient City families have quite died out. These were Algar, Hacon, Thovy, Lotering, Bukerel, Aswy, Basing, Anketill, Blount, Batte, Frowyk, Hervy, Vyel, Harvell, Aleyne, Hardel, and others. Some of these families became extinct; some withdrew into the country; some, perhaps, lost their wealth and sank down into the mass of the people.

As an illustration of these divisions, let us take a string of names consecutively from the Index to the Calendar of Wills, part i. (1288-1358):— Furnell

Fulbert Fynchyngfeld Garscherche

Fulham Fyngrie Garthorp

Fulke Garton

Fuller Gaitone Gatesdene

Fulsham Galeys Gaugeour

Funder Galocher Gaunt

Furbur Gamelyn Gaunter

Furmager Ganter Gautroun

Furnyval Garchorp Gedlestone

Fusedame Garderobe Geffrei

Fustor Gardiner Gene

Fynch Garlaun Gentil

Fyneham Garlecmonger Gentilman

Of these names—thirty-nine in all—fourteen belong to trades, fifteen belong to places, three express a qualification or condition, three are Christian names, the name Gamelyn suggests Chaucer’s Cook’s Tale of Gamelyn. In another place this occurs as a Christian name. Furnival reminds us that as early as the reign of Henry IV. the Inn once belonged to the Lords Furnival and their town house had become an Inn of Chancery. The name of Fynch appears from Riley’s Memorials, p. 229, to have belonged to Winchelsea; the Galocher was a maker of galoches, which were shoes with wooden soles; the name of Gene may have referred to Genoa; Fusedame and Gautroun are beyond me. (See also Appendix IX.)

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings