8. Genus—CORONULA. Pl. 15, 16.

8. Genus—CORONULA. Pl. 15, 16.

CORONULA. Lamarck. Annales du Museum, tom. 1 (1802).

DIADEMA. Schumacher. Essai d’un Nouveau Syst., &c., 1817.

CETOPIRUS (SED NON CORONULA). Ranzani. Memoire di Storia Naturale (1820).

POLYLEPAS. J. E. Gray, (Klein). Annals of Philosophy, (new series), vol. 10, 1825.

Compartments six, of equal sizes: walls thin, deeply folded, with the folds forming cavities, open only on the under side of the shell: opercular valves much smaller than the orifice of the shell.

Distribution, mundane, imbedded in Cetacea.

This genus and the three following, namely, Platylepas, Tubicinella, and Xenobalanus, have very considerable claims to be separated as a sub-family, as has been proposed by Drs. Leach and Gray. Although in structure and habits they are certainly closely related together; yet only few characters can be predicated of all four in common,—some characters failing in one genus and some in another. All four, however, differ from the foregoing genera in the opercular valves not being articulated together, being simply united by tough horny membrane; but Chelonobia makes some approach in this respect. All four have the branchiæ composed of a double fold; but this can hardly be considered a character of much weight, as may be inferred from the remarks made on this subject at p. 153 of the Introduction, where the differences of these four genera from the other genera of the family are discussed at some length. Altogether I have been led to conclude, though with much hesitation, that these genera had better not be separated as the sub-family of Coronulinæ.

Our present genus, Coronula, is closely related to Platylepas, and likewise to Xenobalanus, though this latter genus is so very different in external aspect that it might easily be mistaken for a pedunculated Cirripede. Lamarck and some other authors have placed the species of Chelonobia under Coronula, but this has arisen, as explained under that genus, from a misapprehension of their structure; the folded very thin walls in Coronula having been compared with the radiating septa of the very thick walls in Chelonobia. I may further add, that Coronula has been divided into two genera by Ranzani, on palpably insufficient grounds.

General Appearance.—The three recent species of this genus have a very handsome and striking appearance. The shell is highly symmetrical, owing to the six compartments being of the same size and having exactly the same outline. The general shape is either depressed or, as expressed by the name, like a crown. The walls are longitudinally and slightly ribbed, owing, as we shall presently see, to their wonderfully folded structure; and the surface is marked by very fine longitudinal striæ, crossed by finely beaded lines of growth. Hence the walls offer a strong contrast in appearance with the six, smooth radii, of equal breadth. The symmetrically hexagonal, or rounded-hexagonal orifice of the shell is closed by a thick, nearly horizontal membrane, supporting, towards the rostral end, the small opercular valves, with a slit, having protuberant lips, in the middle, for the protrusion of the cirri. The opercular membrane is attached all round, but a short distance beneath the summit of the shell. In regard to size, I have seen a specimen of C. diadema two inches in height and two and a half in diameter.

Structure of the Shell.—The structure at first appears singularly complicated, and quite unlike that of any other Cirripede; but the whole results simply from the folding of the very thin walls, which in all essential respects are constructed like those in Balanus. In a young specimen of C. balænaris, having the orifice of the shell 2/10ths of an inch in diameter, I found the upper part of each compartment only slightly sinuous, not more so than is common in many varieties of Balanus, but more symmetrical, for each compartment had three slight furrows, making, for the whole shell, eighteen furrows. The ensuing changes during the growth of the shell will be best understood by looking at the diagrams a, b, c, in fig. 10, Pl. 15, which are supposed to represent the basal margins of the walls of a single compartment: (a) shows the simply sinuous wall of the young shell. As the shell grows, the furrows rapidly grow deeper and deeper (b), and wider and wider; at the same time, the folds or ridges between the furrows gradually become drawn out at their ends into transverse loops (c), the extremities of which ultimately become closely pressed together—the furrows being thus converted into cavities, extending from the top to the base of the compartments. This structure in the mature shell will be best understood by looking at the transverse or horizontal section (Pl. 16, fig. 7) of the rostral end of the shell of C. diadema, in which species the folding of the walls is simpler than in C. balænaris or C. reginæ: the walls (e) are represented by a double line connected by little cross lines,—(h) being one of the transverse loops at the outer end of one of the folds, and (f′) one of the cavities between the folded walls, open at the bottom of the shell, and occupied by the epidermis of the Whale. The walls of the compartments, as here represented, (A being the rostrum, C C the lateral compartments, D D the alæ of the carino-lateral compartments,) are separated from each other by the broad radii; but if the section had been taken low down near the basis, the end of the folded wall of one compartment would have been separated from that of the adjoining compartment only by the close suture: this will be understood by a glance at the entire shell, given in fig. 3, Pl. 15. The rostrum of the same species, viewed from the inside, is shown at fig. 1, Pl. 16; here it may be observed, that the basal margin (e e′ e′′) of the folded wall is extremely oblique, the outer portion having extended downwards much more than the inner portion: this obliquity is more clearly shown in the lateral view (fig. 2) of a lateral compartment, for this figure will equally well serve for a lateral view of the rostrum (fig. 1), if the ala (a′) be supposed to be removed. The section of the rostrum in fig. 7, (A), will now be intelligible in relation to the view of the rostrum given in fig. 1, if it be borne in mind that the section has been taken high up, near the letters a, b, c′′ in fig. 1.

As above stated, the folds or ridges in the young shell become more and more transversely drawn out at their ends into the transverse loops, till the latter join and touch each other. In C. balænaris the lines of junction are simple, though very close; in the other species, the ends of the transverse loops, where touching, are finely and elegantly toothed, and thus locked together. These teeth appear single when the shell is viewed either externally or internally, but when the walls along the lines of junction are forced apart, they are seen really to consist of transverse rows of minute teeth. These teeth are less distinct, forming only sinuous ridges in C. barbara (fig. 6, Pl. 15); in all cases the teeth are formed by the modification of the very minute beads, which ornament the lines of growth on the external surface of the shell. In the rostrum of C. diadema, as seen internally (fig. 1, Pl. 16), the serrated and closely-fitting lines of junction (f) between the ends of the transverse loops of the folded walls are plainly shown. It is the more or less rounded surfaces of the transverse loops which give to the external surface of the parietes its longitudinally ribbed structure: the ribs are plainest in C. diadema, fig. 3, Pl. 15. The shell, in fact, as seen externally, consists of but an extremely small portion of the external surface of the whole length of wall, being exclusively formed of the transversely looped ends of the radiating folds, together with the radii. Owing to the ends of the transverse loops being so closely pressed together, the furrows are practically converted (as already remarked) into cavities, open only on the under side of the shell, and extending from the oblique bases of the compartments up to their apices; and these are invariably filled by the black epidermis of the Whale. Owing to this circumstance, the skin of the Whale has been mistaken by some authors for parts of the Cirripede! In C. diadema, in which the summit of the shell is often a little disintegrated, the whale’s skin is often there exposed, forming three black spots at the top of each compartment. It should always be remembered that these flattened and deep cavities are furrows, which homologically ought to be open in longitudinal lines along the external surface of the shell, from the top to the bottom.

As the shell increases in diameter, each of the original eighteen transverse loops, forming the exterior surface of the shell, increases in breadth; and they would have had to increase extremely, had not some of the transverse loops become, during growth, divided into two or three new transverse loops, in a manner strictly analogous with the first formation of the eighteen folds in the young shell. In Pl. 15, fig. 7, 8, 9, we see how one of the circumferential transverse loops, by the formation of a medial furrow, or rather bay, becomes developed into two transverse loops; and it is rather important to observe that three new loops might equally well have been contemporaneously formed. By the repeated formation of new circumferential loops and the consequent formation of new folds, the wall of the shell, when old, especially in C. balænaris, becomes folded in a wonderfully complicated manner, as may be seen in Pl. 15, fig. 5, which is an exact tracing of the extreme basal edge of the wall of a shell of C. balænaris; to perceive the full amount of complication, it is advisable to trace the wall of any one of the compartments, from one suture (s) to another. In this figure the sutures are purposely drawn a little open. It may be seen that the new transverse loops, and consequently the new folds of the walls, have been, in this species, mostly formed in symmetrical order, on both sides of the six sutures; this results from the transverse loops on the sutures almost always giving rise contemporaneously to three new transverse loops. In C. diadema the transverse loops on the sutures usually divide into only two new loops, one on the rostral side and one still remaining at the suture; hence the folding of the walls in this species is much less symmetrical. The number, however, of the transverse loops and the exact pattern of the folding is variable in all four species of the genus. I may further add, to show the complication of the folds, that in a shell of C. balænaris, having a basal diameter of two inches, and which had the walls as little folded as ever they are, yet I found, by careful measurement, that the entire basal edge of the wall, if stretched straight, would have extended for a length of fifty-two inches! Therefore, if the wall had not been folded, but had been simply circular, as in ordinary cirripedes, the basal diameter of the specimen would have been between sixteen and seventeen inches!

The central membranous basis is flat, but the bottom of the folded walls of the shell is concave, which is caused by the outer ends of the folded walls having grown at a greater rate than the inner ends. The concavity is deep in C. diadema; in C. balænaris it is much less so, and here the inner hood-like ends of the folded walls are rather abruptly, but in a variable degree, produced downwards, generally even slightly beneath the level of the circumference of the shell; this fact is of interest in relation to the peculiar, depending, spur-like processes in the genus Platylepas. A lateral view of a compartment in both these species, is given in Pl. 16, figs. 2 and 3; and by supposing in each case a compartment to stand opposite, at a distance which may be judged of from fig. 5, the vertical sectional outline of the whole shell will be understood: in fig. 3 of C. balænaris, however, the inner hood-like ends of the folded walls are not produced so much downwards as is usual.

In the same manner, as the outside of the shell consists of the transversely expanded ends of the folded walls, pressed closely together, so the cavity in which the animal’s body is lodged, is formed by the inner and less closely joined ends of the folds, lined by the thick sheath (a, fig. 1 and 7, Pl. 16), which latter extends down very near to the basal membrane. The cavity for the body, is small compared to the whole shell; in C. diadema it is deeply cup-formed, with a small, flat, membranous bottom or basis; in C. balænaris it is wider and shallower, with a broader bottom, and with the upper edges of the walls more inflected. In both species, the thick membrane connecting the opercular valves to the shell, is attached all round near the summit of the sheath. The uppermost portion of the sheath is not marked by concentric lines, as in most of the Balanidæ, owing to the opercular membrane not being, as we shall presently see, regularly moulted. A portion of a single wall, when closely examined, is found to be formed of an outer and inner lamina, united by longitudinal septa, and is thus permeated by minute, square, longitudinal pores,—exactly as in the normal structure of Balanus. The walls are extremely thin, and are striated longitudinally, owing to the slight projection, on both the inner and outer surfaces, of the longitudinal septa; they are thicker in the part forming the external transverse loops, being here, in C. balænaris, as much as 15/1000ths of an inch in thickness; but when forming one side of the spoke-like folds, the thickness is only 6/1000ths of an inch. The inner lamina is thicker, contrary to what is usual, than the outer lamina; the sharp tips of the longitudinal septa project a little beyond either lamina, giving to the basal edge of the wall a serrated outline. It is singular that the thin outer lamina is first formed as a rim or ledge on each side of the longitudinal septa; these ledges being not closely united for some little space up the wall, as is represented in the enlarged drawing of a bit of the basal wall of C. diadema, Pl. 16, fig. 6. The open clefts thus left are, of course, covered by the so-called epidermis, for otherwise the included threads of corium would have been exposed. Each fresh period of growth, in the case of C. diadema (fig. 6) and reginæ, and to a certain extent in C. balænaris, is marked by little knobs on the longitudinal, slightly prominent, septa, and this prefigures an analogous strongly marked structure in Tubicinella. A fine thread of corium runs up each pore to the summit of the compartment; for these pores are not, as in Balanus, cut off by transverse calcareous septa, or have their upper ends solidly filled up with shelly matter. As, however, the summit of the shell in Coronula is sometimes disintegrated, the threads of corium within the pores would have been exposed, had not each thread formed for itself, as I suppose, a transverse membranous septum near the summit of the shell; at least this is the case with the larger pores of the radii. The walls, where closely pressed together in the spoke-like folds, are disunited at the extreme base, but above this they are firmly calcified together. A ribbon of corium runs along the basal edge of each spoke, and sends threads of corium up the parietal pores on each side, and its upper edge serves to deposit calcareous matter (homologous with the layers of the sheath) and thus to unite the two walls firmly together. In C. diadema, the walls of the terminal transverse loops are simply calcified together like the spoke-like portions; but in C. balænaris the opposite sides of the loops are united by septa (see the transverse section in Pl. 15, fig. 2 a), making from five to eleven longitudinal tubes within each transverse loop; these tubes being larger than the parietal pores. When a piece of the shell is dissolved in acid, no tubuli can be discovered, which may be accounted for by the thinness of the walls; nor are there any spines on any of the external membranes. The number of the pores, in the parietes of a moderately-sized specimen of C. balænaris, I calculated was at 3400, each occupied by a thread of corium springing from the eighteen branched ribbons, diverging from the corium, surrounding the base of the sack. To this number must be added between 300 and 400 larger threads of corium running up the tubes in the transverse loops; and no less than about 2300 fringes and threads occupying the pores in the six radii: thus we see that the dermal system in Coronula is wonderfully complicated.

Radii.—The radii are very wide in C. diadema. In all the species their summits are square or parallel to the basis. Their internal structure is remarkable: as the walls in this genus are extremely thin, so are the proper radii, for in fact they consist in this and all cases, as we know, of one margin of the wall modified by its lateral growth against the opposed compartment. But as the radii in Coronula are not plicated, like the walls, the shell would have been excessively weak along the six lines of suture, had not the radii been strengthened by numerous sinuous plates, springing from the inner lamina of the proper radius, and running downwards, attached to the folded wall of the compartment to which the radius belongs, and with their free edges pressed against the folded wall of the opposed compartment. These plates give out short transverse denticuli, making altogether a beautiful structure, as is best seen in Pl. 16, fig. 3, but also in fig. 2 and 4, and d in fig. 1. In the section, fig. 7, the proper radius (d) is seen to be continuous with the wall (e), and to be very thin, in fact forming but a small portion of the compound radius: it is formed of an outer and inner approximate lamina, separated by septa, which are nearly horizontal, and which consequently cannot be shown in the transverse section fig. 7. The outer lamina of the radius is imperfect, or does not reach quite to the suture, leaving the septa a little exposed (imperfectly shown in Pl. 16, fig. 3), exactly as is the case with the outer lamina of the parietes, at the basal margin of the shell. In all common Balanidæ, a ribbon of corium runs up each of the six sutures, and sends in fine threads between the septa of the radii, but here a thread of corium runs up a minute, cylindrical pore, situated on the line of junction between the radius and the wall whence it arises; and from this longitudinal thread the finer threads spring which pass between the horizontal septa of the proper radius: this cylindrical pore is rather large in C. balænaris, but excessively small in C. diadema (see a black dot (d′) in section, fig. 7), and is solidly filled up in the upper part of the shell. The plates (fig. 3) which run down from the inner lamina of the proper radius, and form the greater part of its thickness, are occupied by fringes of corium, extending up from a ribbon of corium, running along each suture, like those which run along the bases of the spoke-like folded walls. This difference in the origin of the ribbons of corium, occupying the interspaces between the plates and the pores in the proper radii, shows the essential difference between the latter and the thick inner portions of the compound radii. In C. balænaris (fig. 3), the compound radius extends from the outside of the shell to the sheath and to near the basal edges of the folded walls: in C. diadema (fig. 2), it does not extend so far inwards and downwards; and in C. reginæ (fig. 4), even still less so. It ensues from this circumstance that when, in these two latter species, a transverse section is made across the middle of the shell, a large chamber (v, fig. 7), occupied by the ovaria, is found on each line of suture (s s), separating the radii (d) and alæ (a).

The Alæ in C. diadema (section, Pl. 16, fig. 7, a′) and C. reginæ, are of remarkable thickness, nearly equal to that of the radii, and in C. balænaris, of considerable thickness; this is evidently to give strength to the shell, which is weakest along the lines of suture, notwithstanding that the radii have been specially thickened. The edge of each ala presents a miniature resemblance of the edge of the radius, namely, a central ridge sending off on both sides sinuous plates, themselves denticulated. In C. balænaris, the ala rests almost entirely on the inner surface of the compound radius; but in the other two species, in which, as already stated, the radii and alæ are separated by chambers, the ala rests on a plate (c′′ in fig. 1, 4, and 7), which extends from the top of the radius to the bottom of the sheath, narrowing downwards (c′′, fig. 1), and is a specially developed portion of the sheath for the radius to rest on. In C. diadema and reginæ, the sides of the folded walls, at the ends of the chambers (v, in section, fig. 7), are strengthened by the deposition of layers of shell in connexion with the sheath. The sheath extends close down to the basal membrane in C. balænaris, and does not project freely: in the other two species it depends freely, but does not run quite so low down. I have only further to remark, that the sutures, though very strongly united, are not calcified together; for they easily separate after the action of caustic potash.

The Basis (Pl. 28, fig. 1 a-1 c) is membranous and is formed of concentric slips: each slip has eighteen angles, corresponding with the open ends (see Pl. 16, fig. 5) of the eighteen folds of wall. A ray of membrane runs under each of these folds, being prolonged from the basal membrane; but these rays can hardly properly be called parts of the basal membrane, for they split at each period of growth along the middle, and the two halves are drawn from under the basal edges of the walls, and thus come to invest their outer surfaces. The basal membrane, and the whole cementing apparatus, which is much simpler than in Balanus, has been fully described (p. 135) in the Introduction.

Opercular Valves.—In the sessile cirripedes hitherto examined, the four opercular valves are inclined towards each other, and nearly fill up the orifice of the shell, being united to the walls by a more or less narrow circular border of membrane; this membrane being attached rather low down to the sheath. In Coronula the opercular membrane is stretched like the skin of a drum, almost horizontally across the top of the shell; it is, however, generally attached to the sheath rather lower down at the carinal than at the rostral end: hence the animal’s body, as remarked by Burmeister, is attached almost horizontally; but this we shall see, under Xenobalanus and Tubicinella, cannot be considered a character of much importance. The valves are quite small compared with the opercular membrane, and certainly are of little functional importance. The scuta in C. balænaris and diadema (Pl. 15, fig. 3 b) are sub-triangular; but the under or growing surface is elongated and arched. These valves stand almost at the rostral end of the orifice, instead of on each side of it. In C. balænaris the terga are small, with the under surface oval: in C. diadema they are either quite aborted, or are represented by a barely visible plate of shell, parallel and close to the tergal margin of the scutum. The aperture leading into the sack is formed by a nearly medial slit of considerable length, furnished with irregularly protuberant, inwardly inclined lips. These lips are formed by the development of an inner fold or crest of membrane, which can be just detected in most Cirripedes: the lips include a double fold of corium, and are covered by a delicate tunic, continuous with that lining the sack, and homologically continuous with the opercular membrane. The opercular membrane is very thick, tough, and yellowish; it is, in parts, finely plicated in lines radiating from the apices of the valves: these plicæ consist of membrane in an altered condition, being harder, more horny, and of a browner yellow; the plicæ are large at the rostral end of the scuta, and projecting beyond these valves, they afford attachment to the rostral depressor muscles. Rims of similarly modified membrane (Pl. 15, fig. 2 b) connect the scuta and terga together. The rims and plicæ are occasionally moulted together with the opercular membrane. In almost all hitherto described Balanidæ, a new opercular membrane is formed at each period of exuviation, and as soon as formed, the old one is generally moulted, together with the other membranes of the body: the case is very different in Coronula, in which it is evident, from the lines of growth on the valves and sheath, that a new membrane is formed only at rather long intervals, and that it is formed in some degree extensible, so as to allow of some growth in the shell. Two or even three of these membranes are retained at the same time, one over the other; and thus, by their joint thickness, they afford protection to the included animal’s body, and compensate for the smallness of the opercular valves. In a large specimen of C. balænaris, two inches in diameter, there had been formed, since its existence as a very young shell, not more than eight opercular membranes, whereas the other membranes must have been moulted within this same period at least thirty times. In a young specimen of this species, having the orifice of the shell only two tenths of an inch in diameter, I found the opercular membrane, as usual, double. This membrane is not furnished with spines, nor is it penetrated by tubuli as in most other genera. The tissue left after the opercular valves have been dissolved in acid, presents no tubuli, or any other recognisable character, and is not divided (as is usual) into layers.

Muscles of the Sack.—These muscles differ considerably from those of other sessile cirripedes hitherto described. There are the usual five (or properly six, the two tergal muscles being here, as elsewhere, confluent) bundles of fasciæ; but they hardly can be called bundles, they are so much spread out and thin. In C. balænaris, each rostral muscle consists, in different specimens, of from three to five principal fasciæ; these, at their upper ends, are attached to the cartilaginous plicæ at the rostral extremities of the scuta; at their lower ends, they do not reach (as in all the previous genera) to the basal membrane, but after converging, they diverge again into a little fan of fibres, which are firmly attached to the corium low down on the sides of the sack. The lateral depressores of the scuta consist each of about three fasciæ, and they terminate downwards like the rostral muscles. The tergal depressores are spread out into a thin sheet; upwards they reach to the basal edges of the lips of the sack-aperture, and downwards they curve a little towards the rostral and opposite end of the shell, and extend nearly to the basal membrane. These tergal muscles include two fasciæ, larger than the others, which extend rather further, both upwards and downwards, than the other fasciæ. But the most novel character in these several muscles is that in their lower portions they do not exhibit transverse striæ, thus showing a tendency to become involuntary as in pedunculated cirripedes. This circumstance, and their feebleness, is easily accounted for by the thick unyielding nature of the opercular membrane, and the feebly developed character of the opercular valves. In C. diadema, the tergal muscles are much spread out, having, as in C. balænaris, a larger fascia on each side; but the lateral depressores of the scuta form a well defined nearly cylindrical bundle; the rostral pair are extremely weak and spread out: I could perceive only feeble transverse striæ on some of these muscles, and on others there was not the least trace of striæ. I may add that the adductor scutorum muscle is well developed, as are the eight pairs of muscles which unite the animal’s body to the under surfaces of the scuta. The action of the adductor scutorum serves to close the sack-aperture, but towards the carinal end necessarily with very small force; protection in this part can only be afforded by the protuberant, valvular lips, and by the dorsal surfaces of the inwardly curled cirri, with their tufts of bristles.

Mouth.—The mouth (Pl. 26, figs. 3, 4) is much elongated transversely, and does not differ essentially from that of most other Balanidæ. The labrum is notched and not in the least bullate, though in C. diadema there is a slight prominence outside close beneath the notch. The palpi are of large size, with their bristly apices touching each other. The mandibles are very strong, with from four to five main teeth, which are remarkable by presenting only rudiments of being laterally double; but between the second and third, and between the third and fourth main teeth, there is a small intermediate tooth,—these I have not met with in any sessile cirripede hitherto described. The maxillæ are small, with the two upper spines remarkably strong. The outer maxillæ are on their inner faces bilobed. Between these organs there is a minute projection, or mentum, flattened in the longitudinal axis of the body; I have not noticed this in any previous Cirripede.

The Cirri are short and extremely much flattened: the three anterior pairs have their rami unequal in length by two or three segments; the posterior edges of their pedicels are fringed by tufts of extremely fine hairs. The pedicel of the first cirrus is very broad; its rami are short, with the segments very broad. The rami of the second and third cirri are short, with the segments protuberant in front and thickly clothed with spines; the terminal segments have some short, thick, claw-like spines. The three posterior pairs have protuberant segments, each supporting three or four pairs of short, strong, main spines, with a small intermediate tuft: the dorsal tuft is small.

The prosoma is of large size. The stomach is large, without cæca, but with some internal longitudinal plaits (in C. balænaris at least), showing a tendency to the formation of cæca. In the stomach of C. balænaris I found a considerable quantity of a conferva, too much, I think, to have got in accidentally.

Generative system.—The vesiculæ seminales are large; and at their broad blunt ends, in C. balænaris, four separate vasa deferentia enter, of which fact I have seen no other instance. The ovarian tubes do not extend up the sides of the sack, but lie at the bottom, over the basal membrane; in C. balænaris they send six short ray-like prolongations into the six sutures; in C. diadema they send similar prolongations into the sutures, and fill up, as I believe, the six chambers (Pl. 16, fig. 7, v) lying between the radii and alæ: I have examined only one specimen of C. diadema in spirits, and this had the ovarian tubes in an early state of development, when they can with difficulty be distinguished from the pulpy corium; the orange-coloured masses, however, which filled the six cavities, resembled the layer which certainly consisted of undeveloped ovarian tubes and cæca, lying over the basal membrane. The ova are wonderfully numerous; their length is 3/400ths of an inch. The larvæ have been noticed in the anatomical introduction.

Branchiæ.—These are immensely developed, covering almost four fifths of the area of each side of the sack. Each consists of two nearly equal folds, attached vertically to the carinal end of the sack, and transversely across the upper end extending to the animal’s body. The outline of the free part is rounded. Both folds of both branchiæ are deeply plicated on both sides; hence the superficies of the whole is very great. We shall find that this structure is common to the three following allied genera, but with these exceptions, I have observed double branchiæ only in one species of one other genus, namely, in Chthamalus dentatus.

Attachment.—The shells adhere with remarkable strength to the whale’s skin. Having, until recently, examined only separated specimens, and observing portions of the whale’s skin adhering to the outside, and solidly filling up the cavities on the under side, I did not doubt that the shell had the power of forming, by its own action, a deep cavity in the skin of the whale. Inspection of the basal outline of the walls of the shell (Pl. 16, fig. 5) of C. balænaris, will show how singularly unfitted its structure is for any burrowing process; and I was led to speculate on the possibility of the pupa being able to bury itself deeply in the skin, but rejected this view as opposed to what is known of the habits and structure of the pupæ of other Cirripedes. Having now examined several specimens of C. diadema adhering, in a group, to a large piece of skin, in Mr. Stutchbury’s collection, it has become evident that the attachment is as much owing to the upward growth of the whale’s skin, as to the downward growth of the Coronula. In Pl. 15, fig. 4, a vertical section is given of the whale’s skin, taken through the place whence a shell of C. diadema has been removed; consequently we here see nothing but the whale’s skin: the upper black layer is the dark horn-coloured epidermis, forming the general surface of the whale’s body, and resting on an orange-coloured fibrous layer, which is lightly shaded in the drawing. The two horns in the section are two of the eighteen projections, formed entirely of the dark epidermic layer, which fill up the eighteen flattened cavities produced by the folding of the walls. Outside the horns we see the section of a circular furrow, in which the circumferential margin of the shell was lodged; and between the horns, there is the central hollow, within which, when lined with shell, the cirripede’s body was included. The circular furrow is formed in main part by the epidermic layer being thinner there than on either side, and partly by the orange-coloured, underlying fibrous layer curving a little downwards, from having apparently yielded to the pressure of the circumferential margin of the shell. With respect to the cause of the thinness of the epidermis under the circular furrow, I do not know how much to attribute to mere mechanical compression or stretching, and how much to the pressure of the shell, having checked[124] its formation. In the case of very young and small shells, it is hardly possible that their pressure can have in any way influenced the formation of new epidermic layers under the thick old layers; and we must believe, at least in these cases, that the whole effect is mechanical, the sharp basal edges of the shell having indented the epidermis; but this is not more surprising than that the radicle of a plant should penetrate hard ground. Whether the indented epidermis in the circular furrow becomes ruptured, I am not sure; ragged layers may commonly be observed outside the shell, but it is very possible that these may be the ends of layers of epidermis which have been preserved by the covering of the shell, whereas, on the surrounding parts of the whale’s body, these same layers have been removed by disintegration. To return to the section,—the outline of the boss of orange-coloured fibrous tissue, under the central hollow, clearly shows that it must have been formed by its own upward growth, for it stands above the general surrounding level of the corresponding layer. This same conclusion is still more obvious with respect to the eighteen flattened prominent horns, formed of the dark epidermis; the manner in which the epidermis has been forced, moulded, and packed into the eighteen flattened and curved cavities of the shell, so as to adhere to them with considerable tenacity, is extremely curious. The prominence of these horns is so great that it appears to me quite impossible to account for them, excepting by a special formation of epidermis beneath each cavity. The basal membrane of the Coronula, which lies at the bottom of the central hollow, adheres by its own cementing apparatus; and when the larva first attaches itself, this adhesion must be very important, as it allows the basal edges of the shell, during their slow downward growth, to press firmly on the whale’s skin, and so slowly indent it with the circular furrow. The final cause, probably, of the cavities on the under side of the shell in this genus, formed by the singularly convoluted parietes, is to allow of the upward growth into them of the epidermis of the whale, thus securing a firm attachment and allowing the shell to exert a strong downward pressure, and thus effect its partial imbedment, and protection from the enormous force of the waves to which it must be exposed.

With respect to C. balænaris, I have seen only specimens, preserved on shrunk and twisted whale’s skin, with the underlying fibrous layer not preserved; but the cavities in the shell were filled by horns of epidermis, exactly as in C. diadema. There is, however, this difference in the attachment of the two species, that in C. balænaris, owing to its depressed form, the circumference of the shell indents the whale’s skin, not vertically downwards, as in C. diadema, but very obliquely outwards; and, consequently, buries itself much more completely, but less deeply, under a folded and apparently ruptured flap of the epidermis. In young specimens, of the size of a shilling, the entire shell, with the exception of the operculum, is thus covered up and protected whilst young and tender.

Geographical Distribution.—The genus is found wherever whales occur, that is, from the Arctic to the Equatorial regions, in both hemispheres. It is asserted that sometimes as many as a couple of hundred specimens will adhere to a single whale. Coronula barbara, a form closely allied to C. diadema, existed during the Red Crag period; and Bronn has described some fossil specimens from Italy.

Affinities.—In the wonderfully convoluted shell,—in the parietal tubes not being either filled up by calcareous layers or being crossed by calcareous septa,—in the outer lamina of the shell between the longitudinal septa near the basis being imperfect, Coronula differs from all the foregoing genera; in the two latter respects it agrees with the three following allied genera, viz., Platylepas, Tubicinella, and Xenobalanus. The equal size of all six compartments of the shell, has been observed in very few genera besides Coronula. In a new opercular membrane not being formed at each exuviation, and in two or three of these membranes being persistent, and in their being attached high up the sheath, this genus agrees with the three following genera alone. In the valves tending to be rudimentary, and in the protuberant lips of the sack-aperture, we have a close alliance with Xenobalanus. The muscles of the sack being spread out, and tending to lose their transversely striated character, are great peculiarities in Coronula, Tubicinella, and Xenobalanus. The simplicity of the cement-ducts is a remarkable character, observed in two of the following genera, but not in Tubicinella. The double branchiæ is a peculiarity common to all four genera. Neither the mouth nor cirri offer any new characters of much importance in Coronula or in the three allied genera: the lower teeth of the mandibles not being laterally double, but having small intermediate teeth, is the newest feature in the mouth.

1. CORONULA BALÆNARIS. Pl. 15, fig. 2, 2 b: Pl. 16, fig. 3, 5.

LEPAS BALÆNARIS. Gmelin. Systema Naturæ (1789).

---- ------ Chemnitz. Conch., vol. 8, Tab. 99, fig. 845, 846 (1785).

BALANUS ------ Bruguière. Encyclop. Method., Pl. 164, fig. 13-18 (1789).

CORONULA ------ Lamarck. Annales du Museum, vol. 1, Tab. 30, fig. 2-4 (1802).

-------- ------ Chenu. Illust. Conch., Plate, fig. 1 and 4.

-------- ------ De Blainville. Dict. des Scien. Nat., 1818 and 1824, Tab. 117, fig. 3, 3 a.

Shell much depressed, with longitudinal flattened ribs, having simple edges; orifice rounded-hexagonal: radii very thick, almost equalling the shell in thickness: opercular valves four.

Hab.—Attached to whales in the Southern Ocean.

Having described, under the genus, in so much detail the structure of the whole shell, it will be sufficient here to point out the characters by which this species differs from the others.

General Appearance.—The shell is generally much depressed, though sometimes, in large specimens, from the turning in of the basal edges, a considerable degree of convexity is acquired. The radii are moderately wide, and give a star-like appearance to the shell. The surface of the whole upper part of the shell is smooth; the broad and much flattened ribs (i. e. the terminal, transverse loops of the folded walls) of which each compartment is formed, generally divide at a short distance from the apex. The close sutures separating these ribs are straight, and not finely serrated, by which character alone this species can at once be discriminated from the others. The surface, when closely examined, is found to be finely striated longitudinally, and is transversely crossed, chiefly in the lower part, by minutely beaded growth-ridges. The orifice is rounded-hexagonal, and is small compared with the whole shell; it is also smaller than the basal edge of the internal cavity of the shell; consequently the whole basal edge cannot be seen through the orifice from one point of view,—the operculum of course having been removed. An unusually large specimen was 2.75 of an inch in diameter; this individual was one of the more convex varieties, and yet its entire thickness, from top to base, was only .9 of an inch.

Operculum.—Having described, under the genus, the general structure of the opercular valve, I will here only add a few details on their shape. They are small compared with the whole extent of the opercular membrane. The scuta (Pl. 15, fig. 2 b, scutum to the left) stand near each other at the rostral end of the aperture leading into the sack, with their two rostral ends united by the yellowish-brown, longitudinally plicated, horny membrane, described under the genus. The terga (fig. 2 b) stand a little apart from the scuta, on the sides of nearly the middle of the sack-aperture. The lips are protuberant and moderately developed all round. The scuta are elongated, and a little curved; including the upper imbedded portion, they are almost sub-triangular: but the under growing surface is much elongated, nearly flat, with the two ends of nearly the same width, truncated and rounded. The Tergum, in rather small specimens is, if the upper imbedded portion be included, sub-triangular, with the growing surface oval, and between one third and one half of the length of the scutum; but in large specimens, the tergum becomes style-formed, lying parallel to the tergal margin of the scutum, with the growing surface proportionally much smaller, and not above one fifth of the length of the growing surface of the scutum. Hence we see some tendency in the tergum to become rudimentary, as it is in the next species. The brown, horny, plicated substance in which the terga are imbedded, extends considerably beyond the valves themselves.

Structure of the Shell and Radii.—I have already so fully discussed this subject, that I will here only enumerate the points in which this species differs from C. diadema and reginæ:—Firstly, the more symmetrically folded walls (Pl. 16, fig. 5), new folds arising on both sides of all six sutures. Secondly, the inner ends of the folded walls, which surround the internal cavity, being almost square, but with their angles rounded; their inner ends descend some little way beneath the basal edge of the sheath, as low, or lower, than the circumference of the shell. Thirdly, the external lines of junction between the transverse terminal loops being smooth or not serrated. Fourthly, these loops being flatter towards the outside, and being internally filled by septa (Pl. 15, fig. 2 a); tubes being thus formed larger than the proper parietal pores. Sixthly, the sutural edges of the compound radii (Pl. 16, fig. 3) being very much broader in the inner and upper part of each compartment than in the outer and lower part; for in the inner and upper part they stretch from the outside of the shell to the sheath, so that the alæ rest on them, and hence no large open cavity is left between the radii and alæ; in the inner and upper part, also, the radii extend down nearly to the basal edges of the folded walls. The septa, of which the radii are formed, stand further apart than in C. diadema and reginæ. Seventhly, the alæ are only 1/5th or 1/6th of the thickness of the radii, whereas in the two other species they are very much thicker, being nearly as thick as the radii: the alæ are also here (fig. 3, a′) squarer than in those two species, that is, their basal margins are not so short compared with their upper margins; their edges present, also, a slightly different structure. Eighthly, the basal edge of the sheath does not here project freely, and does not descend quite so close to the basal membrane.

Mouth.—The palpi are furnished with a row, extending along the whole basal exterior margin, of very long upwardly pointing spines; on their upper edges there is a brush of small spines. The edge of the labrum is clothed with extremely fine spines, and is furnished with a few minute teeth. The mandibles have four teeth, and the lower end is broadly rounded and coarsely spinose: the second and third teeth are double at their points, and between the second and third, and again between the third and fourth, there is a small intermediate tooth.

Regarding the Cirri, I have nothing especial to remark.

Geographical Distribution.—I have examined nine sets of specimens, having localities attached to them: three from off New South Wales; two off the Cape of Good Hope; two from the west coast of South America; and two marked only “South Sea.” Hence I am led to conclude that this species is confined to the southern hemisphere, or if it extends into the northern hemisphere, it is probably only in the Pacific Ocean. I do not believe (though so stated in some works) that this species occurs on the shores of Europe. It seems often to be associated with Tubicinella. Some specimens thus associated, sent by Mr. Bennett to Professor Owen, were said to have been attached to the Balæna australis.

2. CORONULA DIADEMA. Pl. 15, fig. 3, 3 a, 3 b; Pl. 16, fig. 1, 2, 7.

LEPAS DIADEMA. Linn. Systema Naturæ, 1767.

---- ---- Chemnitz. Conch., vol. 8, Tab. 99, figs. 843, 844.

BALANUS DIADEMA. Bruguière. Encyclop. Method., n. 164, fig. 13, 14 (1789).

CORONULA ------ De Blainville. Dict. des Sc. Nat. (1824), Tab. 117, fig. 4.

-------- ------ Leach. Encyclop. Brit. Suppl., vol. iii, 1824.

-------- ------ Chenu. Illust. Conch., Plate, fig. 3.

-------- ------ Burmeister. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Rankenfüsser, 1834, Tab. 2, fig. 1-14, 18.

Shell crown-shaped, with longitudinal convex ribs, having their edges crenated; orifice hexagonal: radii moderately thick, very broad: terga absent or rudimentary.

Hab.—Attached to whales, in the Arctic Seas; United States and Great Britain; Gulf-Stream, Atlantic Ocean; New Zealand(?).

General Appearance.—As previously remarked, owing to the fulness of the generic description, minute details on structure, excepting those characteristic of the present species, need not here be given. The crown-like shape of the shell is well expressed by its name of Diadema, but the crown tends to pass into a cylinder. The radii are extremely broad. The orifice is large, and neatly hexagonal: when the operculum is removed the whole inside of the cup-formed shell can be seen at once, for the flat membranous basis is much smaller than the orifice. The under side of the shell is deeply concave. The outside of each compartment is formed by broad, rounded, and somewhat prominent, rarely divided, ribs (i. e. the transverse ends of the folded walls); these ribs are closely united together by finely serrated lines of junction (Pl. 16, fig. 1, f). Their surfaces outside are delicately striated longitudinally, and plainly crossed (more plainly than in the foregoing and the next species) by irregular, transverse ridges, especially in the lower part of the shell. The largest specimen which I have seen was two and a half inches in diameter and two in height.

Scuta.—These are placed close together at the rostral end of the orifice, and are imbedded in the brownish, tough, longitudinally plicated, horny substance, which extends far beyond both ends of the valves. In outline (fig. 3 b) they are mitre-shaped, or rounded and sub-triangular, a little curved, and more or less elongated, being most so in young specimens; they are, however, less elongated and rather more massive than in C. balænaris. Terga,—these seem entirely absent in most specimens; but in one (fig. 3 a) I found a rudiment, namely, a short thin plate of shell, barely visible to the naked eye, extending parallel and near to the tergal margin of the scutum. The lips of the aperture of the sack are prominent, and highly so towards the carinal end.

Structure of Shell and Radii.—Owing to the shell not spreading much at the base, new folds in the walls are much seldomer formed, and therefore the external longitudinal ribs (i. e. the terminal transversely elongated loops), are much seldomer divided, than in C. balænaris or reginæ; even rather large specimens sometimes having only the original eighteen folds.[125] When new folds are formed, only one is formed on one, viz., the rostral, side of each suture, instead of on both sides, as in C. balænaris. The inner ends of the folded walls, surrounding the basal membrane, are narrow, instead of being almost square, as in C. balænaris. The lower edge of the sheath, which projects freely, descends almost to the level of the basal edges of the walls. The outer ends of the folded walls, forming the transverse loops, are internally filled up solidly by calcareous matter, instead of by septa forming tubes, as in C. balænaris. The radii (Pl. 16, fig. 2) are a little thicker in the lower and outer than in the upper and inner part of each compartment; in the middle, they do not reach the sheath by about half the thickness of the compartment, and consequently they are separated from the plates (c′′ in fig. 1 and 7) on which the alæ rest, by large chambers (v in fig. 7), which extend up to nearly the apices of the compartments: the extent, however, to which the upper ends of these chambers have been solidly filled up, varies a little. The sinuous plates forming the main portion of the compound radii are rather thinner and closer together than in C. balænaris. The alæ are thick, being thickest in the middle part, and there equal the radii in thickness; their lower margins are very short compared with their upper margins, hence they are almost wedge-formed.

Mouth.—The teeth and fine hairs on the labrum are sometimes obscure, and sometimes plain: close outside the bottom of the medial notch, there is a small hard prominence. The palpi are broad; on their basal exterior margins there is a short row of spines, which do not equal in length the width of the palpi, and therefore are not so long as in C. balænaris. The mandibles have five main teeth, of which the second and third show only an obscure rudiment of being double; between these two teeth, and between the third and fourth tooth, there is a small intermediate tooth: the inferior angle is narrow, rounded, and spinose. The extremity of the apodeme of the maxillæ is expanded.

Cirri.—I have only to remark, that the pedicel of the first cirrus is extremely broad, and that the rami are set on in an unusually crooked manner: the basal segment of the shorter and broader ramus of this cirrus has its dorsal surface produced into a plate fringed with very fine hairs.

Geographical Distribution.—I have received only four specimens with certain localities attached to them: namely, the Arctic Seas of Scandinavia; the coast of the United States, and of Britain; and the Gulf-Stream. There is also a specimen in the British Museum, sent by Mr. Stephenson, mingled with shells of Mollusca from New Zealand; but a Coronula, procured from a floating whale in the early part of the outward voyage, might so easily be sent home with specimens subsequently collected in another county, that I do not as yet fully admit that this species is an inhabitant of the Southern Pacific Ocean: I am less willing to admit this, from suspecting that C. reginæ in the Pacific, replaces the C. diadema of our Northern Seas.

3. CORONULA REGINÆ. Pl. 15, fig. 5; Pl. 16, fig. 4.

Shell globulo-conical or depressed, with longitudinal, much flattened ribs, having their edges crenated, and their surfaces striated and granulated; orifice hexagonal: radii thin, not exceeding one fifth of the thickness of a compartment: terga absent.

Hab.—Attached to whales, Pacific Ocean; Mus. Cuming, Stutchbury, and Darwin.

I have seen eight specimens of this form—two in Mr. Cuming’s collection, one of which was procured at Iquique in Peru, the other from an unknown locality; one was given me in Chile, and was stated to have come from the Pacific; two others are in Mr. Stutchbury’s collection, from unknown but distinct localities, and three in a group in the British Museum. These eight specimens, of which six were collected separately, all strikingly agree in general aspect and in details of structure, so that I can easily recognise the shell, and can at once pick out a single compartment, when mingled with those of the two foregoing species; nevertheless, the differences are so small, that I at first hesitated whether to name the species; but, upon reflection, I am convinced that it is distinct. Coronula reginæ is much more closely related to C. diadema than to C. balænaris, and I suspect that it replaces in the Pacific the former of these two species.

General Appearance; shell conical, straight-sided; some specimens being nearly as much depressed as C. balænaris, and considerably more depressed than any variety of C. diadema; other specimens being globulo-conical, but rather less globular than the ordinary form of C. diadema. I may here remark, that shape is of more value in this genus, in which the shell is attached to the yielding skin of whales, than in those genera in which it adheres to rocks. The orifice is neatly hexagonal, and the whole internal cavity, when the opercular membrane is removed, can be seen from one point of view, owing to the contraction of the lower part of the cavity and small size of the basal membrane. The surface of the shell is smooth, but has, even up to the summit, a peculiar frosted appearance, different from that of the foregoing species, caused by the longitudinal striæ being rather more distinct, and being crossed by beaded, very delicate transverse lines of growth. The ends of the transverse loops, forming the exterior surfaces of the compartments, are much flattened, even more so than in C. balænaris. The lines of junction between the loops, are finely serrated, as in C. diadema; and internally they are solidly filled up, instead of being formed into a set of tubes by longitudinal septa, as in C. balænaris. The under side of the shell, with its folded walls, presents an appearance intermediate between the variable appearance of this part in the above two species.

The sutural edges of the radii (Pl. 16, fig. 4) offer by far the most remarkable character, in their thinness from top to bottom; for they hardly exceed one fifth of the thickness of the compartment, measured from the external surface to the base of the sheath; hence a very large cavity is left between the radii and alæ: in the thickness of the radii the three species already described form a series, C. reginæ at one end and C. balænaris at the other. The sinuous plates, forming the lower part of the radius, are coarser and stand rather further apart than in C. diadema. The alæ are thick, and have the same outline, being narrow at their basal margins and broad at top, as in C. diadema, with their sutural edges similarly constructed: the basal edge of the sheath likewise projects freely.

Operculum.—This resembles most closely that of C. diadema. There are no rudiments of terga. The scuta cannot be distinguished from those of C. diadema.

Mouth.—The labrum has a row of inwardly curved little teeth along the whole crest, and these I did not notice in C. diadema: there is only a trace of the prominence on the outside at the bottom of the central notch. The hairs on the basal exterior margin of the palpi are moderately long. The mandibles have five teeth. In the Cirri, the first pair resembles in its peculiar structure those of C. diadema. In the sixth pair, however, the segments support only three pairs of main spines: but the specimen was not very large, and probably in old specimens there would have been four pairs.

Summary.—The present species differs from both the foregoing only in its rather more conical and straight-sided outline, smooth, frosted surface, and in the narrowness of the sutural edges of the radii, and consequent large size of the chambers between the radii and alæ. It resembles C. diadema, as far as the shell is concerned, in the external ribs or transverse loops having their lines of junction serrated and in being solidly filled up—in the shape of the orifice and of the internal cavity of the shell—in the shape and structure of the alæ—and in the basal edge of the sheath being free. It comes nearer to C. diadema than to C. balænaris in the structure of the radii. It differs from C. diadema, and comes nearer to C. balænaris, in the external ribs being flattened, instead of being convex, and in the lines of growth being very delicate. But as it resembles C. diadema in the several foregoing characters of its shell, in the opercular valves, in all parts of the mouth (excepting the labrum), and in the cirri, it is very much more nearly related to that species than to C. balænaris.

4. CORONULA BARBARA. Pl. 15, fig. 6.

CORONULITES DIADEMA (?) Parkinson, Organic Remains (1811), vol. 3, p. 240, Pl. 16, fig. 19.

Shell (probably) crown-shaped, with longitudinal convex ribs, having their edges crenated, and their surfaces rugged, both externally and internally, with transverse ridges: radii moderately thick; the spaces between the radii and the alæ solidly filled up.

Fossil in Red Crag, (Bawdsey and Sutton); Mus. S. Wood and Geological Society.

The species here described, though near to C. diadema and easily confounded with it, I have no doubt is distinct. I owe to the kindness of the Rev. Mr. Image an examination of the original specimen figured by Parkinson; and in Mr. Stutchbury’s collection there is a similar and more perfect specimen; both of these resemble C. diadema in general form, but have been too much worn to be positively identified. The following description is drawn up from some compartments collected by Mr. Searles Wood, belonging certainly to three, and probably to four individuals, one of which was young; as these specimens agree in all essential respects, I feel pretty confident that the characters, by which the present species differs from C. diadema, are of specific value.

Structure of Shell.—The longitudinal ribs on each compartment (i. e. the terminal transverse loops), are convex and prominent, as in C. diadema, but they are crossed by more prominent ridges of growth than even in the roughest varieties of that species, so that the surface of the shell is more rugged. In the three previous species, the surface of the wall entirely round the cavities occupied by the whale’s skin, is striated only by longitudinal very fine lines; but here, the outer portion, or that (fig. 6) formed by each transverse loop, is crossed by transverse ridges of growth, like, but less prominent than, those on the external surface of the shell. The minute teeth, along the lines of junction between the transverse loops, are here less regular, and can hardly be said to exist; for the two edges are locked together by what may be more strictly called minute zig-zag ridges than teeth. The exact number of the circumferential plications in the walls is variable in the same manner as in the three foregoing species. The sutural edges of the radii are about as thick as, or rather thicker than, in C. diadema. As in this latter species, and in C. reginæ, each ala rests, not on the internal surface (as in C. balænaris, and in all other Balanidæ) of the radius, but on a special plate; but in C. barbara, instead of a deep chamber, running up to the apex of the compartment, being left between the radius and ala, this part is filled up almost entirely by solid shell. Although the extent to which this chamber is filled up varies a little, and although its depth varies a little in C. diadema, yet there is a marked difference between the specimens of this latter species, in which the chamber is most filled up, and those of C. barbara, in which it is least filled up. The alæ are thick, as in C. diadema, and their sutural edges have a central ridge, sending off on both sides sinuous ridges. The basal margins of the alæ are not short compared with their upper margins, and therefore the whole ala is not wedge-formed; and in this rather important respect C. barbara resembles C. balænaris (Pl. 16, fig. 3), and differs from C. diadema (fig. 2). The lower edge of the sheath does not seem to have projected freely,—in this respect, also, resembling C. balænaris. From the basal margin of the alæ not being narrow, and from the inner ends of the folded walls being, as it would appear, also broad, I have little doubt that the cavity in which the animal’s body was lodged, resembled in shape that in C. balænaris, the membranous basis being larger than the orifice of the shell.

Opercular valves unknown.

Summary.—This species is more nearly related to C. diadema than to the others; but in some points, just specified, it resembles C. balænaris. The characters by which it differs from all the species are, firstly, the more prominent transverse ridges on the external surface of the shell, and more especially on the surfaces bounding the outer sides of the cavities occupied by the epidermis of the whale. Secondly, the character of the teeth, or rather ridges, along the lines of junction between the transverse loops. And, thirdly, the spaces between the radii and the plates on which the alæ rest, being solidly filled up.

Species Dubiæ.

The Coronula bifida is an Italian tertiary species, so named by Bronn, in his “Italiens Tertiär-Gebilde” (1831), p. 126. It is very possible that this may be identical with C. barbara, but Bronn does not seem to have been aware of the absolute necessity of giving minute details in his descriptions of fossil cirripedes. The chief character of C. bifida is thus given:—“Eine tiefe Furche oder Spalte theilt die Längenrippe von oben herab bis zur Hälfte, welche bei der sonst ähnlichen C. diadema entweder ganz fehlt, oder nur zuweilen kurz angedeutet ist.” Had it been stated that the longitudinal ribs were divided from the middle down to the base, instead of from the top to the middle, the description would have been intelligible to me, though the character thus afforded would not have been of specific value, as this dividing of the ribs occasionally occurs in all four species, and is produced by the formation of new folds to the walls.