Volume 2 — FOOTNOTES:
Reading edition
Senefelder has published a little memoir of the origin and progress of the invention, in which he relates with great simplicity the hardship, and misery, and contumely, he encountered before he could bring it into use. He concludes with an earnest prayer, "that it may contribute to the benefit and improvement of mankind, and that it may never be abused to any dishonourable or immoral purpose."
If I remember rightly, a detailed history of the art was given in one of the early numbers of the Foreign Review.
There are no poor laws in operation at Munich, no mendicity societies, no tract, and soup and blanket charities; yet pauperism, mendicity, and starvation, are nearly unknown. For the system of regulations by which these evils have been repressed or altogether remedied, I believe Bavaria is indebted to the celebrated American, Count Rumford, who was in the service of the late king, Max-Joseph, from 1790 to 1799.
Several new manufactories have lately been established, particularly of glass and porcelain, and the latter is carried to a high degree of perfection.
Mr. Russel speaks of the secrecy with which the sittings of the Chambers were then conducted: they are now public, and the debates are printed in the Gazette at considerable length.
But how did it happen that from a condition like this, there was no release but by death?—See Horace Walpole's Correspondence to Sir Horace Mann, vol. i. p. 328.
Transcriber's Note: Errata as given in the original have been applied to the text. Other than the most exceedingly obvious typographical errors, all inconsistent spelling, hyphenation, diacriticals, archaic usage, etc. have been preserved as printed in the original. The boldface used to bracket the name "Kunstverein" in the entry for the 16th on page 46 indicates characters in a Fraktur typeface.