LETTER FROM PROF. I. N. VAIL.
Reading edition
My Dear Dr. Bowers: I have read with much interest thy compendium of “The Earth’s Annular System,” as published by me in 1886. A synopsis of that work can give but a meager idea of the grand conception of the annular evolution of the earth. “The Annular Theory” stands on the immutable truth that worlds evolve according to invariable law.
This compels us to admit that all worlds are made alike, in the general changes they undergo. Just as a bud evolves into a flower of the most delicate construction and architectural order, so a world launched from the same designing Hand must move in the same line of eternal order, and under the law of natural uniformity develop and grow into a completed world.
This also leads us to the conclusion that if one world possess at any time an annular system, then all worlds must possess a similar appendage during some period of their existence. Consequently that simple fact that the planet Saturn possesses at this time an annular or ring system is proof that the earth once had a similar appendage. For we must either admit this truth or we must admit that the planet Saturn has not evolved thus far along a line of nature’s uniformity, but is today a victim of accidental conditions. This law refuses to admit.
But “The Annular Theory” does not rest on these grounds alone. A universe of invariable order pronounces it an immutable truth. The judgment of the chemist and philosopher is positive that a rotating world cannot pass from the molten state to the present condition of the earth without undergoing annular changes.
Since the publication of “The Earth’s Annular System” I have had opportunities of examining more minutely the subjects treated of therein and have secured the most overwhelming evidence that the theory there proposed is in the main correct and will stand the test of all time. I have found, outside the realm of physical science, the most positive evidence that primitive man actually saw at least two rings revolving about the earth, named them and worshiped them as gods. These relics I have rescued from the wreck of ages, and with these I will prove the fact that this earth once had a complex system of Saturn-like rings.
Thus in the end the geologist and astronomer will be compelled to admit its truthfulness whether they desire to or not. I have found among the ruins of ancient Egypt, Babylonia, India and China annular fossils, the identification of which settles at once and forever this great question.
Again, I need not point the geologist to the mysteries of the glacial epochs, which grow darker and darker as he looks for a competent cause for their production. He must know that the great ocean of vapors that hovered for unknown time over the earth in the loftiest heights of the atmosphere, such as now are seen on two of our neighbor planets, could not have fallen to the earth without covering it in the higher latitudes with measureless masses of snow, resulting in excessive refrigeration. I need but point him to the fact, proven by the coast surveys of the world, that the oceans have encroached upon the land to such an extent since the last glacial epoch that they stand now fully thirty fathoms deeper than they did in pre-glacial times. I need only point him to that grand clock-work of worlds shining from the firmament—every scintillating point, every rolling sun, is a witness of nature’s eternal order, and proclaims that uniformitarian principle of world evolution, by which the philosophic investigator must stand. The geologist must build on this rock of uniformity in the evolution of worlds. The earth has evolved along this line, and the wreck of annular conditions is seen on every page of its rocky volume.
In the year 1875 I published a little volume entitled “The Earth’s Aqueous Ring.” In it I stated my convictions, and gave reasons therefor, that all the glacial periods the world ever saw were produced by supra-aerial vapors descending from an annular system that revolved about the earth from the remotest geologic ages to the flood of Noah, which was itself produced by the fall of the last remnants of those upper waters. These claims I am fully prepared to substantiate, whatever opposition may be brought against them.
Isaac N. Vail,
Elsinore, Cal., July 6, 1892.