Chapter VI · —Concluded

It is also important to remember that the press appealed to a very much smaller percentage of the population in colonial times than it does to-day. “In Boston with a population of 8000, Campbell succeeded in selling but 3000 copies of his News Letters when it was the only newspaper printed in America.”[1] Later the circulation of all the papers increased, but it was still but a small proportion of the colonists who received first hand the opinions of the editor. And this body of subscribers was for the most part of the professional class or the wealthier part of those in trade, persons naturally of a conservative temper and apt to look with disfavor on any strong attack on or disregard of legalized and established authority.

In New York, owing to the peculiar way in which the press was introduced, it for the first forty years of its existence did nothing to put itself in antagonism to the government; in Massachusetts it at first was given a subvention by the General Court; in South Carolina a comparatively large sum was offered to any printer who would brave the dangers of the climate and establish a press. With these exceptions its early days were passed under governments which viewed with dislike or suspicion any attempts on the part of the printers to take an intelligent part in the questions that were interesting the people. For this reason the press in all the colonies early assumed a position of antagonism to the constituted authority and in return the government took every opportunity to hurt it by means of prosecutions in the courts or inquisitorial proceedings before the Governor and his Council. It is interesting to note however that these proceedings lost almost all their terrors as the period of the Revolution approached, for the press received more and more the support of the people, who had learned to appreciate the wide circulation which the newspapers gave to the new doctrines; thus we constantly find the grand juries refusing to find true bills against the printers, in this way reducing the Governor to the use of Informations which were looked on with suspicion by the people and seldom resulted in a verdict of Guilty.

But the greatest influence of the press was exerted through the flood of hand-bills and pamphlets which ever increased in volume as the period of the Revolution drew near. Printed in large numbers and circulating everywhere, we find Governors reporting to the home government that it was impossible to stop them, and that they were doing incalculable harm.

If now we attempt in a very brief way to review the whole matter of the struggle for the liberty of the press we shall find:

First: That the system in vogue in America, as in England, up to the close of the seventeenth century, was a system of administrative control by the Crown through appointed officers called Censors, to whom all writings had to be submitted before publication and who either gave or refused permission to print. That this Censorship was shared by Church and State in some instances only complicated the situation.

Second: With the failure to pass the Licensing Bill in 1695 the press became in all parts of the English dominion freed from this censorship; but a system of judicial control took its place, for all publications were now subject to the law of libel, and an attack on the dominant party was held by the courts to be a libel, and a censure of the Governor to be a personal reflection on the King. In Franklin’s case in England in 1731,[2] it was laid down by Lord Raymond that the court alone was to judge of the criminality of a libel, to the jury was given only the right to decide as to the fact of publication.

In England that doctrine continued in force until the passage of Mr. Fox’s Libel Bill in 1792. But fifty-eight years earlier the Zenger case (in 1734) had established in principle the freedom of the press in the colonies, by settling the right of juries to find a general verdict in libel cases. We have said “in principle,” for this right, which the colonists soon grew to consider as a part of their common law, was yet in practice more or less nullified in the different colonies according as the Governor was able to impose his will on the courts or was opposed by an intelligent public opinion.

In other words, liberty of the press did not and could not exist in the colonial period, but the people accepted the principle and when they obtained the opportunity incorporated it in Bills of Rights and State Constitutions. The Continental Congress in issuing, on Oct. 21st, 1774, an “Address to the people of Canada” proceeded to detail and enlarge upon the rights to which English subjects were entitled, and among them placed the freedom of the press.[3]

We see the same point made by State after State.

Maryland, 1776: “That the liberty of the press ought to be inviolably preserved.”

Virginia, 1776: “That the freedom of the press is one of the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by despotic governments.”

Pennsylvania, 1776: “That the people have a right to freedom of speech, and of writing, and of publishing their sentiments; therefore the freedom of the press ought not to be restrained.”

Georgia, 1777: “Freedom of the press and trial by jury to remain inviolable forever.”

Vermont, 1777: “That the public have the right to freedom of speech and of writing and publishing their sentiments; therefore the freedom of the press ought not to be restrained.”

South Carolina, 1778: “That the liberty of the press be inviolably preserved.”

Massachusetts, 1780: “The liberty of the press is essential to the security of freedom in a state; and ought not, therefore, to be restrained in this commonwealth.”

New Hampshire, 1784: “The liberty of the press is essential to the security of freedom in a state; and it ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved.”

Pinckney’s Plan of 1787: “The Legislature of the United States shall pass no law touching or abridging the liberty of the press.”

Delaware, 1792: “The press shall be free to every citizen who undertakes to examine the official conduct of men acting in a public capacity, and any citizen may print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty. In prosecutions for publications investigating the proceedings of officers, or where the matter published is proper for public information, the truth thereof may be given in evidence; and in all indictments for libels, the jury may determine the facts and the law, as in other cases.”

After the Federal Convention came together in 1787 it was proposed to insert in the Constitution, “the liberty of the press shall be inviolably preserved.” This was defeated by six states against five.[4] But when the different States afterwards sent to the first Congress the proposals from which the first ten Amendments were selected we find in nearly all some reference to the liberty of the press. The article on the subject from Massachusetts was selected and now appears as a part of the First Amendment to the Constitution, “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.”[5] And since that time nearly every Constitution drawn up by the different States has contained an admission of the principle so long contended for by supporters of the rights of the press, that, as David Hume says, “its liberties, and the liberties of the people must stand or fall together.”

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andrews, Alexander—History of British Journalism; 2 vols. London, 1859.

Anson, Sir Wm. R.—Law and Custom of the Constitution; 2 vols. Oxford, 1886.

Barry, John Stetson—The History of Massachusetts; 3 vols. Boston, 1855.

Booth, Mary L.—The History of the City of New York. New York, 1880.

Bradford, Wm.—New England’s Spirit of Persecution Transmitted to Pennsylvania. New York, 1693.

Brodhead, John Romeyn—History of the State of New York; 2 vols. New York, v.d.

Brown, David Paul—The Forum; 2 vols. Philadelphia, 1856.

Brown, Henry B.—The Liberty of the Press; Am. Law Review, 34, 321.

Buckingham, Joseph T.—Specimens of Newspaper Literature, with Personal Memoirs, Anecdotes, and Reminiscences; 2 vols. Boston, 1852.

Burk, John D.—The History of Virginia from its first Settlement to the Present Day; 4 vols. Petersburg, Va., 1805.

Burn, John Southerden—The Star Chamber. London, 1870.

Chalmers, George—Political Annals of the Present United Colonies from the Settlement to the Peace of 1763. London, 1780.

Collier, Edward—Essay on the Law of Patents and the General History of Monopolies. London, 1803.

Cucheval-Clarigny, M.—Histoire de la Presse en Angleterre et aux Etats Unis. Paris, 1857.

De Peyster, Frederic—Early Political History of New York. New York, 1865.

Duane, Wm.—Canada and the Continental Congress, An Address delivered before the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, 1850.

Dunlap, Wm.—History of New York; 2 vols. New York, 1839.

Eastman, F. S.—History of New York. New York, 1831.

Fisher & Strahan—Law of the Press. London, 1895.

Force, Peter—American Archives; 9 vols. Washington, v.d.

Ford, Paul Leicester—Journal of Hugh Gaine. New York, 1901.

Fowle, Daniel—Total Eclipse of Liberty. Boston, 1755.

Franklin, Benjamin—Autobiography. New York, 1849.

Fraser, Hugh—Privileges of the Press in relation to Libel; Law Quarterly Review, 7, 158.

Gentz, F. von—Reflections on the Liberty of the Press in Great Britain, London, 1820 (trans.)

Gordon, Wm. D. D.—The History of the Rise, Progress and Establishment of the Independence of the United States of America; 4 vols. London, 1788.

Grant, James—History of the Newspaper Press. London, 1840.

Hall, Robert—An Apology for the Freedom of the Press and for General Liberty. London, 1793.

Harrison, W. L. S.—Proceedings at the Printers Banquet held at the N. Y. Typographical Society, on the Occasion of Franklin’s Birthday, 1850. New York, 1850.

Hening, Wm. Waller—Statutes at Large of Virginia; 16 vols. New York, 1823.

Howell, T. B.—State Trials; 30 vols. London, v.d.

Hildeburn, Charles—Sketches of Printers and Printing in Colonial New York. New York, 1895.

Hudson, Frederick—A History of Journalism. New York, 1873.

Hunt, F. Knight—The Fourth Estate; Contributions Towards a History of Newspapers and of the Liberty of the Press; 2 vols. London, 1850.

Hutchinson, Thomas—History of Massachusetts; 2 vols. Salem, 1795.

Jefferson, Thomas—Notes on the State of Virginia. London, 1787.

Jones, Horatio Gates—Andrew Bradford, Founder of the Newspaper Press in the Middle States of America; An Address delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, 1869.

Lechford, Thomas—Note-Book. Am. Antiquarian Society; Vol. VII, 1885.

Leake, Isaac Q.—Memoirs of the Life and Times of General John Lamb. Albany, 1850.

Lincoln, Wm.—History of Worcester, Mass. Worcester, 1862.

Massachusetts—MS. Records of the Colony.

McAdam, David—History of the Bench and Bar of New York; 2 vols. New York, 1897.

McMaster, John Bach—A Free Press in the Middle Colonies. Princeton Review; Vol. I (N. S.)

Munsell, Joel—Annals of Albany; 10 vols. Albany, v.d.

New York—The Colonial Laws of; 5 vols. Albany, 1894.

New York—Votes and Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Colony of. 1691-1765; 2 vols. New York, 1765.

New York—Votes and Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Colony of. 1766-1776. Albany, 1820 (reprint).

New York—Votes and Proceedings of the Legislative Council, Albany. New York, 1861.

North, S. N. D.—Constitutional Development of the Colony of New York. Mag. Am. Hist. III, 161.

O’Callaghan, E. B.—Documents relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York; 11 vols. Albany, v.d.

Odgers, W. Blake—The Law of Libel. Philadelphia, 1887.

Pennsylvania—Minutes of the Provincial Council of; 3 vols. Philadelphia, 1852.

Proud, Robert—History of Pennsylvania; 2 vols. Philadelphia, 1798.

Ross, Peter—A History of Long Island. New York, 1903.

Rutherfurd, Livingston—John Peter Zenger. His Press, His Trial, and a Bibliography of his Imprints and those issued by his Wife and Son. Also a reprint of the Trial. New York, 1904.

Satterlee, Herbert L.—Political History of the Province of New York. New York, 1885.

Taylor, Hannis—The Freedom of the Press. Argument ex parte John L. Rapier, before Supreme Court of U. S., n.p., n.d.

Taylor, Henry Osborn—Development of Constitutional Government in the American Colonies. Mag. Am. Hist. II, 705.

Thomas, Benjamin Franklin, Memoir of Isaiah Thomas. Boston, 1874.

Thomas, Isaiah—History of Printing; 2 vols. Albany, 1874.

The Tryal of John Peter Zenger. London, 1738.

Wallace, John William—Address on Wm. Bradford. Albany, 1863.

Wallace, John William—Col. Wm. Bradford. Philadelphia, 1884.

Livingston Rowe Schuyler.

New York City.

FOOTNOTES: