← Table of contents
Shakespearean Tragedy

Act 2 — INDEX

Reading edition

The titles of plays are in italics. So are the numbers of the pages containing the main discussion of a character. The titles of the Notes are not repeated in the Index.

Aaron, 200, 211.

Abnormal mental conditions, 13, 398.

Accident, in tragedy, 7, 14-16, 26, 28; in Hamlet, 143, 173; in Othello, 181-2; in King Lear, 253, 325.

Act, difficulty in Fourth, 57-8; the five Acts, 49.

Action, tragic, 11, 12, 31; and character, 12, 19; a conflict, 16-19.

Adversity and prosperity in King Lear, 326-7.

Albany, 297-8.

Antonio, 110, 404.

Antony and Cleopatra, 3, 7, 45, 80; conflict, 17-8; crisis, 53, 55, 66; humour in catastrophe, 62, 395-6; battle-scenes, 62-3; extended catastrophe, 64; faulty construction, 71, 260; passion in, 82; evil in, 83-4; versification, 87, Note BB.

Antony, 22, 29, 63, 83-4.

Arden of Feversham, 9.

Ariel, 264.

Aristotle, 16, 22.

Art, Shakespeare's, conscious, 68-9; defects in, 71-78.

Arthur, 294.

As You Like It, 71, 267, 390.

Atmosphere in tragedy, 333.

Banquo, 343, 379-86.

Barbara, the maid, 175.

Battle-scene, 62, 451, 469; in King Lear, 255, Note X.

Beast and man, in King Lear, 266-8; in Timon, 453.

Bernhardt, Mme., 379.

Biblical ideas, in King Lear, 328.

Bombast, 73, 75-6, 389, Note F.

Brandes, G., 379, 393.

Brutus, 7, 14, 22, 27, 32, 81-2, 101, 364.

Caliban, 264.

Cassio, 211-3, 238-9, 433-4.

Catastrophe, humour before, 61-2; battle-scenes in, 62; false hope before, 63; extended, 62; in Antony and Coriolanus, 83-4. See Hamlet, etc.

Character, and plot, 12; is destiny, 13; tragic, 19-23.

Chaucer, 8, 346.

Children, in the plays, 293-5.

Cleopatra, 7, 20, 84, 178, 208.

Coleridge, 104-5, 107, 109, 127, 165, 200, 201, 209, 223, 226, 228, 249, 343, 353, 362, 389, 391, 392, 397, 412, 413.

Comedy, 15, 41.

Conflict, tragic, 16-9; originates in evil, 34; oscillating movement in, 50; crisis in, 51-5; descending movement of, 55-62.

Conscience. See Hamlet.

Cordelia, 29, 32, 203-6, 250, 290, 314, 315-26, Note W.

Coriolanus, 3, 9, 43, 394-5; crisis, 53; hero off stage, 57; counter-stroke, 58; humour, 61; passion, 82; catastrophe, 83-4; versification, Note BB.

Coriolanus, 20, 29, 83-4, 196.

Cornwall, 298-9.

Crisis. See Conflict.

Curtain, no front, in Shakespeare's theatre, 185, 458.

Cymbeline, 7, 21, 72, 80, Note BB; Queen in, 300.

Desdemona, 32, 165, 179, 193, 197, 201-6, 323, 433, 437-9.

Disillusionment, in tragedies, 175.

Dog, the, Shakespeare and, 268.

Don John, 110, 210.

Double action in King Lear, 255-6, 262.

Dowden, E., 82, 105, 330, 408.

Dragging, 57-8, 64.

Drunkenness, invective against, 238.

Edgar, 305-7, 453, 465.

Edmund, 210, 245, 253, 300-3, Notes P, Q. See Iago.

Emilia, 214-6, 237, 239-42, Note P.

Emotional tension, variations of, 48-9.

Evil, origin of conflict, 34; negative, 35; in earlier and later tragedies, 82-3; poetic portrayal of, 207-8; aspects of, specially impressive to Shakespeare, 232-3; in King Lear, 298, 303-4, 327; in Tempest, 328-30; in Macbeth, 331, 386.

Exposition, 41-7.

Fate, Fatality, 10, 26-30, 45, 59, 177, 181, 287, 340-6.

Fleay, F.G., 419, 424, 445, 467, 479.

Fool in King Lear, the, 258, 311-5, 322, 447, Note V.

Fools, Shakespeare's, 310.

Forman, Dr., 468, 493.

Fortinbras, 90.

Fortune, 9, 10.

Freytag, G., 40, 63.

Furness, H.H., 199, 200.

Garnet and equivocation, 397, 470-1.

Ghost, Banquo's, 332, 335, 338, 361, Note FF.

Ghost, Caesar's, Note FF.

Ghost in Hamlet, 97, 100, 118, 120, 125, 126, 134, 136, 138-40, 173-4.

Ghosts, not hallucinations because appearing only to one in a company, 140.

Gloster, 272, 293-6, 447.

Gnomic speeches, 74, 453.

Goethe, 101, 127, 165, 208.

Goneril, 245, 299-300, 331, 370, 447-8.

Greek tragedy, 7, 16, 30, 33, 182, 276-9, 282.

Greene, 409.

Hales, J.W., 397.

Hamlet, exposition, 43-7; conflict, 17, 47, 50-1; crisis and counter-stroke, 52, 58-60, 136-7; dragging, 57; humour, and false hope, before catastrophe, 61, 63; obscurities, 73; undramatic passages, 72, 74; place among tragedies, 80-8; position of hero, 89-92; not simply tragedy of thought, 82, 113, 127; in the Romantic Revival, 92, 127-8; lapse of time in, 129, 141; accident, 15, 143, 173; religious ideas, 144-5, 147-8, 172-4; player's speech, 389-90, Note F; grave-digger, 395-6; last scene, 256. See Notes A to H, and BB.

Hamlet, only tragic character in play, 90; contrasted with Laertes and Fortinbras, 90, 106; failure of early criticism of, 91; supposed unintelligible, 93-4; external view, 94-7; 'conscience' view, 97-101; sentimental view, 101-4; Schlegel-Coleridge view, 104-8, 116, 123, 126-7; temperament, 109-10; moral idealism, 110-3; reflective genius, 113-5; connection of this with inaction, 115-7; origin of melancholy, 117-20; its nature and effects, 120-7, 103, 158; its diminution, 143-4; his 'insanity,'121-2, 421; in Act ii.129-31, 155-6; in iii. i.131-3, 157, 421; in play-scene, 133-4; spares King, 134-6, 100, 439; with Queen, 136-8; kills Polonius, 136-7, 104; with Ghost, 138-40; leaving Denmark, 140-1; state after return, 143-5, 421; in grave-yard, 145-6, 153, 158, 421-2; in catastrophe, 102, 146-8, 151, 420-1; and Ophelia, 103, 112, 119, 145-6, 152-9, 402, 420-1; letter to Ophelia, 150, 403; trick of repetition, 148-9; word-play and humour, 149-52, 411; aesthetic feeling, 133, 415; and Iago, 208, 217, 222, 226; other references, 9, 14, 20, 22, 28, 316, 353, Notes A to H.

Hanmer, 91.

Hazlitt, 209, 223, 228, 231, 243, 248.

Hecate, 342, Note Z.

Hegel, 16, 348.

2 Henry VI., 492.

3 Henry VI., 222, 418, 490, 492.

Henry VIII., 80, 472, 479.

Heredity, 30, 266, 303.

Hero, tragic, 7; of 'high degree,' 9-11; contributes to catastrophe, 12; nature of, 19-23, 37; error of, 21, 34; unlucky, 28; place of, in construction, 53-55; absence of, from stage, 57; in earlier and later plays, 81-2, 176; in King Lear, 280; feeling at death of, 147-8, 174, 198, 324.

Heywood, 140, 419.

Historical tragedies, 3, 53, 71.

Homer, 348.

Horatio, 99, 112, 310, Notes A, B, C.

Humour, constructional use of, 61; Hamlet's, 149-52; in Othello, 177; in Macbeth, 395.

Hunter, J., 199, 338.

Iachimo, 21, 210.

Iago, and evil, 207, 232-3; false views of, 208-11, 223-7; danger of accepting his own evidence, 211-2, 222-5; how he appeared to others, 213-5; and to Emilia, 215-6, 439-40; inferences hence, 217-8; further analysis, 218-22; source of his action, 222-31; his tragedy, 218, 222, 232; not merely evil, 233-5; nor of supreme intellect, 236; cause of failure, 236-7; and Edmund, 245, 300-1, 464; and Hamlet, 208, 217, 222, 226; other references, 21, 28, 32, 192, 193, 196, 364, Notes L, M, P, Q.

Improbability, not always a defect, 69; in King Lear, 249, 256-7.

Inconsistencies, 73; real or supposed, in Hamlet, 408; in Othello, Note I; in King Lear, 256, Note T; in Macbeth, Notes CC, EE.

Ingram, Prof., 478.

Insanity in tragedy, 13; Ophelia's, 164-5, 399; Lear's, 288-90.

Intrigue in tragedy, 12, 67, 179.

Irony, 182, 338.

Isabella, 316, 317, 321.

Jameson, Mrs., 165, 204, 379.

Jealousy in Othello, 178, 194, Note L.

Job, 11.

Johnson, 31, 91, 294, 298, 304, 377, 420.

Jonson, 69, 282, 389.

Juliet, 7, 204, 210.

Julius Caesar, 3, 7, 9, 33, 34, 479; conflict, 17-8; exposition, 43-5; crisis, 52; dragging, 57; counter-stroke, 58; quarrel-scene, 60-1; battle-scenes, 62; and Hamlet, 80-2; style, 85-6.

Justice in tragedy, idea of, 31-33, 279, 318.

Kean, 99, 243-4.

Kent, 307-10, 314, 321, 447, Note W.

King Claudius, 28, 102, 133, 137, 142, 168-72, 402, 422.

King John, 394, 490-1.

King Lear, exposition, 44, 46-7; conflict, 17, 53-4; scenes of high and low tension, 49; dragging, 57; false hope before catastrophe, 63; battle-scene, 62, 456-8; soliloquy in, 72, 222; place among tragedies, 82, 88, see Tate; Tate's, 243-4; two-fold character, 244-6; not wholly dramatic, 247; opening scene, 71, 249-51, 258, 319-21, 447; blinding of Gloster, 185, 251; catastrophe, 250-4, 271, 290-3, 309, 322-6; structural defects, 254-6; improbabilities, etc., 256-8; vagueness of locality, 259-60; poetic value of defects, 261; double action, 262; characterisation, 263; tendency to symbolism, 264-5; idea of monstrosity, 265-6; beast and man, 266-8; storm-scenes, 269-70, 286-7, 315; question of government of world, in, 271-3; supposed pessimism, 273-9, 284-5, 303-4, 322-30; accident and fatality, 15, 250-4, 287-8; intrigue in, 179; evil in, 298, 303-4; preaching patience, 330; and Othello, 176-7, 179, 181, 244-5, 441-3; and Timon, 245-7, 310, 326-7, 443-5; other references, 8, 10, 61, 181, Notes R to Y, and BB.

König, G., Note BB.

Koppel, R., 306, 450, 453, 462.

Laertes, 90, 111, 142, 422.

Lamb, 202, 243, 248, 253, 255, 269, 343.

Language, Shakespeare's, defects of, 73, 75, 416.

Lear, 13, 14, 20, 28, 29, 32, 249-51, 280-93, 293-5, Note W.

Leontes, 21, 194.

Macbeth, exposition, 43, 45-6; conflict, 17-9, 48, 52; crisis, 59, 60; pathos and humour, 61, 391, 395-7; battle-scenes, 62; extended catastrophe, 64; defects in construction, 57, 71; place among tragedies, 82, 87-8, Note BB; religious ideas, 172-4; atmosphere of, 333; effects of darkness, 333-4, colour, 334-6, storm, 336-7, supernatural, etc., 337-8, irony, 338-40; Witches, 340-9, 362, 379-86; imagery, 336, 357; minor characters, 387; simplicity, 388; Senecan effect, 389-90; bombast, 389, 417; prose, 388, 397-400; relief-scenes, 391; sleep-walking scene, 378, 398, 400; references to Gunpowder Plot, 397, 470-1; all genuine? 388, 391, 395-7, Note Z; and Hamlet, 331-2; and Richard III., 338, 390, 395, 492; other references, 7, 8, 386, and Notes Z to FF.

Macbeth, 13, 14, 20, 22, 28, 32, 63, 172, 343-5, 349-65, 380, 383, 386, Notes CC, EE.

Macbeth, Lady, 13, 28, 32, 349-50, 358, 364, 366-79, 398-400, Notes CC, DD.

Macduff, 387, 391-2, 490-1.

Macduff, Lady, 61, 387, 391-2.

Macduff, little, 393-5.

Mackenzie, 91.

Marlowe, 211, 415-6.

Marston's possible reminiscences of Shakespeare's plays, 471-2.

Measure for Measure, 76, 78, 275, 397.

Mediaeval idea of tragedy, 8, 9.

Melancholy, Shakespeare's representations of, 110, 121. See Hamlet.

Mephistopheles, 208.

Merchant of Venice, 21, 200.

Metrical tests, Notes S, BB.

Middleton, 466.

Midsummer Night's Dream, 390, 469.

Milton, 207, 362, 418.

Monstrosity, idea of, in King Lear, 265-6.

Moral order in tragedy, idea of, 26, 31-9.

Moulton, R.G., 40.

Negro? Othello a, 198-202.

Opening scene in tragedy, 43-4.

Ophelia, 14, 61, 112, 160-5, 204, 399. See Hamlet.

Oswald, 298, 448.

Othello, exposition, 44-5; conflict, 17, 18, 48; peculiar construction, 54-5, 64-7, 177; inconsistencies, 73; place among tragedies, 82, 83, 88; and Hamlet, 175-6; and King Lear, 176-7, 179, 181, 244-5, 441-3; distinctive effect, and its causes, 176-80; accident in, 15, 181-2; objections to, considered, 183-5; point of inferiority to other three tragedies, 185-6; elements of reconciliation in catastrophe, 198, 242; other references, 9, 61, Notes I to R, and BB.

Othello, 9, 20, 21, 22, 28, 29, 32, 176, 178, 179, 186-98, 198-202, 211, 212, Notes K to O.

Pathos, and tragedy, 14, 103, 160, 203, 281-2; constructional use of, 60-1.

Peele, 200.

Pericles, 474.

Period, Shakespeare's tragic, 79-89, 275-6.

Pessimism, supposed, in King Lear, 275-9, 327; in Macbeth, 359, 393.

Plays, Shakespeare's, list of, in periods, 79.

Plot, 12. See Action, Intrigue.

'Poetic justice,' 31-2.

Poor, goodness of the, in King Lear and Timon, 326.

Posthumus, 21.

Problems, probably non-existent for original audience, 73, 157, 159, 315, 393, 483, 486, 488.

Prose, in the tragedies, 388, 397-400.

Queen Gertrude, 104, 118, 134, 136-8, 161, 164, 166-8.

Reconciliation, feeling of, in tragedy, 31, 36, 84, 147-8, 174, 198, 242, 322-6.

Regan, 299-300.

Religion, in Edgar, 306, Horatio, 310, Banquo, 387.

Richard II., 3, 10, 17, 18, 42.

Richard II., 20, 22, 150, 152.

Richard III., 3, 18, 42, 62, 82; and Macbeth, 338, 390, 395, 492.

Richard III., 14, 20, 22, 32, 63, 152, 207, 210, 217, 218, 233, 301.

Romeo and Juliet, 3, 7, 9, 15; conflict, 17, 18, 34; exposition, 41-5; crisis, 52; counter-stroke, 58.

Romeo, 22, 29, 150, 210.

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, 137, 405-6.

Rules of drama, Shakespeare's supposed ignorance of, 69.

Salvini, 434.

Satan, Milton's, 207, 362.

Scenery, no, in Shakespeare's theatre, 49, 71, 451.

Scenes, their number, length, tone, 49; wrong divisions of, 451.

Schlegel, 82, 104, 105, 116, 123, 127, 254, 262, 344, 345, 413.

Scot on Witch-craft, 341.

Seneca, 389-90.

Shakespeare the man, 6, 81, 83, 185-6, 246, 275-6, 282, 285, 327-30, 359, 393, 414-5.

Shylock, 21.

Siddons, Mrs., 371, 379.

Soliloquy, 72; of villains, 222; scenes ending with, 451.

Sonnets, Shakespeare's, 264, 364.

Spedding, J., 255, 476, Note X.

Stage-directions, wrong modern, 260, 285, 422, 453-6, 462.

Style in the tragedies, 85-9, 332, 336, 357.

Suffering, tragic, 7, 8, 11.

Supernatural, the, in tragedy, 14, 181, 295-6, 331-2. See Ghost, Witch.

Swinburne, A.C., 80, 179, 191, 209, 218, 223, 228, 231, 276-8, 431.

Symonds, J.A., 10.

Tate's version of King Lear, 243, 251-3, 313.

Temperament, 110, 282, 306.

Tempest, 42, 80, 185, 264, 328-30, 469; Note BB.

Theological ideas in tragedy, 25, 144, 147, 279; in Hamlet and Macbeth, 171-4, 439; not in Othello, 181, 439; in King Lear, 271-3, 296.

Time, short and long, theory of, 426-7.

Timon of Athens, 4, 9, 81-3, 88, 245-7, 266, 270, 275, 310, 326-7, 443-5, 460; Note BB.

Timon, 9, 82, 112.

Titus Andronicus, 4, 200, 211, 411, 491.

Tourgénief, 11, 295.

Toussaint, 198.

Tragedy, Shakespearean; parts, 41, 51; earlier and later, 18, 176; pure and historical, 3, 71. See Accident, Action, Hero, Period, Reconciliation, etc.

Transmigration of souls, 267.

Troilus and Cressida, 7, 185-6, 268, 275-6, 302, 417, 419.

Twelfth Night, 70, 267.

Two Noble Kinsmen, 418, 472, 479.

Ultimate power in tragedy, 24-39, 171-4, 271-9. See Fate, Moral Order, Reconciliation, Theological.

Undramatic speeches, 74, 106.

Versification. See Style and Metrical tests.

Wordsworth, 387.

Waste, tragic, 23, 37.

Werder, K., 94, 172, 480.

Winter's Tale, 21, Note BB.

Witches, the, and Macbeth, 340-9, 362; and Banquo, 379-87.

Wittenberg, Hamlet at, 403-6.

Wordsworth, 30, 198.

Yorkshire Tragedy, 10.

GLASGOW: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND CO. LTD.

8vo. 12s. 6d. net.

Notes in this chapter

Note 1 · Julius Caesar is not an exception to this rule. Caesar, whose murder comes in the Third Act, is in a sense the dominating figure in the storNote 2 · Timon of Athens, we have seen, was probably not designed by Shakespeare, but even Timon is no exception to the rule. The sub-plot is concernNote 4 · Comedy stands in a different position. The tricks played by chance often form a principal part of the comic action.Note 9 · Aristotle apparently would exclude them.Note 10 · Richard II. is perhaps an exception, and I must confess that to me he is scarcely a tragic character, and that, if he is nevertheless a tragNote 12 · I have raised no objection to the use of the idea of fate, because it occurs so often both in conversation and in books about Shakespeare's Note 13 · It is dangerous, I think, in reference to all really good tragedies, but I am dealing here only with Shakespeare's. In not a few Greek trageNote 1 · The famous critics of the Romantic Revival seem to have paid very little attention to this subject. Mr. R.G. Moulton has written an interestNote 3 · In the same way a comedy will consist of three parts, showing the 'situation,' the 'complication' or 'entanglement,' and the dénouement or 'Note 5 · When the subject comes from English history, and especially when the play forms one of a series, some knowledge may be assumed. So in RicharNote 1 · It may be convenient to some readers for the purposes of this book to have by them a list of Shakespeare's plays, arranged in periods. No suNote 2 · The reader will observe that this 'tragic period' would not exactly coincide with the 'Third Period' of the division given in the last note.Note 9 · I do not profess to reproduce any one theory, and, still less, to do justice to the ablest exponent of this kind of view, Werder (VorlesungeNote 13 · I may add here a word on one small matter. It is constantly asserted that Hamlet wept over the body of Polonius. Now, if he did, it would maNote 19 · This aspect of the matter leaves us comparatively unaffected, but Shakespeare evidently means it to be of importance. The Ghost speaks of itNote 4 · Cf. again the scene at Ophelia's grave, where a strong strain of aesthetic disgust is traceable in Hamlet's 'towering passion' with Laertes:Note 8 · This passage in Hamlet seems to have been in Heywood's mind when, in The Second Part of the Iron Age (Pearson's reprint, vol. iii., p. 423),Note 26 · In the remarks above I have not attempted, of course, a complete view of the character, which has often been well described; but I cannot foNote 30 · I am indebted to Werder in this paragraph.Note 1 · One instance is worth pointing out, because the passage in Othello has, oddly enough, given trouble. Desdemona says of the maid Barbara: 'ShNote 2 · The whole force of the passages referred to can be felt only by a reader. The Othello of our stage can never be Shakespeare's Othello, any mNote 8 · The dead bodies are not carried out at the end, as they must have been if the bed had been on the main stage (for this had no front curtain)Note 9 · Against which may be set the scene of the blinding of Gloster in King Lear.Note 21 · I will not discuss the further question whether, granted that to Shakespeare Othello was a black, he should be represented as a black in ourNote 6 · See, for instance, Aaron in Titus Andronicus, ii. iii.; Richard in 3 Henry VI., iii. ii. and v. vi., and in Richard III., i. i. (twice), i. Note 9 · Coleridge's view is not materially different, though less complete. When he speaks of 'the motive-hunting of a motiveless malignity,' he doeNote 16 · The feelings evoked by Emilia are one of the causes which mitigate the excess of tragic pain at the conclusion. Others are the downfall of INote 8 · I mean that no sufficiently clear reason is supplied for Edmund's delay in attempting to save Cordelia and Lear. The matter stands thus. EdmNote 10 · I say 'the reader's,' because on the stage, whenever I have seen King Lear, the 'cuts' necessitated by modern scenery would have made this pNote 11 · Even if Cordelia had won the battle, Shakespeare would probably have hesitated to concentrate interest on it, for her victory would have beeNote 19 · This effect of the double action seems to have been pointed out first by Schlegel.Note 23 · E.g. in As You Like It, iii. ii. 187, 'I was never so berhymed since Pythagoras' time, that I was an Irish rat, which I can hardly remember'Note 25 · With this compare the following lines in the great speech on 'degree' in Troilus and Cressida, i. iii.: Take but degree away, untune that stNote 31 · The whole question how far Shakespeare's works represent his personal feelings and attitude, and the changes in them, would carry us so far Note 3 · What immediately follows is as striking an illustration of quite another quality, and of the effects which make us think of Lear as pursued Note 10 · Imagination demands for Lear, even more than for Othello, majesty of stature and mien. Tourgénief felt this and made his 'Lear of the SteppeNote 12 · In this she stands alone among the more notable characters of the play. Doubtless Regan's exclamation 'O the blest gods' means nothing, but Note 13 · i. ii. 1 f. Shakespeare seems to have in mind the idea expressed in the speech of Ulysses about the dependence of the world on degree, orderNote 15 · iv. i. 1-9. I am indebted here to Koppel, Verbesserungsvorschläge zu den Erläuterungen und der Textlesung des Lear (1899).Note 19 · The 'clown' in Antony and Cleopatra is merely an old peasant. There is a fool in Timon of Athens, however, and he appears in a scene (ii. iiNote 20 · [This is no obstacle. There could hardly be a stage tradition hostile to his youth, since he does not appear in Tate's version, which alone Note 26 · Cf. Cornwall's satirical remarks on Kent's 'plainness' in ii. ii. 101 ff.,—a plainness which did no service to Kent's master. (As a matter oNote 34 · Biblical ideas seem to have been floating in Shakespeare's mind. Cf. the words of Kent, when Lear enters with Cordelia's body, 'Is this the Note 36 · I believe the criticism of King Lear which has influenced me most is that in Prof. Dowden's Shakspere, his Mind and Art (though, when I wrotNote 4 · In parts of this paragraph I am indebted to Hunter's Illustrations of Shakespeare.Note 12 · If this paragraph is true, some of the statements even of Lamb and of Coleridge about the Witches are, taken literally, incorrect. What thesNote 15 · Schlegel's assertion that the first thought of the murder comes from the Witches is thus in flat contradiction with the text. (The sentence Note 17 · This comparison was suggested by a passage in Hegel's Aesthetik, i. 291 ff.Note 23 · The latter, and more important, point was put quite clearly by Coleridge.Note 30 · For only in destroying I find ease To my relentless thoughts.—Paradise Lost, ix. 129. Milton's portrait of Satan's misery here, and at the Note 33 · I do not at all suggest that his love for his wife remains what it was when he greeted her with the words 'My dearest love, Duncan comes herNote 1 · So Mrs. Siddons is said to have given the passage.Note 6 · The tendency to sentimentalise Lady Macbeth is partly due to Mrs. Siddons's fancy that she was a small, fair, blue-eyed woman, 'perhaps evenNote 13 · Virgilia in Coriolanus is a famous example. She speaks about thirty-five lines.Note 16 · See Cunliffe, The Influence of Seneca on Elizabethan Tragedy. The most famous of these parallels is that between 'Will all great Neptune's ONote 17 · Cf. Coleridge's note on the Lady Macduff scene.Note 18 · It is nothing to the purpose that Macduff himself says, Sinful Macduff, They were all struck for thee! naught that I am, Not for their own dNote 19 · And the idea that it was the death of his son Hamnet, aged eleven, that brought this power to maturity is one of the more plausible attemptsNote 21 · I have confined myself to the single aspect of this question on which I had what seemed something new to say. Professor Hales's defence of tNote 2 · Cf. Antonio in his melancholy (Merchant of Venice, i. i. 6), And such a want-wit sadness makes of me That I have much ado to know myself.Note 1 · It is impossible to tell whether Coleridge formed his view independently, or adopted it from Schlegel. For there is no record of his having Note 5 · Steevens observes that Heywood uses the phrase 'guled with slaughter,' and I find in his Iron Age various passages indicating that he knew tNote 5 · I have noted also what must be a mistake in the case of Pericles. König gives 17.1 as the percentage of the speeches with broken ends. I wasNote 8 · The number of light endings, however, in Julius Caesar (10) and All's Well (12) is worth notice.Note 3 · As this point occurs here, I may observe that Shakespeare's later tragedies contain many such reminiscences of the tragic plays of his young
Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings