← Table of contents
Reflections on the motive power of heat

Note 38 — IV.[34] CARNOT’S THEORY OF THE MOTIVE POWER OF HEAT.[35] WITH NUMERICAL RESULTS DEDUCED FROM REGNAULT’S EXPERIMENTS ON STEAM.[36]

Robert Henry Thurston translation

The evolution of heat in a fixed conductor, through which a galvanic current is sent from any source whatever, has long been known to the scientific world; but it was pointed out by Mr. Joule that we cannot infer from any previously-published experimental researches, the actual generation of heat when the current originates in electro-magnetic induction; since the question occurs, is the heat which is evolved in one part of the closed conductor merely transferred from those parts which are subject to the inducing influence? Mr. Joule, after a most careful experimental investigation with reference to this question, finds that it must be answered in the negative. (See a paper “On the Calorific Effects of Magneto-Electricity, and on the Mechanical Value of Heat; by J. P. Joule, Esq.” Read before the British Association at Cork in 1843, and subsequently communicated by the Author to the Philosophical Magazine, vol. xxiii., pp. 263, 347, 435.)

Before we can finally conclude that heat is absolutely generated in such operations, it would be necessary to prove that the inducing magnet does not become lower in temperature, and thus compensate for the heat evolved in the conductor. I am not aware that any examination with reference to the truth of this conjecture has been instituted; but, in the case where the inducing body is a pure electro-magnet (without any iron), the experiments actually performed by Mr. Joule render the conclusion probable that the heat evolved in the wire of the electro-magnet is not affected by the inductive action, otherwise than through the reflected influence which increases the strength of its own current.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings