DESCRIPTION OF THE TABLES
Reading edition
PAGE
Summary of evidence in favour of finger marks being persistent96
Interpolation of ridges104
I.Percentage frequency of Arches, Loops, and Whorls on the different digits, as observed in the 5000 digits of 500 different persons115
II.Distribution of the A. L. W. patterns on the corresponding digits of the two hands116
III.Percentage frequency of Arches on the digits of the two hands117
IV.Percentage frequency of Loops on the digits of the two hands118
V.Percentage frequency of Whorls on the digits of the two hands118
VIa.Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occurs in the same digits of the two hands120
VIb.Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occurs in various couplets of different digits120
VII.Couplets of fingers of different names in the same and in the opposite hands121
VIII.Measures of relationship between the digits on a centesimal scale129
IX.Index to 100 sets of finger prints133
X.Number of different index-heads in 100 sets, according to the number of digits noted136
XI.Number of entries under the same heads in 100 sets139
XII.Index-headings under which more than 1 per cent of the sets were registered in 500 sets140
XIII.Percentage of entries falling under a single head in 100, 300, and 500 sets141
XIV.Number of different index-headings in 100 sets, according to the number of fingers in each set, and to the method of indexing142
XV.Number of entries in 500 sets, each of the fore, middle, and ring-fingers only146
XVI.Number of cases of various anthropometric data that severally fell in the three classes of large, medium, and small, when certain limiting values were adopted159
XVII.Distribution of 500 sets of measures, each set consisting of five elements, into classes160
XVIII.Number of the above sets that fell under the same headings161
XIX.Further analysis of the two headings that contained the most numerous entries162
XX.Observed random couplets174
XXI.Calculated random couplets174
XXII.Observed fraternal couplets175
XXIII.Fraternal couplets—random, observed, and utmost feasible176
XXIV.Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets181
XXV.Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—random and observed182
XXVI.Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—resemblance measured on centesimal scale182
XXVII.Twins186
XXVIII.Children of like-patterned parents188
XXIX.Paternal and maternal influence190
XXX.Different races, percentage frequency of arches in fore-finger194
XXXI.Distribution of number of ridges in AH, and of other measures in loops203
XXXII.Ordinates to their schemes of distribution204
XXXIII.Comparison of the above with calculated values205
XXXIV.Proportions of a typical loop on the right and left thumbs respectively209