← Table of contents
East-West Trade Trends

letter of transmittal

Reading edition

To the Congress of the United States:

I have the honor to submit herewith the fourth semiannual report on operations under the Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act of 1951 (Battle Act), the administration of which is a part of my responsibilities.

The period covered is July through December 1953.

A large part of this report is an examination of what the Soviet Union has been doing in its trade relations with the free world. In order to put the Russian activities of the last half of 1953 in a more understandable framework we have ranged back over the last 30 years to show how foreign trade fits into their economy and serves their purposes. To study Soviet trends and tactics is obviously important to the economic defense of the free world. To make a report to the Congress and the public on these matters should also be useful. There has been much public interest in the subject.

The selection of this theme, however, does not mean that Soviet trade activities are the only important consideration to be taken into account in the formulation of U. S. economic defense policy. They are not. Many other factors enter in, as told in Chapter V.

In preparing the report my staff has drawn heavily upon the expert knowledge of the Department of State and other agencies. But of course the responsibility for the report is ours.

In my last Battle Act report I said that the strategic trade control program had been hampered by lack of public knowledge. This is still true, but to a less extent, it seems to me. There is a better understanding of the Government’s policies, a greater realization that the soundness of East-West trade policy is to be judged not primarily on the amount of trade, but more on what kind of goods move back and forth, and on what terms they move.

Signature of Harold Stassen
Signature of Harold Stassen

Harold E. Stassen, Director, Foreign Operations Administration.

May 17, 1954.

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION:Page

Note on “Strategic” and “Nonstrategic” 1

CHAPTERS:

I. Stalin’s Lopsided Economy 3

Emphasis on Heavy Industry

How Forced Industrialization Affects Trade

How the Kremlin Controls Trade

West Has Never Barred Peaceful Exports

Stalin’s Last Gospel

II. The New Regime and the Consumer 11

Letting Off Pressure

The “New Economic Courses”

Malenkov’s Big Announcement

Khrushchev and the Livestock Lag

Mikoyan Advertises the Program

Has Stalin Been Overruled?

III. The Kremlin’s Recent Trading Activities 19

The New Trade Agreements

More Consumer Goods Ordered

A Shopping Spree for Ships

Most of All, They Want Hard Goods

Something Different in Soviet Exports

They Have Dug Up Manganese

The Emergence of Russian Oil

Gold Sales Expanded

Reaching Outside Europe

IV. What’s Behind It All 35

The Kremlin and Peace

A Mixture of Motives

Their Objectives Haven’t Changed

Their Practices Haven’t Changed

The Challenge

V. U. S. Policy on Strategic Trade Controls 43

The Background

Basic Policy Reaffirmed

The New Direction of Policy

Reviewing the Control Lists

East-West Trade: Road to Peace

Trade Within the Free World

The China Trade Falls Off

They Play by Their Own Rules

United States Policy on the China Trade

VI. The Battle Act and Economic Defense 55

Battle Act Functions

The Money and the Manpower

Meshing the Gears

Improving the Machinery

The Termination-of-Aid Provision

Miscellaneous Activities

Summary of the Report

APPENDICES

A. Trade Controls of Free World Countries 65

B. Statistical Tables 89

C. Text of Battle Act 99

CHARTS

1. Volume of Trade of OEEC Countries With European Soviet Bloc 6

2. Free World Trade With the Soviet Bloc 21

3. EDAC Structure 57

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings