← Table of contents
An essay on the foundations of geometry

Note 55 — Chapter I · A SHORT HISTORY OF METAGEOMETRY.

Reading edition

Sir R. Ball does not regard his non-Euclidean content as a possible space (v. op. cit. p. 151). In this important point I disagree with his interpretation, holding such a content to be a space as possible, à priori, as Euclid's, and perhaps actually true within the margin due to errors of observation.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings