INDEX
Reading edition
Adelung, J. C. cited 262
Aglio, Augustina, fac simile of Dresden Codex by 263-266
Böttiger, C. A., mention of Dresden Codex by 262
controversy with Abert concerning Dresden Codex 267
Brasseur, copy of the Manuscript Troano by 284, 286, 343
cited 350
Calendar system, tabular view of 270-374
Charency, H. de, cited 282
Codex Cortesianus, similarity of, to Manuscript Troano and Dresden Codex 286
Dresden Codex, numerals in 261-338
Ebert, F. A., description of Dresden Codex by 263
controversy with Böttiger concerning Dresden Codex 267
Falkenstein, K. C., preservation of Dresden Codex by 268
Fleischer, H. L., mention of Dresden Codex by 263
Förstemann, E., citation from Die Mayahandschrift of 261-269
cited 272, 278, 280, 281, 283, 290, 292, 293, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 320, 322, 329, 330, 339, 340
Götze, J. C., preservation of Dresden Codex by 261
biographical sketch of 261, 262
Humboldt, A. von, notice of Dresden Codex by 262, 263
Kingsborough, Lord, Dresden Codex copied by order of 262
Mexican Antiquities of, cited 266
Landa, cited 348
Landa’s alphabet, insufficiency of 259, 347
Manuscript Troano, copy of, by Brasseur 285, 286, 343
study of, by C. Thomas, cited 339, 343, 344, 345, 350, 365, 366, 367, 370
Maya and Mexican manuscripts, C. Thomas on, cited 280
Maya Codices, aids to the study of, by C. Thomas 253-371
Mexican Antiquities, by Lord Kingsborough, cited 266, 267
Rosny, L. de, cited 267, 347, 355, 357
Schellhas, P., cited 345, 359, 360, 361, 362, 364
Schultz-Sellack, K., cited 278
Silvestre, É., Paléographie universelle of, cited 267
Thomas, C., paper on aids to the study of the Maya codices by 253-371
Troano Manuscript, copy of, by Brasseur 285, 286, 343
Vater, J. S., cited 262
Transcriber’s Note
The following errors and inconsistencies have been maintained.
Misspelled words and typographical errors:
Page Error
267 “hasty and obtrusive notice.” should read ‘hasty and obtrusive notice.’
272 indi cated should read indicated
291 “and” repeated.
295 Plate 48, 2nd line first asterisk is missing.
296 Period missing after Fig
322 In the original text, the 7 is printed above the 17, with no horizontal line separating the two numbers.
327 Tables XXI and XXII are not labeled in the original publication but, by context, appear to be the two sections of table following Table XX.
338 Sixth column should read Sixth column.
338 Footnote number for 338-1 was missing. It was inserted based on the context of the note.
348 Illustration No. 6 was missing the caption.
364 Fig. 39 should read No. 39