← Table of contents
A Practical Hand-book of Drawing for Modern Methods of Reproduction

A · PRACTICAL · HANDBOOK · OF · DRAWING FOR MODERN METHODS · OF · REPRODVCTION

Reading edition

BY

CHARLES G. HARPER,

AUTHOR OF “ENGLISH PEN ARTISTS OF TO-DAY.”

Illustration from A Practical Hand-book of Drawing for Modern Methods of Reproduction

Illustrated with Drawings by several Hands, and with Sketches by the Author showing Comparative Results obtained by the several Methods of Reproduction now in Use.

LONDON: CHAPMAN & HALL, Ld.

1894.

TO CHARLES MORLEY, ESQ.

Dear Mr. Morley,

It is with a peculiar satisfaction that I inscribe this book to yourself, for to you more than to any other occupant of an editorial chair is due the position held by “process” in illustrating the hazards and happenings of each succeeding week.

Time was when the “Pall Mall Budget,” with a daring originality never to be forgotten, illustrated the news with diagrams fashioned heroically from the somewhat limited armoury of the compositor. Nor I nor my contemporaries, I think, have forgotten those weapons of offence—the brass rules, hyphens, asterisks, daggers, braces, and other common objects of the type-case—with which the Northumberland Street printers set forth the details of a procession, or the configuration of a country. There was in those days a world of meaning—apart from libellous innuendo—in a row of asterisks; for did they not signify a chain of mountains? And what Old Man Eloquent was ever so vividly convincing as those serpentine brass rules that served as the accepted hieroglyphics for rivers on type-set maps?

These were the beginnings of illustration in the “Pall Mall Budget” when you first filled the editorial chair. The leaps and bounds by which you came abreast of (and, indeed, overlook) the other purveyors of illustrated news, hot and hot, I need not recount, nor is there occasion here to allude to the events which led to what some alliterative journalist has styled the Battle of the Budgets. Only this: that if others have reaped where you have sown, why! ’twas ever thus.

For the rest, I must needs apologize to you for a breach of an etiquette which demands that permission be first had and obtained before a Dedication may be printed. To print an unauthorized tribute to a private individual is wrong: when (as in the present case) an Editor is concerned I am not sure that the wrong-doing halts anything before lèse majesté.

Yours very truly, CHARLES G. HARPER.

London, May, 1894.

PREFACE
PREFACE

Everywhere to-day is the Illustrator (artist he may not always be), for never was illustration so marketable as now; and the correspondence-editors of the Sunday papers have at length found a new outlet for the superfluous energies of their eager querists in advising them to “go in” for black and white: as one might advise an applicant to adventure upon a commercial enterprise of large issues and great risks before the amount of his capital (if any) had been ascertained.

It is so very easy to make black marks upon white cardboard, is it not? and not particularly difficult to seize upon the egregious mannerisms of the accepted purveyors of “the picturesque”—that cliché phrase, battered nowadays out of all real meaning.

But for really serious art—personal, aggressive, definite and instructed—one requires something more than a penchant, or the stimulating impulsion of an empty pocket, or even the illusory magnetism of the vie bohême of the lady-novelist, whose artists still wear velvet coats and aureoles of auburn hair, and marry the inevitable heiress in the third volume. Not that one really wishes to be one of those creatures, for the lady-novelists’ love-lorn embryonic Michael Angelos are generally great cads; but this by the way!

What is wanted in the aspirant is the vocation: the feeling for beauty of line and for decoration, and the powers both of idealizing and of selection. Pen-drawing and allied methods are the chiefest means of illustration at this day, and these qualities are essential to their successful employ. Practitioners in pen-and-ink are already numerous enough to give any new-comer pause before he adds himself to their number, but certainly the greater number of them are merely journalists without sense of style; mannerists only of a peculiarly vicious parasitic type.

“But,” ask those correspondents, “does illustration pay?” “Yes,” says that omniscient person, the Correspondence-Editor. Then those pixie-led wayfarers through life, filled with an inordinate desire to draw, to paint, to translate Nature on to canvas or cardboard (at a profit), set about the staining of fair paper, the wasting of good ink, brushes, pens, and all the materials with which the graphic arts are pursued, and lo! just because the greater number of them set out, not with the love of an art, but with the single idea of a paying investment of time and labour—it does not pay! Remuneration in their case is Latin for three farthings.

Publishers and editors, it is said, can now, with the cheapness of modern methods of reproduction as against the expense of wood-engraving, afford to pay artists better because they pay engravers less. Perhaps they can. But do they?

Pen-drawing in particular has, by reason of these things, almost come to stand for exaggeration and a shameless license—a convention that sees and renders everything in a manner flamboyantly quaint. But this vein is being worked down to the bed-rock: it has plumbed its deepest depth, and everything now points to a period of instructed sobriety where now the untaught abandon of these mannerists has rioted through the pages of illustrated magazines and newspapers to a final disrepute.

Artists are now beginning to ask how they can dissociate themselves from that merely manufacturing army of frantic draughtsmen who never, or rarely, go beyond the exercise of pure line-work; and the widening power of process gives them answer. Results striking and unhackneyed are always to be obtained to-day by those who are not hag-ridden by that purely Philistine ideal of the clear sharp line.

These pages are written as a plea for something else than the eternal round of uninspired work. They contain suggestions and examples of results obtained in striving to be at one with modern methods of reproduction, and perhaps I may be permitted to hope that in this direction they may be of some service.

CHARLES G. HARPER.

CONTENTS.

PAGE

INTRODUCTORY 1

THE RISE OF AN ART 9

COMPARATIVE PROCESSES 22

PAPER 78

PENS 92

INKS 96

THE MAKING OF A PEN-DRAWING 102

WASH DRAWINGS 121

STYLES AND MANNER 135

PAINTERS’ PEN-DRAWINGS 154

WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.

ENGLISH PEN ARTISTS OF TO-DAY: Examples of their work, with some Criticisms and Appreciations. Super royal 4to, £3 3s. net.

THE BRIGHTON ROAD: Old Times and New on a Classic Highway. With 95 Illustrations by the Author and from old prints. Demy 8vo, 16s.

FROM PADDINGTON TO PENZANCE: The Record of a Summer Tramp. With 105 Illustrations by the Author. Demy 8vo, 16s.

Illustration from A Practical Hand-book of Drawing for Modern Methods of Reproduction
List of Illvstrations.
List of Illvstrations.

PAGE

Vignette on Title

Kensington Palace. Photogravure Frontispiece

The Hall, Barnard’s Inn 25

A Window, Chepstow Castle 29

On Whatman’s “Not” Paper 31

From a Drawing on Allongé Paper 31,32

Bolt Head: A Misty Day. Bitumen process 38

Bolt Head: A Misty Day. Swelled gelatine process 39

A Note at Gorran. Bitumen process 43

A Note at Gorran. Swelled gelatine process 43

Charlwood. Swelled gelatine process 45

Charlwood. Reproduced by Chefdeville 45

View from the Tower Bridge Works. Bitumen process 48

View from the Tower Bridge Works. Bitumen process.

Sky revised by hand-work 49

Kensington Palace 51

Snodgrass Farm 53

Sunset, Black Rock 55

Drawing in Diluted Inks, reproduced by Gillot 57

Chepstow Castle 61

Clifford’s Inn: a Foggy Night 65

Pencil and Pen and Ink Drawing reproduced by Half-tone Process 68

The Village Street, Tintern. Night 70

Leebotwood 71

Examples of Day’s Shading Mediums 75, 76

Churchyard Cross, Raglan 76

Canvas-grain Clay-board 84

Plain Diagonal Grain 85

Plain Perpendicular Grain 85

Drawing in Pencil on White Aquatint Grain Clay-board 86

Black Aquatint Clay-board and Two Stages of Drawing 87

Black Diagonal-lined Clay-board and Two Stages of Drawing 87

Black Perpendicular-lined Clay-board and Two Stages of Drawing 88

Venetian Fête on the Seine, with the Trocadero illuminated 89

The Gatehouse, Moynes Court 110

Portrait Sketches 118, 119

The Houses of Parliament at Night, from the River 122

Victoria Embankment near Blackfriars Bridge: a Foggy Night 123

Corfe Railway Station 125

The Ambulatory, Dore Abbey 127

Moonlight: Confluence of the Severn and the Wye 131

Diagram showing Method of reducing Drawings for Reproduction 133

Painter’s Pen-drawing—Pasturage, by Mr. Alfred Hartley 155

"" Portrait, by Mr. Bonnat 156

Towing Path, Abingdon, by Mr. David Murray 158

A Portrait from a Drawing by Mr. T. Blake Wirgman 159

Finis 161

A PRACTICAL HANDBOOK OF DRAWING FOR REPRODUCTION.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings