← Table of contents
Theory and practice of the confessional

Note 517 — Chapter II · LIMITATION OF JURISDICTION OR RESERVED CASES

Richard F. (Richard Frederick) Clarke translation

Reuter, Theol. Mor. De Pœnitent. n. 371. Cf. Stotz, Trib. Pœnit. Lib. II. Q. 2, § 5, n. 64. Schmalzgrueber, l. c. Lib. I. Tit. 29, n. 31, and many others. This is, in fact, the doctrine which is generally received as valid amongst the older moralists. Many of the later ones, it is true, teach that a stranger cannot be absolved from a sin which is reserved in the diocese in which he confesses, falsely assuming that the priest who hears the confession of a penitent coming from a strange diocese is restrained by his own bishop from absolving. See Ballerini, Notæ ad Gury, II. n. 573, and Opus Theol. Mor. l. c. cp. II. De Reservat. Casuum, n, 709 ss.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings