← Table of contents
The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 3 (of 4)

Note 463 — Chapter II · (continued 2)

Francis Plumptre Beresford Osmaston translation

The above distinction is hardly consonant with that of customary parlance. We should rather say that the melody of the song gave an utterance to the words, and the instrumentation was, for the very reason that it was more independent, more directly an accompaniment. But the point emphasized here seems to be the closeness of the association. In this aspect, no doubt, the music actually sung is more an accompaniment to the intelligible content. As a rule accompaniment is generally used as the accompaniment of a song or choral writing, and Hegel himself uses it in this sense previously.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings