Note 764 — Chapter III · THE LEGATION OF PANDULF 1219–1221 (continued 2)

“Tum quia castrum domini sui regis proditione cepit antequam ipsum difidasset.” I think this sentence of the Dunstable annalist (l.c.) tends to confirm the Barnwell writer’s statement that Fotheringay was in the custody of Hubert. Strictly speaking, Fotheringay was never “a castle of his (Aumale’s) lord the King,” i.e., King Henry; it was a castle of the Earl of Huntingdon’s, and held of the King of Scots; Henry had only the right to its custody during the minority of the heir, and he had committed it to Alexander as custodian. If, however, Alexander had (as he very likely may have done) placed it temporarily in Henry’s hand, to be garrisoned by Henry’s men under Henry’s justiciar, the Dunstable writer’s words would be far more intelligible than if they were applied to it when in the keeping of the Earl of Chester, who we know was, at some date before—unluckily there is nothing to prove how long before—12th March, 1221, appointed custodian of the honour of Huntingdon not by Henry, but, with Henry’s sanction, by Alexander; see above, footnote 748.