← Table of contents
The Gulf and Inland Waters, The Navy in the Civil War. Volume 3

Note 5 — Chapter III · ToC

Reading edition

Mitchell's conduct was approved by a Naval Court of Inquiry. Higgins, who was most emphatic in his condemnation, could not appear as a witness, the War Department not being willing to spare him from his duties. The difference was one of judgment and, perhaps, of temperament. From Higgins's character it is likely that, had he commanded the naval forces, the Louisiana would either have done more work or come to a different end. As the old proverb says, "He would have made a spoon or spoiled the horn."

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings