← Table of contents
The Ethics of Diet

Note 156 — XXIII. CHESTERFIELD. 1694–1773.

Reading edition

An instance of the common confusion of thought and logic. The too obvious fact that a large proportion of animals are carnivorous neither proves nor justifies the carnivorousness of the human species. The real question is, is the human race originally frugivorous or carnivorous? Is it allied to the Tiger or to the Ape?

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings