← Table of contents
The Critique of Pure Reason

Note 76 — Chapter I · The Discipline of Pure Reason

J. M. D. (John Miller Dow) Meiklejohn translation

The definition must describe the conception completely that is, omit none of the marks or signs of which it composed; within its own limits, that is, it must be precise, and enumerate no more signs than belong to the conception; and on primary grounds, that is to say, the limitations of the bounds of the conception must not be deduced from other conceptions, as in this case a proof would be necessary, and the so-called definition would be incapable of taking its place at the head of all the judgements we have to form regarding an object.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings