← Table of contents
The Critique of Pure Reason

Note 25 — Chapter II · Of the Deduction of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding

J. M. D. (John Miller Dow) Meiklejohn translation

Lest my readers should stumble at this assertion, and the conclusions that may be too rashly drawn from it, I must remind them that the categories in the act of thought are by no means limited by the conditions of our sensuous intuition, but have an unbounded sphere of action. It is only the cognition of the object of thought, the determining of the object, which requires intuition. In the absence of intuition, our thought of an object may still have true and useful consequences in regard to the exercise of reason by the subject. But as this exercise of reason is not always directed on the determination of the object, in other words, on cognition thereof, but also on the determination of the subject and its volition, I do not intend to treat of it in this place.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings