← Table of contents
Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays

Note 16 — AND OTHER ESSAYS (continued 2)

Reading edition

This must not be regarded as a historically correct account of what Zeno actually had in mind. It is a new argument for his conclusion, not the argument which influenced him. On this point, see e.g. C.D. Broad, "Note on Achilles and the Tortoise," Mind, N.S., Vol. XXII, pp. 318-19. Much valuable work on the interpretation of Zeno has been done since this article was written. [Note added in 1917.]

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings