Note 55 — PART SECOND. OF PARTICULAR SURGICAL SUBJECTS. (continued 9)

[The principal objection to this method is, that it is not always successful, and that it requires, in some cases, to be repeated again and again before a sufficient amount of adhesive action is induced to obliterate the vaginal sac. Moreover, by carelessness on the part of the surgeon, the canula may slip out of the vaginal sac, and so allow the fluid to pass into the cellular substance of the scrotum, where, if it be not speedily evacuated by free incisions, it is sure to occasion gangrene. But this is not all. The operation, even when well performed, is sometimes followed by violent inflammation and suppuration; in one instance, indeed, I knew it to be productive of tetanus. The patient, a stout, robust mechanic, about twenty-six years of age, whom I saw twice in consultation, was doing apparently well during the first eight days after the operation; when, owing to exposure to cold, the symptoms of the disease in question manifested themselves, and in less than twenty-four hours the man expired. Upon examination after death, the vaginal tunic was found to be considerably thickened, and its cavity to contain several ounces of sero-sanguinolent fluid, intermixed with a small quantity of unhealthy-looking pus. No adhesions had taken place between the opposite sides of the sac. A case of a similar kind is alluded to by Sir George Ballinggall, in his “Outlines of Military Surgery.”

The operation by injection has, I know, many advocates, both in this country and in Europe; and, when well executed, is generally unattended with risk, if not always successful. The fact, however, that it may be followed by serious mischief, with occasional loss of life, should be sufficient to deter the practitioner from resorting to it, more especially when we reflect that we are in possession of another remedy, not only entirely devoid of danger, but always, so far as my observation extends, most effective. This remedy is the seton, which I have been in the habit of employing, in repeated instances, for some years past, and from which I have never experienced any other than the most happy results. The operation is perfectly simple, the amount of inflammation produced by the presence of the foreign body may be easily regulated, and there is no danger of sloughing of the scrotum, much less of the development of tetanus, or other mischief.

In performing the operation, a large round trocar is introduced at the usual place, and after the fluid has been thoroughly evacuated, the instrument is again conveyed along the canula to the upper and fore part of the scrotum, for the purpose of effecting a counter-opening, which should be from an inch and a half to two inches from the first. The trocar is now withdrawn, when an eyed-probe, armed with a skein of silk or piece of tape, is passed along the tube, upon removing which the operation is completed. The seton need seldom be retained longer than four or five days; during which period, as well as for some time subsequently, the recumbent posture should be enjoined, along with suspension of the scrotum, and the usual antiphlogistic means. When the inflammation, tenderness, and swelling have considerably abated, the reduction of the tumour may be promoted by the daily inunction of equal parts of iodine and camphorated mercurial ointment.—ED.]