Note 2 — PART FIRST. OF INFLAMMATION.
Reading edition
[Mr. Hunter endeavoured to settle this point by experiments on the inferior animals. With this view, he made a wound in the right side of the chest of a dog, and placing the thermometer in contact with the diaphragm, ascertained that the temperature was 101°. A large dossil of lint was then thrust into the opening, when the edges were drawn together with adhesive strips. On the following day, when the parts were in a state of inflammation, the foreign substance was removed, and the instrument being again introduced, no difference of heat was found to exist. Similar experiments were made on the rectum and vagina of an ass, with like results. Hence Hunter concluded that there was no real increase of temperature. From more recent researches, however, it is obvious that this inference of the great English surgeon is at variance with facts. Thus, in erysipelas, furuncle, and anthrax, the thermometer has been observed, in numerous instances, to rise as high even as 107°, being an increase over the average heat of the blood of eleven degrees. Results of a similar nature have been noticed in tetanus, acute rheumatism, and other maladies.—ED.]