Note 19 — CHRONICLES OF BORDER WARFARE (continued 2)

This statement, that Capt. Audley Paul commanded at Redstone, and of his attempting to intercept a foraging Indian party, can not possibly be true. There was no fort, and consequently no garrison, at Redstone in 1758. It was not built ’till 1759, and then by Col. James Burd, of the Pennsylvania forces. James L. Bowman, a native of Brownsville, the locality of Redstone Old Fort, wrote a sketch of the history of that place, which appeared in the American Pioneer in February, 1843, in which he says: “We have seen it stated in a creditable work, that the fort was built by Capt. Paul––doubtless an error, as the Journal of Col. Burd is ample evidence to settle that matter.” Col. Burd records in his Journal: “Ordered, in Aug. 1759, to march with two hundred of my battalion to the mouth of Redstone Creek, to cut a road to that place, and to erect a fort.” He adds: “When I had cut the road, and finished the fort,” etc.

The other part of the story, about Capt. John Gibson commanding at Fort Pitt in “the fall of 1758,” is equally erroneous, as Gen. Forbes did not possess himself of Fort Duquesne till Nov. 25th, 1758, within five days of the conclusion of “fall” in that year; and Gen. Forbes commanded there in person until he left for Philadelphia, Dec. 3d following. There is, moreover, no evidence that Gibson was then in service. The story of his decapitating Kis-ke-pi-la, or the Little Eagle, if there was such a person, or of his beheading any other Indian, is not at all probable. He was an Indian trader for many years, and was made prisoner by the Indians in 1763, and detained a long time in captivity.

Gibson could not by any such decapitating exploit, have originated the designation of “Big Knife,” or “Big Knife warrior,” for this appellation had long before been applied to the Virginians. Gist says in his Journal, Dec. 7th, 1750, in speaking of crossing Elk’s Eye Creek––the Muskingum––and reaching an Indian hamlet, that the Indians were all out hunting; that “the old Frenchman, Mark Coonce, living there, was civil to me; but after I was gone to my camp, upon his understanding I came from Virginia, he called me Big Knife.” Col. James Smith, then a prisoner with the Indians, says the Indians assigned as a reason why they did not oppose Gen. Forbes in 1758, that if they had been only red coats they could have subdued them; “but they could not withstand Ash-a-le-co-a, or the Great Knife, which was the name they gave the Virginians.”––L. C. D.

––––

Comment by R. G. T.––See note on p. 77, regarding erection of early forts at Redstone. James Veech, in Monongahela of Old, says, “We know that the late Col. James Paull served a month’s duty in a drafted militia company in guarding Continental stores here [Fort Burd] in 1778.” The term “Big Knives” or “Long Knives” may have had reference either to the long knives carried by early white hunters, or the swords worn by backwoods militia officers. See Roosevelt’s Winning of the West, I., p. 197.