← Table of contents
A history of economic doctrines

Note 262 — Chapter II · : ADAM SMITH (continued 2)

R. (Robert) Richards translation

Traité, Book I, chap. 2. Is it not strange that Say should have failed to apply this idea to commerce? He regards the latter as productive because it creates exchangeable values. Nevertheless he criticises Condillac for having said that mere exchange of goods increases wealth because it increases the utility of objects. This is because Say is perpetually mixing up utility and exchange value, a confusion that leads him into many serious mistakes.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings