← Table of contents
A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason'

Note 14 — II. HISTORICAL

Reading edition

Cf. Vaihinger, Commentary, i. p. 344 ff. Beattie does, indeed, refer to Hume’s view of mathematical science as given in the Treatise, but in so indirect and casual a manner that Kant could not possibly gather from the reference any notion of what that treatment was. Cf. Beattie’s Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth (sixth edition), pp. 138, 142, 269.

Explore with AITake your curiosity a little further.

Reading settings